The Block dud suburbs revealed: Shock data shows reno risks
New analysis of median prices in the year leading up to the show's auction days for the past 17 seasons shows homes in seven of the suburbs were losing money months before contestants picked up a paint brush or emotionally abused their partner.
In ten of those seasons, the show's selected suburb was significantly outperformed by the wider Melbourne or Sydney market, depending where it was located.
And it appears their latest destination in Daylesford is on track to join the list of money-losing suburb choices.
Latest figures show the suburb's $818,000 median has dropped $72,000 in the 12 months to the end of June.
On Phillip Island last year, price records show that in the 12 months it took the show to go from buying its Cowes site to hosting the auctions in November, the median house price had tumbled $35,000 (4.5 per cent) to $750,000.
And by the time the show's Hampton East auctions were held in November 2023, the local median price had dropped more than $100,000 — despite the figures used to calculate that median including The Block's sales.
One of the homes purchased by high profile billionaire Adrian Portelli has already gone on to sell for a more than $1m loss.
Median price reductions typically reflect a reduction in the majority of home prices in an area, including higher-end offerings like those on The Block.
The reality renovation show has also been criticised for over renovating to the point where homes are sold far below what the updates would cost, as well as for its impossible time frames and unrealistic auction results.
Depreciation schedules calculated for the last season of The Block by quantity surveyors BMT showed all of the homes would eventually allow an investor to claim more than $4m in tax deductions as the value of the materials and fixtures added during the renovation declined.
The highest price paid was $3.3m, but the rest sold for less than $3m, indicating the properties were overcapitalised by close to $1m.
With another season commencing, property, building and renovation experts have advised anyone inspired by the reality TV program to watch Grand Designs or to head to social media or YouTube for a dose of renovation before starting their own attempt.
Prominent buyer's agent Cate Bakos said after more than a decade, only picking 60 per cent of suburbs where values rose wasn't a good strike rate, and in many instances it should have been clear they wouldn't perform well.
Ms Bakos said more recent choices to centre the show in regional Victorian townships including Phillip Island and this year's season in Daylesford had gone against wider trends of the state's regional holiday home hotspots' values facing a protracted down turn — and anyone looking for a flip should consider similar areas with caution.
'Buying near the peak for the regional areas is a bit silly,' Ms Bakos said.
'We had crazy growth during Covid, so I wouldn't have chosen regions as a location for The Block.'
The prominent buyer's agent said it was important those considering a renovation while watching this season should be very conscious that the homes were heavily overcapitalised, and warned their auctions were unrealistic.
'I would argue that it's all questionable,' Ms Bakos said.
'Watch Grand Designs — that's a better insight, I think, than The Block into what can go wrong.'
Real Estate Institute of Australia president Leanne Pilkington said anyone getting ideas of flipping homes from The Block needed to remember 'the whole purpose is to entertain'.
While the show did face additional challenges with the need to find a site where at least five similar properties could be worked on by contestants, Ms Pilkington said others needed to 'be much more discerning'.
She added that building industry members she knew couldn't watch the show without 'getting very frustrated with it'.
Despite this, Ms Pilkington said those looking for a bit of inspiration and the latest trends could potentially draw on features and advice from the judges in the reveal episodes.
Her advice for picking a winning area to consider flipping a home in was to focus on homes closer to the median house price, those near public transport and key amenities such as hospitals and major shopping centres.
'And it's absolutely better to go for a middle of the road property,' Ms Pilkington said.
Property Developer Network founder Rob Flux has been helping amateur property developers and flippers, tackling similar sized projects to The Block, for a number of years.
Mr Flux said he had gone up against The Block's producers as a prospective buyer for a property in the past, and had been told their offer for it was about $2m above his own.
'They are overpaying in all departments,' he said.
'And, I don't know if it is by design or by coincidence, but they are going into areas that aren't growing, and sometimes where the market is going down.'
While this might help them find properties that suit their needs, Mr Flux said it was not ideal.
However, he noted the bigger risk was following their approach to renovations.
'Despite the fact that it's called reality TV, there's nothing real about it,' Mr Flux said.
'It's extremely rare for anyone to live on site and work for eight weeks.'
Instead, he advised a more practical approach starting with understanding what was missing but likely to soon be in demand in an area, working out what buyers would pay for it and then calculating if there could still be a profit — factoring in a buffer in case the market doesn't rise.
'Then, if the market goes in your direction and it works well, you will double your profits,' Mr Flux said.
