
AI Deepfakes Are Stealing Millions Every Year — Who's Going to Stop Them?
Your CFO is on the video call asking you to transfer $25 million. He gives you all the bank info. Pretty routine. You got it.
But, What the — ? It wasn't the CFO? How can that be? You saw him with your own eyes and heard that undeniable voice you always half-listen for. Even the other colleagues on the screen weren't really them. And yes, you already made the transaction.
Ring a bell? That's because it actually happened to an employee at the global engineering firm Arup last year, which lost $25 million to criminals. In other incidents, folks were scammed when "Elon Musk" and "Goldman Sachs executives" took to social media enthusing about great investment opportunities. And an agency leader at WPP, the largest advertising company in the world at the time, was almost tricked into giving money during a Teams meeting with a deepfake they thought was the CEO Mark Read.
Experts have been warning for years about deepfake AI technology evolving to a dangerous point, and now it's happening. Used maliciously, these clones are infesting the culture from Hollywood to the White House. And although most businesses keep mum about deepfake attacks to prevent client concern, insiders say they're occurring with increasing alarm. Deloitte predicts fraud losses from such incidents to hit $40 billion in the United States by 2027.
Related: The Advancement Of Artificial Intelligence Is Inevitable. Here's How We Should Get Ready For It.
Obviously, we have a problem — and entrepreneurs love nothing more than finding something to solve. But this is no ordinary problem. You can't sit and study it, because it moves as fast as you can, or even faster, always showing up in a new configuration in unexpected places.
The U.S. government has started to pass regulations on deepfakes, and the AI community is developing its own guardrails, including digital signatures and watermarks to identify their content. But scammers are not exactly known to stop at such roadblocks.
That's why many people have pinned their hopes on "deepfake detection" — an emerging field that holds great promise. Ideally, these tools can suss out if something in the digital world (a voice, video, image, or piece of text) was generated by AI, and give everyone the power to protect themselves. But there is a hitch: In some ways, the tools just accelerate the problem. That's because every time a new detector comes out, bad actors can potentially learn from it — using the detector to train their own nefarious tools, and making deepfakes even harder to spot.
So now the question becomes: Who is up for this challenge? This endless cat-and-mouse game, with impossibly high stakes? If anyone can lead the way, startups may have an advantage — because compared to big firms, they can focus exclusively on the problem and iterate faster, says Ankita Mittal, senior consultant of research at The Insight Partners, which has released a report on this new market and predicts explosive growth.
Here's how a few of these founders are trying to stay ahead — and building an industry from the ground up to keep us all safe.
Related: 'We Were Sucked In': How to Protect Yourself from Deepfake Phone Scams.
Image Credit: Terovesalainen
If deepfakes had an origin story, it might sound like this: Until the 1830s, information was physical. You could either tell someone something in person, or write it down on paper and send it, but that was it. Then the commercial telegraph arrived — and for the first time in human history, information could be zapped over long distances instantly. This revolutionized the world. But wire transfer fraud and other scams soon followed, often sent by fake versions of real people.
Western Union was one of the first telegraph companies — so it is perhaps appropriate, or at least ironic, that on the 18th floor of the old Western Union Building in lower Manhattan, you can find one of the earliest startups combatting deepfakes. It's called Reality Defender, and the guys who founded it, including a former Goldman Sachs cybersecurity nut named Ben Colman, launched in early 2021, even before ChatGPT entered the scene. (The company originally set out to detect AI avatars, which he admits is "not as sexy.")
Colman, who is CEO, feels confident that this battle can be won. He claims that his platform is 99% accurate in detecting real-time voice and video deepfakes. Most clients are banks and government agencies, though he won't name any (cybersecurity types are tight-lipped like that). He initially targeted those industries because, he says, deepfakes pose a particularly acute risk to them — so they're "willing to do things before they're fully proven." Reality Defender also works with firms like Accenture, IBM Ventures, and Booz Allen Ventures — "all partners, customers, or investors, and we power some of their own forensics tools."
So that's one kind of entrepreneur involved in this race. On Zoom, a few days after visiting Colman, I meet another: He is Hany Farid, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and cofounder of a detection startup called GetReal Security. Its client list, according to the CEO, includes John Deere and Visa. Farid is considered an OG of digital image forensics (he was part of a team that developed PhotoDNA to help fight online child sexual abuse material, for example). And to give me the full-on sense of the risk involved, he pulls an eerie sleight-of-tech: As he talks to me on Zoom, he is replaced by a new person — an Asian punk who looks 40 years younger, but who continues to speak with Farid's voice. It's a deepfake in real time.
Related: Machines Are Surpassing Humans in Intelligence. What We Do Next Will Define the Future of Humanity, Says This Legendary Tech Leader.
