
Trump's record defense budget hits $1 trillion despite DOGE
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth argued before the Senate Armed Services Committee that the budget is needed to "end four years of chronic underinvestment in our military."
Former President Joe Biden requested increased levels of defense spending, but congressional Republicans asked for even more. A DoD spokesperson told USA TODAY that Hegseth continues to review programs for cuts or further reallocations.
The Pentagon and NNSA spending boost contrasts with major cuts to other programs sought by the administration and the Republican majority in Congress. The reconciliation megabill, which passed the Senate on July 1, must again win House approval before it goes to Trump for his signature. (The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.)
Over the next decade, the reconciliation bill would cut $1 trillion from Medicaid, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office; $300 billion from food stamps; and hundreds of billions more from clean energy programs.
Foreign aid and education programs are on the chopping block in the main budget, which Congress has not yet started deliberating.
House Armed Services Committee Chair Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Alabama, said the defense spending boost in the reconciliation bill is "needed to restore American deterrence, revitalize the defense industrial base, and modernize our military."
Figures on both sides of the political spectrum, including Trump's former chief strategist Steve Bannon, have expressed frustration over the defense budget's continued growth.
"You can't talk about fraud and waste and abuse in this town unless you're gonna go to the Pentagon," Bannon said in an April 24 podcast. "And you know what's happened since [DOGE] went over there? Crickets ... The system we have is not sustainable."
William Hartung, a defense spending expert at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told USA TODAY that the Pentagon's rushed budget rollout omitted key documents detailing "the nuts and bolts" of its funding requests.
"It makes it very hard to analyze ... their priorities," Hartung said. "(There's) a lot missing if you're a member of Congress trying to evaluate this."
That could leave lawmakers and analysts flying blind during the hurried reconciliation bill push, which Trump ordered congressional GOP leaders to have on his desk by July 4.
Hartung argued that spending more on defense doesn't necessarily equate to getting better results because Congress often spends money based on what congressional district or state will receive the work rather than how the proposal aligns with U.S. strategy.
Former Democratic Rep. John Tierney, who now heads the Council for a Livable World and Center for Arms Control and Nonproliferation nonprofits, said he believes the political climate discourages lawmakers of both parties from questioning defense spending.
"There's not a lot of thought about what the strategy is," Tierney added.
Nuclear modernization, missile defense garner billions
According to the Pentagon, around $85 billion of the proposed defense budget would go toward U.S. nuclear capabilities and Trump's Golden Dome missile defense initiative. Much of the funding will go toward America's triad of nuclear-armed bombers, intercontinental ballistic missiles, and nuclear submarines whose replacements are centerpieces of a broader $1.7 trillion nuclear modernization effort.
More: Trump pushes $175 billion 'Golden Dome' missile defense plan
Hartung emphasized the Pentagon and NNSA's poor track record of keeping such protects on-time and on-budget.
The Government Accountability Office estimated in June that the full cost of developing and deploying the Sentinel ICBM, slated to replace the Minuteman III missiles that have remained on watch since 1970, will balloon to "approximately $170 billion" after the Air Force realized the new missiles could not use legacy Minuteman III silos.
"This project is totally out of control," argued Tierney.
The administration wants the restructured Sentinel program to receive $4.5 billion in fiscal 2026, according to budget documents. New silos are not included in that figure.
The NNSA, which designs, builds and maintains the country's nuclear warheads, is in line to receive a $5.56 billion (or nearly 30%) boost in funding for its Weapons Activities division compared to the previous year.
The agency is struggling to hit its timeline and cost goals for reestablishing mass production of nuclear warheads' explosive cores, known as plutonium pits.
A May USA TODAY investigation detailed the NNSA's decades-long battle to secure enough federal employees with adequate technical backgrounds to oversee the agency's complex and sprawling projects. Government watchdogs have consistently highlighted staffing problems as an Achilles heel for the agency.
More: Nuclear weapons woes: Understaffed nuke agency hit by DOGE and safety worries
NNSA's fiscal 2026 budget request does not include significant funding for additional federal employees, despite agency leaders testifying to Congress on May 20 about their scramble to address DOGE-created vacancies amid a near-total hiring freeze.
"It's a recipe for wasting money," said Hartung of the NNSA funding boost.
Davis Winkie's role covering nuclear threats and national security at USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Outrider Foundation and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.
