Trump sets 50% US tariffs on copper, Brazilian imports starting in August
'I am announcing a 50% TARIFF on Copper, effective August 1, after receiving a robust NATIONAL SECURITY ASSESSMENT,' Trump said in a post on his Truth Social media platform, a reference to a 'Section 232" national security trade investigation into the red metal that has been under way.
The announcement came hours after he also informed Brazil that its 'reciprocal' tariff on August 1 would rise to 50% from 10%, a shockingly high level for a country with a balanced US trade relationship.
Trump first broached the copper tariff during a cabinet meeting on Tuesday, setting off a scramble by companies to import as much copper as soon as possible from Chile and other major suppliers.
He blamed the decline of the US copper industry on past administrations, saying copper was needed for semiconductors, aircraft, electric vehicle batteries and military hardware.
'America will, once again, build a DOMINANT Copper Industry,' Trump wrote.
Trump's Brazil tariff order came in a letter to Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva that vented anger over what he called the 'Witch Hunt' trial of Lula's right-wing predecessor, Jair Bolsonaro, and adding to an increasingly bitter public feud with Lula.
Trump also criticised what he said were Brazil's attacks on free elections, Americans' free speech and 'SECRET and UNLAWFUL Censorship Orders to US Social Media platforms'. He ordered the US Trade Representative's office to launch a new 'Section 301" unfair trade practices investigation that could add even more tariffs, citing 'Brazil's continued attacks on the Digital Trade Activities of American companies'.
Lula responded to Trump's letter by issuing a statement saying that any unilateral measure to increase tariffs would be met with a response in accordance with Brazilian law.
Brad Setser, a former US trade official now with the Council on Foreign Relations, said Trump's action could easily spiral into a damaging trade war between the two democracies.
'This shows the danger of having tariffs that are under the unilateral control of one man,' Setser said. 'It's tied to the fact that Lula beat Trump's friend Bolsonaro in the election.'
Brazil is the 15th largest US trading partner, with total two-way trade of $92bn in 2024, and a rare $7.4bn US trade surplus, according to US Census Bureau data.
Top US exports to Brazil are commercial aircraft, petroleum products and crude oil, coal and semiconductors while Brazil's top exports to the US are crude oil, coffee, semi-finished steel and pig iron.
The South American country has held off on implementing a digital services tax but has sought to advance legislation with stronger competition regulations on digital platforms.
Trump earlier on his Truth Social media platform issued August 1 tariff notices to seven minor trading partners that exported only $15bn in goods to the US last year: a 20% tariff on goods from the Philippines, 30% on goods from Sri Lanka, Algeria, Iraq and Libya, and 25% on Brunei and Moldova. The latest letters add to 14 others issued earlier in the week including 25% tariffs for powerhouse US suppliers South Korea and Japan, which are also to take effect August 1 barring any trade deals reached before then.
They were issued a day after Trump said he was broadening his trade war by imposing a 50% tariff on imported copper and would soon introduce long-threatened levies on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. Trump's rapid-fire tariff moves have cast a shadow over the global economic outlook, paralysing business decision-making.
NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE EU
As more tariff drama unfolded in Washington, US and EU negotiators pushed closer to a trade deal to ease Trump's tariffs on the biggest bilateral US trading partner bloc.
Trump said he would 'probably' tell the EU within two days what rate it could expect for its exports to the US, adding that the 27-nation bloc had become much more co-operative.
EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said good progress had been made on a framework trade agreement and a deal may even be possible within days.
Sefcovic told EU legislators he hoped that EU negotiators could finalise their work soon, with additional time now from the extension of a US deadline to August 1 from July 9.
'I hope to reach a satisfactory conclusion, potentially even in the coming days,' Sefcovic said.
However, Italian economy minister Giancarlo Giorgetti had earlier warned that talks between the two sides were 'very complicated' and could continue right up to the deadline.
EU officials and auto industry sources said that US and EU negotiators were discussing a range of potential measures aimed at protecting the EU's auto industry, including tariff cuts, import quotas and credits against the value of EU automakers' US exports.
HIGHEST TARIFF LEVELS SINCE 1934
Equity markets shrugged off the Republican president's latest tariff salvo on Wednesday, while the yen remained on the back foot after the levies imposed on Japan.
After Trump's announcement of higher tariffs for imports from the 14 countries, US research group Yale Budget Lab estimated consumers face an effective US tariff rate of 17.6%, up from 15.8% previously and the highest in nine decades.
Trump's administration has been touting those tariffs as a significant revenue source. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent said Washington has taken in about $100bn so far and could collect $300bn by the end of the year. The US has taken in about $80bn annually in tariff revenue in recent years.
