Altisource Q2 Revenue Up 11 Percent
- Revenue (GAAP) rose 11% to $43.3 million in Q2 2025, reflecting year-over-year improvement in Adjusted EBITDA across both major business segments.
- Net income turned positive at $16.6 million, driven by an $18.5 million one-time tax reserve reversal for India in Q2 2025.
- But underlying operating cash flow (non-GAAP) remained negative.
These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›
Altisource Portfolio Solutions (NASDAQ:ASPS), a provider of services and technology for the mortgage and real estate industries, published its Q2 2025 earnings on July 24, 2025. The most notable news was a sharp swing to positive net income (GAAP), largely due to a substantial tax benefit from reversing reserves tied to prior uncertainties with Indian tax positions. Revenue climbed 11% to $43.3 million, up from $39.1 million in the same quarter last year, with adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP) rising 23% to $5.4 million. With no available analyst consensus, it is not possible to gauge this quarter's results against Street expectations. Overall, the second quarter showed stronger service revenue and profitability compared to the same period in 2024, but the headline numbers were heavily influenced by non-operational gains and persistent cash outflows.
Metric Q2 2025 Q2 2024 Y/Y Change
Diluted EPS (GAAP) $1.48 ($2.33) $1.86
Adjusted Diluted EPS (Non-GAAP) $0.19 ($1.67) —
Revenue (GAAP) $43.3 million $39.1 million 11%
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) $5.4 million $4.4 million 23%
Net Income (GAAP) $16.6 million ($8.3 million) $24.9 million
Business Overview and Strategic Focus
Altisource is a specialized services and technology company concentrated in the mortgage, real estate, and loan origination markets. It offers a portfolio of technology platforms and business process services supporting mortgage servicing, property management, and mortgage origination. Key product lines include technology solutions such as Equator, a loan servicing platform, and RentRange, which provides data analytics for real estate investment.
Its growth strategy depends on deep relationships with major clients, technology-enabled solutions, and effective management of debt and overall financial leverage. One customer, Onity, accounts for a substantial portion of revenue, leading to client concentration risk. The company also emphasizes innovation in software-as-a-service (SaaS) and automation, while actively managing debt and seeking opportunities in evolving regulatory and market conditions.
Quarter Highlights: Revenue Growth, One-Off Gains, and Debt Moves
During Q2 2025, Altisource saw service revenue rise 11%, supported by improvements in Adjusted EBITDA in both the Servicer and Real Estate, and Origination segments. Service revenue increased by $3.9 million year over year, Segment-level margins increased slightly. However, gross margin on service revenue dipped from 34% in Q2 2024 to 32% in Q2 2025 (GAAP). This decline occurred despite top-line growth.
The most significant profit driver was the $18.5 million reversal of reserves related to uncertain Indian tax positions, including $9.6 million for taxes and $9.0 million for accrued interest. This non-operational item transformed the company's net income for the period; without it, adjusted net income would have been much lower at $2.2 million (non-GAAP). Excluding this effect, adjusted diluted earnings per share (non-GAAP) moved to $0.19 from a loss a year earlier, demonstrating improvement, but on a much smaller scale than the GAAP figures.
Debt reduction and restructuring were also major features. After a term loan exchange in Q1 2025, long-term debt consisted of a $160.0 million senior secured term loan and a $12.5 million super senior term loan, compared to $232.8 million at the end of 2024, aided by a $12.5 million Super Senior facility and $45.4 million in equity issued in exchange for debt. Net debt (non-GAAP) at quarter end was $142.2 million. This reduction is expected to lower annual GAAP interest expense to approximately $9.5 million, creating future savings in cash flow and improving the balance sheet. The company also implemented a 1-for-8 reverse stock split on May 28, reducing shares outstanding and altering share price dynamics.
Despite the positive headline results, operating cash flow (GAAP) remained negative at ($0.3) million for the quarter and ($5.3) million for the first six months of 2025. Negative cash flow from operations (GAAP) signals continued pressure on the ability to fund future investments internally, even as the company works to stabilize its financial base. Corporate and other segment losses offset improvements in the main business lines, underscoring ongoing challenges with cost discipline outside core operating units. No dividend was declared or paid during the quarter. ASPS does not currently pay a dividend.
Industry and Market Context
Market conditions during the quarter shaped Altisource's growth in important ways. The broader mortgage industry saw a modest pickup: foreclosure initiations were up 22% for the five months ended May 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, but volumes remain well below pre-pandemic levels, with foreclosure initiations still 22% lower than in 2019 and foreclosure sales 51% below that benchmark for the same period. Mortgage origination volumes rose 14% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, driven mainly by a 58 % jump in refinancing activity, while purchase activity fell slightly.