Truth be told, Farid wasn't originally sure if deepfake detection was a good business. "I was a little nervous that we wouldn't be able to build something that actually worked," he says. The thing is, deepfakes aren't just one thing. They are produced in myriad ways, and their creators are always evolving and learning. One method, for example, involves using what's called a "generative adversarial network" — in short, someone builds a deepfake generator, as well as a deepfake detector, and the two systems compete against each other so that the generator becomes smarter. A newer method makes better deepfakes by training a model to start with something called "noise" (imagine the visual version of static) and then sculpt the pixels into an image according to a text prompt.
Because deepfakes are so sophisticated, neither Reality Defender or GetReal can ever definitively say that something is "real" or "fake." Instead, they come up with probabilities and descriptions like strong, medium, weak, high, low, and most likely — which critics say can be confusing, but supporters argue can put clients on alert to ask more security questions.
To keep up with the scammers, both companies run at an insanely fast pace — putting out updates every few weeks. Colman spends a lot of energy recruiting engineers and researchers, who make up 80% of his team. Lately, he's been pulling hires straight out of Ph.D. programs. He also has them do ongoing research to keep the company one step ahead.
Both Reality Defender and GetReal maintain pipelines coursing with tech that's deployed, in development, and ready to sunset. To do that, they're organized around different teams that go back and forth to continually test their models. Farid, for example, has a "red team" that attacks and a "blue team" that defends. Describing working with his head of research on a new product, he says, "We have this very rapid cycle where she breaks, I fix, she breaks — and then you see the fragility of the system. You do that not once, but you do it 20 times. And now you're onto something."
Additionally, they layer in non-AI sleuthing techniques to make their tools more accurate and harder to dodge. GetReal, for example, uses AI to search images and videos for what are known as "artifacts" — telltale flaws that they're made by generative AI — as well as other digital forensic methods to analyze inconsistent lighting, image compression, whether speech is properly synched to someone's moving lips, and for the kind of details that are hard to fake (like, say, if video of a CEO contains the acoustic reverberations that are specific to his office).
"The endgame of my world is not elimination of threats; it's mitigation of threats," Farid says. "I can defeat almost all of our systems. But it's not easy. The average knucklehead on the internet, they're going to have trouble removing an artifact even if I tell 'em it's there. A sophisticated actor, sure. They'll figure it out. But to remove all 20 of the artifacts? At least I'm gonna slow you down."
Related: Deepfake Fraud Is Becoming a Business Risk You Can't Ignore. Here's the Surprising Solution That Puts You Ahead of Threats.
All of these strategies will fail if they don't have one thing: the right data. AI, as they say, is only as good as the data it's trained on. And that's a huge hurdle for detection startups. Not only do you have to find fakes made by all the different models and customized by various AI companies (detecting one won't necessarily work on another), but you also have to compare them against images, videos, and audio of real people, places, and things. Sure, reality is all around us, but so is AI, including in our phone cameras. "Historically, detectors don't work very well once you go to real world data," says Phil Swatton at The Alan Turing Institute, the United Kingdom's national institute for AI and data science. And high-quality, labeled datasets for deepfake detection remain scarce, notes Mittal, the senior consultant from The Insight Partners.
Colman has tackled this problem, in part, by using older datasets to capture the "real" side — say from 2018, before generative AI. For the fake data, he mostly generates it in house. He has also focused on developing partnerships with the companies whose tools are used to make deepfakes — because, of course, not all of them are meant to be harmful. So far, his partners include ElevenLabs (which, for example, translates popular podcaster and neuroscientist Andrew Huberman's voice into Hindi and Spanish, so that he can reach wider audiences) along with PlayAI and Respeecher. These companies have mountains of real-world data — and they like sharing it, because they look good by showing that they're building guardrails and allowing Reality Defender to detect their tools. In addition, this grants Reality Defender early access to the partners' new models, which gives it a jump start in updating its platform.
Colman's team has also gotten creative. At one point, to gather fresh voice data, they partnered with a rideshare company — offering their drivers extra income by recording 60 seconds of audio when they weren't busy. "It didn't work," Colman admits. "A ridesharing car is not a good place to record crystal-clear audio. But it gave us an understanding of artificial sounds that don't indicate fraud. It also helped us develop some novel approaches to remove background noise, because one trick that a fraudster will do is use an AI-generated voice, but then try to create all kinds of noise, so that maybe it won't be as detectable."
Startups like this must also grapple with another real-world problem: How do they keep their software from getting out into the public, where deepfakers can learn from it? To start, Reality Defender's clients have a high bar for whom within the organizations can access their software. But the company has also started to create some novel hardware.
