
B.C. tribunal rejects injured worker's claim for $20K rifle under health benefits
The Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal says the decision marks the culmination of a 'lengthy procedural history' of reviews and appeals at various levels within the province's workplace safety and compensation agency, known as WorkSafeBC, involving the health benefits claim.
The forestry worker, who is not named in the decision, was injured on the job in 2016, sustaining a 'litany of permanent physical injuries,' including a fractured spine, hearing loss and an amputated forearm.
A part of his rehabilitation, the agency already bought the avid outdoorsman an all-terrain vehicle, valued at $40,000, as well as a trailer and a specialized hoist for his garage to lift his dog carrier on and off the vehicle.
'These items were provided to him so that he could go out into the woods to exercise his dogs and train them in cougar tracking,' the tribunal noted in its decision last month, summarizing the observations of an officer who reviewed the case.
The injured worker was similarly furnished with a pair of motors for his fishing boat – equipped with specialized electric starters and tilt functions to easily raise and lower them into the water – along with a 'special fishing rod, chest harness and two electric fishing reels.'
But when the claimant told his occupational therapist that he was ready to start hunting again, he compiled another list of equipment he intended to expense under his health benefits.
'Semi-custom' rifle sought
Prior to his injury, the claimant would hunt animals on foot, shooting them with a rifle at close range, he said. However, due to physical limitations in the wake of the accident, his new plan was to hunt from 'a stand overlooking a large area, and shoot animals from a stable position, from ranges out to and exceeding 1,000 yards,' the appeal tribunal heard.
To accomplish the task, the claimant would need an 'extremely lightweight' rifle and scope, chambered for a preferred type of ammunition that costs $180 per box, the tribunal heard.
'He was aware of a particular (rifle) brand which he liked, anticipating that the total cost of his rifle and scope would be in excess of $20,000,' tribunal vice-chair Anand Banerjee wrote in the decision.
'In particular, the worker requested that the board provide him with a semi-custom rifle manufactured by a small American firm called Gunwerks, in a model called the 'ClymR.''
The worker explained that he would be shooting at animals from a range of 800 to 1,700 yards, according to the tribunal, and 'this is why he needed a rifle and scope combination which would be accurate at such extreme distances.'
Swarovski binoculars, accessories
The claimant would also require a brand-new pair of Swarovski binoculars valued at $3,900. 'The worker expressed the view that lesser brands than Swarovski would cause him to experience eye strain over long hours of use, and this is why he wanted the premium binoculars,' Banerjee wrote.
The hunter went on to provide a more detailed wish list in November 2021, explaining that, if the Gunwerks rifle was not available, a titanium rifle built by arms maker Proof Research would be 'an acceptable alternative' at $16,000, the tribunal heard.
'In addition to the Swarovski binoculars, the worker requested a Swarovski-branded forehead rest ($175), a Swarovski-branded universal tripod adapter ($154), a brand-new shooting tripod made by Gunwerks ($650), a Hog Saddle clamping rifle rest for the new tripod ($429) and a brand-new rangefinder which offered ballistic compensation (approximately $1,800),' Banerjee wrote.
Prior claims, dismissals
When WorkSafeBC rejected the man's itemized request in August 2022, the board noted he had already been provided a rifle through a separate worker's compensation claim in 2013, when he was working as a hunting guide.
'Although you have been provided with a firearm previously, I must consider your current request on its individual merits and circumstances, which means that because you were provided a firearm in the past does not mean that you are currently entitled to another firearm,' the board wrote in its 2022 decision.
The board also placed 'significant weight' on the fact that WorkSafeBC could not ensure that a new gun 'will be used in a lawful and safe manner,' it said, denying the request for the gun and the associated hunting gear.
The man appealed the decision to WorkSafeBC's review division, which, in February 2023, affirmed the board's dismissal of his request. 'Since the board had already provided the worker with significant recreational items associated with his interest in hunting, (it) was satisfied that nothing further was reasonably necessary,' Banerjee summarized.