However, management noted that the current environment remains 'close to historically low' in terms of industry delinquencies, continuing to constrain organic growth for foreclosure- and default-related services, as referenced in recent disclosures. The company reported some wins in new business during the period, estimating annualized stabilized service revenue from sales wins of $1.1 million in its Servicer and Real Estate business and $3.3 million in Origination.
Technology remains a central theme, but the company reported no quantitative progress on platforms like Equator or in SaaS adoption metrics. Management continues to describe technology-enabled solutions as an area of focus, yet offered no new data to measure this area's contribution during the period.
Regulatory factors impacted results through the tax reversal in India—removing significant uncertainty and legal overhang. Though management underscored that regulation remains an ever-present aspect of operating in the mortgage and real estate services sector.
Outlook and What to Watch
Management offered no explicit financial guidance for the next quarter or the full year. Executives highlighted their expectation that higher industry defaults and foreclosure volumes would boost results in Altisource's most profitable business lines. They noted a weighted average sales pipeline between $36 million and $44 million in potential annualized service revenue, with the majority of future opportunities likely to be realized in 2026 and beyond.
The company remains focused on growing business lines with favorable industry trends, managing costs, and building financial flexibility following the recent debt restructuring. Investors may want to monitor whether operating cash flow can turn positive, how well sales pipeline wins convert to recurring revenues, and any changes in client concentration or major contract renewals.
Revenue and net income presented using U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) unless otherwise noted.
Where to invest $1,000 right now
When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,037%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500.
They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
JesterAI is a Foolish AI, based on a variety of Large Language Models (LLMs) and proprietary Motley Fool systems. All articles published by JesterAI are reviewed by our editorial team, and The Motley Fool takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this article. JesterAI cannot own stocks and so it has no positions in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Better Quantum Computing Stock: IonQ vs. Rigetti Computing
Key Points IonQ and Rigetti Computing have developed fundamentally different methods to create quantum computers. IonQ aspires to build the internet of the future while Rigetti focuses on commercializing its superconducting qubit technology. Neither IonQ nor Rigetti are profitable, although they have amassed large sums of cash to fund their operations. 10 stocks we like better than IonQ › The quantum computing industry is a promising area to invest in. Quantum machines can complete complex calculations in minutes that would take classical computers centuries, thanks to the power of quantum mechanics. In the sector, IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) and Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI) are among the prominent players. IonQ uses ions to power its quantum machines while Rigetti employs the traditional superconducting qubits process. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Both have seen impressive share price increases over the past year. IonQ stock is up over 400% through July 23 while Rigetti climbed more than 1,000% in that time. Is one a better investment in the nascent quantum computing field? Examining these businesses in more detail can help to arrive at an answer. Rigetti Computing's tried-and-true tech Rigetti uses a proven method of producing qubits. Qubits are a quantum device's equivalent to a classical computer's bit. But while bits represent a zero or one, the properties of quantum mechanics mean qubits can be both at the same time, enabling orders of magnitude faster processing speeds. Superconducting qubits offer several advantages. They can be manufactured using existing semiconductor chip processes, and can complete calculations faster than ion-based quantum machines. Rigetti hopes to gain greater commercialization with the latest version of its quantum computer, the Ankaa-3 system, which launched at the end of 2024. However, the technology isn't cheap. Superconducting qubits require special cryogenic equipment to keep temperatures colder than outer space. This is necessary for qubits to maintain stability long enough to perform calculations before they break down. As a result, the company exited the first quarter with an operating loss of $21.6 million on sales of $1.5 million. The loss is 30% greater than the previous year while Q1 revenue plunged 52% year over year. This combination of falling revenue and rising costs is unsustainable over the long run. That's why Rigetti executed a $350 million equity offering that helped it build up a stockpile of $575 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments with no debt as of June 11. This cash hoard should sustain the company's operations in the short term, but it will need to produce revenue growth to build a sustainable business. IonQ's lofty ambition to remake the internet IonQ's ion-based method holds several advantages over superconducting qubits. Its tech can operate at room temperature, eschewing the need for cryogenic equipment. The technology also offers low error correction rates. Because qubits quickly break down, quantum computers are prone to calculation mistakes that limit their ability to scale. IonQ's reduced error rates make scalability a possibility. Consequently, the company aims to construct a