logo
This Morning Trick Can Boost Focus in Just 5 Minutes, According to Doctors

This Morning Trick Can Boost Focus in Just 5 Minutes, According to Doctors

Yahoo6 hours ago

This Morning Trick Can Boost Focus in Just 5 Minutes, According to Doctors originally appeared on Parade.
Getting up in the morning can be a struggle, especially when you're feeling extra-groggy with a long to-do list. Luckily, engaging in a few early-morning activities can give your brain a boost and help you feel alert enough to take on the day.The groggy morning feelings are due to sleep inertia, which is a temporary disorientation, drowsiness or cognitive impairment when you rouse from sleep, and it usually lasts about 30 minutes, according to the Sleep Foundation. Most people experience sleep inertia to some degree, but it's often more common for people who don't get enough sleep. 'The brain does need a little boost first thing in the morning because you're transitioning from sleep mode to awake mode,' explains , a family physician in Salem, Ohio, who focuses on geriatric health and longevity. You might think that pouring yourself a big cup of coffee will do the trick. And while it certainly can, what you really need is an activity that helps you transition from sleep to getting into the swing of your day, Dr. Sevilla says. There are actually several activities that you can do in the morning to get your brain going and boost focus throughout the day. 🩺SIGN UP for tips to stay healthy & fit with the top moves, clean eats, health trends & more delivered right to your inbox twice a week💊
If you're feeling groggy and in desperate need of the power to focus, try splashing cold water on your face. An older small study found that when people splash their faces with chilly water after a nap, five minutes afterward, they performed just as well on a memory search task as those who didn't nap. Related: The Mid-Morning Habit Neurologists Are Begging You to Never, Ever DoTaking a cold shower could have a similar effect. Research suggests that immersing yourself in cold water can help you feel more attentive and alert. Dr. Sevilla says he switches to cold water at the end of his morning shower, explaining, 'This really helps me become more alert for the day ahead.'
Not a cold water fan? We don't blame you! And we have other options for you. They include:
Mornings are usually quiet. So, taking a few minutes to meditate lets you focus on yourself and start your day off right, says director of the neuroscience program at St. Michael's College in Colchester, Vermont. She suggests surrounding yourself with calming music and positioning yourself in a comfortable space. 'You have time, and you're doing your meditation, the things that make you happy,' she says.
Getting sunlight exposure within 30 minutes to an hour of waking up can ignite your brain, Dr. Sevilla says. A small 2023 study suggested that morning bright light helped office workers, who spend most of their days indoors, feel more alert; they also slept better at night.
Taking a walk outside will help you get moving and give you sunlight exposure, Dr. Sevilla says. Another idea is to incorporate yoga into your meditation practice, Dr. Fabian-Fine says. Exercise has been shown to give you energy and boost alertness, two things you need first thing in the morning. Related: Want To Lose Weight? Here's the One Thing Dietitians Are Begging You To Do When You Wake Up
Eating prebiotic-rich foods, like oats, slightly green bananas, flaxseeds and cooked starchy vegetables for breakfast will give you 'fermentable fibers' that nourish healthy gut bacteria, says Dr. Hariom Yadav, Ph.D., an associate professor of neurosurgery and brain repair and director of the Center for Microbiome Research at the University of South Florida in Tampa. He suggests also incorporating probiotics, such as yogurt, kefir and fermented foods, which will support gut health—and also brain health.
New research, co-authored by Dr. Yadav and published in Nature Scientific Reports, found that consuming probiotics restores balance to the gut microbiome and reduces inflammation in the body, including the brain. This could help activate your brain in the morning, and also potentially lower your risk for dementia later on.
Mornings can be chaotic. You're probably trying to get yourself and everyone in your household ready, grabbing breakfast and checking your phone, while getting out the door on time. But Dr. Fabian-Fine advises taking it slowly to recharge yourself. Too much multitasking means 'we're overloading our brains constantly,' she says. Related: I'm a Neuroscientist and I Like To Start My Mornings With This Surprising Habit
Many people grab their phones as soon as they wake up and immediately start scrolling social media. Dr. Sevilla says this is something you should avoid, as it can stress you out rather than support your brain. Activities like doomscrolling 'set you up for conditions like chronic fatigue, because you constantly need that quick rush of dopamine by constantly reading social media or the internet,' he adds. Too often, people 'take their brain health for granted,' Dr. Fabian-Fine says. Taking some time for yourself in the morning and participating in brain-healthy activities will help you focus throughout the day and keep your brain healthy long term.
Up Next: Mike Sevilla, MD, a family physician in Salem, Ohio, who focuses on geriatric health and longevity
Ruth Fabian-Fine, Ph.D., director of the neuroscience program at St. Michael's College
Hariom Yadav, Ph.D., an associate professor of neurosurgery and brain repair and director of the Center for Microbiome Research at the University of South Florida
Sleep Inertia: How to Combat Morning Grogginess, Sleep Foundation
The alerting effects of caffeine, bright light and face washing after a short daytime nap, Clinical Neurophysiology
Short-Term Head-Out Whole-Body Cold-Water Immersion Facilitates Positive Affect and Increases Interaction between Large-Scale Brain Networks, Biology
Shine light on sleep: Morning bright light improves nocturnal sleep and next morning alertness among college students, Journal of Sleep Research
Does exercise really boost energy levels? Harvard Medical School
Protection of Alzheimer's disease progression by a human-origin probiotics cocktail, Scientific Reports
This Morning Trick Can Boost Focus in Just 5 Minutes, According to Doctors first appeared on Parade on Jun 29, 2025
This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 29, 2025, where it first appeared.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Which Immunoglobulin Route Best Prevents Infections?
Which Immunoglobulin Route Best Prevents Infections?