Caitlin Hamston and her partner Scott have flipped or built four properties across Melbourne's inner west over the past nine years.
On two occasions they've lived in the homes during the renovations, a process they wouldn't recommend for anyone with kids.
While they stick to areas they know, they will even give these a miss if conditions aren't right.
'If it was going backwards, we would avoid it,' Ms Hamston said.
Her advice for would-be renovators was to find areas where prices look likely to rise, pick streets with a good feel to them, then look for blocks that don't have constraints that would impact extensions or a new home build.
Ms Hamston also advised against getting caught up with luxury finishes, and to look for affordable alternatives wherever possible.
'Otherwise, it defeats the whole purpose if you are trying to renovate and sell for a profit,' she said.
She also advised against expecting to complete renovations quickly, with her and her partner's typically taking two years to turn over each of their four builds to date.
While Ms Hamston does own a building company, which has made their work easier, she said they had been noticing trades were becoming easier to engage in the past few months.
Along with interest rate reductions helping to limit holding costs for loan repayments, she said now could be an opportune time to consider trying a renovation project.
Expert Advice For Flipping Properties
– Focus on areas you know with good amenities, schools and transport;
– Work out what housing an area is missing, who will buy it and what they will pay;
– Calculate a budget based on what buyers are likely to pay;
– Aim to be selling a home close to the suburb's median price, to ensure the most potential buyers;
– Expect to make mistakes and budget for them;
– Consider potentially hidden holding costs including land tax, interest rate repayments and energy bills for the site;
– Budget for realistic time lines to complete work;
– Don't assume that lots of other people doing a particular type of home flip or development in an area means they are making a profit, check your own numbers;
– Look for areas with high street appeal, then look for homes or blocks without easements or issues that could hamper your plans to renovate;
– Get good trades around you that are reliable;
– Consider higher cost improvements such as updating the facade and even adding a pool, if there is advice it will help boost a sale;
– Avoid properties with low-return repairs needed, such as those that require underpinning;
– Explore YouTube channels and even social media for advice from qualified builders and trades, not 'reality' TV;
– Don't rush into things;
– Try engaging with local community property development networking events;
Sources: Property Developer Network's Rob Flux, Buyer's advocate Cate Bakos, serial flipper Caitlin Hamston
THE BLOCK SUBURBS' TRACK RECORD
Daylesford, 2025 (The Block auction to be held November)
Median house price 2025 (June): $818,000
Median house price 2024 (June): $890,000
12-month change: -$72,000 (-8.1%)
Melbourne average change: -$1106 (-1.3%)
Phillip Island, 2024 (November)
Median house price 2024: $750,000
Median house price 2023: $785,000
12-month change: -$35,000 (-4.5%)
Melbourne average: $0 (0%)
Hampton East, 2023 (November)
Median house price 2023: $1,437,500
Median house price 2022: $1.55m
12-month change: -$112,500 (-7.3%)
Melbourne average: -$30,000 (-3.3%)
Gisborne, 2022 (November)
Median unit price 2022: $1.2m
Median unit price 2021:$935,000
12-month change: $265,000 (28.3%)
Melbourne average change: $43,000 (5%)
Hampton, 2021 (November)
Median unit price 2021: $2.33m
Median unit price 2020: $1.903m
12-month change: $430,000 (22.4%)
Melbourne average change: $111,000 (14.8%)
Brighton, 2020 (November)
Median house price 2020: $2.71m
Median house price 2019: $2.545m
12-month change: $165,000 (6.5%)
Melbourne average change: $26,000 (3.6%)
St Kilda, 2019 (November)
Median unit price 2019: $528,809
Median unit price 2018: $514,000
12-month change: $14,809 (2.9%)
Melbourne average change: -$20,000 (-3.5%)
St Kilda, 2018 (October)
Median unit price 2018: $525,000
Median unit price 2017: $542,500
12-month change: -$17,500 (-3.2%)
Melbourne average change: $21,200 (3.9%)
Elsternwick, 2017 (October)
Median house price 2017: $1.87m
Median house price 2016: $1.605m
12-month change: $265,000 (16.5%)
Melbourne average change: $25,000 (4.8%)
