logo
Trapped in the Crossfire: Indian workers bore the brunt of the Israel-Iran conflict

Trapped in the Crossfire: Indian workers bore the brunt of the Israel-Iran conflict

Russia Today9 hours ago

When sirens wailed across Israeli cities and missiles from Iran struck Israeli territory, about 150 Indian construction workers from the Bahraich district in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh found themselves caught in an increasingly dangerous situation, desperately seeking a way home.
The workers, who traveled to Israel over the past year seeking better economic opportunities, faced a harsh reality: trapped between the promise of steady income and the very real threat of becoming casualties in a regional conflict.
Sandeep, a resident of the Mihipurwa area, spoke to his family on the phone from Hadera, painting a grim picture of daily life under fire. 'Missiles are falling here, but we get alerts before they hit,' he explained to worried relatives back home. 'When the sirens start, we run to the bunkers and hide. These daily situations are affecting our work, and now we just want to come home.'
The situation created a painful dilemma for the workers and their families. While the income from Israel has provided unprecedented financial stability – with workers earning around 160,000 rupees (about $1863) per month, compared to much lower wages in rural India – the escalating violence made the cost of this prosperity potentially too high to bear.
Kamlavati, whose husband Gopal has been working in Israel for a year, captured the anguish felt by families back home. 'My husband has been working safely in Israel for a year, and in this situation, we demand from the government that he be sent back home safely,' she said. 'Because now, seeing the conditions in Israel, we are getting scared.'
The irony of their situation is not lost on the families. Kamlavati described how the money from Israel has transformed their lives – they've been able to build a new home and provide better opportunities for their children. Her daughter has started attending school, while her younger son is still very small. But the fear for her husband's safety has overshadowed these material gains.
'We are getting money – he gets 160,000 rupees and keeps sending money home regularly, which helps run the household,' she explained. 'But now, seeing the new house being built doesn't feel good. We just want the children's father to come back.'
The workers are part of a larger Indian diaspora in Israel. According to Indian Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh, as of December 4, 2024, 6,583 Indian workers had reached Israel for employment, recruited by Israeli authorities and deployed across 195 Israeli companies. Of these workers, 2,325 were engaged in building construction, 1,906 in iron bending, 1,578 in plastering, and 774 in ceramic tiling – all essential skills for Israel's construction industry.
Mihipurwa has been particularly affected by this migration. Local official Shravan Kumar Madeshia revealed that 250 people from the area had filled out application forms for work in Israel, with 150 being selected and currently working there. This represents a significant portion of the area's working-age population, making tensions in West Asia a community-wide concern.
The families of brothers Sandeep and Sanjay exemplify the collective anxiety gripping the region. 'Both brothers have been living in Israel for a year, but now seeing the terrible war between Iran and Israel, we want our sons to return home safely,' their relatives said.
The conflict escalated dramatically before the countries agreed to a ceasefire on Tuesday.
Recent Iranian missile attacks hit residential areas in Tel Aviv, bringing the war directly to neighborhoods where many of the Indian workers live and work.
The tense environment presents a stark contrast to the hopes these workers had when they first arrived in Israel. For many from rural Uttar Pradesh, the opportunity to work in Israel represented a chance to escape poverty and provide for their families in ways that would have been impossible at home. The monthly salary is several times what they could earn in similar work in India.
However, the reality of living in a war zone has quickly overshadowed these economic benefits. The workers described a daily routine of constant vigilance – working while listening for air raid sirens, knowing that at any moment they might need to run for shelter. The psychological toll of this existence is evident in their desperate pleas to return home.
The absence of available flights made their situation even more precarious. Commercial aviation has been severely disrupted due to the conflict, with many airlines suspending or limiting services to and from Israel. This has left the workers with no clear path home, despite their growing desperation to leave.
The Indian government faces a delicate diplomatic challenge in the Middle East. India maintains strong relationships with both Israel and Iran, and has refused to join international condemnations of Israeli actions. New Delhi is accustomed to balancing ties with rival states during crises, but the most recent presented a particularly difficult test.
For the families in Bahraich, the geopolitical complexities matter little compared to their immediate concern: bringing their loved ones home safely. The transformation of their economic fortunes has come at an unexpected cost – the constant fear that their primary breadwinners might become casualties in a conflict that has nothing to do with them.
With hundreds of people requiring hospital treatment, the Indian workers found themselves in an increasingly untenable position. They were neither combatants nor civilians in the traditional sense, but economic migrants caught in the crossfire of a regional conflict.
During the recent crisis, when families in rural India waited anxiously for news from their loved ones, and workers huddled themselves in bunkers to the sound of sirens, one could not help but be reminded that in our interconnected world, no conflict is truly local, and its human toll extends far beyond the immediate theater of war.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Berlin planning a strike on Moscow? Merz wrote the justification
Is Berlin planning a strike on Moscow? Merz wrote the justification

