Musk backtracks on Trump criticism after White House outreach
The Tesla and SpaceX CEO voiced regret after having launched an exchange of increasingly personal attacks last week on their respective social media sites by calling Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill a 'disgusting abomination.' In other remarks, he called it too expensive.
The feud escalated to a point where Musk threatened to start a rival political party and suggested Trump be impeached.
For investors, the open rift potentially posed multiple hurdles for Tesla, SpaceX and the rest of Musk's sprawling business empire, including Starlink, which depends heavily on its relationship with the U.S. and other governments.
'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X on Wednesday, without saying which specific posts he was talking about.
He has deleted some of the posts, including the one signaling support for impeachment. He has not walked back his criticism of Trump's tax bill, however.
Vance, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and David Sacks, Trump's crypto czar and a longtime Musk friend, all pushed for Musk and Trump to make up, said two people briefed on the conversations.
Asked if he had helped defuse tensions between the two, Vance told reporters at the Kennedy Center that he had spoken with Musk and Trump about 'trying to ensure that Elon is publicly supporting and privately supporting the president's agenda.'
He said Trump was 'rightfully very frustrated' with about Musk's comments, but had no desire to be in a long-term feud with the billionaire and big campaign donor.
One of the sources said Musk was serious about potentially starting a new party, a risk for Trump's Republicans going into the November 2026 midterm congressional elections.
In the 2024 vote, Musk gave Republicans roughly $300 million, contributing to their sweep of the White House and both houses of Congress.
On Friday, James Fishback, a Tesla investor and adviser to Musk's government cost-cutting effort, posted on X that the billionaire owed Trump 'a full-throated apology.'
Musk retorted: 'What's the apology for exactly?'
Musk subsequently deleted several posts, and a senior Trump adviser called Fishback to thank him, according to one of the sources.
Musk spoke to Trump on Monday, according to a White House source with knowledge of the matter.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Wednesday that Trump appreciated the apology. Asked if the administration was reviewing Musk's government contracts after Trump's threat last week to cancel them, Leavitt said she was not aware of any such efforts.
TESLA CONCERNS
Tesla shares were marginally lower on Wednesday. The stock has recouped most of its losses from the Trump-Musk feud, but shares are still down 19% on the year, equal to roughly $300 billion in market value.
Sales of Tesla have fallen across key markets in Europe, China and U.S. states including California as car buyers shun the company following Musk's embrace of hard-right politics in the U.S. and worldwide.
Musk is betting big on driverless technology to grow the company, but self-driving tech is in early stages and faces skepticism. An acrimonious relationship with Trump would risk more scrutiny of Musk's business practices, as the U.S. Transportation Department regulates vehicle design standards and would have a big say in whether Tesla can mass-produce robotaxis without pedals and steering wheels.
'The conciliatory tone from Musk recently might indicate his desire to protect his businesses in the light of the position he has found himself in,' said Mamta Valechha, consumer discretionary analyst at Tesla investor Quilter Cheviot.
Shawn Campbell, adviser and investor at Camelthorn Investments, said the relationship between Musk and Trump could be restored but also said it was unlikely it would return to where it once was.
'The stakes between the richest man in the world and leader of the most powerful nation in the world are just so big, with billions of dollars of government contracts at stake, not to mention the power to investigate and regulate and tax,' said Campbell, who personally holds Tesla shares.
Musk took credit for Republicans retaining a majority of seats in the House of Representatives and retaking a majority in the Senate with his cash infusion last year. Trump then named him to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. He left the role late last month.
Declaring their relationship over on Saturday, Trump said there would be serious consequences if Musk decided to fund Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the tax and spending bill. Trump also said he had no intention of repairing ties with Musk.