Medscape

time20 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Which Immunoglobulin Route Best Prevents Infections?

TOPLINE: In patients with inborn errors of immunity who are prone to viral infections, immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) administered via the conventional subcutaneous route showed lower viral infection rates than the intravenous and facilitated subcutaneous routes. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a cross-sectional study to compare the incidence of viral infections among immunocompromised patients who had been receiving IRT via different administration routes for more than 5 years. They included 58 patients (56.8% boys; median age, 17 years; median age at diagnosis, 11.5 years) with inborn errors of immunity. The intravenous route was the most common route of immunoglobulin administration (n = 32), followed by the conventional subcutaneous (n = 16) and facilitated subcutaneous (n = 10) routes. Patients underwent monitoring of immunoglobulin levels and had nasal swab collected monthly, with viral infections recorded when symptoms such as runny nose, cough, or fever were present. Infections from different immunoglobulin administration routes were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction testing of nasal swabs and serum immunoglobulin levels using nephelometry. TAKEAWAY: The overall viral infection frequency was 3.79%, with rates of 4.2% for the intravenous route, 2.5% for the conventional subcutaneous route, and 4.4% for the facilitated subcutaneous route of immunoglobulin administration. The conventional subcutaneous route associated with significantly lower infection rates than the other routes (P < .05). Adenovirus (21.8%), influenza A virus (16.4%), and human rhinovirus/enterovirus (16.4%) were the most frequently detected viral agents. At 3 months, patients with X-linked agammaglobulinemia (6.06%) and those with common variable immunodeficiency (3.65%) had the highest rates of viral infections. IN PRACTICE: 'Shared decision-making between patients and healthcare professionals is critical in determining the most appropriate administration route and product to minimize the risk of infections and achieve optimal treatment outcomes,' the authors wrote. SOURCE: The study was led by Hulya Kose, Department of Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey. It was published online on May 30, 2025, in the European Journal of Pediatrics. LIMITATIONS: This research had limitations due to the small sample size within specific patient subgroups. DISCLOSURES: The study did not receive any specific funding. The authors declared having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Designates Four Nutrients of Public Health Concern Validating Glucose Health, Inc. (OTC: GLUC) Patent Pending Soluble Fiber-Based Nutrition Formulation
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Designates Four Nutrients of Public Health Concern Validating Glucose Health, Inc. (OTC: GLUC) Patent Pending Soluble Fiber-Based Nutrition Formulation

Associated Press

time31 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Designates Four Nutrients of Public Health Concern Validating Glucose Health, Inc. (OTC: GLUC) Patent Pending Soluble Fiber-Based Nutrition Formulation