Russia Today

timean hour ago

  • Russia Today

Is Berlin planning a strike on Moscow? Merz wrote the justification

Forget the fog of war. Even in war, and sometimes especially in war, some things are exceedingly clear. Regarding the so-called 'Hamas-Israel War', for instance, it is obvious that in reality it is not a war at all but a genocide, namely the Gaza Genocide, carried out by Israel against the Palestinians whose unbroken resistance will be the stuff of legends, and of history too. Likewise, in the case of Israel's current assault on Iran – really, of course, a combined US-Israeli attack from the get-go – there is no room for doubt that it is criminal and a 'blatant act of aggression,' as multiple experts in international law agree. That's because in essence, Israel is not acting with a UN mandate – which it would not have received – or in self-defense. The legal basis for this compelling assessment is not complex and there is no room for good-faith debate: Israel's attack violates Article 2 (4) of the foundational UN Charter, which is recognized universally as jus cogens, that is, a binding norm: no pick and choose. The few generally accepted, narrowly defined potential exceptions to this article's comprehensive prohibition on the use of force, such as an erroneous incursion, certain operations at sea, or a rescue of nationals, clearly do not apply. The Israeli onslaught also does not have the blessing of the UN Security Council, and it cannot possibly count as lawful self-defense under Article 51. So far, so simple. If anyone tries to make this look complicated by flagrantly misapplying and abusing the notion of a 'preemptive strike', you are dealing with Israeli or Israel-Lobby disinformation and propaganda. That too is anything but surprising. Yet what is more puzzling than the above is the response of the governments, and often the mainstream media of the West, to this clearly criminal Israeli attack. After years of invoking international law to go after Russia, it turns out that the same leaders and talking heads will tie themselves into 5-D pretzels to let Israel get away with whatever Israel feels like doing on any given day. This is not really news either, of course: Western 'elites', with Washington always in the lead, have behaved no better when serving as accomplices in Israel's Gaza Genocide. But there is something peculiar and noteworthy about how exactly some important Western politicians and their media and 'think tank' experts spin the attack on Iran. Take, for instance, Germany. Its chancellor Friedrich Merz has gone out of his way to loudly endorse the assault on Iran. He has even exposed himself to ridicule and some – if far too little – criticism by employing revoltingly indecent language. Calling Israel's actions 'dirty work' (it sounds even worse in the original German: 'Drecksarbeit') that must be done and for which we all should be grateful, Merz has revealed his double racism: As a German and a historian, I can only say that a German leader praising Jews for doing 'our' dirty work is, to put it very mildly, extremely boorish. Defining the criminal killing of Iranians as that 'dirty work' adds a very nasty 'colonial' flavor reminiscent of say, Kaiser Wilhelm II gloating over massacring Chinese during the so-called Boxer Rebellion. While Merz has been clumsy enough to couch his obnoxious ideas in equally obnoxious language, he has by no means been alone. All too many prestigious German publications, such as the staid Frankfurter Zeitung or the also important Merkur newspaper, have hurried to either simply agree with Merz or at least to excuse and relativize his vile statement. In addition, rather overworked all-purpose 'experts', such as the reliably conformist and rarara-russophobic Christian Mölling, have used their perma-perk in Germany's streamlined talk shows to cynically diminish international law and help dress up Israel's newest crime as so necessary that it trumps all law anyhow. Mölling was self-unaware enough to openly argue that some countries (read: Israel) can't afford the 'luxury' of accepting 'normative limits' and that international law, anyhow, might be 'protecting the wrong ones' (read: Iran). It's breathtakingly brazen and intellectually primitive, and also historically speaking, very German in the worst sense: If we or our friends (read: Israel) feel constrained by international law, then that's a problem not for us or our friends but for international law. And now, let's take a step back and think for a moment like a German who was not a conformist intellectual mediocrity: Enlightenment giant Immanuel Kant. For those with ears to hear and brains to process, Kant has taught us that reason and ethics demand that the justifications for our actions ought to be generalizable in good conscience. In short, when we act, we should be able to show that we are acting according to a fair and reasonable rule. Let's generalize into such a rule, then, what German leader Friedrich Merz has just said and what all too many German mainstream representatives agree with: A country (here: Israel) that feels sufficiently afraid (as judged by that country) of another country (here: Iran) has a right (that trumps international law) to attack that other country without provocation and even during ongoing negotiations. Interesting. Consider that German elites have been fanning war hysteria relentlessly. Not a day seems to go by without some German general, spy, or politician warning their fellow Germans that Russia is at least likely, really almost certain, to attack within the next five years or so. Evidence: zero. Indeed? So, if we are all supposed to be so afraid of Russia in Germany, does that now mean that according to Merzian logic we may as well one day launch a preemptive strike on Moscow? After all, we could then say we felt threatened and our military and the intelligence services were telling us that the Russians were coming. And moreover, we'd probably claim that we, the Germans, were proudly doing the 'Drecksarbeit' for all of NATO (minus, most likely, the US). And isn't doing the 'Drecksarbeit' now officially a good thing in Germany, again? Absurd, you say? Yes, absolutely. Exactly as absurd as Israel's pretexts for attacking Iran. And yet those have been officially endorsed by a German chancellor, including self-revealing dirty language. Let's hope that Moscow does not take seriously what Merz says. Because if Moscow did take it seriously, then by Merzian logic, it should feel very threatened indeed by Berlin – and again by Merzian logic, who knows where that might lead.

