‘Sick of it': Liberals pledge to scale back Welcome to Country ceremonies
Peter Dutton strongly condemned the actions of neo-Nazis attending the Shrine of Remembrance in Melbourne on Friday, who heckled and booed during the Welcome to Country ceremony.
But Mr Dutton and Liberal frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price have previously backed scaling back the use of Welcome to Country ceremonies, with Senator Price warning people are 'sick if it'.
Amid the Shrine clash and a fresh furore over claims the NRL's Melbourne Storm 'cancelled' the welcome at AAMI Park on Friday the topic is back on the agenda.
Wurundjeri elder Aunty Joy Murphy was scheduled to perform the service at the match before she was informed just hours before kick-off the Welcome to Country ceremony was no longer wanted.
'We were all just dumbfounded,' Aunty Joy said.
'We would dearly love to be out there, but they've broken our hearts.'
A Storm statement insisted there was 'a miscommunication of expectations regarding the use (of) Welcome to Country at Melbourne Storm events throughout the year'.
'We acknowledge and accept the timing and miscommunication was not ideal and we have spoken to the groups concerned this afternoon,'' a spokesman said.
Former prime minister Tony Abbott, federal opposition leader Peter Dutton and National Party leader David Littleproud have all indicated support for a winding back of the tradition.
Speaking at a Voice to parliament No campaign event in 2023, Mr Abbott said he is 'getting a little bit sick of Welcomes to Country because it belongs to all of us, not just to some of us'.
'And I'm getting a little bit tired of seeing the flag of some of us flown equally with the flag of all of us,'' he said.
'And I just think that the longer this goes on, the more divisive and the more difficult and the more dangerous that it's getting now.'
Mr Dutton has also expressed some reservations over Acknowledgement of Country and Welcome to Country ceremonies.
'It's a respectful way to acknowledge the Indigenous heritage of our country,'' he said.
'But I do get the point that when you go to a function and there's an MC who I think appropriately can do recognition, you then get the next five or ten speakers who each do their own Acknowledgement to Country, and frankly, I think it detracts from the significance of the statement that's being made,' he told 2GB radio.
Price: 'Everyone's getting sick of it'
Senator Price has described the tradition as 'divisive'.
'There is no problem with acknowledging our history, but rolling out these performances before every sporting event or public gathering is definitely divisive,' she said.
'It's not welcoming, it's telling non-Indigenous Australians 'this isn't your country' and that's wrong. We are all Australians and we share this great land.'
She said 'around the country' there were some people whose 'only role, their only source of income, is delivering Welcome to Country'.
'Everyone's getting sick of Welcome to Country,'' she said.
Victoria Police have confirmed the man who led the booing in Melbourne expected to be charged on summons with offensive behaviour.
'There is no place in Australia for what occurred in Melbourne,' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement.
'A neo-Nazi disrupting Anzac Day is abhorrent, un-Australian, and disgraceful. The people responsible must face the full force of the law.'
Why Peter Dutton won't display Aboriginal flags
But Peter Dutton has also declared he will not display the Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander flags during press conferences if he is elected prime minister, arguing the practice 'divides people unnecessarily'.
' I'm very strongly of the belief that we are a country united under one flag and if we're asking people to identify with different flags, no other country does that, and we are dividing our country unnecessarily,' he told Sky News.
'We should have respect for the Indigenous flag and the Torres Strait Islander flag, but they are not our national flags.'
Mr Dutton has already adopted the practice of not standing in front of the Torres Strait Islander flag.
'The fact is that we should stand up for who we are, for our values, what we believe in,' he said.
'We are united as a country when we gather under one flag, which is what we should do on Australia Day.'
PM's view on flags
Three years ago, in his first press conference as prime minister, Anthony Albanese made a quiet statement by installing both the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island flags next to the Australian flag before embarking on the ill-fated referendum.
'We didn't make a fuss, we didn't put out a media release ... we just did it,' Mr Albanese said.
'We have flags that represent our entire nation. It's an opportunity to speak about our full history.'
Labor frontbencher Patrick Gorman, the assistant minister to the Prime Minister, had previously explained the significance of the change under Mr Albanese.
'To some, this change may have appeared insignificant,' Mr Gorman said.
'To others it instantly represented another step towards greater inclusion.'
On seeing all three flags behind the Prime Minister of Australia, the former minister for Indigenous Australians, Linda Burney, said she got a lump in her throat.
'The thoughtfulness, the nod to respect (and) the inclusivity of the gesture was something everyone noticed and really appreciated,' she reflected.
'But they do. Because symbols, however small, always represent something bigger.