BENTONVILLE, Ark., June 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Glucose Health, Inc. (OTC: GLUC), a publicly traded company specializing in diabetic nutrition and soluble fiber-based nutrition products, today commented on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) official recognition and designation of dietary fiber as a nutrient of public health concern in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–20251. Dietary fiber is one of four nutrients identified by HHS and USDA as critically under-consumed, to the detriment of the well-being of Americans. This federal designation of public health concern underscores a significant public health deficiency and is expected to drive increased government funding of dietary fiber awareness campaigns leading to follow-on demand for dietary fiber-based nutrition solutions. Among the companies best positioned to benefit from the designation issued by HHS and USDA is Glucose Health, Inc., which began scientific formulation and product development of its now patent pending soluble fiber-based nutrition products in 2017. Glucose Health, Inc.'s flagship diabetic nutrition brand GlucoDown® is a dietary fiber-infused nutrition drink scientifically formulated to support balanced glucose levels particularly after meals. GlucoDown® competes in the diabetic nutrition category and is found on the shelves of national pharmacy chains alongside products such as Glucerna® (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott, ABT) and Boost® (Nestlé USA, Inc., Nestlé S.A., Nestlé, NSRGY). GlucoDown® offers health-conscious consumers a differentiated focus on providing dietary fiber's established metabolic benefits via a refreshing beverage offered in powdered drink flavors and iced teas. Glucose Health, Inc. also utilizes a variant of its patent pending formulation in its brand Fiber Up®, a delicious-tasting powdered beverage dietary fiber supplement targeting digestive and gut health. Scientifically formulated to compete with Metamucil® (The Procter & Gamble Company, P&G, PG), Fiber Up® builds upon the company's mission to make fiber supplementation effective and enjoyable. 'The federal government's recognition of dietary fiber as a nutrient of public health concern validates what has been our core mission since 2017' said Murray Fleming, CEO of Glucose Health, Inc. 'We anticipated this public health priority and began development work formulating GlucoDown® and Fiber Up® to give consumers effective but still flavorful ways to contribute to their overall metabolic health. We believe Glucose Health, Inc. is uniquely positioned at the intersection of evolving public health priorities and anticipated rising consumer demand.'Investor Contact: Investor Relations [email protected] OTC: GLUC

CCHR wants electroshocking children prohibited under child abuse laws
CCHR wants electroshocking children prohibited under child abuse laws