US and Israel dealt ‘colossal damage' to UN nuclear watchdog
US and Israel dealt ‘colossal damage' to UN nuclear watchdog

Russia Today

time4 hours ago

  • Russia Today

US and Israel dealt ‘colossal damage' to UN nuclear watchdog

The US and Israel have undermined the credibility of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) by using the agency's information to plan attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said. Israel launched strikes on Iran's nuclear and military infrastructure on June 13, a day after the IAEA's Board of Governors passed a resolution declaring Iran to be in breach of its Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) obligations – an accusation Tehran denies. Last week, the US carried out extensive airstrikes targeting three Iranian nuclear facilities. 'The fact that Iranian nuclear facilities under the control of the IAEA have become targets for American and Israeli missiles is an open challenge to the NPT,' Zakharova said in a press briefing on Wednesday. The UN nuclear watchdog's own resolutions declare attacks on nuclear sites illegal under international law. The attacks posed 'real obstacles' to implementing agreements between the IAEA and Tehran, she added. The credibility of the agency's global verification system, which was used as a source of information for planning the bombing, is in question. Therefore, the US and Israel are 'responsible for colossal damage to the IAEA's activities, no matter how hard they try to blame Tehran,' Zakharova said. According to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, European leaders pressured IAEA chief Rafael Grossi into publishing a negative report on Iran, which was later used to justify an IAEA Board of Governors resolution accusing the Islamic Republic of breaking the NPT. The West 'exerts very serious influence on international organizations,' and most of these bodies are no longer unbiased, he said on Tuesday. Grossi admitted just last week that the agency had found no evidence that Iran had a 'systematic plan' to build a nuclear weapon but expressed concern about Tehran enriching uranium to 60% purity. The fissile material needs to be enriched to 90% to be considered weapons grade. The Iranian Parliament has voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA until the Islamic Republic is given security guarantees for its nuclear facilities. The bill currently awaits ratification by the Supreme National Security Council to be made law. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that Tehran will also need to reconsider its NPT cooperation. 'Twenty years of transparency and trust-building regarding Iran's peaceful nuclear program' have not yielded results, and this issue will be addressed, he told New Arab on Tuesday.

No parallels between Israel-Iran and Ukraine conflicts
No parallels between Israel-Iran and Ukraine conflicts

Russia Today

time5 hours ago

  • Russia Today

No parallels between Israel-Iran and Ukraine conflicts

Israel's 'unprovoked' attack on Iran bears no comparison to the Ukraine conflict, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Thursday, rejecting an assessment made by the US special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff. Witkoff had suggested earlier that the recent ceasefire between Iran and Israel could serve as a model for ending the hostilities between Russia and Ukraine. 'We're hopeful that people look at what happened in Iran and say: 'we want a part of that sort of peace process as well,'' Witkoff told CNBC on Wednesday. 'This may well gravitate towards Russia and Ukraine.' Peskov firmly rejected the comparison, saying the two conflicts differ 'in their essence and nature.' 'The Israeli attacks on Iran were absolutely unprovoked,' he stated. In contrast, the launch of Russia's military operation in Ukraine had roots 'going back several decades,' Peskov noted, citing NATO's expansion toward Russian borders and its support for an 'armed coup' in Kiev in 2014. 'It is hardly appropriate to draw parallels here,' the Kremlin spokesman added, describing the notion of 'peace by force' as irrelevant to the Ukraine context. He argued that pressuring Russia into a ceasefire with Ukraine would be ineffective. Israel struck Iranian targets on June 13, claiming that Tehran was close to being able to build a nuclear weapon – an assertion disputed by both the International Atomic Energy Agency and US intelligence. The US joined the offensive, hitting Iranian nuclear sites, prompting Iran to retaliate with a missile strike on a US base in Qatar. A ceasefire was reached on Tuesday, reportedly on the initiative of US President Donald Trump. The Ukraine conflict escalated in 2022 after Kiev increased its shelling of civilians in the Donbass region in violation of the Minsk agreements, according to Moscow. Russia has also cited NATO's military presence in Ukraine and Kiev's ambitions to join the military bloc as key reasons for its military action, accusing Western countries of exacerbating the crisis by supplying arms to Kiev. Negotiations between Moscow and Kiev resumed in May after a nearly three-year hiatus. The two parties agreed to exchange prisoners and the remains of fallen soldiers. Draft peace proposals were exchanged earlier this month, but Peskov said discussions on those documents would not begin until the current humanitarian agreements are fulfilled.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store