‘New ceasefire agreed' after clashes in Syria
A previous ceasefire announced the day before quickly fell apart.
The announcement came after Israel launched a series of rare air strikes in the heart of Damascus, part of a campaign that it said is intended to defend the Druze – who also form a substantial community in Israel – and to push Islamic militants away from its border.
Government soldiers stand next to confiscated items stolen during clashes in Sweida city (Omar Albam/AP)
The escalating violence has appeared to be the most serious threat yet to the ability of Syria's new rulers to consolidate control of the country after a rebel offensive led by Islamist insurgent groups ousted long-time despotic leader, Bashar Assad, in December, bringing an end to a nearly 14-year civil war.
As clashes have raged for days in the southern Syrian city of Sweida between government forces and Druze armed groups, Israel has launched dozens of strikes targeting government troops and convoys, and on Wednesday struck the Syrian Defence Ministry headquarters in the heart of Damascus.
That strike killed one person and injured 18, Syrian officials said. Another strike hit near the presidential palace in the hills outside Damascus.
Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said after the air strike in a post on X that the 'painful blows have begun'.
An Israeli military official said the army was preparing for a 'multitude of scenarios' and that a brigade, normally comprising thousands of soldiers, was being pulled out of Gaza and sent to the Golan Heights.
Syria's Defence Ministry had earlier blamed militias in the Druze-majority area of Sweida for violating a ceasefire agreement that had been reached on Tuesday, causing Syrian army soldiers to return fire.
It said they were 'adhering to rules of engagement to protect residents, prevent harm, and ensure the safe return of those who left the city back to their homes'.
Meanwhile, reports of attacks on civilians continued to surface, and Druze with family members in the conflict zone searched desperately for information about their fate amid communication blackouts.
The primarily Sunni Muslim leaders have faced suspicion from religious and ethnic minorities, whose fears increased after clashes between government forces and pro-Assad armed groups in March spiralled into sectarian revenge attacks.
Hundreds of civilians from the Alawite religious minority, to which Assad belongs, were killed.
Israeli soldiers stand guard as Syrian Druze protest near the Israeli-Syrian border (Leo Correa/AP)
In Jaramana near the Syrian capital, Evelyn Azzam, 20, said she fears that her husband, Robert Kiwan, 23, is dead. The newlyweds live in the Damascus suburb but Mr Kiwan would commute to Sweida for work each morning and got trapped there when the clashes erupted.
Ms Azzam said she was on the phone with Mr Kiwan when security forces questioned him and a colleague about whether they were affiliated with Druze militias. When her husband's colleague raised his voice, she heard a gunshot. Mr Kiwan was then shot while trying to appeal.
'They shot my husband in the hip from what I could gather,' she said, struggling to hold back tears. 'The ambulance took him to the hospital. Since then, we have no idea what has happened.'
The Druze religious sect began as a 10th-century offshoot of Ismailism, a branch of Shiite Islam.
More than half the roughly one million Druze worldwide live in Syria. Most of the other Druze live in Lebanon and Israel, including in the Golan Heights, which Israel captured from Syria in the 1967 Middle East War and annexed in 1981.
In Israel, the Druze are seen as a loyal minority and often serve in the military.
In Syria, the Druze have been divided over how to deal with the country's new leaders, with some advocating for integrating into the new system while others have remained suspicious of the authorities in Damascus and pushed for an autonomous Druze region.