(Reporting by Alexandra Ulmer and Nandita Bose; Additional reporting by Jeff Mason, Rachael Levy, Arpan Daniel Varghese, Akash Sriram, Sruthi Shankar and Gursimran Kaur; Writing by David Gaffen, Gursimran Kaur and Timothy Heritage; Editing by Colleen Jenkins, Howard Goller, Philippa Fletcher, Nick Zieminski and Lincoln Feast.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
44 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
Judge temporarily bars Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles
In a major blow to the Trump administration, San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who sued to restrict its activity. Breyer's order will take effect at noon on said the protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion.' Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterizing the protests as a rebellion. 'The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion,' Breyer wrote. The Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling. Trump summoned military troops to Los Angeles to support a civilian police operation over the objection of Newsom, an extraordinary and rarely used measure. The ruling came hours after Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to 'liberate' Los Angeles at a press conference that was dramatically interrupted when federal agents dragged Democratic U.S. Senator Alex Padilla out of the room, forced him to the ground and handcuffed him. The court battle and press conference scuffle underscored the political polarization generated by Trump's approach to immigration enforcement and use of presidential power. Trump summoned first the National Guard, then the Marines, to help federal police forces guard federal buildings from protesters and to protect federal immigration agents as they pick up suspected violators. Trump has defended his decision, saying if he had not done so the city would be in flames. The protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence and restricted to a few city blocks. California also requested that Breyer bar troops from participating in arrests or patrolling communities, as well as to limit the military to protecting federal buildings and personnel. But the judge said it was too soon to rule on that question because it was not clear whether the military was actually engaging in law enforcement activities. The Trump administration denied that the National Guard was participating in law enforcement. Some 700 U.S. Marines will be on the streets of the city by Thursday or Friday, the military has said, to support up to 4,000 National Guard troops. Breyer did not order any immediate change to Trump's deployment of U.S. Marines, over whom Trump has more direct authority as commander-in-chief. But Breyer wrote that the Trump administration's 'use of the National Guard and the Marines comes into conflict with California's police power' and that 'restraining the President's use of military force in Los Angeles is in the public interest.' In his ruling, Breyer wrote that the presence of the troops in the city was itself inflaming tensions with protesters and depriving the state of California of the ability to use the Guard for other purposes, such as fighting fires and drug smuggling. Breyer noted that Trump's deployment threatened other states as well by upsetting the balance of power between federal and state governments. Newsom said at a press conference he expected the ruling to stand on appeal. Trump, Newsom said, 'is not a monarch, he is not a king and he should stop acting like one.' (Reporting by Brad Brooks, Sandra Stojanovic, Omar Younis, Jane Ross and Arafat Barbakh in Los Angeles, Luc Cohen and Dietrich Knauth in New York, and Idrees Ali in Washington; Additional reporting by Costas Pitas, Christian Martinez, Ryan Jones, Ted Hesson, Abhirup Roy and Alexia Garamfalvi; Writing by Daniel Trotta and James Oliphant; Editing by Saad Sayeed, Ross Colvin, Mary Milliken, Nick Zieminski, Diane Craft and Edwina Gibbs)
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Brand new world: how smart companies are building communities, not just customers
While President Trump and Elon Musk were going at it like Ike and Tina, something far more interesting was happening in the background. The Trump administration's GENIUS Act isn't just another boring government bill – it's basically America's official "we're going all-in on Web3" announcement. What is Web3? Web3 represents the next evolution of the internet – from Web1's static websites to Web2's social platforms, and now to Web3's decentralised networks where users can own digital assets, participate in governance, and share in value creation. Think blockchain technology, digital tokens, NFTs, and community-owned platforms. Instead of tech giants controlling everything, Web3 promises shared ownership and transparent, community-driven ecosystems. For brands trying to figure out what on earth comes next, this is the clearest signal yet that the old playbook is getting tossed out the window. Welcome to the network effect economy Here's the thing about Reed's Law that business school probably didn't teach you: when networks grow, they don't just get bigger – they get exponentially more valuable. Every new person who joins doesn't just add one more connection; they create new groups, communities, and possibilities that benefit everyone already there. This isn't theoretical anymore. The real-world asset market just exploded 260% to $23 billion this year, and brands are suddenly realising they're not just selling stuff – they're building ecosystems. Think about it: every customer who joins your brand's digital community potentially makes that community more valuable for everyone else. It's like the difference between running a store and building a city. We're also seeing the rise of super apps – all-in-one platforms that combine social media, payments, commerce, and communication. Think WeChat in China, but imagine if X (Twitter), Meta, or Telegram successfully built Western versions. The great brand awakening The Web3 revolution is splitting brands into two camps: The Heritage Brands: Some of the world's most renowned consumer brands have clear head starts – millions of existing fans, significant marketing budgets, and brand recognition. They can afford to experiment. But do these companies, with decades of "this is how we do things" baked into their DNA, have what it takes to embrace decentralised communities and shared ownership? The Web3 Natives: The new