'In this case, they represented renewal, a fresh start, and the Albanese Government's deep desire to build stronger foundations with First Nations people.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Allan has time to abandon Melbourne's gargantuan folly. But it's about to run out
The way the SRL East contracts are structured, construction and engineering companies working on the project bill the state on a monthly basis. Under this pay-as-you-dig arrangement, consortia are paid profits only on costs they have incurred and work they have done. This means that if the government quit the SRL now, it could break the main works contracts it has already signed for a fraction of their nominal, $5.3 billion value. There are no hidden nasties like there were in the East West Link contract the former Coalition government booby-trapped for Labor on the eve of the 2014 state election. Once the tunnel boring machine is loaded onto freight transport in Guangzhou, the costs incurred by the main works consortia – this first to get its hands dirty is the Suburban Connect consortia comprising of Acciona, CPB Contractors and Ghella – will escalate quickly. By Christmas, the Victorian government will be standing deep in a hole at Clarinda with a choice only to keep digging. This calculus should be front-of-mind for anyone reading revelations by my colleagues Patrick Hatch and Kieran Rooney about the North West Strategic Assessment, a wafty title given to a secret government document detailing urgent rail projects needed in parts of Melbourne far removed from the proposed route of SRL East. In the eight years since a room full of PwC consultants started dreaming up plans for an orbital rail loop around Melbourne, the public transport needs of the city's fast-growing western and northern suburbs has gone from pressing to dire. Loading Former premier Daniel Andrews promised to electrify the Melton and Wyndham lines within weeks of unveiling his plans for SRL. While nothing has been done on the former, the latter is ploughing ahead despite Infrastructure Australia warning about the business case and funding model and the federal government privately urging the state to change tracks. Premier Jacinta Allan and many of her ministers remain convinced of the electoral popularity of the SRL. Two days after the federal election wiped out the last two Liberal-held seats in Melbourne's eastern suburbs and silenced murmurings around her leadership, Allan went so far as to suggest it's the SRL wot won it. Yet how can a Labor government, in good conscience, prioritise another rail line for a part of Melbourne already well serviced by public transport above the provision of basic transport services for communities living in neglected parts of the city? As one Labor MP who represents a Melbourne growth area explained, access to reliable public transport isn't just about moving people around or enabling townhouse and high-rise developments. Fundamentally, it is about opportunity to study, to work and to prosper. Loading That opportunity should not be equal only for people living east of the Maribyrnong River or inside Melbourne's ring road. The state and federal government's combined $4 billion investment to rebuild Sunshine station and untangle the knot of metro, regional and freight lines that run past its existing platforms is the first significant step towards modern rail transport for people living in Caroline Springs, Melton, Tarneit and Wyndham Vale. It should be the start of a more substantial pivot away from giving Melbourne's east what it wants and providing the west and north what they need. SRL East is a project which, in the unlikely event it is completed on time, will run its first service in 2035. Its opportunity cost is being counted now, on a daily basis, across health, mental health, education and other essential services, where jobs are being cut and agencies defunded. Loading In the new currency of Victoria's public sector, every metre of SRL tunnel equates to $130 million that could otherwise be spent on teachers or nurses or preventive healthcare or government schools. Before the last state election, when then opposition leader Matthew Guy promised to axe the SRL and redirect the money into hospitals, Daniel Andrews delivered a pithy retort. 'Not rail or hospitals,' he tweeted. 'Both.' It was a brilliant line and, as it turns out, complete bollocks.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Allan has time to abandon Melbourne's gargantuan folly. But it's about to run out
The way the SRL East contracts are structured, construction and engineering companies working on the project bill the state on a monthly basis. Under this pay-as-you-dig arrangement, consortia are paid profits only on costs they have incurred and work they have done. This means that if the government quit the SRL now, it could break the main works contracts it has already signed for a fraction of their nominal, $5.3 billion value. There are no hidden nasties like there were in the East West Link contract the former Coalition government booby-trapped for Labor on the eve of the 2014 state election. Once the tunnel boring machine is loaded onto freight transport in Guangzhou, the costs incurred by the main works consortia – this first to get its hands dirty is the Suburban Connect consortia comprising of Acciona, CPB Contractors and Ghella – will escalate quickly. By Christmas, the Victorian government will be standing deep in a hole at Clarinda with a choice only to keep digging. This calculus should be front-of-mind for anyone reading revelations by my colleagues Patrick Hatch and Kieran Rooney about the North West Strategic Assessment, a wafty title given to a secret government document detailing urgent rail projects needed in parts of Melbourne far removed from the proposed