Explainer: How Labor's housing plan will impact you
The Albanese government's comprehensive housing package promises billions in new investment, rent and first homebuyer support, crisis accommodation, and a crackdown on foreign investment.
Some experts, however remain cautious, with Labor's housing plan likely to drive property prices higher in the near term before supply-side measures can take effect.
Here's a quick breakdown on how Labor plans to tackle Australia's housing crisis.
100,000 homes for first home buyers
Labor has committed $10 billion to build 100,000 homes over eight years, exclusively for purchase by first home buyers and locked away from property investors. They would be built in partnership with state developers.
Universal 5 per cent deposit
From 2026, income limits under the First Home Buyers Guarantee will be abolished, allowing any first homebuyer to purchase a home with just a 5 per cent deposit without having to pay Lenders Mortgage Insurance. Prices on eligible properties will also be lifted and there will be no income caps or participant limit.
Smaller mortgages through Help to Buy
Labor's Help to Buy shared equity scheme, where the government covers up to 40 per cent of a home's cost that first home buyers can buy out at a later date, is said to be expanded later this year. Smaller mortgages mean lower repayments and homebuyers will also be able to gradually buy out the government's stake over time,
Build to Rent
Property developers can access tax incentives to build apartments with a portion of units rented 'affordably' below market rate.
Rent relief
Labor has delivered a 45 per cent increase in Commonwealth Rent Assistance – the biggest back-to-back increase in over 30 years, helping over 1 million households better manage rising rents.
Social and affordable housing push
Through the Housing Australia Future Fund and other programs, Labor plans to deliver 55,000 social and affordable homes (28,000 already in development). The scheme will prioritise housing for vulnerable women, children, veterans, and key workers. The aim is to cut social housing waitlists.
Support for crisis accommodation
Labor is investing a record $1.2b into new crisis and transitional housing-for older women, young Australians, and those escaping family violence-to provide safe, emergency shelter for the most vulnerable.
Apprentice incentive payments
To meet ambitious housing targets, Labor is looking to incentivise more people into trades.
This mean investing $78m to fast track the qualification of 6000 tradies to help build more homes across Australia.
From July 1, 2025, eligible apprentices will also receive $10,000 in incentive payments, on top of their wages, over the life of their apprenticeship to work in housing construction.
Foreign investor ban
From April 1, 2025 to March 31, 2027, foreign investors, including temporary residents and foreign-owned companies, cannot apply to buy an established dwelling in Australia unless an exception applies. These limited exceptions will include investments that significantly increase housing supply or support the availability of housing supply, and for the Pacific Australia Labour Mobility (PALM) scheme.
So what does it all mean? Ray White chief economist Nerida Conisbee provides some further insights.
Deposit scheme expansion: a double-edged sword
Labor's signature policy – extending the 5 per cent deposit scheme to all first home buyers regardless of income – represents a fundamental shift in housing accessibility.
Under the expanded program, approximately 80,000 Australians are expected to enter the property market annually, up from the current 50,000 who access the income-capped version.
'By removing the substantial barrier of lenders' mortgage insurance and the need for a 20 per cent deposit, the policy dramatically lowers the entry threshold to homeownership,' Ms Conisbee said.
'For the typical Sydney property, this could mean the difference between needing a $200,000 deposit and requiring just $50,000 – potentially saving years of saving time for aspiring homeowners.'
However, economic fundamentals suggest the policy is likely to drive price growth in the short term, Ms Conisbee ads.
'The Productivity Commission's research on first homebuyer incentives consistently shows that measures increasing purchasing power, without commensurate supply increases, typically lead to price escalation in targeted market segments,' she said.
'With more buyers able to enter the market simultaneously and competing for the existing housing stock, upward price pressure becomes inevitable.'
Supply challenges amid construction headwinds
Labor's ambitious target of building 1.2 million new homes over five years, including the 100,000 dedicated first-buyer properties, also represents an unprecedented construction challenge.
Australia has never achieved this volume in any five-year period, according to Ms Conisbee, who said the closest being approximately 1.1 million homes last decade – a figure achieved with significant foreign capital investment.
As it stands, the current construction environment presents substantial obstacles to meeting these targets,' she said.
These include building costs, which continue to outpace house price growth, making new construction increasingly uneconomical.
Industry insolvencies have also exceed 1200 annually and continue to rise, while Labor productivity remains low compared to historical standards.
Construction time frames, meanwhile, have extended from 6.5 months pre-pandemic to over 10 months today.