To show me, Colman holds up a laptop. "We're now able to run all of our magic locally, without any connection to the cloud on this," he says. The loaded laptop, only available to high-touch clients, "helps protect our IP, so people don't use it to try to prove they can bypass it."
Related: Nearly Half of Americans Think They Could Be Duped By AI. Here's What They're Worried About.
Some founders are taking a completely different path: Instead of trying to detect fake people, they're working to authenticate real ones.
That's Joshua McKenty's plan. He's a serial entrepreneur who cofounded OpenStack and worked at NASA as Chief Cloud Architect, and this March launched a company called Polyguard. "We said, 'Look, we're not going to focus on detection, because it's only accelerating the arms race. We're going to focus on authenticity,'" he explains. "I can't say if something is fake, but I can tell you if it's real."
To execute that, McKenty built a platform to conduct a literal reality check on the person you're talking to by phone or video. Here's how it works: A company can use Polyguard's mobile app, or integrate it into their own app and call center. When they want to create a secure call or meeting, they use that system. To join, participants must prove their identities via the app on their mobile phone (where they're verified using documents like Real ID, e-passports, and face scanning). Polyguard says this is ideal for remote interviews, board meetings, or any other sensitive communication where identity is critical.
In some cases, McKenty's solution can be used with tools like Reality Defender. "Companies might say 'We're so big, we need both,'" he explains. His team is only five or six people at this point (whereas Reality Defender and GetReal both have about 50 employees), but he says his clients already include recruiters, who are interviewing candidates remotely only to discover that they're deepfakes, law firms wanting to protect attorney-client privilege, and wealth managers. He's also making the platform available to the public for people to establish secure lines with their attorney, accountant, or kid's teacher.
This line of thinking is appealing — and gaining approval from people who watch the industry. "I like the authentication approach; it's much more straightforward," says The Alan Turing Institute's Swatton. "It's focused not on detecting something going wrong, but certifying that it's going right." After all, even when detection probabilities sound good, any margin of error can be scary: A detector that catches 95% of fakes will still allow for a scam 1 out of 20 times.
That error rate is what alarmed Christian Perry, another entrepreneur who's entered the deepfake race. He saw it in the early detectors for text, where students and workers were being accused of using AI when they weren't. Authorship deceit doesn't pose the level of threat that deepfakes do, but text detectors are considered part of the scam-fighting family.
Perry and his cofounder Devan Leos launched a startup called Undetectable in 2023, which now has over 19 million users and a team of 76. It began by building a sophisticated text detector, but then pivoted into image detection, and is now close to launching audio and video detectors as well. "You can use a lot of the same kind of methodology and skill sets that you pick up in text detection," says Perry. "But deepfake detection is a much more complicated problem."
Related: Despite How the Media Portrays It, AI Is Not Really Intelligent. Here's Why.
Finally, instead of trying to prevent deepfakes, some entrepreneurs are seeing the opportunity in cleaning up their mess.
Luke and Rebekah Arrigoni stumbled upon this niche accidentally, by trying to solve a different terrible problem — revenge porn. It started one night a few years ago, when the married couple were watching HBO's Euphoria. In the show, a character's nonconsensual intimate image was shared online. "I guess out of hubris," Luke says, "our immediate response was like, We could fix this."
At the time, the Arrigonis were both working on facial recognition technologies. So as a side project in 2022, they put together a system specifically designed to scour the web for revenge porn — then found some victims to test it with. They'd locate the images or videos, then send takedown notices to the websites' hosts. It worked. But valuable as this was, they could see it wasn't a viable business. Clients were just too hard to find.
Then, in 2023, another path appeared. As the actors' and writers' strikes broke out, with AI being a central issue, Luke checked in with former colleagues at major talent agencies. He'd previously worked at Creative Artists Agency as a data scientist, and he was now wondering if his revenge-porn tool might be useful for their clients — though in a different way. It could also be used to identify celebrity deepfakes — to find, for example, when an actor or singer is being cloned to promote someone else's product. Along with feeling out other talent reps like William Morris Endeavor, he went to law and entertainment management firms. They were interested. So in 2023, Luke quit consulting to work with Rebekah and a third cofounder, Hirak Chhatbar, on building out their side hustle, Loti.
"We saw the desire for a product that fit this little spot, and then we listened to key industry partners early on to build all of the features that people really wanted, like impersonation," Luke says. "Now it's one of our most preferred features. Even if they deliberately typo the celebrity's name or put a fake blue checkbox on the profile photo, we can detect all of those things."