quantum computing network, reminiscent of the infrastructure that underpins today's world wide web. It pursued several acquisitions to achieve its goal of building "the next generation of the internet," in the words of IonQ Chairman Peter Chapman. But like Rigetti, IonQ's costs are rising. It posted a Q1 operating loss of $75.7 million, an increase from 2024's $52.9 million, on revenue of $7.6 million. So it, too, is pursuing an equity offering to the tune of $1 billion. In addition, IonQ believes it can hit revenue of $75 million to $95 million in 2025. This would be a strong increase over 2024, when sales soared 95% year over year to $43.1 million. Making the choice between IonQ and Rigetti Computing stock Although Rigetti's superconducting qubits technology is well established in the quantum computing industry, IonQ's approach is producing higher sales. On top of that, another factor to consider is share price valuation. This can be assessed using the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, a metric commonly used when companies are not profitable. Data by YCharts. The chart reveals Rigetti's P/S multiple has skyrocketed from where it was a year ago, and is far higher than IonQ's as well. This suggests Rigetti stock is overpriced, making IonQ the better value. That said, IonQ stock is not cheap, given it has a P/S ratio exceeding 200. While quantum computers hold the promise of revolutionizing the computing industry, whether IonQ or Rigetti's approach will win out in the end is far from certain. After all, quantum computing is still in its infancy. Its market size was just $4 billion in 2024, although industry estimates predict rapid growth to $72 billion by 2035. As of now, IonQ's 2024 sales success coupled with an outlook of 2025 revenue growth, and a far better valuation compared to Rigetti, make its stock the superior quantum computing investment between these two businesses. Ideally, wait for a dip in IonQ's share price, and for its Q2 results to validate it's on a trajectory to hit 2025 sales targets before deciding to pick up shares. Should you invest $1,000 in IonQ right now? Before you buy stock in IonQ, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and IonQ wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
Canada News.Net
3 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Starmer, Modi hail long-sought India-UK free trade deal
LONDON, U.K.: In a significant step forward for post-Brexit Britain and rising global power India, Prime Ministers Keir Starmer and Narendra Modi on July 24 concluded a long-awaited free trade agreement that will dramatically reduce tariffs on key goods and deepen economic and strategic cooperation between the two countries. The signing took place at Chequers, the British Prime Minister's official country residence, where trade ministers Jonathan Reynolds of the U.K. and Piyush Goyal of India formalized the pact. The deal, years in the making, was hailed as a turning point in bilateral relations and a symbol of renewed ambition on both sides. Starmer described it as "the most substantial and economically transformative trade agreement" the United Kingdom has entered into since its departure from the European Union in 2020. Modi, echoing the sentiment, called it "a historic day" in India–U.K. relations. Alongside the trade pact, the two nations unveiled nearly six billion pounds (US$8 billion) in new commercial and investment commitments across strategic sectors such as artificial intelligence, aerospace, dairy, and clean energy. Both leaders pledged closer collaboration in defense, climate action, healthcare, and migration policy. The deal, which still requires ratification by the British Parliament, has been in negotiation since early 2022. Talks were launched initially under then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who ambitiously promised a conclusion by the Diwali festival that year. However, negotiations saw multiple delays under the former Conservative government, only gaining new momentum after the 2024 elections, which saw Modi win re-election and Labour come to power under Starmer. Under the agreement, India's average tariff on British exports will drop sharply from 15 percent to three percent. Notably, tariffs on Scotch whisky and English gin — long a sticking point — will be cut in half from 150 percent to 75 percent, and gradually reduced to 40 percent over a decade. Automotive tariffs, which currently exceed 100 percent, will fall to 10 percent under a tariff-rate quota system. The U.K. projects that the deal will boost bilateral trade by 25.5 billion pounds ($35 billion) annually by 2040 and inject nearly five billion pounds ($6.8 billion) a year into the British economy. Meanwhile, India's Trade Ministry has stated that 99 percent of Indian exports, including textiles, leather goods, and food items, will be granted duty-free access to the U.K. market. Beyond the numbers, the agreement underscores a renewed political and cultural closeness. Nearly two million people of Indian origin live in the U.K., a legacy of deep historical ties dating back to the colonial era, which ended in 1947. Starmer emphasized that shared heritage and people-to-people connections provide a strong foundation for a modern partnership. "The U.K. and India have unique bonds of history, of family and of culture," he said. "This deal marks the beginning of a new chapter — ambitious, modern, and built for the future." With a nod to the cricket rivalry currently playing out between the two nations, Modi added a lighthearted metaphor: "Cricket is a great symbol of our partnership. There may be a swing and a miss at times, but we always play with a straight bat. Together, we are building a high-scoring, enduring alliance." The agreement is seen not just as a bilateral milestone, but as a signal of Britain's growing pivot toward the Indo-Pacific and India's emergence as a central player in global trade diplomacy.