On Wednesday, Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said in a statement that the Israeli army 'will continue to attack regime forces until they withdraw from the area — and will also soon raise the bar of responses against the regime if the message is not understood'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
20 minutes ago
- The National
If Lindsay Hoyle has nothing to hide, he should release his emails
LINDSAY Hoyle, the Speaker of the House of Commons, is no stranger to controversy. In February 2024, he broke with Commons convention to effectively block a debate on a scheduled SNP motion calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. Allegedly he gave in to threats from Keir Starmer, then leader of the Opposition, who feared a significant rebellion amongst his back bench MPs just a couple of months away from a likely general election. It was alleged, but denied by both Hoyle and Starmer, that during a private and off the record meeting between the pair prior to the debate, Starmer had threatened Hoyle with the withdrawal of Labour support for Hoyle in the election for Speaker unless Hoyle blocked what could be a politically damaging debate for Starmer. Following that meeting, Hoyle broke with convention and decided to allow a Labour amendment to an SNP motion on Gaza to go to a vote, effectively denying the SNP the chance to vote on their own motion. [[SNP]] MPs then walked out of the Chamber in protest, and the [[SNP]] Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said that he and his MPs had lost confidence in the Speaker. READ MORE: Westminster denies Lindsay Hoyle 'personally intervened' on secret Israeli emails Hoyle later claimed that he had done so out of concern for the safety of MPs, an explanation which convinced no one. A furious Flynn later told the BBC that the Speaker had effectively lied to the Commons and that Hoyle's impartiality was now in question. A motion demanding Hoyle's resignation later amassed the signatures of 81 MPs. Now, Hoyle again finds himself at the centre of a row concerning Gaza. Hoyle allegedly intervened to block the release of emails he sent to Israeli politicians, though the House of Commons has since denied claims the Speaker personally stepped in. Responding to a Freedom of Information (FoI) request lodged by Declassified UK, the UK Government said Hoyle was the individual who had chosen not to release the written correspondence since October 2023 between himself and the Israeli Embassy, Labour Friends of Israel and members or officials of the Knesset, the Israeli legislature. The response said that Hoyle "has formed the reasonable opinion that disclosure of the information would be likely to prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs". The main prejudice the release would be likely to cause would be to the already tattered confidence in Hoyle's impartiality. If there was nothing of concern in the emails, why not release them? Hoyle previously visited Israel in November 2023 for a 'solidarity visit'. He has not displayed much interest in solidarity with the people of Gaza who are currently being starved to death in a man-made famine. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could decide right now that all Palestinian children in Gaza should get a full meal tomorrow and it would happen. The necessary aid is just a few kilometres away from where it is desperately needed, but Netanyahu and his cabinet of religious extremists refuse to allow aid trucks to enter Gaza in any sufficient numbers necessary to avert a famine. Instead, in a sop to the man child in the White House, he has agreed to the televisually appealing but woefully inadequate airdropping of limited aid into the territory. Airdrops can never come close to supplying the quantity of aid which is required. Wind gusts being what they are, some of the aid launched out of the back of military cargo flights ends up in the sea where desperate and starving Palestinians risk being fired upon by Israeli gun boats as they attempt to retrieve bags of flour soaked in salt water. Dropping aid from aircraft is potentially dangerous, one man in Gaza told the BBC: "When aid is dropped from the air, it risks landing directly on tents, potentially causing serious harm, including injury or even death." While acknowledging that even a little aid is better than none, aid organisations harbour no illusions about the air drop campaign. Ciarán Donnelly of the International Rescue Committee told the BBC: 'Aid drops are a grotesque distraction from the reality of what's needed on the ground in Gaza right now. They can never deliver the volume, the consistency or the quality of aid and services that's needed.' READ MORE: Palestine Action protest to go ahead with more than 500 people, organisers say Videos of pallets of aid being parachuted out of aircraft might look good on TV, and allow the likes of Starmer to claim that something is being done, but it can never come remotely close to delivering the quantity of aid that is needed. In fact, it's a literal drop in the ocean. John Curtice weighs in on independence plans Polling expert John Curtice has given his opinion on First Minister John Swinney's plan to achieve independence, which rests upon the [[SNP]] winning a majority at Holyrood at the next Scottish elections. Given the current state of play of opinion polling, Curtice believes that it is "most extremely unlikely" that the [[SNP]] can win a majority of seats at [[Holyrood]] in May next year. Speaking at The Herald's Unspun Live at the Fringe, Curtice said: "What is he [John Swinney] doing? He is saying to people: if you want independence, vote SNP. Do not vote for Alba, do not vote for the Greens. 'He does not want there to be a fragmented list vote. He wants people to vote for the SNP. The challenge facing the SNP – the thing that has not changed in Scottish politics despite the turbulence of the last two and a half years – is support for independence. 'We are still around 50/50 on the independence question.' Curtice still believes that it is most likely that the SNP will be the largest party by a considerable margin, but it will have to reach an agreement with another party, most likely the Scottish Greens, in order to form a government. Labour's position is looking difficult, although not as difficult as that of the Tories, who face potential decimation at the hands of Reform, whom Curtice expects to win more than ten seats in Holyrood.