Using Loti is simple. A new client submits three real images and eight seconds of their voice; musicians also provide 15 seconds of singing a cappella. The Loti team puts that data into their system, and then scans the internet for that same face and voice. Some celebs, like Scarlett Johansson, Taylor Swift, and Brad Pitt, have been publicly targeted by deepfakes, and Loti is ready to handle that. But Luke says most of the need right now involves the low-tech stuff like impersonation and false endorsements. A recently-passed law called the Take It Down Act — which criminalizes the publication of nonconsensual intimate images (including deepfakes) and requires online platforms to remove them when reported — helps this process along: Now, it's much easier to get the unauthorized content off the web.
Loti doesn't have to deal with probabilities. It doesn't have to constantly iterate or get huge datasets. It doesn't have to say "real" or "fake" (although it can). It just has to ask, "Is this you?"
"The thesis was that the deepfake problem would be solved with deepfake detectors. And our thesis is that it will be solved with face recognition," says Luke, who now has a team of around 50 and a consumer product coming out. "It's this idea of, How do I show up on the internet? What things are said of me, or how am I being portrayed? I think that's its own business, and I'm really excited to be at it."
Related: Why AI is Your New Best Friend... and Worst Enemy in the Battle Against Phishing Scams
Will it all pay off?
All tech aside, do these anti-deepfake solutions make for strong businesses? Many of the startups in this space are early-stage and venture-backed, so it's not yet clear how sustainable or profitable they can be. They're also "heavily investing in research and development to stay ahead of rapidly evolving generative AI threats," says The Insight Partners' Mittal. That makes you wonder about the economics of running a business that will likely always have to do that.
Then again, the market for these startups' services is just beginning. Deepfakes will impact more than just banks, government intelligence, and celebrities — and as more industries awaken to that, they may want solutions fast. The question will be: Do these startups have first-mover advantage, or will they have just laid the expensive groundwork for newer competitors to run with?
Mittal, for her part, is optimistic. She sees significant untapped opportunities for growth that go beyond preventing scams — like, for example, helping professors flag AI-generated student essays, impersonated class attendance, or manipulated academic records. Many of the current anti-deepfake companies, she predicts, will get acquired by big tech and cybersecurity firms.
Whether or not that's Reality Defender's future, Colman believes that platforms like his will become integral to a larger guardrail ecosystem. He compares it to antivirus software: Decades ago, you had to buy an antivirus program and manually scan your files. Now, these scans are just built into your email platforms, running automatically. "We're following the exact same growth story," he says. "The only problem is the problem is moving even quicker."
No doubt, the need will become glaring at some point soon. Farid at GetReal imagines a nightmare like someone creating a fake earnings call for a Fortune 500 company that goes viral.
If GetReal's CEO, Matthew Moynahan, is right, then 2026 will be the year that gets the flywheel spinning for all these deepfake-fighting businesses. "There's two things that drive sales in a really aggressive way: a clear and present danger, and compliance and regulation," he says. "The market doesn't have either right now. Everybody's interested, but not everybody's troubled." That will likely change with increased regulations that push adoption, and with deepfakes popping up in places they shouldn't be.
"Executives will connect the dots," Moynahan predicts. "And they'll start saying, 'This isn't funny anymore.'"
Related: AI Cloning Hoax Can Copy Your Voice in 3 Seconds—and It's Emptying Bank Accounts. Here's How to Protect Yourself.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Critics Rock Trump Administration For Posting 'Delusional' And 'Backwards' Meme
President Donald Trump has promised to revive the coal industry, and the Energy Department is serving notice that it's ready to move forward. The tweet on the Energy Department's official X feed shows a piece of coal and a Wendy Williams phrase that's become a meme: Trump has long promoted coal and other fossil fuels, and he has a grudge against most forms of clean energy. He famously despises windmills, but also isn't fond of solar ― nor does he like green-powered vehicles such as electric cars, despite briefly promoting former friend Elon Musk's Tesla vehicles at a White House event this year before the two fell out. Trump has also declared a national emergency to fast-track new energy production ― specifically nuclear, oil, gas, and coal. He seems to favor coal in particular, signing multiple executive orders to help the industry since taking office. Critics fired some clean burns back at the agency:
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk, a social media powerhouse, boosts fortunes of hard-right figures in Europe