The man exhausted his last appeal by pleading his case to the tribunal, where Banerjee spent 'several months' and 'obtained a number of books and articles on the various topics relating to long-range shooting, hunting, accuracy, optics, ammunition, ethics, and the price/availability of rifles, optics, and ammunition,' he said.
Much of that reading material was provided to the worker at the beginning of this year. 'I made it clear to him that I wished to learn about his experience and knowledge in hunting and long-range shooting, and I was interested in hearing whether he agreed or disagreed with any of the materials provided to him,' Banerjee wrote.
Hunter lacks 'skill and experience'
Over the course of the appeal hearing, the tribunal vice-chair and the claimant discussed in fine detail the mechanics of different rifles, optics and ammunition, as well as the importance of hunting in the man's life.
At the conclusion of the hearing, Banerjee cited three grounds for denying the appeal.
First among them was the vice-chair's finding that the claimant 'does not possess the level of skill and experience – or even the desire to master the necessary level of skill and experience' to participate in long-range hunting in any 'meaningful extent.'
'I question whether the proposed long-range hunting even meets the minimal threshold of being something for which the worker has sufficient interest or passion in order to be considered as a health-care benefit,' he wrote.
'Life-or-death decision'
Banerjee also expressed concern that the claimant was diagnosed with bouts of depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation and post-traumatic stress as a result of his injury, with one doctor observing that he had a 'short fuse' and was at risk of self-harm.
The same doctor also assessed that the worker was prone to difficulty completing tasks without error 'due to waning attention/fatigue,' adding he 'is able to complete tasks where accuracy is not a critical job requirement.'
Banerjee stressed that long-range rife hunting 'is literally defined by the concept of 'accuracy,' both mental and physical' and that such hunters are 'required to make a literal life-or-death decision' based on several simultaneous factors.
He also emphasized that providing the gear as part of the worker's health-care benefits would signal an 'implied endorsement' of both the hunter's skill and hunting ethics, as well as an endorsement of the equipment sought, which Banerjee assessed as not likely to result in ethical hunts at such great distances in the hands of the worker.
Finally, the tribunal vice-chair explained that the claimant already owns 'a battery of rifles' with high-end scopes, although 'he considers every single one of these rifles to be unsuitable for his new chosen hunting pursuit.'
'If this is the case, then he should be expected to sell or trade in these unsuitable rifles in order to maximize his returns and use the funds to purchase equipment that he prefers,' Banerjee concluded.
'This is a final reason why the worker should not be provided with the requested hunting equipment as a health-care benefit under this claim.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
a few seconds ago
- CTV News
Burnaby RCMP gang team seizes vehicles, drugs and $63K in cash in 3 traffic stops
Police shared this image of items seized during the third traffic stop. (Burnaby RCMP) Burnaby RCMP's Gang Enforcement Team had a busy nine-day stretch earlier this month, making sizable seizures during three traffic stops between July 8 and 16. In all, the team seized two vehicles, multiple weapons, more than a kilogram of illicit drugs, 55 cartons of illegal cigarettes and more than $63,000 in cash over the span, Burnaby RCMP said in a news release Friday. The first traffic stop took place July 8 near Beresford Street and McKay Avenue. BGET officers stopped a Porsche and made 'observations' that led them to arrest the occupant, police said. A search of the vehicle led to the seizure of the illegal cigarettes, plus nearly $16,000 in cash. Burnaby RCMP seizure 1 Police shared this photo of items seized during the first traffic stop. (Burnaby RCMP) On July 14, the second stop occurred during proactive patrols near Boundary Road and Canada Way, according to Burnaby RCMP. This time, BGET officers stopped a Tesla and noted that the driver had 'a criminal drug trafficking history.' 'Observations made by the officers resulted in the arrest of the occupant, and a subsequent search of the vehicle resulted in the seizure of the vehicle, two cellular phones, a collapsible baton, miscellaneous illicit drugs and over $4,000 in cash,' the release reads. Burnaby RCMP seizure 2 Police shared this image of the items seized during the second traffic stop. (Burnaby RCMP) Two days later, on July 16, the third traffic stop occurred, this time on Imperial Street near Gray Avenue. In this case, too, the driver had a criminal drug trafficking history, according to police. The driver also had a history of assault with a weapon. After arresting the vehicle's occupant, officers seized it, along with two cellphones, two knives, more than a kilogram of 'miscellaneous illicit drugs,' and nearly $44,000 in cash. Burnaby RCMP seizure 3 Police shared this image of items seized during the third traffic stop. (Burnaby RCMP) While all three drivers were arrested, none of them have been charged. The investigations are ongoing and 'appropriate charges will be forwarded' when they are concluded, police said. 'These are just three examples of the great work that our BGET officers are doing day in and day out,' said Insp. Matt Toews, in the release. 'Every time we disrupt a drug organization like this is one step closer to safer streets and a safer community.'