Glasgow Times
26 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Ex-Israeli security chiefs call for end to war as Netanyahu hints at new stage
On the ground in Gaza, health officials reported new deaths on Tuesday of Palestinians seeking food at distribution points. The Israeli defence body co-ordinating aid to Gaza announced a new deal with local merchants to improve aid deliveries as desperation mounts. The former security officials speaking out included those who led Israel's Shin Bet internal security service, Mossad spy agency and the Israeli military – and ex-Prime Minister Ehud Barak. In a roughly three-minute video posted to social media this week, they demanded an end to the war and said the far-right members of the government are holding the country 'hostage' in prolonging the conflict. 'This is leading the state of Israel to the loss of its security and its identity,' Ami Ayalon, former head of Shin Bet, said in the footage. Yoram Cohen, former head of Shin Bet, called Mr Netanyahu's objectives 'a fantasy'. 'If anyone imagines that we can reach every terrorist and every pit and every weapon and in parallel bring our hostages home, I think it is impossible,' he said. Mr Netanyahu, meanwhile, announced on Monday that he would convene his Security Cabinet in the coming days to direct the army on the next stage of the war, hinting that even tougher military action was an option in Gaza. Mr Netanyahu said he remained committed to achieving his war objectives, including defeating Hamas, releasing all hostages and ensuring Gaza never again threatens Israel. Israeli media said the meeting was expected on Tuesday, with disagreements between Mr Netanyahu and the army chief, Lt Gen Eyal Zamir, on how to proceed. The reports, citing anonymous officials in Mr Netanyahu's office, said the prime minister was pushing the army, which already controls about three quarters of Gaza, to conquer the entire territory, a step that could endanger the hostages, deepen the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and further isolate Israel internationally. Various reports have said Mr Zamir opposes this step and could step down or be pushed out if it is approved. Palestinians struggle to get food from the back of a truck in southern Gaza (Mariam Dagga/AP) Several hundred Palestinians have been killed by Israeli fire since May while heading toward food distribution sites, airdropped parcels and aid convoys in Gaza, according to witnesses, local health officials and the United Nations human rights office. The Israeli military says it has fired only warning shots and disputes the toll. Local health officials said Israeli forces opened fire on Tuesday morning towards Palestinians seeking desperately needed aid and in targeted attacks in the central and southern Gaza Strip, killing at least 25 people. The Israeli military did not have an immediate comment. The dead include 19 people who were killed in southern Gaza, 12 of them seeking aid near the Morag corridor and in Teina area, some three kilometres (1.86 miles) from the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation hub east of Khan Younis, according to the Nasser hospital and the Ministry of Health. The ministry does not distinguish between militants and civilians and operates under the Hamas government. The UN and other international organisations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties. Elsewhere in central Gaza, Al-Awda hospital said it received the bodies of six Palestinians who were killed on Tuesday after Israeli troops targeted crowds near an aid distribution site run by the GHF. The GHF, however, said there were no incidents at their sites on Tuesday. The Israeli defence body in charge of co-ordinating aid to Gaza, called COGAT, wrote on X that there will be a 'gradual and controlled renewal of the entry of goods through the private sector in Gaza'. 'This aims to increase the volume of aid entering the Gaza Strip, while reducing reliance on aid collection by the UN and international organisations,' it said Tuesday. A limited number of local merchants were approved for the plan and will sell basic food products, baby food, fruit and vegetables, and hygiene supplies through bank transfers, COGAT said. Thousands of Palestinians crowded against aid trucks entering the Gaza Strip through the southern Morag corridor on Monday, attempting to get whatever food they could during a protracted food shortage across the enclave. Mohammed Qassas from Khan Younis in southern Gaza said his children are so hungry that he is forced to storm aid trucks. 'I have young children, how am I supposed to feed them? No one has mercy. This resembles the end of the world,' he said. 'If we fight, we get the food. If we don't fight, we don't get anything.' As the trucks drove away, men climbed onto them, scrambling for any remaining scraps. 'The conditions are very challenging and we are hoping for a system to be in place,' Mr Qassas said. 'Some people go home with some 200 kilogrammes (441 pounds), and others go home with only one kilogramme (35 ounces). It is a mafia-like system.' After relentless efforts to get food from the trucks, it has become a routine for men to be seen coming back carrying flour sacks on their back, as well as carrying wounded and dead bodies from near the aid sites. Yusif Abu Mor from Khan Younis said the trucks' aid system is akin to a death trap. 'This aid is stained with humiliation and blood,' he said, adding that aid seekers run the risk of being killed by shootings or run over by aid trucks surrounded by crowds of hungry Palestinians. Israel's blockade and military offensive have made it nearly impossible to deliver aid safely, contributing to the territory's slide towards famine nearly 22 months into the war with Hamas. Aid groups say Israel's week-old measures to allow more aid in are far from sufficient. Families of hostages in Gaza fear starvation affects them too, but blame Hamas. As international alarm has mounted, several countries have airdropped aid over Gaza. The UN and aid groups call such drops costly and dangerous for residents, and say they deliver far less aid than trucks. Egypt, which has strong security ties with Israel, is a mediator in ceasefire talks, and its President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi said Israel's war in Gaza has become a 'war of starvation, genocide and liquidation of the Palestinian cause'. Mr El-Sissi said the war no longer aims to achieve political outcomes or release the hostages. He reiterated his call for European governments and US President Donald Trump to help stop the war and deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza's more than two million people. Long lines of trucks waiting to enter Gaza from Egypt have been a recurring image of the war.