ROME (AP) — Hard-right commentators, politicians and activists in Europe have uncovered a secret to expanding their influence: engaging with Elon Musk. Take the German politician from a party whose own domestic intelligence agency has designated as extremist. Her daily audience on X surged from 230,000 to 2.2 million on days Musk interacted with her posts. She went on to lead her party to its best-ever electoral showing. Or the anti-immigration activist in Britain, who was banned from Twitter and sentenced to 18 months in prison for contempt of court. Since Musk let him back on the platform in late 2023, he's mentioned, reposted or replied to the billionaire more than 120 times on X — and gained nearly a million followers. Even a little-known social-media influencer turned politician from Cyprus has benefited from the Musk effect. Before winning a surprise seat in the European Parliament, where he's advocated for Musk, the influencer seemed to have one ambition: to hug the world's richest man. He got his hug — and political endorsements. On days Musk has interacted with his account on X, the man's audience exploded from just over 300,000 to nearly 10 million views. Elon Musk may have tumbled from political grace in Washington -- he stepped down as an adviser to President Donald Trump in May and has since traded insults with the president -- but as he works to build his own political party, his power on X his power remains unchecked. Musk's influence on the platform he bought for $44 billion has made him a kingmaker at home and abroad. Among those he has chosen to cultivate are hard-right politicians and insurgent influencers across Europe, according to an Associated Press analysis of public data. His dominance, which has real-world financial and political impacts, is fueling concerns in Europe about foreign meddling -- not from Russia or China this time, but from the United States. 'Every alarm bell needs to ring,' said Christel Schaldemose, a vice president of the European Parliament who works on electoral interference and digital regulation. 'We need to make sure that power is not unbalanced.' In seeking to quantify Musk's effect on European politics, The Associated Press analyzed more than 20,000 posts over a three-year period from 11 far-right European figures across six countries who frequently promote a hard-right political or social agenda and had significant interactions with Elon Musk since he purchased Twitter. Tens of thousands of posts by Musk on Twitter, now known as X, were also collected. The AP used the records, obtained from data provider Bright Data, to analyze how Musk's account interacted with the European influencers, and vice versa, and the extent to which Musk's engagement boosted their reach. These case studies are not meant to be representative of a broad universe; rather, they showcase the ways in which Musk's engagement can have an impact on local influencers who share his views. Due to limitations on data collection, the dataset is not a complete record of all posts made by these accounts. Even so, it captured at least 920 instances in which one of the European accounts tagged, replied or otherwise attempted to interact with Musk's account, and at nearly 190 instances where Musk's own posts interacted with the Europeans. The AP also analyzed records of daily follower counts, using data from Social Blade, to measure any growth in the European accounts' audience that occurred in the wake of Musk's online interactions. This kind of analysis is no longer possible. In March, Social Blade removed X from its analytics, saying that X had increased its data access fees to prohibitive levels, making the platform harder to research. Among those included in AP's analysis are several people who have run into legal trouble in their own countries. An anti-immigrant agitator in the U.K., for example, was sentenced in October to 18 months in prison for violating a court order blocking him from making libelous allegations against a Syrian refugee. A German politician was convicted last year of knowingly using a Nazi slogan in a speech. An Italian vice premier was acquitted in December of illegally detaining 100 migrants aboard a humanitarian rescue ship. Others examined by AP were an influencer known as the 'shieldmaiden of the far-right;' a German activist dubbed the 'anti-Greta Thunberg' now living in what amounts to political exile in Washington, D.C.; and two politicians who have advocated for the interests of Musk's companies as those firms seek to expand in Europe. AP's analysis shows how Musk is helping unite nationalists across borders in common cause to halt migration, overturn progressive policies and promote an absolutist vision of free speech. While his efforts have sparked backlash in some countries, Musk's promotion of a growing alliance of hard-right parties and individuals has helped rattle the foundation of a transatlantic bond that has guided U.S. and European relations for over eight decades. Engagement from Musk does not guarantee a surge in followers or page views. But AP found it can have a huge impact, especially on up-and-coming influencers. One account that began with around 120,000 followers when Musk took over Twitter in October 2022 topped 1.2 million by January of this year. Seven other European accounts saw six-figure increases in their follower counts over the same period. Most of the 11 accounts examined saw triple-digit percentage increases in their followers. Even some that grew more steadily on their own before Musk interacted with them saw their follower counts rise sharply after he began engaging with their posts. Similarly, on days Musk interacted with a post, its account saw its views soar — in most cases, accruing two to four times as many views, with a few seeing boosts 30 or 40 times their normal daily viewership. Musk is not the only factor influencing the growth of these accounts, of course, but their rising fortunes are a measure of how the platform has evolved under his leadership. When Musk acquired X, he pledged to turn it into a haven for free speech, declaring himself a 'free speech absolutist.' AP's analysis adds to growing evidence that instead of serving as a neutral forum for free speech, X amplifies Musk's speech. This shift has given him sweeping power to direct people's attention. 