
HMRC does not know how many billionaires pay tax in the UK, MPs claim
A report by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) is calling on the tax office to publish its plan for increasing the tax take from wealthy taxpayers both domestically and offshore.
It found HMRC does not use its data to identify wealthy people and publish transparency about how much tax they pay.
There are just a handful of billionaires in the UK, but they have wealth and assets 500 times greater than a person who meets HMRC's definition of 'wealthy'.
Since 2019/20, HMRC has defined wealthy individuals as those with incomes of £200,000 or more, or assets equal to or above £2million, in any of the last three years.
While HMRC has increased the amount of tax revenue from the wealthy - from £2.2billion in 2019/20 to £5.2 billion in 2023/24 - the report found that the tax gaps are 'particularly difficult to measure'.
PAC says HMRC is 'overly confident and optimistic' the wealthy tax gap - the difference between what's owed and what's actually paid - is £1.9 billion, and that an offshore tax gap of £300million seems 'far too low'.
The very wealthiest paid £119billion in personal taxes in the 2023/24 tax year, around £140,000 per person, and made up a quarter of the UK's personal tax receipts.
However, a recent report by the National Audit Office found tax avoidance and evasion could be much higher than previously estimated.
The complexity of wealthy people's tax affairs made it more difficult for HMRC to identify any tax owed, the NAO said.
Lloyd Hatton MP, member of PAC said: 'We already know a great deal about billionaires living in the UK, with much information about their tax affairs and wealth in the public domain.'
However, a recent report by the National Audit Office found tax avoidance and evasion could be much higher than previously estimated.
The complexity of wealthy people's tax affairs made it more difficult for HMRC to identify any tax owed, the NAO said.
'So we were disappointed to find that HMRC, of all organisations, was unable to provide any insight into their tax affairs from its own data - particularly given that any single one of these individuals' contributions could make a significant difference to the overall picture.
'We found a similar apparent lack of curiosity in how wide the tax gap is both for the very wealthy and for wealth stashed away offshore.'
What is PAC calling for?
Among its recommendations, PAC is calling on HMRC to close the tax gap further and publish a plan and timeline for increasing its tax take.
MPs also claim that HMRC cannot identify how much tax is paid by billionaires, despite the relatively small number of individuals involved.
As such, it is calling for a plan to understand how much wealth is held by billionaires using publicly accessible data, like the Sunday Times Rich List.
This would be similar to the US, where its Inland Revenue Service has worked with researchers to link its data with the Forbes 400.
Another one of the committee's recommendations is a review into whether segmenting wealthy customers according to their levels of wealth could help assess risk better.
Currently, wealthy individuals are treated as a single group, but it's understood that the tax office looks at who poses the biggest risk based on all taxable income and gains, rather than wealth alone.
Hatton said: 'Our report shows that, however you slice it, there is a lot of money being left on the table. HMRC must, under its new leadership, begin collecting the correct amount of tax from the very wealthiest - and this must include wealth that is currently squirreled away in tax havens.'
An HMRC spokesperson said: 'The government is determined to make sure everyone pays the tax they owe.
'Extra resources were announced in the recent spending review which allows us to significantly step up our work on closing the tax gap amongst the wealthiest. This includes recruiting an extra 400 officials specialising in the wealthy and offshore tax gap, and increasing prosecutions of those who evade tax.'
The Government has said it plans to crack down on tax-dodging, with the Chancellor vowing to collect over £6billion a year during her first Budget.
In her spring spending review, she increased this amount to £7.5billion, announcing plans to reward informants within businesses that are not complying with the tax regime.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
10 minutes ago
- BBC News
Former Southampton City Council post room worker becomes leader
A former council post room worker has been formally elected as the authority's Alex Winning did postal work at Southampton City Council at the age of 16, before working in the council's HR and adult services teams, according to his LinkedIn takes over an authority which has been allowed exceptional support by the government to prevent financial Winning is the authority's third leader in two years after Satvir Kaur became an MP and Lorna Fielker resigned to run for regional mayor. The father of one, who was previously the council's cabinet member for children and learning, said he wanted the authority to be "brilliant at the basics".He said he understood residents' "strong feelings" about missed waste collections and the recently-ended car ban in Portswood Road. He told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: "People in Southampton, all they want is basic services delivered. We have to be doing that."We're fully aware that things haven't been good enough for some time in waste, and we're as frustrated as residents with that."He endorsed the decision to scrap the Portswood Road bus gate trial after it caused increased traffic in neighbouring leader said: "At the end of the day, it didn't work in the way that we wanted it to and we needed to be quite honest about that."There are residents that are sad to see it go. Obviously, there was a lot that were very happy to see it go. It won't be coming back."Mr Winning, who was born and raised in Southampton, said he "never in a million years" thought he would be the council's leader and would "take the role incredibly seriously". Additional reporting by Marcus White, BBC News, Southampton You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X, or Instagram.