The Trump administration promised '90 deals in 90 days' after he unveiled an array of country-specific duties in early April. So far, only two agreements have been reached, with Britain and Vietnam. Trump has said a deal with India was close.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Does the BRICS currency threaten the dollar?
According to economists and political analysts, one of the main reasons for Trump's economic rhetoric has to do with US fears that BRICS countries are embarking on a strategic plan to dethrone the dollar, or de-dollarise the world, as some observers put it. Some people may be wondering why the US President has been acting out in recent months, threatening to impose tariffs, at times in a seemingly excessive manner. Economists and political analysts suggest that one of the main reasons for Trump's economic rhetoric is the United States' concern that BRICS countries are initiating a strategic plan to undermine the dollar, a process some observers refer to as "de-dollarisation''. The BRICS grouping includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa and a few other countries that joined in the past couple of years. It all started in Kazan, Russia, during the 16th BRICS summit last year when these countries unveiled a symbolic BRICS banknote, unleashing hot debate regarding the US dollar's dominance. At the time, Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasised that the dollar is being used as a ''weapon.'' A year before, meanwhile, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva proposed creating a new, common currency in South America to reduce its reliance on the dollar in international trade. India has also been advocating for local currency settlements among BRICS nations. The unveiling of the BRICS currency bill, featuring the Taj Mahal, added controversy, as the bloc explores challenging the US dollar's global financial power. Despite research showing that the US dollar remains the primary reserve currency, Trump would take none of that as he continued his criticism of BRICS. "We are going to require a commitment from these seemingly hostile countries that they will neither create a new BRICS currency, nor back any other currency to replace the mighty US dollar or, they will face 100% Tariffs,'' he wrote in his Social Truth platform in January. The statement was similar to the one he posted last November. According to Bloomberg, Brazil and South Africa have criticised Trump separately for his anti-BRICS comments, while India has refrained from responding publicly, signalling that it is walking a fine line in maintaining its relationship with Washington. Would a BRICS currency threaten the dollar? Political analyst Anda Mbikwana offers his insights on the issue. 'The unveiling of a symbolic BRICS banknote at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum represents far more than ceremonial posturing — it signals a deliberate escalation in the bloc's strategy to construct alternative financial architectures that could fundamentally reshape global monetary dynamics. ''While critics may dismiss this $200 denomination note as mere symbolism, the careful design choices reveal sophisticated strategic thinking. The front's display of founding member flags alongside the reverse featuring partner nations creates a visual narrative of expanding multipolarity that directly challenges the hierarchical nature of the dollar-dominated system. ''This imagery reinforces BRICS' positioning as what President Putin has characterised as 'non-western' rather than 'anti-western' — a crucial distinction that broadens its appeal across the Global South.'' The Technological Infrastructure Behind De-dollarisation ''The symbolic banknote masks more substantive developments in BRICS' financial infrastructure. Russia's emphasis on blockchain-based payment systems and central bank digital currencies represents a technologically sophisticated approach to circumventing traditional dollar-denominated channels. ''These systems offer practical alternatives to SWIFT and correspondent banking relationships that have become increasingly weaponised through sanctions regimes.'' And how does this directly affect South Africa, one might ask. Said Mbikwana: ''For South Africa, this development presents both opportunities and challenges. Greater financial integration within BRICS could reduce transaction costs and currency exposure risks in trade with major partners. ''However, it also requires careful navigation of relationships with Western economies that remain crucial for South African exports and investment. The Reserve Bank's approach to central bank digital currency development will become increasingly strategic as these alternative payment systems mature.'' According to Mbikwana, despite BRICS' banknote symbolic significance, fundamental economic realities limit BRICS' ability to quickly displace dollar dominance. ''The United States retains unparalleled capital market depth, institutional credibility, and network effects that have historically proven resilient to challengers. Moreover, internal coordination challenges within BRICS — particularly between China and India — limit the bloc's ability to present a unified monetary alternative.'' The BRICS symbolic banknote, added Mbikwana, should be understood not as an immediate threat to dollar hegemony, but as a manifestation of longer-term structural shifts in global economic governance. ''Its significance lies not in its current form, but in its representation of institutional momentum toward financial multipolarity. ''American opposition to these developments may paradoxically accelerate their adoption by reinforcing perceptions of dollar weaponisation among emerging economies. ''The ultimate question is not whether BRICS can immediately supplant the dollar, but whether it can create sufficient institutional alternatives to reduce the international community's dependence on dollar-denominated systems. In this context, symbolic gestures serve as important markers of political will and institutional capacity — prerequisites for any serious challenge to existing monetary hierarchies.'' The purpose of the banknote will serve as a payment system designed to facilitate transactions within the BRICS bloc using local currencies and potentially central bank digital currencies. While a BRICS currency could potentially challenge the US dollar's dominance, it's unlikely to replace it entirely soon. There is ongoing development and testing, with a pilot programme potentially appearing before the end of 2026. Some economists are criticising Trump for threatening the BRICS, according to a CBS News report, saying it makes the US look weak. "It isn't a good look, as it indirectly elevates the stature of a non-threat and suggests a lack of confidence in the dollar," Brad Setser, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and former Treasury Department economist, wrote on X.