'There's an extreme asymmetry in the way Musk is able to leverage and shape the platform,' said Timothy Graham, an associate professor in digital media at the Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia, who has studied data anomalies on X. 'There's an unequivocal sense when you go onto the site that you're entering Musk's kingdom.' Musk's megaphone: Bigger than Trump and Taylor Swift Since he acquired Twitter in 2022, Musk has come to dominate the platform. His followers have more than doubled, to more than 220 million — growth so tremendous that it easily outpaced the other Top 10 accounts. Not even Taylor Swift has been able to keep up. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose followers grew by 21 million — or 25% — from October 2022 through January, clocked a distant second. Donald Trump's followers grew by 14%, or around 12 million, while Taylor Swift mustered a mere 3% growth, or 3 million new followers. None of the other Top 10 accounts have shown such consistent follower growth, month after month, AP found. The result is a further concentration of power for the world's richest man, who now commands the most popular account on a social media platform used by hundreds of millions of people around the world. Given the opacity of the algorithms that power X, it's hard to determine with certainty what array of factors might be driving such unusual — and unusually consistent — growth in Musk's account. But researchers who have analyzed data patterns on X argue that the platform's algorithm has, at times, been altered to amplify Musk's voice. How X promotes content is a growing point of contention in Europe. In January, the European Union expanded its investigation of X to assess how the platform pushes content to users and why some material goes viral. In February, French prosecutors opened a separate investigation into X over allegations that Musk changed the platform's algorithms to promote biased content. Musk's public attacks on left-leaning politicians, support for hard-right policies and loose handling of facts have prompted rebukes from British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, former German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, French President Emmanuel Macron, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, Italian President Sergio Mattarella, and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre. X did not respond to requests for comment. Musk is X's kingmaker Musk's dominance creates a strong incentive for people seeking to increase their clout — or their revenues, through the platform's monetization options — to exploit these network effects and try to get Musk to engage with their content. 'People know that he's gearing everything towards him,' said Graham, the digital media scholar in Australia. 'They're doing everything they can to get close to this person because he is the moneymaker.' Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, for example, has benefited from the Musk effect. AfD coleader Alice Weidel helped lead the party, which advocates for nationalist and anti-immigrant policies, to second place in German parliamentary elections in February. When Musk interacted with her account in the run-up to those elections, the average number of daily views she got rose from about 230,000 to 2.2 million. Germany's domestic intelligence agency in May classified Weidel's party as a right-wing extremist organization, which would subject the AfD to greater surveillance. The party, which maintains that it's a victim of politically motivated defamation, promptly filed a lawsuit against the move, which Musk, along with top U.S. officials blasted as an attack on free speech. The designation has been suspended pending judicial review. The AfD denies any association with Germany's Nazi past — though, in a chat with Musk livestreamed on X in January, Weidel falsely described Hitler as a 'communist, socialist guy.' The chat has gotten 16 million views. Musk also appeared at AfD rallies and endorsed the party in a German newspaper. AfD officials did not respond to requests for comment. Naomi Seibt, a German climate skeptic, pinged Musk nearly 600 times between October 2022 and Jan. 2025. Musk finally engaged in June 2024, when he asked her to explain why the AfD is so controversial in Germany. Since then, Musk has replied to, quoted or tagged Seibt more than 50 times, and her followers have grown by more than 320,000 since Musk took over the platform. On days Musk interacted with Seibt, her posts, on average, got 2.6 times as many views. 'I didn't intentionally 'invade' Elon's algorithm,' Seibt told AP. 'Obviously Elon has a lot of influence and can help share a message even with those who are usually glued to the legacy media, particularly in Germany.' Seibt said she's now living in the United States because she fears political persecution in Europe. 'Washington DC is the political heart of America and thus also the safest place for me to be,' she said. 'I fear the German state wants me locked up.' Musk has also boosted the influence of political insurgents in the U.K. Days before British national elections last July, Musk took to X to ask Nigel Farage, the leader of the populist Reform U.K. party: 'Why does the media keep calling you far-right? What are your policies?' Farage replied eagerly: 'Because we believe in family, country and strong borders. Call me!' Such interactions from Musk helped Farage more than triple his daily audience. Farage did not reply to requests for comment. In Spain, Rubén Pulido, a columnist for a newspaper published by the populist Vox party's think tank, hit the jackpot in August, when Musk responded to two posts in which he argued that rescue boats operated by nongovernmental organizations effectively help smugglers move migrants to Europe. Pulido's visibility soared. On days Musk engaged with him, his account got nearly 300,000 views — roughly three times more than usual. When Musk didn't interact with Pulido's account, the results were just as clear. In January, he again inveighed against migrant rescues and sought to get Musk's attention. 