logo
Google launches AI video creator Flow with Veo 3

Google launches AI video creator Flow with Veo 3

Time of India21-05-2025

Google
unveiled its new AI-powered video generator, Flow, at its developers' conference on Tuesday. It is the latest iteration of VideoFX, a
Google Labs
experiment launched last year, and can generate video and audio elements.
Google Flow
uses its video model
Veo 3
, text-to-image model
Imagen
and AI assistant Gemini to generate subjects, scenes and clips from text prompts. These can be pieced together into videos as per the creator's discretion.
Flow allows camera control with the ability to control the motion, angles and perspectives when creating a video. Users can edit and extend the frame to reveal more elements or transition to the next scene.
The AI video tool allows users to manage and organise all created elements, dubbed 'ingredients', and prompts used to make them
Google has also added Flow TV, which gives exact prompts and techniques for clips, helping creators learn new styles.
Live Events
The company has collaborated with filmmakers Dave Clark, Henry Daubrez and Junie Lau to assess how Flow can be integrated into their workflow and improve it using their insights.
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
Google Flow is available to
Google AI Pro
and Google AI Ultra subscribers in the US, and will be rolled out to more countries soon, the internet major said. Google AI Pro comes with key Flow features and 100 generations per month. The Google AI Ultra gives users the highest usage limits and early access to Veo 3 with native audio generation, bringing environmental sounds and character dialogue directly into video creation.
Also Read:
Key takeaways from Google I/O 2025: Gemini, Search in focus

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aries Daily Horoscope Today, June 06, 2025: Do not hold back your thoughts
Aries Daily Horoscope Today, June 06, 2025: Do not hold back your thoughts

Time of India

time40 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Aries Daily Horoscope Today, June 06, 2025: Do not hold back your thoughts

If you have something in your heart, now is the time to say it. Your natural energy is high, and people are ready to hear you. Do not hold back your thoughts, even if they feel too strong. Confidence will bring clarity. You may feel a bit impatient, but try to be kind while being direct. Communication will open new doors if you speak from your truth. Aries Love Horoscope Today In matters of love, your words can heal or hurt—choose them wisely. Your partner or someone close may be waiting for you to express how you truly feel. If there has been distance, today offers a moment of reconnection. Single souls might meet someone through a conversation that starts casually but feels special. Don't underestimate small talk today. Speak with honesty and warmth. Listening is as important as speaking in love. Emotional honesty builds stronger connections now. Aries Career Horoscope Today Work life shows promise when you trust your own judgment. You may get an opportunity to take the lead or present an idea. Don't let fear stop you. Speak clearly, and others will follow your vision. If you're job hunting, interviews or meetings will go well if you stay calm and confident. Avoid depending too much on others today. Use your own skills and express your thoughts openly. Remember, today is not the day to stay silent at your workplace. Aries Money Horoscope Today Finances are stable but need wise handling. A new idea or suggestion from someone could lead you to better savings or investment strategies. Avoid emotional spending. Instead, focus on long-term security. A conversation with a trusted elder may give you useful money advice. If you have been thinking about starting something new with money, research well before jumping in. Today supports planning, not rushing. Use your voice to negotiate better deals or understand your financial responsibilities. Aries Health Horoscope Today Physically, you may feel energetic, but mentally tired. Too many thoughts or emotions can create inner stress. Headaches or throat discomfort may come from holding back feelings. Speak gently, but do not bottle up emotions. A simple walk or quiet breathing exercise will calm your mind. Stay hydrated and avoid spicy food if your digestion is weak today. Rest when needed and do not ignore small signs from your body. Your health improves when your emotions are expressed with care. Discover everything about astrology at the Times of India , including daily horoscopes for Aries , Taurus , Gemini , Cancer , Leo , Virgo , Libra , Scorpio , Sagittarius , Capricorn , Aquarius , and Pisces .