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Trump wants his Coca-Cola made in Mexico
Coca Cola in Mexico is made with cane sugar rather than corn starch. Now trump wants in available in the US too Image: Supplied Emily Heil Mexican Coke, which is made with real sugar, unlike the US version sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup, has many fans - and American soda drinkers might soon have more options for getting their sweet cola fix. President Donald Trump on Wednesday wrote on Truth Social that he had been in touch with Coca-Cola executives, who he wrote had agreed to produce the nation's top-selling soft drink domestically using cane sugar, as it is done south of the border. 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,' Trump wrote. 'I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola.' He put in a personal plug for the product, even though the president famously drinks Diet Coke, which is made with the sugar substitute aspartame. 'This will be a very good move by them - You'll see,' he wrote. 'It's just better!' Coca-Cola did not confirm any details, but the company suggested in a statement Wednesday that any changes were still in the pipeline. 'We appreciate President Trump's enthusiasm for our iconic Coca-Cola brand,' the company said. 'More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range will be shared soon.' The move bore classic Trump earmarks: leaning on a private company to bend to his will, and announcing changes with more hype than details. It follows the tack taken by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has championed a 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda that includes pushing food companies to remove artificial dyes and other additives from their products. A report by the 'MAHA Commission' in May pointed out high-fructose corn syrup as a factor in obesity and related diseases. Scientists have said there is minimal nutritional difference between sugar and high-fructose corn syrup. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Coca-Cola introduced high-fructose corn syrup into its signature cola in the mid-1980s, spurred by low prices for U.S. corn that were bolstered by federal subsidies to corn farmers. Trump's announcement proved immediately unpopular with the makers of corn syrup, who suggested that importing cane sugar would be more expensive than utilizing a domestic product - and run counter to Trump's stated agenda of boosting American products and manufacturers. 'Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar doesn't make sense,' Corn Refiners Association President and CEO John Bode said in a statement on Wednesday night. 'President Trump stands for American manufacturing jobs, American farmers, and reducing the trade deficit. Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income, and boost imports of foreign sugar, all with no nutritional benefit.' Soda aficionados have long sought out Coke made in Mexico, which its devotees say tastes crisper and less saccharine than its American counterpart.
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
PEPFAR funding exempt from Trump's proposed cuts to foreign aid
NGOs and healthcare systems struggled as the US abruptly cut off its funding for HIV/Aids programs. Image: Navesh Chitrakar /Independent Newspapers THE US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the global program to fight HIV/AIDS, has been exempt from President Donald Trump's request to slash billions in spending on foreign aid and public broadcasting previously approved by Congress. This comes after objections from lawmakers in both Republican and Democrat parties, bringing the size of the package of cuts to $9 billion from $9.4 billion. Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, told reporters after lunch with Republican senators that Trump could accept a change in the measure to exempt PEPFAR. "There is a substitute amendment that does not include the PEPFAR rescission and we're fine with that," Vought said. Congress has until Friday to pass the rescissions package, originally a request to claw back $8.3 billion in foreign aid funding and $1.1 billion for public broadcasting. Otherwise, the request would expire and the White House will be required to adhere to spending plans passed by Congress. If the Senate passes the bill without the PEPFAR cuts, the measure must go back to the House of Representatives for a vote before it can be sent to the White House for Trump to sign into law. Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota, a Republican, said he expected the House would act quickly to pass the measure. PEPFAR aid constituted 17% of South Africa's HIV/AIDS programme. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Reacting to the developments, South Africa's health department spokesperson Foster Mohale said: "We have noted the ruling on PEPFAR, but this doesn't translate into immediate reversal of funding cuts.' Health Justice Initiative director, Fatima Hassan said: "To be honest no one knows the details on this as there is minimal transparency on the US side, so too early to tell what if any impact on SA." Francois Venter from Wits University and Ezintsha said: "Even if they do return, everyone will be deeply wary of the deep dependency on these cuts, and the lack of preparedness and unwillingness of the government to acknowledge the impact of the cuts.' He said the initial impact of funding cuts had been "devastating". "We haven't seen the collapse of immediate delivery services like labs and immediate clinical services, like in some countries, but case finding, data services, monitoring of clinic quality, and many key population services have pretty much ceased to exist. The combination of the overnight withdrawal of PEPFAR, and the complete lack of any urgency or action from the Department of Health, will likely translate into hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths, and millions of new infections, in the next decades, unless something is done urgently." Cape Times