Port Melbourne, 2016 (November)
Median unit price 2016: $643,750
Median unit price 2015: $652,500
12-month change: -$8750 (-1.3%)
Melbourne average change: $20,000 (4%)
South Yarra, 2015 (November)
Median unit price 2015: $590,000
Median unit price 2014: $560,000
12-month change: $30,000 (5.4%)
Melbourne average change: $26,500 (5.5%)
South Yarra, 2015 (April)
Median unit price 2015: $577,800
Median unit price 2014: $552,000
12-month change: $25,800 (4.7%)
Melbourne average change: $18,100 (3.9%)
Prahran, 2014 (October)
Median unit price 2014: $504,000
Median unit price 2013: $522,500
12-month change: -$18,500 (-3.4%)
Melbourne average change: $27,000 (6%)
Albert Park, 2014 (April)
Median unit price 2014: $701,000
Median unit price 2013: $430,000
12-month change: $271,000 (63%)
Melbourne average change: $29,627 (6.8%)
South Melbourne, 2013 (July)
Median unit price 2013: $511,000
Median unit price 2012: $535,000
12-month change: -$24,000 (-4.5%)
Melbourne average change: $40,000 (9.2%)
Bondi, 2013 (March)
Median house price 2013: $1,567,500
Median house price 2012: $1,247,500
12-month change: $320,000 (25%)
Sydney average change: $42,000 (7.4%)
South Melbourne, 2012 (July)
Median house price 2012: $894,500
Median house price 2011: $985,000
12-month change: -$90,500 (-9.2%)
Melbourne average change: -$15,000 (-3%)
Richmond, 2011 (August)
Median house price 2011: $845,000
Median house price 2010: $805,000
12-month change: $40,000 (5%)
Melbourne average change: $35,000 (7.6%)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
14 minutes ago
- ABC News
CSIRO could be facing hundreds more job cuts this year, union warns
There are fears hundreds more Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) jobs could be axed this year, the union has warned. The Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) issued a statement on Thursday morning saying that Australia's national science agency was enduring its "biggest job cuts in a decade". Last year, 440 positions were slashed, and the CPSU said "approximately 200 contract jobs were left to expire, with hundreds more cuts expected to be made to research units later this year". The union said it had made a submission to the Economic Reform Roundtable, warning the nation's capacity for productivity and innovation was being "actively undermined". The union is calling for the federal government to intervene to prevent further proposed cuts. CSIRO Staff Association section secretary Susan Tonks said there was a "clear disconnect between the government's talk about boosting productivity and their failure to support the very institution that helps deliver it". "But deep job cuts at the CSIRO are directly undermining Australia's ability to innovate, compete and grow. And this will continue to be the case as long as this government sits on its hands while hundreds of staff at the CSIRO are shown the door with little to no explanation. "If this government is serious about productivity, it must step in, stop the cuts, and back our country's peak science institution." The CSIRO has been contacted for comment. Ms Tonks said concern among staff was high. "If you're looking at the May budget papers and the workshops … there's workshops coming up to assess what science will be done, and what research will continue in September," she said. "And looking at all the numbers and everything that's coming up, it's looking highly likely that there will be similar numbers [to last year's cuts] coming across the research portfolio. "There's still assessments to be done, but given what we've just come out of, the anxiety and the concern and anger from staff is high." She said it was "hard to say" which areas within the CSIRO would be targeted. "But I think everything's going to be looked at," she said. "Looking at recent conversations with staff in preparation for some of those that are going to go through, there's quotes like, 'We need to be simpler as an organisation, we need to exit some areas and do fewer things better.'" She said it was "unsettling" for staff who had already been through recent changes, and warned some might not remain at the CSIRO if uncertainty lingered. "It's worth noting, public investment in research and development is what delivers innovation, it increases productivity," Ms Tonks said. "The CSIRO's been behind some of the most important scientific innovations that we've had in Australia. "We need to make sure that we back it."
