
Why Leaders Want To Make America Great At Energy Storage
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 14: U.S. President Donald Trump, accompanied by senior staff, including ... More Energy Secretary Chris Wright. Wright has echoed Trump's enthusiasm for natural gas, citing the inability of wind and solar energy to provide similar baseload power. (Photo by)
The Trump Administration is skeptical about green energy, to put it mildly. The remarks of U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright at CERAWeek 2025, the most influential energy conference in the U.S., summarized one of the key reasons, "Beyond the obvious scale and cost problems, there is simply no physical way that wind, solar, and batteries could replace the myriad uses of natural gas." While this statement highlights one of the limits to scaling renewables, there are still several reasons for U.S. industry to make a concerted effort to remain at the forefront of battery storage. Although currently unable to support a wholesale energy transition, battery storage can help reduce electricity costs, compete with rivals technologically, and ensure that Chinese interests are excluded when batteries are powering critical infrastructure and industries.
Balancing electricity demand and supply is crucial for grid resiliency. Too much or too little power can lead to blackouts and damage infrastructure. This is why renewables face a unique challenge called intermittency — their energy generation depends on natural phenomena such as clouds, wind strength, or time of the day, that don't align with electricity demand.
Energy storage can mitigate these uncertainties by storing the excess energy produced by renewables during peak hours for use when the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow. However, keeping energy costs down is a challenge. Storage is key to reducing the cost of energy for consumers and businesses by storing energy when prices are low and discharging it during peak electricity demand hours when prices are high – whether that energy is produced by renewals or natural gas. In California, for example, the increase in storage capacity has reduced curtailment, a term for diminished solar generation, and stabilized electricity pricing.
Energy storage also plays a vital role in enhancing energy security. First, it provides backup power during emergencies, ensuring that critical infrastructure, such as hospitals, emergency services, and communication networks, remains operational. This is especially important during extreme weather events and potential cyberattacks. Secondly, it is a pivotal technology for the U.S. to maintain its energy dominance and stay ahead in the renewable energy race.
China's production of lithium batteries presents an economic and security threat to the United ... More States, making it imperative that the U.S. develops its own manufacturing capacity. (Photo by AFP) / China OUT (Photo by STR/AFP via Getty Images)
Currently, Chinese lithium batteries are among the best in the market, contributing to Beijing's leadership in the renewables sector and the electric vehicle industry. This opens the U.S. and other countries to geoeconomic and security risks should providers opt to use Chinese utility-scale batteries. If the U.S. does not develop better indigenous energy storage, it risks ceding its manufacturing and energy leadership to China and opening electrical grids to disruption.
These factors are expected to drive record-high investments in energy storage in 2025. European countries are investing €80 billion to expand battery capacity by 2030. China, the global leader in renewable investments, is projected to quadruple its battery storage capacity in 2025 according to reported projections from Wood Mackenzie. The U.S. is set to add a record 18.2 GW of utility-scale battery storage in 2025. It is not only developed markets but also emerging ones that are anticipated to make substantial investments, with Saudi Arabia notably taking 7th place globally in capacity addition. Other emerging markets, such as Turkey and Bulgaria, are also expected to see significant investments. As the cost of batteries continues to fall, demand will rise, and global competition in the battery sector will follow.
As demand for large-scale storage rises, countries are competing to enhance their capacity, which drives the development of innovative technologies. Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries lead the market, but lithium extraction presents social and environmental concerns, in addition to geopolitical challenges. China, Australia, and Chile account for 90% of lithium production globally. Many companies are looking for both alternative suppliers and new technologies that address Li-ion's limitations, like its comparatively short lifespan.
Energy Vault, for example, is one of the leading companies in gravity-based storage, offering a longer lifespan than lithium batteries and scalability across different regions and topographies, unlike hydroelectric power. This system stores energy by lifting heavy composite blocks to an elevated position using surplus electricity. The stored potential energy is released by lowering the blocks, which powers a generator via gravity.
A gravity-based energy storage tower, constructed by Energy Vault, is used for grid scale ... More operations, demonstrating an alternative to lithium-Ion batteries.
Another company looking to offer an alternative is Quidnet Energy, which is working on Geomechanical Energy Storage (GES) to achieve a longer lifespan and a more cost-effective solution. This approach stores energy by pumping water into underground rock formations under high pressure. When energy is needed, the pressurized water flows through a turbine to generate electricity, similar to pumped hydro but utilizing underground reservoirs instead of surface-level infrastructure.
As battery prices have dropped significantly, solar energy is now cheaper than ever, and these technologies are expected to become less expensive over time. As renewables expand globally, the U.S. risks falling behind in this race unless companies invest in energy storage. Even as America shifts its focus toward hydrocarbons and exports, advancing energy storage technology must remain a priority. While the current battery storage may not be a suitable replacement for hydrocarbons or nuclear, it is a strategic necessity for maintaining competitiveness both technologically and geopolitically.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock Market Today: Nasdaq Rebounds On China Trade Talk Hopes; These New IPOs Shine As Dutch Bros Breaks Out (Live Coverage)
Stock Market Today: The Dow Jones rose Thursday on a call between Trump and Chinese leader Xi. Tesla stock skidded in early trading.


Atlantic
28 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.