National Post
a few seconds ago
- National Post
NHL saying 'hold on' to Hockey Canada five is a good message, but still lacking
Let's begin by giving the NHL some credit: they made clear this week that just because a court says you're not guilty of something, that doesn't mean you are suddenly in the 'good' column again. Article content 'The allegations made in this case, even if not determined to have been criminal, were very disturbing and the behaviour at issue was unacceptable,' the NHL said Thursday about the Hockey Canada five being found not guilty of sexual assault. 'We will be reviewing and considering the judge's findings. While we conduct that analysis and determine next steps, the players charged in this case are ineligible to play in the league.' Article content Article content Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Cal Foote, Michael McLeod and Dillon Dube are still on the hot seat as far as the NHL is concerned. There's an expectation of good conduct here, the NHL is reminding everyone. Article content And they're right on that. Article content The NHL's standard player contract has a clause declaring players must conduct themselves on and off the ice 'according to the highest standards of honesty, morality, fair play and sportsmanship, and to refrain from conduct detrimental to the best interest of the Club, the League, or professional hockey generally.' Article content In other words, do what you want on your own time, but if your dirty laundry gets out, we're going to have to talk about it. Article content That, presumably, is the crux of the NHLPA's challenge to the league's eligibility position. Article content 'After missing more than a full season of their respective NHL careers, they should now have the opportunity to return to work. The NHL's declaration that the players are 'ineligible' to play pending its further analysis of the court's findings is inconsistent with the discipline procedures set forth in the CBA,' the PA insists. The PA's job is to protect their members' working conditions. Article content Article content But in the end, both the league and the PA are missing the bigger picture: there's a broader cultural leadership role to play and neither organization has said or done what needs to be here. Article content Article content And a huge factor in this is the NHL being the only league of the big four North American professional sports leagues to not have a clearly defined policy around domestic violence and sexual assault. Article content The NFL, for instance, does. That's how they handed Deshaun Watson an 11-game ban after being accused by more than two dozen women of sexual assault and sexual misconduct during massage therapy sessions. Article content The NFL took those accusations and had their own investigation under the auspices of the policy. Article content But everything the NHL does is ad hoc. They have an amorphous standard that they can enforce capriciously. Doing it this way doesn't exactly lay out to players what the expectations are beyond 'don't get your name splashed about in public.' Article content That's no way to lead. All it does is perpetuate a 'boys will boys' culture, where the worst sin is getting caught. Article content


CTV News
a few seconds ago
- CTV News
OPP investigating collision involving 3-year-old
Nottawasaga OPP are investigating a collision that sent a 3-year-old to hospital. According to police, officers responded to an emergency call regarding an electric motorcycle that hit a pedestrian shortly before 8:30 p.m. on July 25. A 3-year-old was transported by air-ambulance to a Toronto hospital with life threatening injuries. Pridham Place in Tottenham was closed for several hours but has since re-opened. Police are asking anyone who witnessed the accident or has information to call the OPP or Crime Stoppers