Suddenly, a reason to buy the Galaxy Z Flip 7 appears
This is the first time I've ever used a clamshell foldable phone, and even though I like the form factor, it just feels too… squat.
Recommended Videos
A thickness of 13.7mm is a lot to slot in the pocket, even if I do quite like the ability to hold the phone in a palm when it's folded down. The compromise for thickness hasn't quite paid off for pocket-friendliness.
Something else that's surprised me is that I've not really enjoyed the length of the phone – the 6.9-inch display comes with a 21:9 ratio for the Super AMOLED display.
I thought I'd enjoy the longer space for scrolling and running through apps, but the persistent 'weird' feeling of something not being quite right lingers.
It's definitely something that one would get used to, but I was a bit bummed out that I didn't like the longer display.
That is, until today.
The thickness conundrum
While the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is thinner than its predecessor (the Z Flip 6 was 14.9mm) it's still bulkier than non-foldable phones like the Galaxy S25 (and certainly more than the S25 Edge (which is only 6.4mm).
Yes, it's more durable – the new Armor Flexhinge (a new design that makes the phone stronger for folding and unfolding) is an improvement, and the IP48 rating means this thing is more protected than ever.
(Although I still have reservations over this thing when it comes to dust resistance, the long-time achilles heel of foldable phones).
Overall though, the form factor has merely intrigued me, and it's a long way from feeling like I'm a flip phone convert in any way.
But today I used it to watch the new IronHeart series on Disney+, which is filmed in a 21:9 aspect ratio. I was annoyed that it displayed in 16:9 format, meaning it had black bars above, below and around the screen.
So I zoomed in, and it was a cinematic revelation – it fitted the display of the Z Flip 7 perfectly.
It was one of the few moments in recent years when a phone has properly impressed me – this is partly to do with me never having reviewed a flip-style foldable phone before, so this screen-filling wonder really drew me in.
But it's also because the Flip 7 is a real step forward in terms of design – the Z Flip 6 has a noticeable bezel around the outside, and while the screen edge on the Flip 7 is hardly invisible, it's a lot thinner.
A retro-futuristic moment
When I started watching, I was transported back to 2009, the year I reviewed the nonsensical LG BL40 Chocolate, a device that was one of the first to have a 21:9 ratio screen.
That's probably a little bit harsh. This was a time when smartphone designs were very… fluid, as brands didn't really know what was going to stick. (Actually it wasn't even a smartphone – it ran LG's proprietary platform).
Back then, the 4.01-inch screen looked absolutely gargantuan, and it was such a novelty. Of course it was – it was very hard to get 21:9 video onto the device as there wasn't even an app portal on it, much less a video player.
But I still loved watching widescreen videos on the thing, mostly because it just felt… right.
Compare that phone from a decade and a half ago (wait, how long…?) with the Flip 7's AMOLED display, with the 2K (1080 x 2520) resolution (and 2,600 nits peak brightness) and it's easy to understand why I was so taken.
It made me feel bad for ignoring the 21:9 screen format as a sideshow – I've not reviewed any of the new Sony Xperia phones that come in this screen ratio, such as the Xperia 1 VI or the 10 VI.
The move by Sony to embrace this screen style for its smartphones seemed like it was just to be different – the Xperia 1 VI ($1,399, around $300 more than the Flip 7) comes with high-end screen tech and 'proper' cameras, positioning it more like a device for film-makers rather than the everyday user.
Given Sony's screen tech and film background, this made sense. But now I see I've been missing out, and I find myself constantly reaching for the Flip 7 to watch a little bit of widescreen content, even if my lovely OLED TV is there as well.
One little flaw
There is one thing that still irks me with this screen size though – and it's something Samsung definitely needs to fix.
When I started watching Ironheart, I was constantly checking to see if it was still in the 21:9 format – some content is partly filmed in this way, and I was worried that, when the scene changed, that I was suddenly zoomed in and missing some of the action.
(I know this is the case when parts of a movie are shot for iMax, for instance).
It would be great if Samsung could automatically recognise this and move the phone in and out of the necessary screen size so I know that I've never missed anything. Maybe it's already doing that, and I've just not used the right video to check.