route of SRL East. In the eight years since a room full of PwC consultants started dreaming up plans for an orbital rail loop around Melbourne, the public transport needs of the city's fast-growing western and northern suburbs has gone from pressing to dire. Loading Former premier Daniel Andrews promised to electrify the Melton and Wyndham lines within weeks of unveiling his plans for SRL. While nothing has been done on the former, the latter is ploughing ahead despite Infrastructure Australia warning about the business case and funding model and the federal government privately urging the state to change tracks. Premier Jacinta Allan and many of her ministers remain convinced of the electoral popularity of the SRL. Two days after the federal election wiped out the last two Liberal-held seats in Melbourne's eastern suburbs and silenced murmurings around her leadership, Allan went so far as to suggest it's the SRL wot won it. Yet how can a Labor government, in good conscience, prioritise another rail line for a part of Melbourne already well serviced by public transport above the provision of basic transport services for communities living in neglected parts of the city? As one Labor MP who represents a Melbourne growth area explained, access to reliable public transport isn't just about moving people around or enabling townhouse and high-rise developments. Fundamentally, it is about opportunity to study, to work and to prosper. Loading That opportunity should not be equal only for people living east of the Maribyrnong River or inside Melbourne's ring road. The state and federal government's combined $4 billion investment to rebuild Sunshine station and untangle the knot of metro, regional and freight lines that run past its existing platforms is the first significant step towards modern rail transport for people living in Caroline Springs, Melton, Tarneit and Wyndham Vale. It should be the start of a more substantial pivot away from giving Melbourne's east what it wants and providing the west and north what they need. SRL East is a project which, in the unlikely event it is completed on time, will run its first service in 2035. Its opportunity cost is being counted now, on a daily basis, across health, mental health, education and other essential services, where jobs are being cut and agencies defunded. Loading In the new currency of Victoria's public sector, every metre of SRL tunnel equates to $130 million that could otherwise be spent on teachers or nurses or preventive healthcare or government schools. Before the last state election, when then opposition leader Matthew Guy promised to axe the SRL and redirect the money into hospitals, Daniel Andrews delivered a pithy retort. 'Not rail or hospitals,' he tweeted. 'Both.' It was a brilliant line and, as it turns out, complete bollocks.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Peta Credlin says Opposition Leader Sussan Ley lacks a‘political identify' as she outlines major challenges for Liberal MP to overcome
Sky News host Peta Credlin has claimed Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has a 'huge mountain to climb' ahead of the next federal election following the Liberal MP's first address at the National Press Club. Ms Ley, in her speech on Wednesday, talked at length about her life before politics, sharing details about her time working in shearing sheds, as an outback pilot and her other prior jobs and experiences. She also fronted up to her party's heavy defeat in the 2025 federal election, admitting the Liberals got 'totally smashed' by Labor. The Sky News host said on Wednesday evening it was a speech the Opposition Leader 'had to make' as the Liberals look ahead to the next election cycle, before outlining the challenges facing Ms Ley in the meantime. 'Her problem is that despite being in the parliament for 24 years, she has had or has almost no political identity. Even inside the Liberal Party, most of her colleagues had no idea, even now, how to pronounce her name,' she said. Credlin said she thought Ms Ley was elected Liberal leader, in part, because the party 'felt it had to have a woman' in charge following Peter Dutton's departure. 'And partly she won the leadership because she's never really upset anyone enough to make any enemies. Now in politics where conviction matters, that's not really a badge you want to wear with much enthusiasm,' Credlin said. Though Credlin commended the MP's speech in Canberra as a 'well-crafted" introductory address, there were key points she said she felt the Liberal leader missed the mark on. 'Ley definitely deflected any really probing questions from the gallery, mostly by being brief because it's much easier to talk yourself into trouble than out of it,' Credlin said. 'Now for me, to be honest, it was not nearly enough economic narrative in what she had to say and too much focus, I thought, on social policy, areas that sold her short, unfortunately, as a woman leader rather than simply the leader.' 'Ley's speech today was a good start, but there's a huge mountain to climb if the Coalition, and the Liberal Party in particular, is to be competitive at the next election.' Ms Ley in her speech on Wednesday also revealed the launch of an extensive review into the Liberals' landslide election loss in May. It comes after another review into the party's election results, which is being chaired by former ministers Pru Goward and Nick Minchin, was announced last week. 'Our federal executive will soon discuss a more broad-ranging and wider review process of the fundamentals of the Liberal Party,' Ms Ley said. 'I believe there is a need for the party as a whole to have a deeper look at the existential issues we face, how our divisional constitutions operate and how we can better serve, support, and most importantly, grow our membership.'
