Donald Trump to meet UK prime minister Keir Starmer in Scotland with trade deal on the agenda
Date: 2025-07-28T09:35:54.000Z
Title: Trump and Starmer to meet in Scotland with trade deal on the agenda
Content: Hello and welcome to the US politics live blog. I'm Tom Ambrose and will be bringing you all the latest news lines over the next few hours.
We start with the news that president Donald Trump will host the British prime minister Keir Starmer at his golf resort in western Scotland on Monday for talks ranging from their recent bilateral trade deal to the worsening hunger crisis in Gaza, the two governments said.
Trump, riding high after announcing a huge trade agreement with the European Union late on Sunday, said he expected Starmer would also be pleased, Reuters reported.
'The prime minister of the UK, while he's not involved in this, will be very happy because you know, there's a certain unity that's been brought there, too,' Trump said. 'He's going to be very happy to see what we did.'
Starmer had hoped to negotiate a drop in U.S. steel and aluminium tariffs as part of the talks, but Trump on Sunday ruled out any changes in the 50% steel and aluminium duties for the EU, and has said the trade deal with Britain is 'concluded'
British business and trade minister Jonathan Reynolds told the BBC the talks with Trump offered Britain a good chance to advance its arguments, but he did not expect announcements on the issue on Monday.
Trump and Starmer were expected to meet at 12pm BST (7am ET) at Trump's luxury golf resort in Turnberry, on Scotland's west coast, before travelling on together later to a second sprawling estate owned by Trump in the east, near Aberdeen, where he is due to arrive at 5.25pm.
Hundreds of police officers were guarding the perimeter of the Turnberry course and the beach that flanks it, with a helicopter hovering overhead, although there was no sign of protesters outside the course.
Starmer was arriving from Switzerland, where England on Sunday won the women's European football championship final.
In other developments:
Donald Trump has announced a tariff deal with the European Union to end months of difficult negotiations between Washington and Brussels after meeting the European Commission chief, Ursula von der Leyen, at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland. 'This is really the biggest trading partnership in the world so we should give it a shot,' the president said before the private meeting started.
US House speaker Mike Johnson said he would have 'great pause' about granting a pardon or commutation to Ghislaine Maxwell while Kentucky Republican representative Thomas Massie said a pardon should be on the table for the jailed Epstein confidante if she were to give helpful information around the Epstein case.
A top US medical body has expressed 'deep concern' to Robert F Kennedy Jr over news reports that the health secretary plans to overhaul a panel that determines which preventive health measures, including cancer screenings, should be covered by insurance companies. The letter from the the American Medical Association comes after the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that Kennedy plans to overhaul the 40-year old US preventive services task force because he regards it as too 'woke', according to sources.
Thai and Cambodian leaders will meet on Monday for talks to end hostilities, Thailand said, after pressure from Donald Trump to end a deadly border dispute.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps
A federal appeals court ruled Friday night to uphold a lower court's temporary order blocking the Trump administration from conducting indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in Southern California. A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing Monday afternoon at which the federal government asked the court to overturn a temporary restraining order issued July 12 by Judge Maame E. Frimpong, arguing it hindered their enforcement of immigration law. Immigrant advocacy groups filed suit last month accusing President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. The lawsuit included three detained immigrants and two U.S. citizens as plaintiffs. In her order, Frimpong said there was a 'mountain of evidence' that federal immigration enforcement tactics were violating the Constitution. She wrote the government cannot use factors such as apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a location such as a tow yard or car wash, or someone's occupation as the only basis for reasonable suspicion to detain someone. The appeals court panel agreed and questioned the government's need to oppose an order preventing them from violating the constitution. 'If, as Defendants suggest, they are not conducting stops that lack reasonable suspicion, they can hardly claim to be irreparably harmed by an injunction aimed at preventing a subset of stops not supported by reasonable suspicion,' the judges wrote. A hearing for a preliminary injunction, which would be a more substantial court order as the lawsuit proceeds, is scheduled for September. The Los Angeles region has been a battleground with the Trump administration over its aggressive immigration strategy that spurred protests and the deployment of the National Guards and Marines for several weeks. Federal agents have rounded up immigrants without legal status to be in the U.S. from Home Depots, car washes, bus stops, and farms, many who have lived in the country for decades. Among the plaintiffs is Los Angeles resident Brian Gavidia, who was shown in a video taken by a friend June 13 being seized by federal agents as he yells, 'I was born here in the states, East LA bro!' They want to 'send us back to a world where a U.S. citizen ... can be grabbed, slammed against a fence and have his phone and ID taken from him just because he was working at a tow yard in a Latino neighborhood,' American Civil Liberties Union attorney Mohammad Tajsar told the court Monday. The federal government argued that it hadn't been given enough time to collect and present evidence in the lawsuit, given that it was filed shortly before the July 4 holiday and a hearing was held the following week. 'It's a very serious thing to say that multiple federal government agencies have a policy of violating the Constitution,' attorney Jacob Roth said. He also argued that the lower court's order was too broad, and that immigrant advocates did not present enough evidence to prove that the government had an official policy of stopping people without reasonable suspicion. He referred to the four factors of race, language, presence at a location, and occupation that were listed in the temporary restraining order, saying the court should not be able to ban the government from using them at all. He also argued that the order was unclear on what exactly is permissible under law. 'Legally, I think it's appropriate to use the factors for reasonable suspicion,' Roth said The judges sharply questioned the government over their arguments. 'No one has suggested that you cannot consider these factors at all,' Judge Jennifer Sung said. However, those factors alone only form a 'broad profile' and don't satisfy the reasonable suspicion standard to stop someone, she said. Sung, a Biden appointee, said that in an area like Los Angeles, where Latinos make up as much as half the population, those factors 'cannot possibly weed out those who have undocumented status and those who have documented legal status.' She also asked: 'What is the harm to being told not to do something that you claim you're already not doing?' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the Friday night decision a 'victory for the rule of law' and said the city will protect residents from the 'racial profiling and other illegal tactics' used by federal agents.