'Hi @elonmusk! Speak up,' he urged. Three weeks later, he tweeted: 'Perhaps @elonmusk might find this interesting.' That post garnered just 5,128 views. Pulido did not respond to requests for comment. While Musk helped boost the accounts of such fringe parties and rising influencers, his interactions did not provide as stark a benefit to more established politicians, AP found. That was true for both Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose ruling Brothers of Italy party has neo-fascist roots, and Dutch politician Geert Wilders, an anti-Islamic firebrand who has been called the Dutch Donald Trump. What happens on X doesn't always stay on X Musk's interactions online have spilled into political endorsements, policy advocacy -- and money. X helps users monetize their accounts, through ad revenue sharing and paid subscription programs as well as direct fundraising links. That means a surge in attention on X can bring a surge in revenue. Tommy Robinson, a British anti-immigration agitator who was released from prison in May, after serving a reduced sentence of seven months for contempt of court, has a link to his fundraising page on his X profile. Interactions from Musk more than doubled Robinson's daily views, from around 380,000 to nearly 850,000. Robinson — whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon — could not be reached for comment Radio Genoa, an account reportedly investigated by Italian authorities last year for allegedly spreading hate speech about migrants, used X to publicize a call for a GoFundMe campaign to raise money for legal defense. Radio Genoa has pinged Musk dozens of times over the last three years, and for good reason: On days Musk engaged with him, the views on his account doubled. Radio Genoa's followers surged from less than 200,000 before Musk's engagement to over 1.2 million. Radio Genoa could not be reached for comment. Eva Vlaardingerbroek -- a conservative Dutch political commentator dubbed the 'shieldmaiden of the far-right' whose account Musk has engaged with three dozen times -- uses X to solicit tips and has creator status, which allows her to charge subscription fees. So does Seibt, the German activist -- though she told AP her earnings from X aren't enough to sustain herself. Vlaardingerbroek did not respond to requests for comment. Musk has also advocated for Matteo Salvini, vice premier of Italy and the leader of the hard-right, anti-migrant League party. On X, Musk's interactions boosted Salvini's daily visibility more than fourfold. Offline, Salvini has urged Italy to move ahead with controversial contracts for Starlink and pushed back against EU efforts to regulate content on X. Before Fidias Panayiotou — a 25-year-old social media influencer from Cyprus with no political experience — won a surprise seat as an independent in the European Parliament last year, he spent weeks camped outside Twitter and Space X headquarters in a highly publicized quest to hug the world's richest man. In January 2023, his wish came true. Their embrace went viral. Soon, Musk was interacting with Panayiotou's posts on a variety of subjects, expanding his typical audience on X by more than 3,000%. Since taking his seat, Panayiotou -- whose positions often also reflect the views of Cyprus' traditional leftist establishment -- has praised X on the floor of the European Parliament, pushed back against regulations that impact the platform, and credited Musk with sparking his call to fire 80% of EU bureaucrats. Musk, evidently, was pleased. 'Vote for Fidias,' he posted on X, an endorsement that was viewed more than 11.5 million times. 'He is smart, super high energy and genuinely cares about you!' In July, after AP asked for comment, Panayiotou posted a video to dispel any impression that he was Musk's puppet. 'I don't have any relationship with Elon Musk,' he said. 'We haven't spoken at all since we hugged, neither through messages, nor by phone, and I've never invited him anywhere.' He said that Musk, unprompted, began reposting his content after he was elected to the European Parliament. 'I don't think it's a danger to democracy honestly that Elon Musk supports me,' Panayiotou explained in another video. 'I think this is the beauty of democracy.' __ Kessler reported from Washington. Menelaos Hadjicostis in Nicosia and Suman Naishadham in Madrid contributed to this report. —- Contact AP's global investigative team at Investigative@ or Erika Kinetz And Aaron Kessler, The Associated Press
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Key things to know about how Elon Musk has boosted hard-right figures in Europe
ROME (AP) — Elon Musk may have tumbled from political grace in Washington, D.C., but as he seeks to build a new political party, his power on X — where he commands the most popular account — remains unchecked. Musk is a kingmaker on the platform he acquired in 2022 for $44 billion. He has used his influence to cultivate hard-right politicians and insurgent activists across Europe. A retweet or reply from Musk can lead to millions of views and tens of thousands of new followers, according to an Associated Press analysis of public data. That fact has not been lost on influencers who have tagged Musk persistently, seeking a reply or a retweet. It has also fueled concerns in Europe about foreign meddling -- not from Russia or China, but from the United States. 