logo
Brand new world: how smart companies are building communities, not just customers

Brand new world: how smart companies are building communities, not just customers

The Star21 hours ago

While President Trump and Elon Musk were going at it like Ike and Tina, something far more interesting was happening in the background. The Trump administration's GENIUS Act isn't just another boring government bill – it's basically America's official "we're going all-in on Web3" announcement. What is Web3?
Web3 represents the next evolution of the internet – from Web1's static websites to Web2's social platforms, and now to Web3's decentralised networks where users can own digital assets, participate in governance, and share in value creation. Think blockchain technology, digital tokens, NFTs, and community-owned platforms. Instead of tech giants controlling everything, Web3 promises shared ownership and transparent, community-driven ecosystems.
For brands trying to figure out what on earth comes next, this is the clearest signal yet that the old playbook is getting tossed out the window. Welcome to the network effect economy
Here's the thing about Reed's Law that business school probably didn't teach you: when networks grow, they don't just get bigger – they get exponentially more valuable. Every new person who joins doesn't just add one more connection; they create new groups, communities, and possibilities that benefit everyone already there.
This isn't theoretical anymore. The real-world asset market just exploded 260% to $23 billion this year, and brands are suddenly realising they're not just selling stuff – they're building ecosystems. Think about it: every customer who joins your brand's digital community potentially makes that community more valuable for everyone else. It's like the difference between running a store and building a city.
We're also seeing the rise of super apps – all-in-one platforms that combine social media, payments, commerce, and communication. Think WeChat in China, but imagine if X (Twitter), Meta, or Telegram successfully built Western versions. The great brand awakening
The Web3 revolution is splitting brands into two camps:
The Heritage Brands: Some of the world's most renowned consumer brands have clear head starts – millions of existing fans, significant marketing budgets, and brand recognition. They can afford to experiment. But do these companies, with decades of "this is how we do things" baked into their DNA, have what it takes to embrace decentralised communities and shared ownership?
The Web3 Natives: The new kids are playing by completely different rules. They're building community ownership and shared governance from the ground up. They move fast, embrace chaos, and actually mean it when they talk about "power to the people."
The plot twist? In Web3, authenticity beats budget. Communities have malarkey detectors that would make airport security jealous, and they'll absolutely destroy brands that are just playing dress-up with decentralisation. What's actually happening
We're in the messy middle where old and new models are colliding: Communities Are Getting Louder: Customers are becoming more like stakeholders and collaborators. Web3 infrastructure is making these relationships more formal and potentially more rewarding.
Customers are becoming more like stakeholders and collaborators. Web3 infrastructure is making these relationships more formal and potentially more rewarding. Engagement Never Sleeps: The days of launch-campaign-and-disappear are numbered. Brands need ongoing conversations with their communities, not just broadcasts to them.
The days of launch-campaign-and-disappear are numbered. Brands need ongoing conversations with their communities, not just broadcasts to them. Super App Evolution: As platforms evolve toward super app status, brands are watching carefully. Will these become Web2-style gatekeepers, or embrace Web3 principles of shared ownership? The GENIUS Act: when government gets it
While everyone was doom-scrolling through the Twitter fight, the real story was hiding in plain sight. The GENIUS Act isn't just regulation – it's infrastructure. It's the government essentially saying, "We're building the highway system for the digital economy."
Notice how Circle, issuer of the USDC digital dollar stablecoin, quietly listed 34 million shares on the New York Stock Exchange under ticker CRCL? Mainstream media was still headlining the billionaire brawl.
Regulatory clarity transforms Web3 from a risky experiment into a legitimate business strategy. When the U.S. government creates clear rules for digital assets, it's giving brands permission to go all-in without worrying about regulatory whiplash. Where smart brands are paying attention
Rather than prescribing what brands must do, here's what forward-thinking ones are quietly testing: Community-First Experiments: Testing token-based loyalty programs and co-creating products with engaged users
Testing token-based loyalty programs and co-creating products with engaged users Platform Strategy Diversification: Not putting all eggs in one basket, whether traditional social media or emerging Web3 platforms
Not putting all eggs in one basket, whether traditional social media or emerging Web3 platforms Long-Term Infrastructure Building: Focusing on genuine community value, regardless of underlying technology
Focusing on genuine community value, regardless of underlying technology Authenticity Over Hype: Bringing real utility and community focus, not just blockchain buzzwords The direction of travel
We're watching the early stages of a fundamental shift from broadcasting messages to passive audiences toward creating spaces where communities form, grow, and create value together.
While President Trump and Elon Musk might be feuding on social media, they're both building toward the same future – one where networks become more important than individual companies, where communities develop more influence than traditional marketing campaigns, and where the smartest brands position themselves to grow alongside the communities they serve.
The future probably belongs to brands that understand they're not just selling products – they're potentially building worlds. And in those worlds, the value grows when the network grows.
Dale Healy, Partner, Adams & Adams, Pretoria