Contributing: Cybele Mayes-Osterman, USA TODAY
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
29 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump megabill gives the oil industry everything it wants and ends key support for solar and wind
President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act ends long-standing federal support for solar and wind power, while creating a friendly environment for oil, gas and coal production. The House of Representatives passed Trump's megabill Thursday ahead of a White House-imposed deadline, after the Senate narrowly approved the controversial legislation Tuesday. Trump has made his priorities on energy production clear. The U.S. will rely on oil, gas, coal and nuclear to meet its growing energy needs, the president said last weekend, bashing wind and solar power. 'I don't want windmills destroying our place,' Trump told Fox News in an interview that aired June 29. 'I don't want these solar things where they go for miles and they cover up a half a mountain that are ugly as hell.' The president's embrace of fossil fuels and hostility to renewable energy is reflected in his signature domestic policy law. It delivers most of the oil and gas sector's top priorities, according to the industry's lobby group, while ending tax credits that have played a crucial role in the growth of solar and wind power. Oil, gas and coal are winners The law opens up federal lands and waters to oil and gas drilling after the Biden administration enacted curbs, mandating 30 lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico over 15 years, more than 30 every year on lands across nine states and giving the industry access to Alaska. The law also slashes the royalties that producers pay the government for pumping oil and gas on federal lands, encouraging higher output. 'This bill will be the most transformational legislation that we've seen in decades in terms of access to both federal lands and federal waters,' Mike Sommers, president of the American Petroleum Institute, n industry lobbying group, told CNBC. 'It includes almost all of our priorities.' The law also spurs oil companies to use a carbon capture tax credit to produce more crude. The tax credit was designed to support nascent technology that captures carbon emissions and stores them underground. Under Trump's bill, producers would receive an increased tax benefit for injecting those emissions into wells to produce more oil. The law ends the hydrogen tax credit in 2028, later than previous versions of the bill. Chevron, Exxon and others are investing in projects to produce hydrogen fuel. 'I have a number of members who plan on investing significantly in hydrogen and so the extension to the end of 2028 was a welcome priority that was fulfilled,' Sommers said. The coal industry is also a big winner from the law, which mandates at least 4 million additional acres of federal land be made available for mining. The law also cuts the royalties that coal companies pay the government for mining on federal land, and allows the use of an advanced manufacturing tax credit for mining metallurgical coal used to make steel. Solar and wind are losers The law phases out clean electricity investment and production tax credits for wind and solar that have played a crucial role in the growth of the renewable energy industry. The investment credit has been in place since 2005 and the production credit since 1992. The Inflation Reduction Act extended the life of both until at least 2032. Solar and wind farms that enter service after 2027 would no longer be eligible for the credits. There is an exception, however, for projects that start construction within 12 months of the bill becoming law. The phaseout is more gradual than previous versions of the legislation, which had a hard deadline of December 31, 2027. That gave all solar and wind projects just 2.5 years to come online in order to take advantage of the credits. 'Despite limited improvements, this legislation undermines the very foundation of America's manufacturing comeback and global energy leadership,' Abigail Ross Hopper, CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, said in a statement when the bill passed the Senate. A related tax credit for using U.S.-made components in solar and wind farms ends for projects that enter service after 2027. A carveout allows projects that start construction within one year of the law's enactment to claim the credit. The credit was designed to spur demand at U.S. factories in order to break the nation's dependence on equipment from China. 'If nothing changes, factories start to close,' Michael Carr, executive director of the Solar Energy Manufacturers Association, told CNBC. 'Factories that are on the drawing board that probably penciled [favorably] two weeks ago, maybe don't pencil now. We'll see investment slow down in the sector going forward.'


The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Photos of grief and tributes after deaths of Diogo Jota and his brother
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Twisted arms and late-night deals: how Trump's sweeping policy bill was passed
Just a few months ago, analysts predicted that Republicans in Congress – with their narrow majorities and fractured internal dynamics – would not be able to pass Donald Trump's landmark legislation. On Thursday, the president's commanding influence over his party was apparent once again: the bill passed just in time for Trump's Fourth of July deadline. But while the GOP may call the budget bill big and beautiful, the road to passing the final legislation has been particularly ugly. Arm-twisting from Donald Trump and last-minute benefits targeting specific states cajoled holdouts, despite conservative misgivings over transformative cuts to Medicaid and the ballooning deficit. Here's the journey of the sprawling tax-and-spending bill. The initial version of the megabill passed by the House in May extended tax cuts from 2017. It also increased the debt limit by about $4tn, and added billions in spending on immigration enforcement while adding work requirements to Medicaid and requiring states to contribute more to Snap nutrition assistance. The Budget Lab at Yale estimated the House bill would add $2.4tn to the debt over the 2025-34 period. Several conservative Republicans balked at several aspects of the bill during long debate sessions. Mike Lawler, a congressman representing New York, wanted a larger Salt deduction – which concerns property tax – while California congressman David Valadao was concerned about the Medicaid cuts, which his district heavily relies on for healthcare. Then Trump traveled to Capitol Hill in late May to help assuage the holdouts. At his meeting with lawmakers, 'he was emphatic [that] we need to quit screwing around. That was the clear message. You all have tinkered enough – it is time to land the plane,' South Dakota congressman Dusty Johnson told reporters. 