Associated Press

time36 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

CCHR wants electroshocking children prohibited under child abuse laws

LOS ANGELES, Calif., June 30, 2025 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — Child and adolescent psychiatrists have issued a policy statement urging broader access to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for children and adolescents despite growing international condemnation of the practice on minors. Both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Human Rights Office have called for an outright ban on ECT for children, explicitly stating: 'ECT is not recommended for children, and this should be prohibited through legislation.'[1] The Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR), a mental health industry watchdog, condemned the statement as 'medically reckless, legally dangerous, and morally indefensible.' CCHR is demanding federal and state lawmakers move urgently to outlaw the electroshocking of children, classifying it as a form of child abuse. ECT, also known as shock treatment, sends up to 460 volts of electricity through the brain to induce a grand mal seizure. This disruption of the brain's electrical activity alters its structure and function, an especially serious risk to the developing brains of children. Yet child psychiatrists not only call for expanded use of ECT on minors but also oppose 'any efforts—legal, legislative, and otherwise—to block access to ECT.' Through US Freedom of Information Act requests, CCHR uncovered that children as young as five have been electroshocked. The full scope remains hidden due to the lack of national transparency requirements on ECT usage. Internationally, some countries have already banned ECT entirely (e.g., Slovenia and Luxembourg). In the U.S., California prohibits it under age 12, and Texas under 16. In Western Australia, ECT on minors under 14 is illegal, with criminal penalties—including jail time—for administering it to children. CCHR was instrumental in helping secure that law, along with state bans in the US. Disturbingly, a child and adolescent psychiatry group has also called for more research involving ECT on youth, potentially exposing children under age 13 to an unproven and highly invasive procedure. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) restricts its use to individuals aged 13 and older for limited diagnoses. The psychiatry group's statement fails to disclose that brain damage is a known risk of ECT. Yet, the American Psychiatric Association concedes that 'ECT can result in persistent or permanent memory loss.' The joint WHO/UN report adds: 'People being offered ECT should also be made aware of all its risks and potential short- and long-term harmful effects, such as memory loss and brain damage.' [2] In June 2024, the California Supreme Court ruled that an ECT device manufacturer must warn doctors of the risks of brain damage and permanent memory loss.[3] In 2018, a US District Court judge found there was sufficient evidence for a jury to conclude that an ECT device could cause brain injury.[4] Neuropathologist Dr. Bennet Omalu—known for discovering chronic traumatic encephalopathy ( brain diseases or damage) in football players—publicly condemned ECT, stating: ' The amounts of electrical energy introduced to the human brain by ECT machines can be nothing but harmful and dangerous…. The patient who receives ECT therapy will manifest permanent and cumulative brain injury, which can be progressive over time and result in chronic encephalopathies and brain degeneration.' [5] Despite pediatric psychiatry's claim that ECT is 'safe and effective,' the FDA has never required manufacturers to prove ECT's safety or efficacy through clinical trials.[6] Internationally renowned researcher Prof. John Read reports that only 11 placebo-controlled trials of ECT have ever been conducted—all prior to 1985, and all deeply flawed. 'None found any benefit beyond the end of treatment,' he stated. Further, children's developing brains are 'particularly susceptible to the memory loss caused by ECT.' [7] Legal precedent exists for holding professionals and psychiatric facilities accountable for misleading parents about the safety and nature of treatment. In June 2024, an Arizona jury awarded $2.5 million in punitive damages to the family of a teen girl who suffered coercion and abuse at a troubled teen treatment facility. They successfully argued that they were misled by marketing materials portraying the program as therapeutic and safe, when it was abusive.[8] CCHR says that this same legal framework must apply to misleading promotion of ECT's benefits to desperate parents. Failing to disclose the full risks of ECT should be subject to the same scrutiny and liability as cases in the troubled teen treatment industry. CCHR asserts that electroshocking should not only be banned nationwide, but if administered to children, should be held accountable under child abuse laws. Jan Eastgate, president of CCHR International, stated, 'The electroshocking of children is without moral or scientific justification and should be indefensible under the law. As international bodies condemn it, and legal rulings establish precedent for holding programs accountable for misleading parents, the U.S. must act. We urge lawmakers at all levels to ban ECT, especially on minors, and define it as a form of child abuse.' CCHR, which was established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and professor of psychiatry, Dr. Thomas Szasz, recommends parents watch its documentary, Therapy or Torture: The Truth About Electroshock, with expert opinions about how ECT damages minds. To learn more, visit: Sources: [1] World Health Organization, OHCHR, 'Guidance on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation,' pp. 58 & 59 [2] [3] [4] 'ECT Litigation Update: Are Patients Being Warned of Brain Damage Risk?' MAD, 13 June 2019 [5] [6] [7] [8] MULTIMEDIA: Image link for media: Image caption: Through US Freedom of Information Act requests, CCHR uncovered that children as young as five have been electroshocked. The full scope remains hidden due to the lack of national transparency requirements on ECT usage. NEWS SOURCE: Citizens Commission on Human Rights Keywords: AP, ban ECT, child abuse laws, ECT usage, Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR International, electroshock, Jan Eastgate, LOS ANGELES, Calif. This press release was issued on behalf of the news source (Citizens Commission on Human Rights) who is solely responsibile for its accuracy, by Send2Press® Newswire. Information is believed accurate but not guaranteed. Story ID: S2P127282 APNF0325A To view the original version, visit: © 2025 Send2Press® Newswire, a press release distribution service, Calif., USA. RIGHTS GRANTED FOR REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY ANY LEGITIMATE MEDIA OUTLET - SUCH AS NEWSPAPER, BROADCAST OR TRADE PERIODICAL. MAY NOT BE USED ON ANY NON-MEDIA WEBSITE PROMOTING PR OR MARKETING SERVICES OR CONTENT DEVELOPMENT. Disclaimer: This press release content was not created by nor issued by the Associated Press (AP). Content below is unrelated to this news story.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store