And maybe this issue should be laid at Disney's door – if you're watching 21:9 content on Netflix, for instance, it's automatically zoomed in to fill the screen, and it won't display the black bars all around, unlike on Disney+.
But I don't feel confident that it's always the case, and it would be great to feel secure that I'm always watching videos in the most immersive way possible.
This aside, the cinematic experience that the 21:9 ratio screen is not something to be sniffed at. The flip-style smartphone might not be to everyone's taste's, but if you like watching videos on the go and have invested in the higher-end streaming services, you'll find a lot to like here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
16 minutes ago
- Forbes
OpenAI: ChatGPT Wants Legal Rights. You Need The Right To Be Forgotten.
As systems like ChatGPT move toward achieving legal privilege, the boundaries between identity, ... More memory, and control are being redefined, often without consent. When OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently stated that conversations with ChatGPT should one day enjoy legal privilege, similar to those between a patient and a doctor or a client and a lawyer, he wasn't just referring to privacy. He was pointing toward a redefinition of the relationship between people and machines. Legal privilege protects the confidentiality of certain relationships. What's said between a patient and physician, or a client and attorney, is shielded from subpoenas, court disclosures, and adversarial scrutiny. Extending that same protection to AI interactions means treating the machine not as a tool, but as a participant in a privileged exchange. This is more than a policy suggestion. It's a legal and philosophical shift with consequences no one has fully reckoned with. It also comes at a time when the legal system is already being tested. In The New York Times' lawsuit against OpenAI, the paper has asked courts to compel the company to preserve all user prompts, including those the company says are deleted after 30 days. That request is under appeal. Meanwhile, Altman's suggestion that AI chats deserve legal shielding raises the question: if they're protected like therapy sessions, what does that make the system listening on the other side? People are already treating AI like a confidant. According to Common Sense Media, three in four teens have used an AI chatbot, and over half say they trust the advice they receive at least somewhat. Many describe a growing reliance on these systems to process everything from school to relationships. Altman himself has called this emotional over-reliance 'really bad and dangerous.' But it's not just teens. AI is being integrated into therapeutic apps, career coaching tools, HR systems, and even spiritual guidance platforms. In some healthcare environments, AI is being used to draft communications and interpret lab data before a doctor even sees it. These systems are present in decision-making loops, and their presence is being normalized. This is how it begins. First, protect the conversation. Then, protect the system. What starts as a conversation about privacy quickly evolves into a framework centered on rights, autonomy, and standing. We've seen this play out before. In U.S. law, corporations were gradually granted legal personhood, not because they were considered people, but because they acted as consistent legal entities that required protection and responsibility under the law. Over time, personhood became a useful legal fiction. Something similar may now be unfolding with AI—not because it is sentient, but because it interacts with humans in ways that mimic protected relationships. The law adapts to behavior, not just biology. The Legal System Isn't Ready For What ChatGPT Is Proposing There is no global consensus on how to regulate AI memory, consent, or interaction logs. The EU's AI Act introduces transparency mandates, but memory rights are still undefined. In the U.S., state-level data laws conflict, and no federal policy yet addresses what it means to interact with a memory‑enabled AI. (See my recent Forbes piece on why AI regulation is effectively dead—and what businesses need to do instead.) The physical location of a server is not just a technical detail. It's a legal trigger. A conversation stored on a server in California is subject to U.S. law. If it's routed through Frankfurt, it becomes subject to GDPR. When AI systems retain memory, context, and inferred consent, the server location effectively defines sovereignty over the interaction. That has implications for litigation, subpoenas, discovery, and privacy. 'I almost wish they'd go ahead and grant these AI systems legal personhood, as if they were therapists or clergy,' says technology attorney John Kheit. 