'The expanding gap between housing demand and supply – now approaching 500,000 dwellings nationwide – will also likely continue to widen before significant new stock becomes available,' Ms Conisbee said.
The paradox: short-term pain for long-term gain
The paradox of Labor's housing policy is that while it risks exacerbating affordability challenges in the short term through price inflation, it may ultimately create the conditions for improved affordability in the longer term.
Higher property prices, while challenging for new entrants, makes it possible for developers to overcome construction barriers and bring new supply to market.
As values rise, previously marginal development projects become viable, and the industry gains additional capital to expand capacity.
Ms Conisbee said Labor's complementary policies – including apprentice incentives, Build to Rent tax benefits, and the Housing Australia Future Fund – aimed to address supply-side constraints gradually.
'However, these measures will take time to yield significant results, likely trailing behind the immediate demand stimulus of the deposit guarantee scheme,' she said.
Outlook: prices rising to meet construction costs
The fundamental economic equation that will drive housing supply recovery is straightforward: house prices need to rise sufficiently to match or exceed construction costs.
One of the key challenges plaguing Australia's housing supply has been that building costs have outpaced house price growth, making it more affordable in most parts of Australia to buy an existing home than build a new one.
'As house prices accelerate under Labor's policies, they will inevitably reach levels that make new construction economically viable again,' Ms Conisbee said.
'This price-to-cost equilibrium is the essential mechanism that will stimulate developers to increase supply despite the significant headwinds facing the construction industry.
:As prices rise to match construction costs, developers will respond with increased output, gradually addressing Australia's critical housing shortage and setting the foundation for more sustainable affordability in the years ahead.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
19 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Netanyahu blasts Albanese for pouring ‘fuel on antisemitic fire' in scathing attack
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has penned an explosive letter to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, obtained by Sky News, accusing him of pouring 'fuel on antisemitic fire' by calling for recognition of a Palestinian state. The Israeli Prime Minister criticised the Labor government for mishandling antisemitism in Australia, saying: 'Following Hamas's savage attack on the people of Israel on October 7, 2023, pro-Hamas extremists and left-wing radicals began a campaign of intimidation, vandalism, and violence against Jews across the free world. In Australia, that campaign has intensified under your watch.' Mr Netanyahu also called upon Mr Albanese to 'replace weakness with action'.
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
Israel weighs Hamas offer of 60-day Gaza truce and hostage release
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accused Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's decision to recognise a Palestinian state of 'pouring fuel on this fire of antisemitism.' The letter, obtained by Sky News, was revealed after N etanyahu slammed Anthony Albanese on social media as a 'weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews.' The spat erupted after the Labor government labelled the retaliatory expulsion of two Australian diplomats from the West Bank as unjustified and disappointing. Netanyahu posted on social media: 'History will remember Albanese for what he is: A weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews.' Dated August 17, before the tit-for-tat cancellation of diplomatic visas began, the letter from Netanyahu to Albanese claims that the decision to recognise palestine is appeasement of Hamas. 'It rewards Hamas terror, hardens Hamas's refusal to free the hostages, emboldens those who menace Australian Jews and encourages the Jew-hatred now stalking your streets,' the letter claims. Netanyahu called on Albanese to act with resolve to combat antisemitism before September 23, which is the Jewish New Year.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
After moving a motion of no-confidence in a Rockliff government, has Labor orchestrated one in itself?
