Rules committee's nod to independent secretariat, fin autonomy for assembly
According to sources, the committee is expected to submit its report during the upcoming monsoon session of the assembly for tabling in the house.
Officials said the move aims to strengthen the institutional framework of the Delhi Assembly in line with the constitutional principle of separation of powers. Since its reconstitution in 1993, Delhi Assembly has functioned without a dedicated secretarial cadre or financial independence.
Unlike Parliament and state legislatures—where the speaker holds authority over appointments and administration—Delhi's legislature depends on officers deputed from various government departments.
This reliance, officials argue, has led to operational inefficiencies and curtailed the assembly's functional autonomy.
"To address these concerns, the speaker proposed the creation of a separate legislative secretariat and the granting of financial autonomy during a recent meeting of the Rules Committee.
This proposal aligns with Articles 98 and 187 of the Constitution, which provide for such arrangements in Parliament and state legislatures respectively," said an official. A senior assembly official noted that the 82nd All India Presiding Officers' Conference, held in Dec 2021 under the chairmanship of the Lok Sabha Speaker, adopted a resolution that all legislatures should get financial autonomy enjoyed by both the houses of Parliament.
This resolution was later shared with the Delhi chief secretary, along with a request for prompt action in consultation with the Vidhan Sabha.
Among the three Union Territories with elected assemblies — Delhi, Puducherry, and Jammu and Kashmir — Delhi is the only one constituted as a constitutional body, with a specific provision for an independent secretariat. "In view of Article 239AA(b) of the Constitution, which empowers Parliament to regulate matters concerning the Delhi Legislative Assembly, the Rules Committee may recommend an amendment to the GNCTD Act, 1991.
This would facilitate the establishment of a separate secretariat and financial autonomy, bringing the Delhi Assembly on par with state legislatures," said an official.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC strikes down Army's quota policy for JAG corps
The Supreme Court on Monday struck down the Indian Army's policy of reserving six out of nine Judge Advocate General (JAG) branch vacancies for men and only three for women, calling it 'arbitrary', unconstitutional and contrary to the principle of gender neutrality. Tariffs won't hit defence deals with US, says MEA In an important ruling reinforcing gender equality in the armed forces, a bench of justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan held that the Army and the Union government could not impose a ceiling on the number of women in the JAG cadre once they had been permitted entry under Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950. 'No nation can be secure when half of its population (i.e., its women force) is held back,' emphasised the bench, adding that the 'true meaning' of gender neutrality is that all meritorious candidates, irrespective of gender, must be selected. The ruling came on petitions filed by two women candidates who had ranked fourth and fifth overall but were denied selection because of the gender-based allocation of seats in the 2023 JAG recruitment. The bench pointed out that in this case, one petitioner , Arshnoor Kaur, had secured 447 marks, higher than the 433 scored by a male candidate ranked third in the men's list, yet she was excluded. The court directed her induction in the next available training course, noting that her exclusion amounted to 'indirect discrimination' in violation of Articles 14 (equality), 15 (no discrimination), and 16 (equality of opportunity) of the Constitution. While the other candidate, Astha Tyagi had secured 477 markes, no order was passed in her case since she joined the Indian Navy during the pendency of the matter. Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan represented the petitioners. Rejecting the Army's reliance on 'extent of induction' policies dating back to 2011 and 2012, the court held these administrative instructions had no statutory backing and could not override the Section 12 notification allowing women into the JAG branch. The bench further declared that the 2023 recruitment policy, which envisaged at least 50% of JAG vacancies for women to 'compensate for their previous non-enrolment' but capped their share at that figure, was neutral on the face of it, but discriminatory in effect. 'Though neutral in form, it is anything but gender-neutral in application and practice…The evidence of the disparate treatment is writ large in the form of the merit list… female candidates have overwhelmingly outscored their male counterparts,' the judgment noted. It cited the example from the present case where a male candidate ranked sixth in the men's merit list had scored fewer marks than a woman ranked tenth in the women's list, yet was selected while she was not. 'The practice of fixing a ceiling limit to recruitment of female candidates has the effect of perpetuating the status quo, which has been historically discriminatory to women candidates. The result of such practice is confinement of women candidates, irrespective of their performance or merit, in their gendered category, thereby being destructive of not just the constitutional scheme but also of the concept of gender-neutrality and merit,' it held. Observing that male and female JAG officers form part of the same cadre, face identical conditions of service, and are evaluated by the same selection criteria, the bench said there was no justification for separate merit lists. It directed that future recruitment be conducted through a common merit list for all candidates, with the list and individual marks made public. 