'Because if they are, then all this passive data collection starts to look a lot like an illegal wiretap, which would thereby give humans privacy rights/protections when interacting with AI. It would also, then, require AI providers to disclose 'other parties to the conversation', i.e., that the provider is a mining party reading the data, and if advertisers are getting at the private conversations.' Infrastructure choices are now geopolitical. They determine how AI systems behave under pressure and what recourse a user has when something goes wrong. And yet, underneath all of this is a deeper motive: monetization. But they won't be the only ones asking questions. Every conversation becomes a four-party exchange: the user, the model, the platform's internal optimization engine, and the advertiser paying for access. It's entirely plausible for a prompt about the Pittsburgh Steelers to return a response that subtly inserts 'Buy Coke' mid-paragraph. Not because it's relevant—but because it's profitable. Recent research shows users are significantly worse at detecting unlabeled advertising when it's embedded inside AI-generated content. Worse, these ads are initially rated as more trustworthy until users discover they are, in fact, ads. At that point, they're also rated as more manipulative. 'In experiential marketing, trust is everything,' says Jeff Boedges, Founder of Soho Experiential. 'You can't fake a relationship, and you can't exploit it without consequence. If AI systems are going to remember us, recommend things to us, or even influence us, we'd better know exactly what they remember and why. Otherwise, it's not personalization. It's manipulation.' Now consider what happens when advertisers gain access to psychographic modeling: 'Which users are most emotionally vulnerable to this type of message?' becomes a viable, queryable prompt. And AI systems don't need to hand over spreadsheets to be valuable. With retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), the model can shape language in real time based on prior sentiment, clickstream data, and fine-tuned advertiser objectives. This isn't hypothetical—it's how modern adtech already works. At that point, the chatbot isn't a chatbot. It's a simulation environment for influence. It is trained to build trust, then designed to monetize it. Your behavioral patterns become the product. Your emotional response becomes the target for optimization. The business model is clear: black-boxed behavioral insight at scale, delivered through helpful design, hidden from oversight, and nearly impossible to detect. We are entering a phase where machines will be granted protections without personhood, and influence without responsibility. If a user confesses to a crime during a legally privileged AI session, is the platform compelled to report it or remain silent? And who makes that decision? These are not edge cases. They are coming quickly. And they are coming at scale. Why ChatGPT Must Remain A Model—and Why Humans Must Regain Consent As generative AI systems evolve into persistent, adaptive participants in daily life, it becomes more important than ever to reassert a boundary: models must remain models. They cannot assume the legal, ethical, or sovereign status of a person quietly. And the humans generating the data that train these systems must retain explicit rights over their contributions. What we need is a standardized, enforceable system of data contracting, one that allows individuals to knowingly, transparently, and voluntarily contribute data for a limited, mutually agreed-upon window of use. This contract must be clear on scope, duration, value exchange, and termination. And it must treat data ownership as immutable, even during active use. That means: When a contract ends, or if a company violates its terms, the individual's data must, by law, be erased from the model, its training set, and any derivative products. 'Right to be forgotten' must mean what it says. But to be credible, this system must work both ways: This isn't just about ethics. It's about enforceable, mutual accountability. The user experience must be seamless and scalable. The legal backend must be secure. And the result should be a new economic compact—where humans know when they're participating in AI development, and models are kept in their place. ChatGPT Is Changing the Risk Surface. Here's How to Respond. The shift toward AI systems as quasi-participants—not just tools—will reshape legal exposure, data governance, product liability, and customer trust. Whether you're building AI, integrating it into your workflows, or using it to interface with customers, here are five things you should be doing immediately: ChatGPT May Get Privilege. You Should Get the Right to Be Forgotten. This moment isn't just about what AI can do. It's about what your business is letting it do, what it remembers, and who gets access to that memory. Ignore that, and you're not just risking privacy violations, you're risking long-term brand trust and regulatory blowback. At the very least, we need a legal framework that defines how AI memory is governed. Not as a priest, not as a doctor, and not as a partner, but perhaps as a witness. Something that stores information and can be examined when context demands it, with clear boundaries on access, deletion, and use. The public conversation remains focused on privacy. But the fundamental shift is about control. And unless the legal and regulatory frameworks evolve rapidly, the terms of engagement will be set, not by policy or users, but by whoever owns the box. Which is why, in the age of AI, the right to be forgotten may become the most valuable human right we have. Not just because your data could be used against you—but because your identity itself can now be captured, modeled, and monetized in ways that persist beyond your control. Your patterns, preferences, emotional triggers, and psychological fingerprints don't disappear when the session ends. They live on inside a system that never forgets, never sleeps, and never stops optimizing. Without the ability to revoke access to your data, you don't just lose privacy. You lose leverage. You lose the ability to opt out of prediction. You lose control over how you're remembered, represented, and replicated. The right to be forgotten isn't about hiding. It's about sovereignty. And in a world where AI systems like ChatGPT will increasingly shape our choices, our identities, and our outcomes, the ability to walk away may be the last form of freedom that still belongs to you.