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
UK's top-rated mattress-in-a-box brand sends shoppers running with up to 55% off sale - score a double size mattress for under £500!
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more The UK's highest-rated mattress-in-a-box brand on Trustpilot is now on sale with savings of up to 55 per cent across the range. The Ergoflex summer sale is live, and in a deal not to miss, you can score a double mattress for under £500; that's an unmissable saving of £498. The award-winning Ergoflex® 5G, with an orthopaedic surface that provides pressure-relieving sleep, has had the backing of over 11,000 shoppers who have bought and loved the mattress, raving about the price, quality and comfort. Ergoflex 5G Mattress, Double The Ergoflex 5G Mattress has 9cm of true high-density visco-elastic memory foam, that offers 'orthopaedic pressure relief'. Helping to ease pressure points (such as the lower back, hips, and shoulders) and with a clever airflow system that helps promote airflow through the centre of the mattress, it's a winner with frustrated sleepers. You can use the offer code SAVE55 to take advantage of the 55 per cent discount across the Ergoflex 5G mattress range. £498 (save £498) Shop With an industry-leading TrustScore and thousands of five-star ratings from shoppers, Ergoflex is a tried and tested mattress brand and top contender when it comes to sleep. Now, the UK's continuously highest-rated mattress-in-a-box brand on Trustpilot has an unmissable sale, with better-than-half-price savings so you can score a double mattress for under £500. Not your usual bog-standard mattress, the Ergoflex 5G Mattress is the brand's most supportive, pressure-relieving mattress yet, made with the highest-density visco-elastic memory foam available today, and shoppers are calling it 'simply blissful'. 'From the first night it has been bliss,' raved one shopper. 'I can honestly say this has been the best mattress I have ever slept on - no waking in pain in the middle of the night. I sleep like a baby until morning and combining it with a memory foam contoured pillow has worked like a charm.' Racking up thousands of five-star reviews and testimonies, the Ergoflex 5G Mattress is nearly three times the depth of the top layers in mattresses from heavily marketed competitors. Offering a very generous 9cm of true high-density visco-elastic memory foam, the mattress aims to improve comfort by offering supportive body-shaping performance with zero partner disturbance ensuring unbroken slumber for both users. Great for you and your partner, many shoppers have praised it as a worthy upgrade, outperforming traditional mattresses with scores of frustrated sleepers claiming they've experienced 'a far better night's sleep' with the 5G Mattress. Those complaining of aches and pains in particular have found relief in the unique orthopaedic surface that provides pressure-relieving, body-cradling sleep. Along with the five layers for extra cushioning and support, the Ergoflex is also popular amongst hot sleepers with a 5cm Cool-Sleep™ airflow system that allows for airflow and temperature regulation . Thanks to the high density open-cell memory foam, the mattress helps to disperse heat more efficiently than previous generation memory foams, while the Tencel outer cover features vented 3D mesh panels at each end to prevent heat retention. One impressed Ergoflex review wrote: 'The mattress is amazing so comfortable, I've never slept on anything like it, I can't wait to get into bed at night. Highly recommend.' You can now use the offer code SAVE55 to take advantage of the discounts across the Ergoflex® 5G mattress range.
Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
US appeals court keeps bar on Los Angeles federal immigration arrests
Aug 2 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court late on Friday affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring U.S. government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled that the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on peoples' appearance, language and where they lived or worked. President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and U.S. Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States. The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration. A California judge last month blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention. In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order. The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity," speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day laborer pick up site, agricultural site, etc." The Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city. "The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement. Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, welcomed the ruling in statement: "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region."