News.com.au
22 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Labor looks to speed up PBS listings amid calls from lobby groups
Health Minister Mark Butler says he is looking at recommendations to speed up medicine approvals amid pressure from lobbyists both within Australia and in the US. Medicines Australia has repeatedly highlighted that Australia lags behind comparable countries in listing new medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) – a list of federally subsidised medicines. It takes an average of 466 days from when the Therapeutic Goods Administration approves a medicine to when it becomes affordable on the PBS, according to the peak body. This is much longer than in the UK and Canada, for example. The lengthy timeline has also angered the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), which has framed the PBS as a 'non-tariff trade barrier' that harms American companies in representations to the Trump administration. Lengthy PBS listing times is among PhRMA's core criticisms. Mr Butler said on Thursday he would look at Medicines Australia's recommendations to make the 'approvals system quicker'. 'We're getting an enormous number of new medicining coming on to the market,' he told the ABC. 'We're living through a turbocharged period of discovery bringing more and more new medicine, so making sure that we can assess them and approve them very quickly to get them into patients as quickly as possible is something I've said is a real priority for us this term.' Because the PBS compels drugmakers to negotiate prices with the federal government, PhRMA has accused Australia of 'freeloading' on US-funded research and development. Meanwhile, American consumers pick up the bill, according to the lobby group. 'The medicines industry, understandably, given their interest, want to make prices higher as well, so there will be a bit of a debate about how we do that,' Mr Butler said. 'But I'm very much on the page of getting medicines more quickly into our system, our PBS system. 'It's a terrific system and we're trying to make medicines cheaper at the same time for Australians.' PhRMA has explicitly urged the Trump administration to 'leverage ongoing trade negotiations' to influence Australia's PBS policies. Mr Butler has echoed Anthony Albanese and fellow senior government ministers in ruling out any 'compromise' on the system as part of tariff talks. For the moment, Donald Trump's concern with the sector appears to be largely focused on bringing down prices in the US rather than punishing allies for having cheaper medicines. A RAND Corporation report found that Americans pay nearly four times more than Australians for medicines and about three times more than the average in other developed economies. The answer, according to the US President, is to make pharmaceuticals in the US. In a warning shot to firms, Mr Trump this week threatened to slap tariffs of up to 250 per cent on foreign-made products. With Australian pharma exports to the US worth more than $2bn in 2024, it would hit producers Down Under hard. Exports are mostly blood products and vaccines but also include packaged medicines and miscellaneous products, such as bandages. 'We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals,' Mr Trump told US business news channel CNBC. 'In one year, 1½ years maximum, it's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country.' He did not say what the initial rate would be, but earlier in the year he said duties on the sector would start from 25 per cent.
ABC News
44 minutes ago
- ABC News
Woodside slammed by regulator for safety incidents at multiple WA decommissioning sites
A key union says it is aware of "significant failures" in Woodside's safety management at one of its offshore projects, days after the national regulator ordered it to suspend its decommissioning work over similar issues. The National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) last Thursday revoked the oil and gas giant's decommissioning obligations at Griffin and Stybarrow gas fields until it completed "essential planning and preparatory activities". The orders come after what NOPSEMA called "preventable health and safety incidents" at both sites. NOPSEMA asked BHP to decommission both gas fields in 2021, a year before its petroleum arm was bought by Woodside. Decommissioning refers to the process of safely closing a mine or oil and gas site, with the expectation that the impacted environment will be rehabilitated afterwards. In May, 16,000 litres of oil spilled into the ocean during removal operations at Woodside's Griffin oil and gas field, which NOPSEMA said had the potential to expose workers to hydrogen sulphide. Meanwhile, the regulator said there had been unsuccessful recovery attempts and the presence of hydrates in some infrastructure at Stybarrow. A Woodside spokesperson said the company had made substantial progress towards decommissioning the Stybarrow, Griffin and Minerva fields, concluding a multi-year decommissioning program. "Across the campaign, more than 25,000 tonnes of infrastructure, including over 140 kilometres of pipe and 100 subsea structures, have been brought to shore to enable recycling and reuse," it said. A Woodside spokesperson said NOPSEMA's revised general directions provided additional time and clarity for essential planning and preparatory activities. The regulator's directions were welcomed by Maritime Union of Australia organiser Doug Heath, who has sent the regulator a deluge of reports about "near misses" at Woodside's decommissioning projects. He told the ABC that "a fundamental breach" had occurred at one of Woodside's offshore projects just this week. "We've had a series of incidents where workers have suffered, in one case a punctured lung," Mr Heath said. "In other cases, there have been a series of near misses." In March, NOPSEMA confirmed it was investigating lifting and crane operations at McDermott's DLV 2000 vessel, which has been decommissioning the Stybarrow gas field. Two years ago, Woodside contractor Michael Jurman died while working at the North Rankin offshore facility, an incident that NOPSEMA is still investigating. Since then, Woodside's health and safety data showed the number of high-potential incidents and total recordable injuries had increased. Mr Heath said the company had not learned its lesson. "If they need the regulator to tell them that they're not doing a good enough job, they've got some significant failures within their HSC management," he said. "[Woodside is] doing more decommissioning work than probably any other oil and gas company in WA, but their standards have slipped over the course of time. A Woodside spokesperson said safety always had been and would continue to be its priority, and it was continuously taking action to strengthen its safety culture.