Did Labor just successfully orchestrate a no-confidence motion in itself? That's probably the question the party should be asking rather than doubling down on its every decision. Labor leader Dean Winter's much-anticipated motion of no confidence in Premier Jeremy Rockliff and confidence in himself finally came to a head on Tuesday evening — and it spectacularly backfired. How bad do you have to play it that, when compared with an 11-year-old government that has driven the state into debt, bungled berth infrastructure for the new Spirit of Tasmania ships and toyed with the idea of privatising government businesses, you're the worse option? Not only did the opposition fail to gain the support of the Greens, who until recently appeared almost desperate to work with Labor, it could not convince a single other member of the crossbench that it was worthy of government. Not to mention, two of those members of the crossbench voted for the last no-confidence motion in the Liberals. Turns out the alternative was even less appealing. And yet it seems Labor's reaction is that the crossbench got it wrong. Compromise is not the way. The Liberals have sold out. Some will say Labor is right, that it needs to stick to its values and its word. But how good does "right" feel when you have just locked yourself into four more years of opposition (theoretically)? It seems, though, that Labor is not seeing this as a total loss. In a statement after the motion failed, Mr Winter wrote "the Liberals' decade-old Labor-Green scare campaign" had been put to bed and it was now the Liberals in bed with the Greens. "Unlike Jeremy Rockliff, Labor won't abandon workers or make deals behind closed doors," Mr Winter said. "While Jeremy Rockliff caved in to the Greens and compromised his values for power, I stood by workers and did not. "Tasmanians have just witnessed the coronation of a Liberal-Green government, and Tasmanian workers will never forget Jeremy Rockliff's betrayal." Apparently, distancing themselves from the Greens is worth more than not having the power to affect real change. That statement likely says a lot about why Labor pushed ahead with its doomed, no-confidence motion. If it could not grab power then at least it could force the Liberals and the Greens to stand side by side. Because while the crossbenchers made it very clear the vote was not an endorsement of the Liberal government, it was a choice. By choosing not to support the motion, the crossbench has chosen to stick with the status quo, aka the Liberals. And Labor is going to make them pay for that every step of the way. Last year it was the "Liberal-Lambie coalition", this year it's the "coronation of a Liberal-Green government". Labor will no doubt have fun with that. From the opposition benches. But while the Liberals might be rejoicing now, nothing about the next four years (if it gets to that) is going to be easy. It would be a stretch to say Mr Rockliff has the crossbench onside. If anything, he is going to need to work out how to get them onside. They are wary and rightfully so. The Liberals have a track record of promising reviews and then ignoring the findings. They have shown, at times, to be so far from transparent they are bordering on opaque and not to mention that "floating billboard of failure" Spirit of Tasmania IV, which will be sailing into Devonport at the end of the week just to remind everyone it can't be used until the end of next year. Plus the Liberals have broken promises before. They promised taxpayers would spend "$375 million and not a red cent more" on a new AFL stadium, then later said they would use borrowings to cover any shortfall. More recently, they vowed to protect the greyhound racing and salmon industries but then leveraged them to make policy concessions to the crossbench. Not that the crossbench is particularly sad about those last two. But what does it say about Mr Rockliff's word? Labor would argue that it says a lot. That he can vow to support these industries one week and abandon them the next. But do you get to keep all your promises if you fail to win a majority? If 18 is the magic number, the Liberals have three-quarters of a mandate. Labor has just over half. It could stand to reason that if you need to lean on others to govern, you're also going to need to give a little ground. In his speech on the motion, Mr Rockliff said the Liberals' decision to move on certain policy areas was an "acknowledgement that people have spoken". "And this acknowledgement that we are in minority government, and we must respect the views of others." He might have won the day, but there's no denying Mr Rockliff has his work cut out for him. He has to deal with a largely progressive crossbench that would like him to go much further than he has when it comes to his promises on the salmon industry and native forest logging. (They'd end both). On a side note, given the crossbench has been willing so far to accept what Mr Rockliff is offering, it seems they at least know how to compromise. Though Labor might argue otherwise. On the other hand, Mr Rockliff has some very conservative voices in his party who are probably hoping that now they have survived the no-confidence motion, the hard asks are over. Bad news: That work is just beginning. If it wants to survive, the Liberals will need to continue to negotiate, to be up-front, transparent and, yes, compromise. On the face of things, the Liberals — at least some of them — seem aware of this. Members of the crossbench, including the Greens, say Mr Rockliff's language and concessions suggest he has an understanding of how minority parliament needs to work. And the Liberals have made moves that go beyond policy and speak to the way they are hoping to approach this new parliament. They have set up a multi-partisan budget panel that had its first meeting last week. The premier has chosen to forgo any extra portfolios so he can focus on dealing with the crossbench. And they have employed former Liberal MP Nic Street, who is well-liked across the parliament, as a crossbench liaison officer. A position that was desperately needed last time. If they stay on this trajectory, maybe, just maybe, things could work out. After all, they cannot afford to be complacent. They would be remiss to think the crossbench won't throw them out again. Sure, Labor's current tack appears to be doubling down, but they could change course. And Labor is right: Values-wise, they do have far more in common with the crossbench. Look at the legislation they teamed up to pass in the last parliament. If the Liberals forget who is allowing them to stay in power and Labor discovers the ability to compromise, Tasmania could see another change in government. For now, though, Labor is busy licking its wounds and maybe considering a new leader. And there appears to be enough "goodwill" across most of the parliament to try to find a way to make it work for the people they are representing. So hopefully, now, the drama is over (a solid two months after parliament blew up). To borrow a Liberal phrase, they can all just "get on with the job".
