Albanese and Rudd will have to sell very different messages on US beef ban's end
Anthony Albanese will be hoping so, but the decision to end import restrictions on beef from the United States presents his government with a delicate communications challenge. He must convince Australians the decision is entirely science-based while simultaneously leading Trump to believe the move is a response to his forceful advocacy for US cattle exporters.
The hamburger-scoffing president had beef on the brain when he stood in the White House Rose Garden in April to announce his liberation day tariffs. Australians, Trump said, were 'wonderful people' but 'they won't take any of our beef'.
'They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers and you know, I don't blame them, but we're doing the same thing right now starting at midnight tonight, I would say,' Trump fumed.
Trump's comments sparked fears of an imminent US ban on Australian beef that did not eventuate, but his grievance with Australian import rules permeated his administration.
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick blasted biosecurity measures that stopped American agricultural exports as 'nonsense', saying: 'One-point-four billion people in India and we can't sell them corn, Europe won't let us sell beef, Australia won't let us sell beef.'
Loading
Cattle ranchers are a key part of Trump's voting base. He is an avid beef eater who once marketed his own brand of steaks. He delights in eating McDonald's aboard his presidential jet.
The US has technically been able to export beef to Australia since 2019, but beef sourced from Canada or Mexico, and slaughtered in the US, had been banned because of disease concerns. The integrated nature of the US supply chain meant that little beef made its way to Australia (before even getting into the issue of whether Australians want to buy grain-fed American beef rather than our own grass-fed meat). That rule has now been scrapped.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
11 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Pauline Hanson calls out ‘gutless' Coalition senators who voted against net zero ditch
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson calls out the 'gutless' senators within the Coalition who voted alongside Labor on the net zero debate and those who abstained from voting. 'They're gutless and they're cowards because they couldn't put their name to it and they didn't want to,' Ms Hanson told Sky News host Danica De Giorgio. 'I take my hat off to Canavan … who actually supported the motion, we are fighting for the Australians out there … everyone that is doing it tough, because the net-zero is seeing them go under. 'It's just ridiculous, we are destroying our economy.'

Sydney Morning Herald
41 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Cambodia and Thailand agree to ceasefire after days of deadly clashes
Singapore: The leaders of Cambodia and Thailand have agreed to a ceasefire after five days of fighting that has claimed at least 35 lives, including civilians, and displaced more than 100,000 people on each side of the disputed borderlands. US President Donald Trump is likely to claim the truce as a personal diplomatic victory after phone calls to both prime ministers on the weekend warning that continued hostilities would hurt their negotiations with his administration over tariffs. As fighting continued in the border provinces on Monday – more than a day after Trump's demands for it to stop – Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet and Phumtham Wechayachai, Thailand's acting prime minister, flew to the neutral ground of Malaysia, this year's chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). They emerged from Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's residence in Kuala Lumpur after almost two hours having secured an 'immediate and unconditional' ceasefire. Both countries blamed the other for the fighting, which started on Thursday after almost two months of escalating rhetoric following a border skirmish on May 28 that left a Cambodian soldier dead. Thailand has accused Cambodia of breaching Geneva Conventions by firing heavy artillery at non-military targets, killing civilians, including children. Cambodia denied the claim and hit back with allegations that Thailand had dropped illegal cluster bombs. Thailand responded that it was not a party to the convention covering cluster munitions. The dispute, which is multi-generational with roots in colonial-era mapping, centres on the ownership of several ancient temples and strategic sites along ambiguous sections of the 800-kilometre border.

The Age
41 minutes ago
- The Age
Cambodia and Thailand agree to ceasefire after days of deadly clashes
Singapore: The leaders of Cambodia and Thailand have agreed to a ceasefire after five days of fighting that has claimed at least 35 lives, including civilians, and displaced more than 100,000 people on each side of the disputed borderlands. US President Donald Trump is likely to claim the truce as a personal diplomatic victory after phone calls to both prime ministers on the weekend warning that continued hostilities would hurt their negotiations with his administration over tariffs. As fighting continued in the border provinces on Monday – more than a day after Trump's demands for it to stop – Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet and Phumtham Wechayachai, Thailand's acting prime minister, flew to the neutral ground of Malaysia, this year's chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). They emerged from Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's residence in Kuala Lumpur after almost two hours having secured an 'immediate and unconditional' ceasefire. Both countries blamed the other for the fighting, which started on Thursday after almost two months of escalating rhetoric following a border skirmish on May 28 that left a Cambodian soldier dead. Thailand has accused Cambodia of breaching Geneva Conventions by firing heavy artillery at non-military targets, killing civilians, including children. Cambodia denied the claim and hit back with allegations that Thailand had dropped illegal cluster bombs. Thailand responded that it was not a party to the convention covering cluster munitions. The dispute, which is multi-generational with roots in colonial-era mapping, centres on the ownership of several ancient temples and strategic sites along ambiguous sections of the 800-kilometre border.