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gulf countries fear Israel-Iran spillover
Gulf countries fear Israel-Iran spillover

eNCA

time3 hours ago

  • eNCA

Gulf countries fear Israel-Iran spillover

Gulf countries on Friday unanimously condemned Israel's strikes on Iran, fearing an escalation that could threaten economic interests and security. "Gulf states are very much caught between a rock and a hard place," Sanam Vakil, director of the Chatham House think-tank's Middle East and North Africa Programme told AFP. While "they are quietly applauding the further weakening of Iran they face real risks and have to play their cards carefully", she said. Their close ties to Israel's protector Washington, which maintains military bases in the region, and their proximity to Iran -- and its missiles -- pose risks. Vakil said that "Saudi diplomats are distancing themselves from Israel and condemning the strikes as a means to stay out of this conflict". The unfolding situation is playing out against a recent diplomatic rapprochement Riyadh has been building with Tehran ever since China in 2023 brokered an agreement aiming to restore ties. "This is a notable difference with the situation that prevailed in the region 10 years ago, when Saudi Arabia was sort of inciting the United States to strike Iran, calling it the 'head of the snake'," said Karim Bitar, a lecturer in Middle Eastern studies at Paris's Sciences Po university. Indeed, as Tehran reeled from Israel's attacks and planned retaliation, Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan called his Iranian counterpart and "stressed the importance of dialogue to address disputes". - Stability at risk - "Gulf countries realise that this Israeli attack will jeopardise their economic interests as well as the entire stability" of the region, Bitar said. That is a major preoccupation of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has been focusing on economic growth, giga-projects at home and diversification away from oil. During Donald Trump's first US presidency, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates had pushed for a stronger stance against Iran. Gulf countries supported Trump's decision to pull the United States out of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. But Gulf sentiment began to change after the United States failed to provide significant backing following attacks blamed on Tehran, analysts said. A 2019 attack -- claimed by Yemen's Huthis but blamed by Riyadh and Washington on Tehran -- hit Saudi Arabia's Abqaiq processing plant and Khurais oil field, temporarily halving the kingdom's crude output. Tehran denied involvement. The UAE too has been targeted by attacks from the Huthis that hit Abu Dhabi in 2022. Seeking to avert attacks by Iran and its proxies, especially as they host US bases that could become targets in the wake of a broader conflict, Gulf monarchies have pursued a detente. "The greatest concern in the Gulf now will be to what extent the United States will have to rely on their bases to assist in the defence of Israel," said Middle East analyst Andreas Krieg. - US 'red line' - While Trump's administration has distanced itself from Israel's operation, it has warned Iran not to hit US targets in the Middle East. "It has... drawn a firm red line, warning that any attacks on US personnel or military installations will provoke a response," Vakil said. She added, however, that "for now, Iran is unlikely to target Gulf infrastructure or assets". The leaders of Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar last month had urged Trump, as he visited the region, to not order US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and to pursue a deal instead, according to the US news outlet Axios. "The Gulf states had hoped that Trump would show strong leadership and would contain (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu's neo-conservative tendencies to escalate," said Krieg. Negotiations on Iran's nuclear programme had been going on between Washington and Tehran, although with little headway. Oman had been readying to host a sixth round of talks on Sunday, before Israel's attack threw that into doubt. For Bitar, the Israeli strikes seemed to be trying to "torpedo" the US-Iran talks. "What will be the US reaction? Will they maintain their blind and unconditional support for Israel, or will they try to go back to the negotiating table and reach a new deal?" he asked. By Sahar Al Attar