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cathie Wood buys $45 million of battered megacap tech stock
Cathie Wood buys $45 million of battered megacap tech stock originally appeared on TheStreet. Cathie Wood doesn't give up on companies she believes in. The Ark Invest chief is known for sticking with tech stocks she sees as "disruptive", often buying even when they face setbacks. This is what she just did, adding to a high-profile tech stock amid a post-earnings dip. Wood's funds have experienced a volatile ride this year, swinging from sharp losses to strong gains. In January and February, the Ark funds rallied as investors bet on the Trump administration's potential deregulation that could benefit Wood's tech bets. But that momentum hit hard in March and April, with the funds trailing the market as top holdings slid amid growing concerns over the macroeconomy and trade policies. Now, the fund is regaining momentum. As of July 25, the flagship Ark Innovation ETF () is up 33.3% year-to-date, far outpacing the S&P 500's 8.6% gain. Wood's remarkable return of 153% in 2020 helped build her reputation and attract loyal investors. Her strategy can lead to sharp gains during bull markets but also painful losses, like in 2022, when ARKK tumbled more than 60%. As of July 25, Ark Innovation ETF, with $6.8 billion under management, has delivered a five-year annualized return of negative 0.03%. The S&P 500 has an annualized return of 16.46% over the same period. Cathie Wood's investment strategy explained Wood's investment strategy is straightforward: Her Ark ETFs typically buy shares in emerging high-tech companies in fields such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, biomedical technology and robotics. According to Wood, these companies have the potential to reshape industries, but their volatility leads to major fluctuations in Ark funds' Ark Innovation ETF wiped out $7 billion in investor wealth over the 10 years ending in 2024, according to an analysis by Morningstar's analyst Amy Arnott. That made it the third-biggest wealth destroyer among mutual funds and ETFs in Arnott's ranking. Wood recently said the U.S. is coming out of a three-year 'rolling recession' and heading into a productivity-led recovery that could trigger a broader bull market. In a letter to investors published in late April, she dismissed predictions of a recession dragging into 2026 and struck an optimistic tone for tech stocks. "During the current turbulent transition in the US, we think consumers and businesses are likely to accelerate the shift to technologically enabled innovation platforms including artificial intelligence, robotics, energy storage, blockchain technology, and multiomics sequencing," she said. But not all investors share this optimism. Through July 10, the Ark Innovation ETF saw nearly $2 billion in net outflows over the past 12 months, according to ETF research firm VettaFi. Cathie Wood buys $45 million of Tesla stock after earnings On July 24, the day when Tesla () dropped 8.2% following its second-quarter earnings, Wood's Ark funds snapped up 143,190 shares worth around $45.3 million. This was one of Wood's largest recent purchases. Tesla's Q2 earnings were quite dismal. The electric vehicle maker reported a 16% drop in automotive revenue as vehicle sales declined for the second straight company posted adjusted earnings of 40 cents per share, missing the 43 cents expected. Revenue came in at $22.50 billion, slightly below the $22.74 billion forecast. 'We probably could have a few rough quarters. I am not saying that we will, but we could,' CEO Elon Musk said. Tesla is grappling with growing challenges, from the rise of lower-cost electric vehicle competitors, especially in China, to a political backlash against Musk that has damaged the brand in the U.S. and Europe. But that hasn't stopped Wood, a longtime supporter of Tesla, from doubling down. 'We've been dealing with controversy around Elon Musk in one form or another since we first bought the stock,' Wood said in a recent interview with Bloomberg. 'We do trust the board and the board's instincts here and we stay out of politics.' She also noted that Musk seems more focused on the business again, especially after he decided to take charge of sales in the US and Europe. 'One of the announcements Elon made recently is that he is going to oversee sales in the US and in Europe,' Wood said. 