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Better EV Stock: Alphabet vs. Tesla (Hint: Robotaxis Are the Key)
Key Points The future of the auto industry lies in electric vehicles and ridesharing in autonomous vehicles. After many years in service, Waymo still can't point to a timeline of profitability. Tesla also faces challenges with its robotaxi offering, but it's well positioned, provided it can demonstrate safety and efficacy. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG)(NASDAQ: GOOGL) isn't, strictly speaking, an electric vehicle (EV) company. However, its autonomous driving technology company, Waymo, is committed to only using EVs in its fleet. Funnily enough, it could be argued that Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) isn't really a pure EV company either. After all, most of its sky–high valuation is attributable to the potential of its robotaxis. However, the comparison of these two as EV companies is valid because the future of the auto industry is EVs, and ridesharing in autonomous vehicles will be a larger part of the industry in the future. But which company is better placed, and which is the better stock? Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Alphabet vs. Tesla It's entirely possible that Alphabet could decide to spin off Waymo, not least because it reportedly could be valued at more than $45 billion. Meanwhile, one of Tesla's biggest supporters, Cathie Wood's Ark Invest, ascribes 88% of Tesla's enterprise value (market cap plus net debt) to robotaxis in its investment case for the stock, producing an expected value of $2,600 for the stock in 2029. As I have previously discussed, the Ark targets should be taken with a pinch of salt, as its track record on Tesla hasn't been good. However, Ark's core argument is sound and points to Tesla being potentially a far more valuable stock than Waymo ever will be. Pathways to profitability The core argument is that Tesla's business model is scalable to profitability while Waymo's is far less so. The issue of Waymo's profitability arose in a recent CNBC interview with Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana, where she was asked whether Waymo is profitable. She replied, "We're proving out that it can be a profitable business." When asked when Waymo would be profitable, she replied, "not clear." It's also not clear if Alphabet/Waymo doesn't have an internal forecast for when it will hit profitability, or if Mawakana preferred not to divulge what the company considers an uncertain forecast. However, it's inconceivable that Alphabet is not internally crunching the numbers on this, and if it does decide to spin off Waymo, it's a question that needs to be answered. The point here is that a business that can't be profitable isn't worth anything, let alone $45 billion, so at some point, its management is going to have to set some timelines. Tesla and timelines Whereas investors need to hear more about timelines from Waymo, whose public self-driving ride-hailing service was launched in 2018, there's probably a need for fewer declared timelines from Tesla, or, rather, a need for more accurate ones. For example, in 2019, CEO Elon Musk famously told investors to expect a million self-driving vehicles on the road by mid-2020. In April 2022, he also stated that Tesla aspired to reach volume production of a dedicated robotaxi (Cybercab) in 2024 -- a timeline that has now been pushed back to 2026. These timeline estimates matter because plugging overly optimistic assumptions from them into valuation models can produce dramatically erroneous conclusions. Why Tesla is better positioned With all that said, Tesla has clear advantages over Waymo, provided it can demonstrate safety and reliability and achieve regulatory approvals. Its advantages include: Lower vehicle costs, with Musk aiming for a $30,000 price tag for a dedicated robotaxi, the Cybercab. Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts estimate Waymo's current vehicles cost more than $120,000. In addition, Tesla manufactures its own cars (Waymo does not), and existing Teslas can be converted into robotaxis using Tesla's as-yet-unreleased-to-the-public unsupervised full self-driving (FSD) software, giving Tesla a significant advantage in scaling the robotaxi business. Tesla's use of camera-centric technology is inherently less expensive than Waymo's combination of cameras, light detection and ranging (Lidar) lasers, and high-definition maps. Every Tesla car (robotaxi or not) on the road is effectively a data gatherer, with the data used to improve the AI that powers its AI models. As such, even though Waymo was first, Tesla has significantly more data than Waymo. Which is the better EV stock? Waymo may become profitable in the future, particularly if Lidar costs continue to drop. However, it's challenging to think that it will be a strong competitor to Tesla, provided Musk's company can master safe, unsupervised FSD using a camera-centric approach. That's a big "if" at this stage, but it becomes a smaller "if" as time goes by and Tesla expands its nascent robotaxi offering across new geographies. Tesla's next robotaxi launch is expected to be in Phoenix, as it plans to continue slowly building its robotaxi business. I think Tesla is the better EV stock when comparing Tesla and Alphabet. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $449,961!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $40,603!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $636,628!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon. See the 3 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
