Idaho legislator wants to amend indecent exposure law after pride celebration in Nampa
A Nampa legislator wants to amend Idaho's indecent exposure law after receiving complaints about Canyon County Pride.
Idaho law currently defines indecent exposure as the exposure of someone's genitals in any public place. It's a misdemeanor on the first offense, and a felony on the second offense within five years.
Rep. Jeff Cornilles, R-Nampa introduced a bill to the House State Affairs Committee on Tuesday to add to that law, also making it a misdemeanor to show the following in public spaces:
Developed female breasts, not including those of someone breastfeeding a child
Adult male breasts that have been medically or hormonally altered to appear like developing or developed female breasts
Artificial breasts
Toys or products intended to resemble male or female genitals
The committee voted on party lines to introduce the bill for a hearing at a later date, with both of its Democrats voting against moving the bill forward.
Rep. Todd Achilles, D-Boise, explained his vote, saying it targets four different groups of people.
'This explicitly targets trans Idahoans in terms of the language,' he said. 'Two, anyone with breast surgery is going to be targeted on this. Three, plastic surgeons are also targeted because they counsel people that get surgery. And fourth, anyone with a set of truck nuts hanging off of their rig is also going to be caught up in this thing for indecent exposure.'
In June 2024, LGBTQ+ event organizers hosted an inaugural Canyon County Pride at Lakeview Park in Nampa, which included musicians and drag performers.
'There were a few individuals who attended last year who wore nipple pasties (which is legal within the Nampa City Code),' Canyon County Pride President Tom Wheeler told the Sun. 'This year, we will require everyone to wear a shirt.'
The event was quick to become controversial within the Canyon County community, attracting protesters the day of the event. Nampa Mayor Mayor Debbie Kling even issued a press release saying the event went against her and the Nampa City Council's beliefs, but the city's lawyer said they had to respect the organizers' First Amendment rights, the Washington Post reported.
Cornilles said Nampa City Councilmember Sebastian Griffin would testify in support of the bill.
Wheeler said this year's festival has already been approved, and his team is hoping to have an even more successful year, tripling security measures, attendance and fundraising efforts. Canyon County Pride received official nonprofit status this year, and the event will showcase over 50 local art and resource booths, Wheeler said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's Smithsonian criticism contrasts with 2017 praise
President Trump has changed his tune on the Smithsonian's depiction of America's past since he visited the National Museum of African American History in 2017. Following that visit to the newly opened museum, Trump was full of praise. 'It's a new, beautiful Smithsonian Museum that serves as a shining example of African Americans' incredible contributions to our culture, our society, and our history,' Trump said months into his first term. 'It also tells of the great struggle for freedom and equality that prevailed against the sins of slavery, and the injustice of discrimination. The work and love of the people who helped create such a masterpiece is a testament to the legacy of so many leaders,' he added. The president added in the February 2017 remarks that 'nothing' was more importnat than his promise to continue 'freedom for African Americans and for every American.' 'This tour was a meaningful reminder of why we have to fight bigotry, intolerance and hatred in all of its very ugly forms,' he added. Those comments returned to the spotlight on Tuesday after Trump announced a review of the Smithsonian's museums for what he called a 'woke' lens on American history. 'The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been — Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future,' the president wrote in a Tuesday Truth Social post. 'We are not going to allow this to happen, and I have instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities where tremendous progress has been made,' Trump wrote. 'This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE.' Trump has declared museum exhibitions must be brought into 'alignment' with his objective to 'celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.' The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History removed an exhibit earlier this month referencing Trump's two impeachments, drawing fire from Democrats. Trump also forced out National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet, the first woman to helm the institution. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) slammed Trump's latest comments during a Tuesday appearanc e on CNN. 'Is he a publicist for slavery, like a lobbyist on behalf of slavery?' he asked. 'It doesn't make any sense that he would want to erase one of the ugliest things that's ever happened in America and educate our children, especially about how we make sure it doesn't happen again.' David Axelrod, a former top Obama advisor, remarked on the notable contrast between first-term and second-term Trump. 'I find myself weirdly nostalgic for the @POTUS Trump who once recognized 'the great struggle for freedom and equality that prevailed against the sins of slavery,' and the value and importance of enshrining that history at the Smithsonian,' Axelrod wrote on X. 'Now he wants to expunge it.'