'When he puts his mind on something, he usually gets the job done. So I think he's much less distracted now than he was, let's say, in the White House 24/7.' Back in March, Wood predicted Tesla's stock would reach $2,600 in five years, which is nearly nine times higher than where it trades now. Much of the optimism is driven by the company's highly anticipated robotaxi, which Wood believes will account for 90% of the company's value. Musk said during the earnings call that Tesla's robotaxi service, which the company has recently started testing in Austin, Texas, will expand to other states, with a goal of covering half the U.S. population by year-end pending regulatory approvals. "That's at least our goal, subject to regulatory approvals. I think we will technically be able to do it," he said. Tesla stock is down more than 21% year-to-date. The stock has long been Wood's biggest holding, accounting for 9.6% of the Ark Innovation Wood buys $45 million of battered megacap tech stock first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 27, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 27, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Platform Makes It Easy to Own Rental Property Without Being a Landlord with as Little as $100
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Although skyscrapers may dominate the typical city skyline (and the imagination), the truth is that a large percentage of landlords in America are not REITs, but individuals who own less than 5 units. It's also true that a lot of Americans rent single-family homes. This, of course, raises the question; why do so many investment platforms focus on large commercial properties instead of single-family homes? After all, it's much easier for smaller investors to understand the mechanics of buying a single-family home and operating it as an investment property. It's also more affordable. The simple answer is money. Most real estate investment platforms focus on accredited investors and the best way to get them the kind of returns they expect is to buy large commercial properties. Arrived seeks to shift that paradigm by giving small, non-accredited investors the opportunity to buy shares of rental homes all over the country and get the benefits that real estate investing provides. Real estate is a diverse asset class with investment options that can fit any bank account when working with the right platform. How Does It Work? Arrived is run by a team of experienced real estate market and industry professionals who identify single-family homes with potential as rental properties and long-term upside. The main difference here is that while most real estate crowdfunding platforms focus on large multi-family or commercial properties, Arrived focuses on single-family homes. Once Arrived purchases a home, it turns the ownership of the property over to an individual LLC. The LLC sells individual "shares" to investors at a price of $10 per share, which is how the platform raises capital to renovate the properties and put them on the rental market. Investors can then buy 10 or more of these individual shares for as little as $100 until the funding goal for the property is met. It's important to note that investors who purchase shares will have to commit to the hold period, which varies with each individual property but is estimated to last between 5 to 7 years. Once those goals are met, Arrived teams up with a preselected management team in the area to handle the nuts and bolts of showing the property and collecting rents. After the property is rented, Arrived investors can earn income on the rent based on the number of shares purchased for the duration of the hold period. Investors can also earn money at the end of the hold period (usually between 5 to 7 years) if their chosen property has appreciated and is sold at a profit. Arrived has taken many of the benefits of REIT offerings (the chance to earn rental income while the property appreciates) and combined them with an investor-friendly business model that allows non-accredited investors to participate. Arrived investors will receive the same kind of detailed expense reports and balance sheets that shareholders in REITs get on an annual basis. Additionally, because Arrived investors are actual property owners, you can gain the annual tax breaks that come with property depreciation and write-off of the capital expenses associated with the property. Fees Almost every investment offering has fees, but Arrived does a good job of minimizing those fees. The company buys properties directly from owners, which usually eliminates broker commissions. After that, Arrived charges two basic fees. One is a sourcing fee, which is a reimbursement paid to Arrived for the cost of scouting out a property and running it through the platform's vetting process. This vetting is designed to make sure that the properties being targeted hit the sweet spot between affordability and market upside. There is also an annual asset management fee (AUM), which covers the cost of the property manager and maintenance for the investor's chosen property. These fees vary from property to property but they will be clearly spelled out in the investment prospectus for each of their offerings. Overall, it's a pretty straightforward fee structure, and considering that investors can buy in for as little as $100, Arrived deserves a lot of credit for keeping it simple and affordable. Ease of Use When it comes to using any