The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reform gives power companies ‘formal notice' it plans to scrap their clean energy subsidies
Reform UK has informed major wind and solar developers that it would terminate their access to a key clean energy subsidy scheme should the party come to power. In a letter described as "formal notice", deputy leader Richard Tice informed the companies that Reform UK intends to scrap the Contracts for Difference (CfD) scheme. This mechanism currently guarantees renewable energy developers a fixed price for their electricity, insulating them from market volatility and encouraging investment in green projects. Sent on Wednesday to firms such as Octopus Energy and SSE Renewables, Mr Tice's correspondence said that "there is no public mandate for the real-world consequences" of clean power. If Reform won an election, he said 'we will seek to strike down all contracts signed under AR7' – the upcoming allocation round for CfDs. 'Let me be clear: if you enter bids in AR7, you do so at your own risk. The political consensus that has sheltered your industry for nearly two decades is fracturing,' he wrote. He added that participation in the upcoming CfD auction 'carries significant political, financial and regulatory risk' for company shareholders. Climate analysts said the move would drive away investment and put British jobs in jeopardy. The Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU) said: 'Polling shows the public see clean energy as the number one growth sector for the UK. 'Arguing against British renewables is arguing for more foreign gas, which will increasingly come from abroad as the North Sea continues its inevitable decline – a geological fact. 'Ripping up long-term policies and changing agreed contracts is likely to destroy the UK's credibility as a solid place to invest and with it, leave us more reliant on gas from abroad whose price we have no significant control over.' Labour said the letter showed Reform was 'actively trying to discourage businesses from investing in clean energy in the UK – leaving bills higher for families, threatening hundreds of thousands of good jobs across the country and putting our energy security at risk.' 'They are disgracefully trying to undermine the UK's national interest,' a party spokesman said. Mr Tice's letter followed a Government decision to allow offshore wind farms to be able to apply for the energy contracts while they are still waiting for full planning consent in a bid to hasten development. Officials have said changes to the scheme will include increasing the length of contracts from 15 years to 20 years for offshore wind, onshore wind and solar projects. The letter also came shortly after Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said greater use of CfDs would cut bills for households by breaking the link between electricity costs and the price of gas. He said: 'We're all paying that higher gas price in our bills, even though most of the energy we're using comes from much cheaper, renewable sources.' Sir Ed also accused Reform leader Nigel Farage of peddling 'myths' about net zero and vowing to challenge 'snake oil sales' with 'thought through' policy.


Daily Record
12 minutes ago
- Daily Record
16-year-olds will be allowed to vote in next general election for first time
The voting age for Scottish elections is already 16, but will now been lowered from 18 for UK Parliament elections as well. Sixteen-year-olds will be allowed to vote in the next general election for the first time, the UK Government has confirmed. The voting age for Scottish elections is already 16, but will now been lowered from 18 for UK Parliament elections as well. Keir Starmer told ITV News: 'I think it's really important that 16- and 17-year-olds have the vote, because they are old enough to go out to work, they are old enough to pay taxes, so pay in. 'And I think if you pay in, you should have the opportunity to say what you want your money spent on, which way the Government should go. 'So I'm really pleased we are able to bring more young people into our democracy and give them a chance to have a say over how their taxes are paid and what they are going to be used for.' Sixteen-year-olds were first allowed to vote in Scotland in the 2014 independence referendum. The voting age in Scottish Parliament and council elections was then permanently lowered ahead of the 2016 Holyrood election. UK Government ministers also want to automatically register people to vote and to make UK-issued bank cards an accepted form of ID at polling stations. The UK Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said 'far too many people' had been put off voting by the voter ID rules introduced by the previous government. The Electoral Commission found that around 750,000 people did not vote due to a lack of ID. The Government has already made the Veteran Card an accepted form of voter ID, and intends to allow digital forms of ID to be used when they become available. Thursday's plans will also see a tightening of the rules on campaign finance aimed at barring 'shell companies' from donating to political parties and requiring more checks on donations to unincorporated associations. The Electoral Commission will be given the power to levy £500,000 fines on those who break the new rules on donations. Rushanara Ali, the minister for democracy, said: 'We are modernising our democracy so that it is fit for the 21st century.' She added: 'By reinforcing safeguards against foreign interference, we will strengthen our democratic institutions and protect them for future generations.' The proposal follows concern about the vulnerability of UK politics to donations from overseas, which came to prominence amid reports Elon Musk was considering a major donation to Reform UK. Unincorporated associations have long been another concern of transparency campaigners, who have warned they can obscure the real source of political donations. It also comes as the Electoral Commission reported spending at last year's general election hit a record high of £94.5 million, including £69.3 million spent by political parties. Labour outspent its rivals, shelling out £30 million during the campaign, more than twice the amount it spent in 2019, while the Conservatives spent £23.9 million and the Liberal Democrats £5.6 million. Reform spent £5.5 million, the Greens £1.7 million and the SNP £799,000.