Ukraine's drone strikes deep into Russia delivered a humiliating blow to Moscow last weekend. Kyiv's defenders celebrated the attack as a triumph of modern warfare and a warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin. But the extraordinary operation got a different response inside the White House: anger. Donald Trump has openly vented in recent weeks about Putin's unwillingness to end the war. But since Sunday's attack, which hit a series of Russian military airfields, the president has privately expressed frustration that the strike could escalate the conflict, according to three administration officials and an outside adviser to the White House. (They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.) These sources told me that the drone strike has reignited the president's long-held displeasure with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and prompted a new debate in the White House about whether the United States should abandon Ukraine. Throughout the war, Trump has deemed Zelensky a 'bad guy' and a 'hothead,' the outside adviser said—someone who could be pushing the globe toward World War III. Trump privately echoed a right-wing talking point this week by criticizing Zelensky for supposedly showboating after the drone attacks; according to the adviser, Trump was impressed with the audacity of the strikes but believes that Zelensky's focus should have been on Ukraine-Russia negotiations in Istanbul. Trump spoke with Putin yesterday, and, in a readout of the call on Truth Social, the U.S. president relayed the Kremlin's plans to strike back against Ukraine. 'We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides,' Trump wrote. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' Trump did not say whether he had warned Putin against retaliating, and two of the administration officials told me that he has not decided on his next steps. Officials have presented him with options that include sanctioning Russia and reducing American aid to Ukraine. Meanwhile, Trump told aides this week that he does not believe a summit with him, Zelensky, and Putin—which he once hoped would be a way to bring the war to a close—will happen any time soon, one of the administration officials told me. Trump, who on the campaign trail last year vowed to end the war within his first 24 hours in office, made a renewed push for a peace deal last month. While Zelensky agreed to an immediate cease-fire, Putin rejected the offer and ratcheted up his bombing of Ukrainian cities. That led Trump to threaten to walk away from peace talks, and to flash some rare ire at Putin. The president had hoped that some progress would be made in this week's talks in Turkey, but the meeting was overshadowed by the drone strikes and went nowhere. The White House has said that the U.S. was not told in advance about the surprise attack, which was carried out by drones hidden across five of Russia's time zones that hit nuclear-capable bombers and inflicted billions of dollars in damage, according to a preliminary estimate from the White House. Steve Bannon and other influential MAGA voices have berated Ukraine for the attack and are attempting to push Washington further from Kyiv. On his podcast this week, Bannon blamed Ukraine for, in his view, sabotaging peace talks while potentially provoking a massive response from Russia. 'Zelensky didn't give the president of the United States a heads-up to say he's going to do a deep strike into strategic forces of Russia, which is going up the escalatory ladder as quickly as you can, on the day before your meeting in Turkey?' Bannon said. 'On the eve of peace talks or cease-fire talks, he takes the Japanese role in Pearl Harbor—the sneak attack.' Bannon has conveyed similar messages to senior West Wing advisers, a fourth administration official told me. Keith Kellogg, Trump's Ukraine envoy, warned on Fox News that 'the risk levels are going way up' because the drones struck part of Russia's 'national survival system'—its nuclear program—potentially pushing Moscow to retaliate in significant ways. Trump has not increased aid to Ukraine since taking office again in January, and he has yet to endorse a bipartisan Senate push, led by his ally Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, to impose harsh economic penalties against Russia and countries that do business with it. There have been other recent signs that the White House is distancing itself from Ukraine, too. Yesterday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not attend a meeting of 50 defense ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels. In the past, the meeting has been an important venue for coordinating military aid for Ukraine. Hegseth was the first U.S. defense secretary to skip the event in three years. The Pentagon cited scheduling issues for his absence. When I asked a White House spokesperson for comment about the drone strikes, she pointed me to Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's briefing-room remarks on Tuesday, when Leavitt said that Trump 'wants this war to end at the negotiating table, and he has made that clear to both leaders, both publicly and privately.' In public remarks about the strikes, Putin downplayed the chances of a cease-fire, asking, 'Who has negotiations with terrorists?' But Zelensky told reporters that the operation over the weekend, code-named Spider's Web, would not have been carried out if Putin had agreed to a U.S.-proposed truce. 'If there had been a cease-fire, would the operation have taken place?' Zelensky asked. 'No.' Exasperated with the conflict, Trump continues to muse about walking away from any sort of diplomatic solution. In his Truth Social post about his call with Putin, the president seemed eager to change the subject to focus on ending a different international crisis. 'We also discussed Iran,' Trump wrote about ongoing talks regarding Tehran's nuclear ambitions. 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion.'


Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
Musk Digs Up Trump's 12-Year-Old Tweet To Attack His Policy Bill
Elon Musk directly jabbed President Donald Trump over his policy bill Thursday— in his most pointed attack on Trump himself—over the legislation Musk has previously mostly blamed Republican lawmakers for. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the ... More White House in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2025. (Photo by ALLISON ROBBERT/AFP via Getty Images) Musk reposted a 2013 tweet from Trump that said he was in disbelief and 'embarrassed' Republicans were extending the debt ceiling, captioning the repost 'wise words.' Trump on Wednesday said the debt limit should be 'entirely scrapped' as a provision of his 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which would raise the debt ceiling ahead of its expected expiration date in August. This is a developing story and will be updated.