AI's dirty secret: How your chatbot is draining Earth's water and energy
AI's dirty secret: How your chatbot is draining Earth's water and energy

India Today

time4 hours ago

  • India Today

AI's dirty secret: How your chatbot is draining Earth's water and energy

Every time you ask a chatbot for help or generate an AI image, somewhere a vast facility hums to life. It's easy to forget that each 'effortless' AI interaction leans on gigantic data centres -- buildings full of servers running nonstop, devouring electricity and gulping is World Environment Day, so it feels fitting to pull back the curtain on AI's unseen carbon footprint, even as we keep creating content with the help of AI, like the images used in this very POWER BEHIND THE MAGIC: WHY AI NEEDS HUGE DATA CENTRESAI models like ChatGPT and sophisticated image generators don't float on dreams. They rely on colossal data centres packed with racks of servers that rarely sleep. IAD71 Amazon Web Services data centre (as on July 17, 2024 in Ashburn, Virginia) () In 2024, global data centres -- including those powering AI -- used around 460 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity. That's roughly equal to Sweden's entire annual power consumption (International Energy Agency, 2024).Forecasts suggest this figure could double to 1,000 TWh by 2026, which would almost match Germany's yearly electricity per the US Department of Energy, a single data centre can draw over 100 megawatts (MW) of power -- enough to run 80,000 average American homes at now you can begin to see why AI has become a 'sizable' contributor to global emissions. AI's rapid expansion is a big driver behind this surge. CARBON COST OF CHATBOTS: ENERGY USED PER PROMPTTraining a large language model isn't a weekend project -- it's an electricity instance, powering up OpenAI's GPT-3 used about 1.3 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of electricity, enough to supply roughly 120 average American homes for a year (ScienceDirect, 2023).Once the model is live, every single prompt you send to GPT-4 still sips power -- about 0.0003 kilowatt-hours (kWh). That's like leaving a 60-watt light bulb on for 20 seconds (Epoch AI, 2025).Now imagine this at scale: ChatGPT answers over 1 billion queries a day. If every Google search worldwide -- around 9 billion a day -- were replaced with a ChatGPT query, global energy use would spike by an extra 10 TWh per year. That's enough to power all the homes in a city the size of San Francisco for a year (Hugging Face and Carnegie Mellon University, 2024).advertisementGenerating a single AI-created image isn't free either. It can use as much energy as fully charging your smartphone once. THE WATER-COOLING FACTOR: HOW AI IS DRAINING RESOURCESElectricity tells only half the story. Those thousands of servers run hot, and cooling them eats up alarming amounts of 2024, Google's data centres consumed nearly 6 billion gallons (22.7 billion litres) of water -- about one-third of Turkey's drinking water for an entire year, as per its 2024 Environment model training, every 10-20 prompts to Google's Bard chatbot reportedly required about 500 ml of water -- mostly for average, data centres use about 1.8 litres of water per kWh of electricity consumed (Meta Platforms, 2023). Put another way, a single large data centre can guzzle as much water in 24 hours as a small that thirst is rising -- industry water consumption grows by 8-20% each year, thanks to AI's surging role and stiff competition (University of California, Riverside, and University of Texas at Arlington, 2025). advertisementWHO'S DOING IT BETTER: GREEN AI INITIATIVES AND THEIR LIMITSSome big names in tech are trying to curb AI's environmental chew. Microsoft, for instance, has cut its water use per computing unit by 39% since 2021, saving about 125 million litres per data centre annually by using reclaimed water and smarter cooling methods (Meta Platforms, 2023).Alternative cooling strategies -- like air cooling or immersing servers in liquid -- are also under the microscope. But these options come with their own cooling cuts water use but can drive up energy needs for pumps or special fluids. Air cooling can be less water-dependent, yet efficiency dips when temperatures climb (Meta Platforms, 2023).Switching to renewables helps, but even 'green' electricity can't keep pace with AI's relentless demand. A recent MIT Lincoln Laboratory report warned that global demand for clean power is lagging far behind AI's growth many companies still don't fully share their energy or water metrics, making it near impossible to verify progress. advertisementTHE BOTTOM LINEAI's magic comes at a genuine cost. Data centres powering our digital conversations and image creations now rival entire nations in electricity use. They swig water comparable to small as AI continues its meteoric rise, this environmental toll only grows World Environment Day, it's worth asking: how can we keep enjoying the convenience of AI without letting it swallow our planet?'Green AI' efforts -- more efficient hardware, smarter cooling, renewable electricity -- are steps in the right direction. But the gap between AI's hunger and our ability to supply green power remains we don't face this challenge head-on, our planet will bear the brunt. Every prompt you send, every image you generate, leaves an unseen footprint that's getting harder to Watch

Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use
Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use