Spectator
39 minutes ago
- Spectator
Ed Davey should stick to his silly stunts – not lecture us on Gaza
Ed Davey's got this Middle East business figured out. The Liberal Democrat leader has tweeted — because, honestly, what else is there to do as Lib Dem leader other than tweet? — his latest insight into the Gaza war: 'Now the Hamas terrorists behind the October 7 atrocities are trying to erode support for recognition of a Palestinian state by falsely claiming it would be a victory for them. Hamas do not represent the Palestinian people and have no future in Gaza with a two-state solution.' That's nice, Ed. Now, I'm not suggesting you're a disingenuous twit and should stick to making a prat of yourself on a surfboard instead of making a prat of yourself on foreign policy, but it couldn't hurt to get a second opinion. Just on the off-chance that you're desperately trying to deflect from your policy of handing Hamas a massive victory by calling for the recognition of a Palestinian state and its unfortunate – and surprising – side effect of handing Hamas a massive victory. In fact, I know who we can ask about what the Palestinians really think. Let's ask…the Palestinians. The Palestinian Centre for Policy and Survey Research is widely respected for its analysis of Palestinian public opinion, not least for its researchers' unrivalled data-gathering in the middle of a war zone. The centre's most recent poll of Palestinian adults was conducted in May and asked a series of questions about the current war and the political mood in the West Bank and Gaza. If legislative elections were held tomorrow, how would they vote? Hamas 43 per cent Fatah 28 per cent Other parties 8 per cent Don't know 19 per cent Did Hamas commit atrocities against Israeli civilians, including women and children, on October 7? Yes 9 per cent No 87 per cent Do they support the disarmament of Hamas in order to stop the war in Gaza? Support 18 per cent Oppose 77 per cent Don't know 5 per cent Satisfaction level for each Palestinian faction or institution: Hamas 57 per cent Fatah 24 per cent Palestinian Authority 23 per cent Mahmoud Abbas 15 per cent Now, it's true that support for Hamas is falling, and on current polling it would not win a hypothetical presidential election. (The incumbent, Mahmoud Abbas, is currently in the 20th year of his four-year term. In Palestine, all elections are hypothetical.) But to suggest that Hamas 'do not represent the Palestinian people' is, if Davey is as fencepost-dumb as I suspect he is, a critical misunderstanding or, if there is a flicker of intelligent life that I have missed, an outright lie. Even if it is a lie, don't be too harsh on the man. You'd lie, too, if you were the kind of chump who thought recognising a Palestinian state in the middle of a war started by Hamas wouldn't send the message that Hamas's methods get results. You'd pathetically attempt to spin it as a tactic by the terrorists who committed (or, if you ask the Palestinians, did not commit) the October 7 atrocities. You'd insist that these terrorists did not represent the Palestinian people, the same Palestinian people who would prefer the war continue than that the terrorists put down their guns. It really is a dilemma. The face of students-and-shires British progressivism says one thing about Hamas, but the people in the West Bank and Gaza say another. Who are you going to believe? Ed Davey, or those lying Palestinians?