San Francisco Chronicle
17 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Obama applauds Newsom's California redistricting plan as 'responsible' as Texas GOP pushes new maps
Former President Barack Obama has waded into states' efforts at rare mid-decade redistricting efforts, saying he agrees with California Gov. Gavin Newsom's response to alter his state's congressional maps, in the way of Texas redistricting efforts promoted by President Donald Trump aimed at shoring up Republicans' position in next year's elections. 'I believe that Gov. Newsom's approach is a responsible approach. He said this is going to be responsible. We're not going to try to completely maximize it,' Obama said at a Tuesday fundraiser on Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts, according to excerpts obtained by The Associated Press. 'We're only going to do it if and when Texas and/or other Republican states begin to pull these maneuvers. Otherwise, this doesn't go into effect.' While noting that 'political gerrymandering' is not his 'preference,' Obama said that, if Democrats 'don't respond effectively, then this White House and Republican-controlled state governments all across the country, they will not stop, because they do not appear to believe in this idea of an inclusive, expansive democracy.' According to organizers, the event raised $2 million for the National Democratic Redistricting Committee and its affiliates, one of which has filed and supported litigation in several states over GOP-drawn districts. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Eric Holder, who served as Obama's attorney general and heads up the group, also appeared. The former president's comments come as Texas lawmakers return to Austin this week, renewing a heated debate over a new congressional map creating five new potential GOP seats. The plan is the result of prodding by President Donald Trump, eager to stave off a midterm defeat that would deprive his party of control of the House of Representatives. Texas Democratic lawmakers delayed a vote for 15 days by leaving the state in protest, depriving the House of enough members to do business. Spurred on by the Texas situation, Democratic governors including Newsom have pondered ways to possibly strengthen their party's position by way of redrawing U.S. House district lines, five years out from the Census count that typically leads into such procedures. In California — where voters in 2010 gave the power to draw congressional maps to an independent commission, with the goal of making the process less partisan — Democrats have unveiled a proposal that could give that state's dominant political party an additional five U.S. House seats in a bid to win the fight to control of Congress next year. If approved by voters in November, the blueprint could nearly erase Republican House members in the nation's most populous state, with Democrats intending to win the party 48 of its 52 U.S. House seats, up from 43. A hearing over that measure devolved into a shouting match Tuesday as a Republican lawmaker clashed with Democrats, and a committee voted along party lines to advance the new congressional map. California Democrats do not need any Republican votes to move ahead, and legislators are expected to approve a proposed congressional map and declare a Nov. 4 special election by Thursday to get required voter approval. Newsom and Democratic leaders say they'll ask voters to approve their new maps only for the next few elections, returning map-drawing power to the commission following the 2030 census — and only if a Republican state moves forward with new maps. Obama applauded that temporary timeline. 'And we're going to do it in a temporary basis because we're keeping our eye on where we want to be long term,' Obama said, referencing Newsom's take on the California plan. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach, designed to address a very particular problem in a very particular moment in time.'
Fox News
18 minutes ago
- Fox News
'Full of s---': New York Republican accuses state Dems of hypocrisy in redistricting push
A House GOP lawmaker from New York is accusing Democratic leaders in his state of having a hypocritical response to redistricting efforts in Texas and other red states. Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., one of three House Republicans nationwide who won a district that President Donald Trump lost in 2024, has been vocal about his opposition to the growing redistricting war across the U.S. "I think obviously across the board, you know, I don't agree with this effort," Lawler told Fox News Digital of the push in both red and blue states. "But I think we also have to look at this holistically – New York did mid-decade redistricting last year." "So, for [Gov.] Kathy Hochul and Democrats like [House Minority Leader] Hakeem Jeffries and [Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer to decry what's happening in Texas, they're full of s---. They literally did it last year." The method for drawing congressional maps does vary between states, with some relying more on their state legislatures, while others – like New York – rely on advice from independent bodies known as redistricting commissions. The Empire State's bipartisan redistricting commission approved a new map in early 2024 that largely affected three congressional seats in upstate and central New York – two of which flipped from red to blue in last year's elections, while the third remained in Democratic hands. It came after New York State's highest court ordered new congressional maps to be drawn for the 2024 election, in what was regarded as a major victory for Democrats after they lost a number of suburban seats in the 2022 midterms. Two of those seats have since flipped back to blue in last year's races, though they saw no significant changes in the latest re-draw. "New York redrew its maps, getting a bogus court order to do so after stacking the Court of Appeals…in an effort to pick up five seats. They picked up four," Lawler said, referencing the four total seats Democrats won in 2024 that they lost in 2022. "So for them to act as though they are holier than thou and that they didn't actually do this first is laughable. And when you look at Texas, you know they legally can do it. New York legally cannot. And that's the difference." Lawler warned, however, that the growing redistricting fight could have negative implications for representation across the country. "When you look at these congressional seats, I mean, they've become so hyperpartisan that there's very few districts that are actually competitive," he said. "I think the larger point is that the American people should want more competitive races, because it forces members of Congress to make sure that they are appealing to a broader swath of voters in their districts. If they only have to worry about a primary to get elected, then they're only playing to the base instead of the broader middle." Lawler said he would soon be introducing a bill to ban partisan gerrymandering nationwide, as part of a larger package aimed at fixing what he saw as longstanding issues with Congress. "There's also other reforms as part of it that I think are essential, including term limits for members of Congress. And, you know, when you're talking about the census, you know, illegal immigrants should not be counted as part of the census – lawful permanent residents and legal, you know, visa holders, among others, should be – but illegals should not be," Lawler said. "I think most Americans agree with that. So there's a number of provisions that will be part of the legislation that I'm putting together." When reached for comment on Lawler's criticism, Viet Shelton, spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), told Fox News Digital, "We know Lawler never minds bending the knee to Donald Trump, but did he forget that Trump demanded Texas Republicans redraw their congressional map to steal seats because they know their party can't win on the merits? Stop whining." The interview comes as Texas is readying to adopt a new congressional map that could give Republicans as many as five new seats in the 2026 midterms. California leaders have pledged to press for new maps to give Democrats a corresponding advantage, while a host of states on both sides, including New York, are signaling that they're also not ruling out similar moves. Fox News Digital reached out to spokespeople for Jeffries, Schumer, and Hochul for comment but did not hear back.