'Ninety-eight percent of that conference is ready to go. They were enthused. They were pumped up by the president, and I think with the holdouts, he did move them. I don't know that we are there yet, but that was a hugely impactful meeting.' In the end, there were only two House Republicans who voted against the bill: Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Warren Davidson of Ohio, both of whom are fiscal hawks concerned about the federal deficit. The bill moved on to the Senate. The Senate version of the budget bill passed on a 50-50 vote with JD Vance, the vice-president, breaking the tie. Until the final stages, however, all eyes were on Republican senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, both noted moderates, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Rand Paul of Kentucky, both noted fiscal conservatives. The bill's authors added tax provisions to benefit Alaska's whaling industry to win the support of Murkowski. They also tried to add provisions protecting rural hospitals from Medicaid cuts in 'non-contiguous states', but the Senate parliamentarian ruled that the amendments would violate restrictions on what the bill could contain without triggering the 60-vote filibuster. Murkowski acquiesced after winning new tax revenues from oil and gas drilling leases for Alaska, provisions protecting clean energy tax credits, and delays on Snap changes. 'Do I like this bill? No,' Murkowski said as she stared down an NBC reporter who had just relayed a comment by Kentucky Republican Rand Paul describing her vote as 'a bailout for Alaska at the expense of the rest of the country'. Other changes to the Senate bill were made in the final days of negotiations, including the striking of a 10-year federal ban on state regulation of AI. A record number of amendments were proposed. Tillis, who announced he would not run again in his politically competitive state, gave a rousing speech about the perils of Medicaid cuts and voted against the bill. Collins and Paul remained in opposition. With few other options, Democrats tried to delay the vote by requiring the entire bill to be read out loud on the floor the night before the vote. But in the end, with Murkowski's vote, the Senate had a tie, allowing Vance to cast the deciding vote. Given the total opposition of Democrats to the bill's passage, Republicans in the House could lose no more than three of their own to get the bill to the finish line. On Wednesday, the last push still felt dubious. Even the procedural vote that is required to move to an actual vote was delayed over hours, as some Republicans considering holding their vote. Ralph Norman of South Carolina told C-Span after voting against the bill in committee that he opposed the Senate version's inclusion of tax credits for renewable energy and its failure to restrict Chinese investment in American property. 'We have one chance, one moment to curb the spending that has plagued this country and will take this country down if we don't get it under control,' he said. 'What I see right now, I don't like.' Victoria Spartz of Indiana had withheld support over concerns about increases in the federal debt. 'I'll vote for the bill, since we need to make it happen for our economy & there are some good provisions in it. However, I will vote against the rule due to broken commitments by Speaker Johnson to his own members,' she wrote on X on Wednesday. 'I'm on Plan C now to deal with the looming fiscal catastrophe.' Spartz referred to a promise Johnson made to fiscal conservatives that he would not bring a budget bill to a vote if it increased the debt beyond a certain amount. Spartz said this bill exceeds the agreed-upon amount by about $500bn. Shortly before midnight there were five Republicans voting no on the procedural rule. But deals were still being made – executive orders promised and other negotiations done on the floor. Once again Trump stepped in, joining Speaker Mike Johnson in coaxing the party members to cast their final approval. The president called several House members and posted on his Truth Social account. 'What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove??? MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!' he wrote early on Thursday morning. Johnson held the vote open for seven hours, the longest vote recorded. And it worked. On Thursday morning, Norman voted yes to advance the bill. So did Andrew Clyde of Georgia, a notable second amendment rights activist in Congress, who failed in his push for an amendment to the bill to remove the registration requirement for firearms suppressors, short-barreled rifles and short-barreled shotguns from the National Firearms Act, creating a path for legal civilian use without registration and paying a federal tax. The holdouts fell into line, and the House voted early on Thursday morning 219-213 in a procedural vote to move forward. There was still a way to go. Johnson had expected to open the vote at 8am. But House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries commandeered the dais for more than eight hours – setting a record previously held by Republican Kevin McCarthy – in marathon stemwinder of a speech attacking the perils of the legislation and delaying the vote. But Johnson remained confident after a night of promises and threats. Massie remained the face of conservative holdouts on the bill. He has faced withering personal attacks from Trump on social media, the creation of a Super Pac to fund a primary challenge and local advertisements attacking his stance on the bill. In the end it was only Massie and Brian Fitzpatrick, a congressman in Pennsylvania who voted for Kamala Harris last year, who voted against a bill that will now rewrite the American political landscape.