logo
Gaza famine a death sentence delivered by global inaction

Gaza famine a death sentence delivered by global inaction

Arab News19 hours ago
https://arab.news/wsvec
Famine in Gaza is no longer a speculative threat, nor is it merely a rhetorical tool to shame the international community into action. It is now a brutal, undeniable fact. The situation has evolved from a humanitarian crisis into a full-blown catastrophe and the numbers speak for themselves. According to the UN, 96 percent of Gaza's population faces acute food insecurity. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification warns that at least 500,000 people are living under 'catastrophic' conditions — one step before mass starvation.
These are not projections. They are the present realities. Gaza, already strangled by an 18-year blockade, is now walking barefoot into famine under the shadow of total siege and relentless bombardment. The current Israeli assault, which began in October 2023, has not only flattened entire neighborhoods and displaced more than 1.7 million people, it has also systematically targeted the infrastructure that makes survival possible: bakeries, food distribution centers, water facilities and even the UNRWA aid warehouses that once formed the backbone of humanitarian relief.
Hospitals are collapsing. Children are dying — not only from bombs, but from hunger. Videos and photographs released by health workers in Khan Younis and northern Gaza show toddlers with protruding ribs, skeletal arms and lifeless eyes. Mothers have been filmed weeping as they try to feed their children with boiled grass and stale bread mixed with animal feed. These are not isolated cases — they are the norm in a place where malnutrition is spreading faster than any ceasefire can catch up.
In previous conflicts, Gaza's suffering was often buried under the weight of geopolitical calculations and narratives of moral equivalence. This time, the truth has become too grotesque to ignore. The UN has repeatedly stated that Gaza is on the brink of famine. In June, the World Food Programme declared that 100 percent of Gaza's population is 'food insecure' — a statistic unprecedented in modern times. In March, famine was declared in northern Gaza by multiple humanitarian agencies, citing more than 30 children dying of starvation in just two hospitals. The rest of the deaths go undocumented, with bodies buried under rubble or in makeshift graves.
To continue treating Gaza's starvation as a 'pressure tactic' used by Palestinian officials or international nongovernmental organizations is to participate in a lie that masks a genocide in progress. What we are witnessing is not a food crisis born of natural disaster or logistical failure. It is manufactured. It is the deliberate denial of food, water and medicine as a weapon of war — what international law classifies as collective punishment and, in some interpretations, genocide.
Let us call it what it is: engineered starvation. And it is working.
The scenes unfolding in Gaza are reminiscent of the worst famines in modern history: Ethiopia in the 1980s, Sudan's Darfur and the besieged cities of Syria. But there is one critical difference: never has the international community had such real-time access to the suffering — drone footage, eyewitness testimonies, satellite images — and still failed to meaningfully intervene. We cannot say we did not know. We know everything and yet we are doing nothing. Or worse — we are enabling.
Standing with Gaza is no longer a political choice or a symbolic gesture — it is an existential test of our humanity.
Hani Hazaimeh
The Biden administration continued to send military aid to Israel, including bombs and surveillance technologies, despite multiple reports from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and even former UN officials calling for arms embargoes. European leaders offer lukewarm appeals for 'humanitarian pauses' while failing to impose any meaningful consequences.
This is no longer about political alliances, strategic partnerships or counterterrorism narratives. Standing with Gaza is no longer a political choice or a symbolic gesture — it is an existential test of our humanity. In the face of children starving to death on live television, neutrality becomes complicity. Silence becomes endorsement.
What is more, supporting Gaza today is not a matter of political affiliation or ideological alignment. It is not reserved for Muslims, Arabs or left-leaning activists. It is a universal moral imperative. Every human being who still believes in dignity, in life, in the right of a child to eat and sleep safely, has a role to play. This is not about Hamas. This is about humanity.
The flood has reached its limit. The time for cautious statements and deferred action is over. The international system, including the UN Security Council and major humanitarian agencies, is facing a crisis of legitimacy. If these bodies cannot prevent the slow death of an entire population by hunger, what are they for? What is the value of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights if it cannot be applied to Gaza? What purpose does international law serve if starvation tactics are used with impunity?
There must be steps taken — now. First, an immediate and unconditional ceasefire is the only way to begin halting the famine. Second, the complete and unrestricted entry of humanitarian aid must be guaranteed by a binding international resolution, not vague promises. Third, accountability must follow. War crimes, including the deliberate starvation of civilians, must be investigated and prosecuted, no matter the perpetrator.
Finally, there is a role for all of us as individuals. Speak up. Do not allow this atrocity to continue in your name. History will remember what we did — or did not do — when Gaza cried out not for help but for bread.
In 2025, the world is being tested not just by war but by its own conscience. Will we choose humanity or will we rationalize genocide with politics and diplomatic fatigue? Gaza is dying, not in silence but in full view of the world.
Let history record that we saw — and that some of us refused to look away.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What Netanyahu fears the most in Gaza
What Netanyahu fears the most in Gaza