'The primary job of this branch is to give legal advice and conduct cases… there is no explanation why gender-based vacancy allocation is necessary for a legal branch where the duties, training, and performance expectations are identical for all officers regardless of gender,' the court said, adding that a merit-based process would only improve the branch's efficiency. It directed the Union of India and the Army to conduct future JAG recruitments without bifurcating vacancies by gender, making it clear that if all deserving candidates happen to be women, all of them must be selected. 'To restrict the women candidates to 50% of the seats, as argued by the respondents despite they being more meritorious than the male candidates is violative of the right to equality,' declared the bench. The Army's contention that JAG officers constitute a combatant reserve and that women are not deployed in counter-insurgency or counter-terrorism roles was dismissed as misconceived. The bench pointed to existing policy changes that have brought women's field attachment and operational training 'at par' with men, as well as examples of women officers commanding convoys in militant-prone areas, serving in elite airborne and parachute units, and operating in UN peacekeeping missions in combat zones. The judgment noted that under the 2023 policy, at least 50% of the vacancies must be reserved for women to 'compensate' for their earlier non-enrolment and to raise their strength in the JAG branch to 142 officers. However, it added that women candidates figuring in the merit list beyond this 50% quota must also be accommodated, and their intake cannot be capped at that limit. 'If women can pilot Rafale jets, operate behind enemy lines, and command convoys in high-risk zones, there exists no legal or operational bar to their deployment at peace locations in the JAG branch,' the judgment said. It added; 'This court clarifies that it is not imposing its own views or predilection on the Army but is implementing the Constitution and the mandate of law. But this court agrees with the view held by many that 'no nation can be secure, when half of its population (i.e. its women force) is held back.' Quoting Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates -- 'People feared electricity when it was invented, the court observed that resistance to change cannot justify discrimination. It stressed that women were not seeking special treatment or relaxed standards, only that merit be given a chance. 'If women officers do not conform to discipline or match the standards prescribed or expected of them, the Army shall be at liberty to act as it would with regard to any errant or unfit male officer,' it said.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mayawati for serious talk in Assembly, Parl
1 2 Lucknow: On the first day of the monsoon session of the UP legislative assembly on Monday, BSP president Mayawati, said, "It should not be just a formality despite being brief, but it is important to make it useful for the state and the public, for which both the govt and the opposition will have to move forward by abandoning their political interests, hatred and bitterness. " She further stated that the monsoon session of Parliament, which is ongoing, is also not functioning in a completely peaceful manner, due to which it is not operating properly and as per the expectations of the people. "Concern among the people is natural because of this, as the burning issues of the public and the country are not being discussed with full seriousness," said Mayawati. The discussion on the possibility of a negative effect on the country's economy and development due to the heavy US tariff on Indian trade is being widely debated everywhere, she said, adding that it needs to be properly discussed, especially in Parliament, because it is related to the national interest and the country's 'good days'. "It cannot be taken lightly, and the country's future cannot be put at stake. Both the govt and the opposition should pay proper and appropriate attention to this," she added. Additionally, whatever doubts are being raised in the country regarding voters, voter lists and their revision, EVMs, etc, which are related to the country, public interest and democracy, should be resolved as soon as possible, she said. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
T Cong hits out at detention of AICC frontline leaders in Delhi
Hyderabad: Chief minister A Revanth Reddy, president B Mahesh Kumar Goud, ministers, and numerous Congress leaders have vehemently condemned the detention of AICC frontline leaders Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi, and others during their protest against the Election Commission of India's (ECI) alleged collusion with the ruling BJP. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Taking to X, CM Revanth posted: "As Rahul Gandhi begins the fight for democracy and the restoration of the sacrosanct power of every Indian's vote… the BJP has resorted to a dastardly act by detaining him, Priyanka Gandhi, and other Congress leaders. Jails cannot crush resolve or silence the voice of Rahul Gandhi. #VoteKiChori." Mahesh Kumar Goud said that the detention of Rahul Gandhi by Delhi Police is not an act of law, but an exposure of the BJP's fear. "Rahul Gandhi has fearlessly exposed the ECI's collusion with the BJP and unmasked the 'Vote Chori' that is shaking the very foundations of democracy. His fight is not for politics, but for the Constitution and the sacred right of 'One Person, One Vote'." The TPCC chief added that every Congress worker, from the grassroots to the top leadership, stands shoulder to shoulder with Rahul Gandhi. "His voice is our voice, his fight is our fight and no detention can break this resolve. The BJP may attempt to silence him, but they will only amplify the nation's call for truth," Mahesh Goud