Spain economy minister urges fair, balanced EU-US tariff deal
Spain economy minister urges fair, balanced EU-US tariff deal

eNCA

time3 hours ago

  • eNCA

Spain economy minister urges fair, balanced EU-US tariff deal

Spanish Economy Minister Carlos Cuerpo said a tariff pact between the EU and Washington should be "fair and balanced," although both sides remain far from a deal as a July deadline approaches. "There is still a long way to go to reach an agreement, but there remains the will to do so," Cuerpo told AFP in an interview on Thursday. His comments came on the sidelines of a trip to Houston, Texas, as he sought to reassure Spanish businesses rattled by US President Donald Trump's wide-ranging tariffs. Trump has slapped a 10 percent tariff on almost all trading partners including the European Union since returning to the presidency in January. He also threatened to impose heftier duties of 50 percent on the bloc, although pausing the higher rate until July 9. For now, Trump's existing tariffs, including 25 percent US duties on imported automobiles and 50 percent levies on steel and aluminum, are affecting European companies, Cuerpo said. Pressure is mounting as July approaches. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC this week that an EU deal will likely be among the last that Washington completes, even as he remained optimistic that both sides would reach this goal. Arriving at a deal by July 9 would be ideal as it signals "certainty and confidence," Cuerpo said. He maintained that things are "progressing," stressing that "there is unanimity among the 27 member states to reach a fair and balanced agreement." - No 'overreaction' - He added that while Europe has prepared a response package to Trump's tariffs, Brussels is holding off implementation so that it cannot be "interpreted as an escalation in this tariff conflict." It is critical that the EU gives a "very clear signal" that it wants to strike a deal with the Trump administration, he said. "The fundamental thing is to avoid any element of overreaction," he added. Besides the EU, higher US tariffs on goods from dozens of economies including Japan and India are also due to take effect in July. Trump has taken an especially harsh stance on China as Beijing pushed back on US levies, with both sides engaging in an escalating tariffs war that has only been temporarily rolled back. The Spanish minister expects Trump's tariffs to have limited effect on his country's economic growth this year, given its smaller exposure to the US market. But he warned that certain sectors like olive oil and wine are at higher risk as more of such exports head to the United States. In the interim, Cuerpo noted the importance too of the Mercosur agreement, a trade deal between the European Union and four South American nations including Brazil. Asked if a new global trade order is emerging, Cuerpo said: "This feeling is widely shared." "We are witnessing a rebalancing of these trade relations at the international level and what nobody knows is what's the new point we will reach," he added. By Moisés Ávila

Google rejects Meta's app store age-verification push
Google rejects Meta's app store age-verification push

The Citizen

time7 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Google rejects Meta's app store age-verification push

As Europe cracks down on online content for minors, Google argues Meta's solution would create new dangers instead of solving old ones. American tech heavyweight Google on Friday reiterated its opposition to verifying the age of a device's user through the app stores built into operating systems, calling a proposal from Facebook and Instagram parent Meta 'ineffective'. Age restrictions and the European regulatory push Limiting access to age-restricted content online is a live issue in Europe, with France battling pornography sites over its newly-introduced requirement that they check users' ages. Paris is also one of several capitals pressing Brussels to introduce Europe-wide regulations cutting off access to social networks for under-15s over concerns including addiction, cyberbullying and hate speech. Basing age verification on details from a device's app store 'would require the sharing of granular age band data with millions of developers… who don't need it', such as producers of uncontroversial apps like flashlights, Google wrote in a blog post. Risk to children 'We have strong concerns about the risks this 'solution' would pose to children,' it added. The search giant's Play Store is a part of the Android operating system, by far the most widely-used around the globe. Google said that using app store data to verify ages would also leave major ways people access content online unprotected for the underage, such as desktop computers or shared family devices. ALSO READ: Google takes issue with Competition Commission market inquiry report Apple — whose own App Store is loaded on every device running its iOS operating system, such as iPhones and iPads — has also pushed back against Meta's proposal. The back and forth 'The right place to address the dangers of age-restricted content online is the limited set of websites and apps that host that content,' the iPhone maker said in a February document. 'Implementing age verification at the operating system or app store level will help ensure that we create an ecosystem that's safe for teens,' the Facebook owner's safety chief Antigone Davis told Euronews in February. Meta has since launched a campaign for European regulation to require the measure. Europe's Digital Services Act (DSA), which came into force last year, says it is up to platforms like Meta's to verify the age of their users — not providers of operating systems or app stores. Google said that changing to the latter system — which has also been pushed by Pornhub parent company Aylo — would mean 'reengineering the protocols that have defined the decentralized web in ways that are hard to fully predict'. NOW READ: WATCH: Meta Teen accounts launched in SA

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store