Al Arabiya

time22 minutes ago

  • Al Arabiya

What Netanyahu fears the most in Gaza

The war in Gaza, with all its horrors, is approaching its second year, making it the longest and deadliest confrontation in the history of the Palestinian and Arab-Israeli conflict. Why has the Gaza war lasted this long? Some believe that Israel fears for the remaining hostages. Others think Israel wants to avoid further losses among its troops. And some see it as incapable of eliminating what remains of Hamas. In my opinion, Israel does not want to end the war except on its own terms – by preventing the return of the Palestinian Authority to rule the Gaza Strip. To prolong the crisis, it will use whatever weapons it has left, from starvation to displacement. In short, what Netanyahu fears most is the establishment of a Palestinian state. Washington has a practical solution to stop the war: Hamas leaves Gaza, and Israel halts its military campaign. But neither Hamas nor Israel is willing to accept this! Israel, in particular, as the stronger party, refuses to eliminate Hamas if the price is the return of the Palestinian Authority. Netanyahu and his team are convinced that the Palestinian Authority poses a greater threat to Israel than Hamas. Hamas has no international legitimacy and represents everything that terrifies most of the world – even the Arab world. It is a militant, ideological jihadist group. Meanwhile, the Palestinian Authority is recognized by the United Nations as the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. If it regains control over Gaza, that would mark the path toward a Palestinian state. Despite all that Hamas has done – including the attacks on October 7 – it remains, in Israel's eyes, merely a 'terrorist group' that can be dealt with just as other countries deal with similar groups. Netanyahu believes it would be foolish to destroy Hamas only to reward the Palestinian Authority with control of Gaza, allowing it to emerge as the victor of these wars and create a de facto Palestinian state. Netanyahu has personally worked to prevent this scenario, fostering a symbiotic relationship with Hamas since the early days of his rule by empowering the group to govern Gaza. Netanyahu is corrupt and opportunistic – but not a fool. He understands that handing over the keys to Gaza to Ramallah would automatically mean the countdown to the creation of a Palestinian state has begun. After his swift and dazzling victories over Hezbollah, al-Assad, and Iran, Netanyahu now faces a reckoning similar to the post-Gulf War moment in 1991. Back then, the US-Gulf coalition defeated Saddam Hussein, liberated Kuwait, and eliminated a major threat to Israel – then demanded a price: A solution to the Palestinian issue. In that same year, the Madrid Conference was held despite Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir's reluctance. He ultimately accepted, paving the way for the later Oslo Accords, which for the first time allowed the Palestinians to return from exile. Netanyahu knows this history – and fears his own victories could similarly 'deviate' toward the establishment of a Palestinian state. In practice, Israel – having destroyed Hezbollah and tracked its leader Hassan Nasrallah underground – could do the same to Hamas. As we've seen, Israel is not deterred by casualties among its soldiers, its hostages are not a top priority, and certainly, the scale of Palestinian deaths is of no concern. Of the 251 original hostages, only about 23 remain alive in captivity. Today, the American envoy's negotiations have reached an advanced stage to end the tragedy in Gaza, secure the release of the remaining hostages – around 50, dead or alive – and disarm Hamas. Yet Netanyahu's main concern remains: the return of the Palestinian Authority to govern Gaza. Even without a deal from the envoy Brett McGurk or David Satterfield, Netanyahu could end the war by eliminating the remaining Hamas forces. He has proven willing to accept further casualties, as he has in parallel wars. He risked his people's safety by opening fronts with Hezbollah, Iran, and the Houthis, and he is prepared to take risks and accept losses in a final showdown with Hamas. So why doesn't Netanyahu end the war? As the conflict nears a possible resolution in the coming two months, I believe his dilemma lies in finding an arrangement that prevents the emergence of a Palestinian state. What's stopping him from ending the Gaza war is not concern over additional Israeli casualties or even losing his role as prime minister – especially since Trump is openly working to shield him from accountability and helping him stay in power. From a strategic perspective, the issue goes beyond current events: Israel does not want the Palestinian Authority to return to Gaza and unite it with Ramallah – even if that means reinstating Hamas or handing Gaza to Ibrahim al-Arjani to run it.

Trump meets Starmer and disagrees with Netanyahu's claim of no starvation in Gaza
Trump meets Starmer and disagrees with Netanyahu's claim of no starvation in Gaza

Arab News

timean hour ago

  • Arab News

Trump meets Starmer and disagrees with Netanyahu's claim of no starvation in Gaza

Israeli strikes killed at least 34 Palestinians before US President Donald Trump met with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday in Scotland, where they confirmed plans to discuss Gaza. A day after Israel eased aid restrictions due to a worsening humanitarian crisis, Trump said he disagreed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's statement that there was no starvation in Gaza. Israel on Sunday announced a pause in military operations in certain areas for 10 hours daily to improve aid flow. Alongside the measures, military operations continued. Israel had no immediate comment about the latest strikes, which occurred outside the declared time frame for the pause between 10 a.m. and 8 p.m. Aid agencies welcomed the new measures but say they are insufficient. Images of emaciated children have sparked global outrage. Most of Gaza's population now relies on aid and accessing food has become increasingly dangerous. Starmer's spokesman, Dave Pares, said Britain supports Trump's efforts to reach a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war, and the plan aims 'to turn a ceasefire into lasting peace.' The plan was discussed by Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Friday. Starmer will discuss it with allies 'including the US and Arab states' and at an emergency meeting of his Cabinet later this week, Pares said. Details of the plan have not been made public. Fourteen Palestinians have died of malnutrition-related causes in the Gaza Strip in the past 24 hours, the territory's Health Ministry said on Monday. They include two children, bringing the total deaths among children from causes related to malnutrition in Gaza to 88 since the war started on Oct. 7, 2023, the ministry said In a statement. The ministry said 59 Palestinian adults also have died of malnutrition-related causes across Gaza since the start of July, when it began counting deaths among adults.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store