web-based platform, the easier it is to use, the better off the platform and its users will be. That goes doubly so for investment platforms that have offerings for non-accredited investors. Arrived's founders understand this and have acted accordingly. Signup is incredibly easy, requiring only an email address and password. After completing the signup, investors are offered the chance to participate in their choice of a weekly webinar with a Q&A for new investors, a Google call, or a live telephone call with an Arrived team member who will walk them through how the platform works and what they can expect as investors. This small gesture goes a long way toward building investor confidence. Investors can ask direct questions and receive answers from an actual Arrived team member. Investors who wish to dive right in can skip past the intro session and dive right into investing, where the offerings will also feature the relevant information to make an informed decision. The process for investing in properties on the platform is just as simple. Investors can browse all available offerings or apply filters to find properties that meet their investment criteria. Investors can view property-specific details for each offering and then purchase shares in homes they want to add to their portfolios. Investor Education Arrived realizes that no online real estate investing platform can accomplish its mission without a highly developed investor education section. This commitment to investor education starts at sign-up and the webinar for new investors with time for a Q&A session, it's incredibly reassuring to a new investor that there is a live person to whom they can ask questions right out of the gate. The Learn tab on the platform's home page will lead investors to an incredibly informative series of blogs on a variety of learning topics. Each of the blogs is well-organized and accessible to novice investors with no experience in real estate. The platform's education efforts do not cut short any topic, and it seems topics in the Learn section are carefully selected. Another great resource here is the How Arrived Works section, which can be accessed under the Learn tab. Clicking this section will direct investors to a simple-to-use page that features a comprehensive article on how the platform works. The article is dedicated to informing investors how the platform targets properties and how investors make money. The Help & FAQ section on Arrived is much more than an afterthought. It's well stocked with information, and investors can get answers to any questions not covered here by clicking on the message widget at the bottom right corner of the page. Arrived's investor education is concise, complete, accessible, and thorough. Offerings Arrived's business model of scouting out rental properties in markets with upside is solid. It's so solid that the company has already fully funded over 180 rental properties with a total value of more than $65 million. The platform typically adds new properties every 1 to 2 weeks, with some of the most popular properties selling out in a matter of minutes. Arrived also launched its first batch of short-term rental properties in September 2022 to allow investors to add even greater diversification to their portfolios and benefit from the greater potential upside of investing in vacation rentals. Arrived also offers diversified funds with the Single Family Residential Fund and an opportunity to invest in real estate-backed debt through the Private Credit Fund. Returns In the first quarter of 2024, 352 individual properties paid dividends of over $1.1 million, which reflects a quarter-over-quarter increase of 16%. Additionally, more than 11,700 investors invested $9.8 million in the Arrived Single Family Residential Fund during the quarter. In the last quarter of 2024, 365 individual properties paid dividends of over $1.84 million, which reflects a quarter-over-quarter increase of 19%. Additionally, over 18,500 investors invested $19M+ in the Arrived Single Family Residential Fund by the end of 2024. Arrived ended Q4 with a stabilized occupancy rate of 92% for 387 operational properties, helped by 66 new leases that were signed during the quarter. The new leases had an average term of 15.5 months, and 63% leased higher than the forecast rent. Should You Use Arrived Homes? The Arrived platform does an admirable job of combining the best aspects of REIT investing with a business model that caters to everyday investors. The opportunity to earn passive income with $100 buy-ins, and the ability to take advantage of tax breaks that are usually only available to large investors, only sweeten the package. Yes, there is a hold period and risk of loss, but at current interest rates, $100 in a savings account isn't going to be a lot in 5 to 7 years. Arrived gives investors the chance to put even small amounts of money to work for them by investing in a tangible asset; without accreditation. Overall, Arrived is worthy of serious consideration by any investor. That goes doubly so for non-accredited investors who want to jump into investing in a real estate property. This article This Platform Makes It Easy to Own Rental Property Without Being a Landlord with as Little as $100 originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