HighlightsGoogle is facing an $800 million lawsuit in Santa Clara County, California, from Android smartphone users who claim the company misappropriates their cellphone data, affecting an estimated 14 million Californians. The plaintiffs allege that Google secretly transmits data over cellular networks even when devices are turned off, which they argue improperly consumes purchased data from mobile carriers without user consent. Despite Google's history of settling class actions, the company is opting for a trial, disputing the plaintiffs' claims that they have a property interest in cellular data allowances and arguing that no actual losses were incurred. Class actions rarely go to trial, which is why a case against Google is proving to be an outlier. The tech giant is defending itself before a jury in Santa Clara County, California, superior court in an $800 million lawsuit by Android smartphone users who say Google misappropriates their cellphone data. A jury of eight women and four men was seated on Tuesday in what lawyers say is expected to be a three-to-four-week trial, with opening statements kicking off on Wednesday. The stakes are high, but the class, which includes an estimated 14 million Californians whose mobile devices use Google's Android operating system, is in some ways just an appetizer. The same plaintiffs lawyers from Korein Tillery; Bartlit Beck and McManis Faulkner are litigating a parallel case in San Jose federal court covering Android users in the other 49 states, with billions of dollars in alleged damages. The plaintiffs in court papers say that even when their phones are turned off, Google causes Android devices to surreptitiously send information over cellular networks "for Google's own purposes," including targeted digital advertising. These transfers improperly eat up data that users purchase from their mobile carriers, the plaintiffs allege. Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said the claims "mischaracterize standard industry practices that help protect users and make phones more reliable," he told me. "We look forward to making our case in court." A unit of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet, Google has a well-used playbook for settling class actions. Earlier this week, for example, the company agreed to pay $500 million to resolve shareholder litigation - a move that comes on the heels of a $50 million deal in May to resolve class-wide allegations of racial bias against Black employees and a $100 million payout in March to a proposed class of advertisers who claimed they were overcharged for clicks on ads. So why is Google taking this case to trial? In court papers, Google's outside counsel from Cooley argue that Android users incurred no actual losses, and that consumers consented to Google's so-called "passive" data transfers via terms of service agreements and device settings. The lawyers also dispute the fundamental premise of the case: that cellular data allowances can be considered "property" under California law and subject to conversion, a civil cause of action that involves taking a person's property without permission. When the "rhetoric and hyperbole are set aside, Plaintiffs' theory is revealed as little more than a (misguided) product design claim - not wrongful conversion," defense counsel wrote. The Cooley team, which includes Whitty Somvichian, Michael Attanasio, Max Bernstein and Carrie Lebel, declined comment. The plaintiffs sued Google in Santa Clara County Superior Court in 2019, asserting that they have a property interest in their cellular plans' data allowances, and that each quantum they pay for has a market value. They don't object to data transmissions when they're actively engaged with Google's apps and properties, like checking email or playing a game. But they say Google never told them it would avail itself of their cellular data when they weren't using their phones to send and receive a range of information on their usage. "The upshot is that these phone users unknowingly subsidize the same Google advertising business that earns over $200 billion a year," plaintiffs lawyer George Zelcs of Korein Tillery said via email. In addition to injunctive relief, the plaintiffs want Google to reimburse them for the value of the cellular data the company consumed. Per person, the amount is modest - 1 to 1.5 megabytes of data each day, the plaintiffs estimate. To put that in context, Americans used just over 100 trillion megabytes of wireless data in 2023, my Reuters colleagues reported. But with a class period dating back to 2016, the totals add up quickly. In court papers, Google lawyers sound almost incredulous at the amount of the claimed nationwide damages, which they say runs in the tens of billions - more than the $7.4 billion Perdue Pharma settlement for the opioid crisis, they note. "Plaintiffs cannot show remotely commensurate harm to the class," they wrote. In denying Google's motion for summary judgment in May, Judge Charles Adams allowed the plaintiffs' claim for conversion to go forward, ruling there are triable issues of material fact for jurors to decide. While Adams said no direct state law precedent exists as to whether cell phone data is property, he pointed to a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year in the parallel federal class action, Taylor v Google. In that case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi in San Jose sided with Google and dismissed the complaint with prejudice in 2022, only to be reversed and remanded on appeal. The appellate panel in an unpublished decision ruled that the plaintiffs plausibly alleged they incurred damages when Google used their cellular data. Adams in a pre-trial order set some limits on what the lawyers will be allowed to argue to the jury. Plaintiffs may not suggest Google engages in "surveillance" of Android users, he wrote, or that the data transfers are a privacy violation. As for Google, Adams said, it "must not present evidence or argument suggesting that this case is 'lawyer driven' or was 'invented' by Plaintiffs' counsel."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store