kids are playing by completely different rules. They're building community ownership and shared governance from the ground up. They move fast, embrace chaos, and actually mean it when they talk about "power to the people." The plot twist? In Web3, authenticity beats budget. Communities have malarkey detectors that would make airport security jealous, and they'll absolutely destroy brands that are just playing dress-up with decentralisation. What's actually happening We're in the messy middle where old and new models are colliding: Communities Are Getting Louder: Customers are becoming more like stakeholders and collaborators. Web3 infrastructure is making these relationships more formal and potentially more rewarding. Customers are becoming more like stakeholders and collaborators. Web3 infrastructure is making these relationships more formal and potentially more rewarding. Engagement Never Sleeps: The days of launch-campaign-and-disappear are numbered. Brands need ongoing conversations with their communities, not just broadcasts to them. The days of launch-campaign-and-disappear are numbered. Brands need ongoing conversations with their communities, not just broadcasts to them. Super App Evolution: As platforms evolve toward super app status, brands are watching carefully. Will these become Web2-style gatekeepers, or embrace Web3 principles of shared ownership? The GENIUS Act: when government gets it While everyone was doom-scrolling through the Twitter fight, the real story was hiding in plain sight. The GENIUS Act isn't just regulation – it's infrastructure. It's the government essentially saying, "We're building the highway system for the digital economy." Notice how Circle, issuer of the USDC digital dollar stablecoin, quietly listed 34 million shares on the New York Stock Exchange under ticker CRCL? Mainstream media was still headlining the billionaire brawl. Regulatory clarity transforms Web3 from a risky experiment into a legitimate business strategy. When the U.S. government creates clear rules for digital assets, it's giving brands permission to go all-in without worrying about regulatory whiplash. Where smart brands are paying attention Rather than prescribing what brands must do, here's what forward-thinking ones are quietly testing: Community-First Experiments: Testing token-based loyalty programs and co-creating products with engaged users Testing token-based loyalty programs and co-creating products with engaged users Platform Strategy Diversification: Not putting all eggs in one basket, whether traditional social media or emerging Web3 platforms Not putting all eggs in one basket, whether traditional social media or emerging Web3 platforms Long-Term Infrastructure Building: Focusing on genuine community value, regardless of underlying technology Focusing on genuine community value, regardless of underlying technology Authenticity Over Hype: Bringing real utility and community focus, not just blockchain buzzwords The direction of travel We're watching the early stages of a fundamental shift from broadcasting messages to passive audiences toward creating spaces where communities form, grow, and create value together. While President Trump and Elon Musk might be feuding on social media, they're both building toward the same future – one where networks become more important than individual companies, where communities develop more influence than traditional marketing campaigns, and where the smartest brands position themselves to grow alongside the communities they serve. The future probably belongs to brands that understand they're not just selling products – they're potentially building worlds. And in those worlds, the value grows when the network grows. Dale Healy, Partner, Adams & Adams, Pretoria
eNCA
8 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump moves to block California electric cars program
LOS ANGELES - US President Donald Trump on Thursday signed resolutions blocking California's landmark efforts to phase out gas-powered cars in favor of electric vehicles, a move the state immediately contested in court. Trump's action, a rebuke of Democratic climate change policies, comes after the Republican-led Congress revoked the state's waiver allowing it to set more stringent regulations for cars. California had planned to end the sale of gasoline-only vehicles by 2035, among other ambitious efforts. During the signing ceremony at the White House, Trump lashed out at the state's bid as "a disaster for this country" and said the resolutions he was signing would save the industry from "destruction." California swiftly sued the Trump administration over the resolutions, with Attorney General Rob Bonta saying: "The President's divisive, partisan agenda is jeopardizing our lives, our economy and our environment." "It's reckless, it's illegal, and because of it, we'll be seeing the Trump administration in court again for the 26th time," he added. California, the nation's wealthiest state with around 40 million people, has long used the waiver in the Clean Air Act to set its own emissions standards as it tries to mitigate some of the worst air pollution in the country. The size of the auto market in the state -- and the fact that several other states follow its lead -- means automakers frequently use its standards nationwide. Trump's move also came as he clashes with California over immigration enforcement. California Governor Gavin Newsom has accused the president of acting like a tyrant over his use of the military to control small-scale protests in Los Angeles. - Environmental concerns - Trump's action was condemned by environmental groups who say the rules are key for easing pollution. And Newsom recently argued that rolling back the state's EV ambitions would boost China's position on the market. While China is a manufacturing hub for such vehicles globally, the United States is a net importer of them, he said in a May statement. This is despite the United States being home to technologies that have pioneered the clean car industry, he noted. Trump has repeatedly criticized subsidies to encourage the EV industry despite significant federal funding allocated to projects in Republican districts -- where thousands of jobs are expected to be created. He took aim at the sector as part of his flurry of executive orders on his first day in office this January in a bid to ensure what he called a "level" playing field for gasoline-powered motors. By Beiyi Seow With Huw Griffith In Los Angeles