'Every alarm bell needs to ring,' Christel Schaldemose, a vice president of the European Parliament who works on electoral interference and digital regulation, told AP. The Associated Press analyzed more than 20,000 posts, which were compiled by Bright Data, over a three-year period from a sample of 11 European figures who had significant interactions with Musk and frequently promote a hard-right political or social agenda. These case studies are not meant to be representative of a broad universe; rather they showcase the ways in which Musk's engagement can have an impact on local influencers that share his views. Musk has sweeping power to direct attention on X Since acquiring Twitter in October 2022, Elon Musk's followers have more than doubled, to over 220 million. No other large account has shown such high or consistent growth. The result: If Musk's X account is his megaphone, it has gotten a lot bigger since he took over -- a change that has global implications. The accounts Musk has been promoting are part of a growing global alliance of nationalistic parties and individuals united in common cause to halt migration, overturn progressive policies and promote an absolutist vision of free speech, which has rattled the foundation of a trans-Atlantic bond that guided U.S. and European relations for over eight decades. Several of the accounts AP analyzed belong to people who have faced allegations of illegal behavior in their own countries. Tommy Robinson, an anti-immigrant agitator in the U.K., was sentenced in October to 18 months in prison for violating a court order blocking him from making libelous allegations against a Syrian refugee. Bjoern Hoecke, a politician from Germany's Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) party, was convicted last year of knowingly using a Nazi slogan in a speech. Italian vice premier Matteo Salvini was acquitted in December of allegations he illegally detained 100 migrants aboard a humanitarian rescue ship Among the others examined by AP: Alice Weidel, who helped lead Germany's Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) party to its best electoral showing this year; Eva Vlaardingerbroek, a Dutch influencer known as the 'shieldmaiden of the far-right'; Naomi Seibt, a German activist dubbed the 'anti-Greta Thunberg' now living in what amounts to political exile in Washington DC; Rubén Pulido and Foro Madrid, both associated with Spain's populist Vox party; and Fidias Panayioutou, a politician from Cyprus who has also advocated for Musk's companies. These accounts collectively gained roughly 5 million followers from the time Musk took over Twitter in October 2022 through January of this year. Most saw triple-digit percentage increases in their followers -- as high as 920%, or in one case of a tiny account exploding over that time, topping 6,000%. Even some accounts that grew more steadily on their own saw their follower counts sharply begin rising once Musk started interacting with them. Similarly, on days Musk interacted with a post, the number of views the account got soared — in most cases, accruing two to four times as many views, with a few seeing boosts 30 or 40 times their normal daily viewership. More established players in Musk's orbit -- like Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose ruling Brothers of Italy party has neo-fascist roots — benefit less when Musk interacts with them on X, AP found. Attention seekers know that getting Musk to engage can be transformative Musk's dominance creates a strong incentive for people to get Musk to engage with their content. Naomi Seibt, a German climate skeptic, pinged Musk nearly 600 times over the past three years. Musk finally engaged in June 2024, when he asked her to explain why the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party is so controversial in Germany. Since then, Musk has replied to, quoted or tagged Seibt more than 50 times, and her followers have grown by more than 320,000 since Musk took over the platform. On days Musk interacted with Seibt, her posts, on average, got 2.6 times as many views. 'I didn't intentionally 'invade' Elon's algorithm,' Seibt told AP. 'Obviously Elon has a lot of influence and can help share a message even with those who are usually glued to the legacy media, particularly in Germany.' Musk's online influence has real-world political and financial impact Alice Weidel, who helps lead the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, saw her daily audience surge from 230,000 to 2.2 million on days Musk interacted with her posts on X. After Musk hosted a livestream with Weidel on X, vice president JD Vance broke protocol and met her in Munich. Weidel's party, which is fighting a lawsuit to block the German government's decision to designate it as an extremist group, went on to secure its best electoral showing ever. Musk has also used X to advocate for the leader of Italy's hard-right League party, Matteo Salvini. On days Musk interacted with Salvini's account, average views were more than four times higher than usual. Now serving as vice premier, Salvini has urged his government to move ahead with controversial contracts for Starlink and pushed back against European efforts to regulate content on X. And Musk has a friend in Brussels: Fidias Panayiotou — a 25-year-old social media influencer from Cyprus. Before winning a surprise seat in the European Parliament last year, the Cypriot spent weeks on a quest to get Elon Musk to hug him. In January 2023, his wish came true. Their embrace went viral. Since taking office, Panayiotou has praised X on the floor of the European Parliament, pushed back against regulations that impact the platform, and credited Musk with sparking his call to fire 80% of EU bureaucrats. Musk, evidently, was pleased. 'Vote for Fidias,' he wrote on X. 'He is smart, super high energy and genuinely cares about you!' The endorsement has been viewed 11.5 million times. —- Kessler reported from Washington —- Contact AP's global investigative team at Investigative@ or Erika Kinetz And Aaron Kessler, The Associated Press