Why Preah Vihear Temple, Other Ancient Hindu Sites Are At Heart Of Thailand-Cambodia Conflict
The Thailand-Cambodia conflict stems from a border dispute centered on the Preah Vihear Temple, with both nations blaming each other for violating territorial sovereignty.
Thailand and Cambodia continue to exchange heavy artillery fire as their worst fighting in more than a decade stretched for a second day on July 25. The continuation comes despite calls from the region and beyond for an immediate ceasefire in an escalating border conflict that has killed at least 16 people.
As the situation remains tense, nearly 1 lakh people were evacuated from conflict areas on the Thai side, as the country's military reported clashes from before dawn in the Ubon Ratchathani and Surin provinces, alleging that Cambodia had used artillery and Russian-made BM-21 rocket systems.
Meanwhile, Cambodia's Defence Ministry said the Thai jets dropped bombs on a road near the ancient Preah Vihear Temple, which has been a site of past conflicts between the two countries.
Cambodian authorities also distributed photos they claimed showed damage caused there, and the country's Culture Ministry said it would pursue justice under international law, since the temple was declared a World Heritage site by UNESCO, the United Nations' cultural organisation, and is believed to be a historical legacy of the Cambodian people.
Thailand and Cambodia have bickered for decades over the jurisdiction of various undemarcated points along their 817 km (508 mile) land border, with ownership of the ancient Hindu temples Ta Moan Thom and the 11th-century Preah Vihear, central to the disputes.
In 1962, the International Court of Justice awarded to Cambodia, the Phnom Penh sovereignty over the Preah Vihear Temple and over a small patch of land surrounding it, but Thailand does not recognise its jurisdiction.
Tension escalated in 2008 after Cambodia attempted to list it as a UNESCO World Heritage site, and the development led to skirmishes over several years and at least a dozen deaths.
Last month, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet had said his government had filed a new complaint with the UN tribunal over four disputed areas, but Thailand has pushed to seek a solution through a nearly 30-year-old bilateral mechanism.
On May 28, a border dispute near Morokot village, in Cambodia's northwestern province of Preah Vihear, left one Cambodian soldier dead.
It began when Cambodian troops were conducting a routine patrol along the border and the Thai side opened fire, according to Cambodian officials.
The Thai army says that Cambodian soldiers entered the disputed patch of land and opened fire when Thai soldiers approached them to negotiate.
On Sunday, Hun Manet, in social media posts, declared that his government will ask the court to rule on the demarcation of several disputed areas, including where the centuries-old Hindu-style Ta Moan Thom, Ta Moan Toch and Ta Kro Bei temples are located.
In February, Cambodian troops and their family members entered the Ta Moan Thom temple in disputed territory and sang the Cambodian national anthem, leading to a brief argument with Thai forces.
Following last week's incident, both sides called for calm and talks to ease their differences, while reserving the right to use military action to safeguard their sovereignty.
On May 29, the two countries' army commanders met to discuss how to avoid more clashes.
view comments
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump says he heard India may stop buying oil from Russia: 'Good step'
US President Donald Trump on Saturday said that he had heard that India might no longer buy oil from Russia, though he acknowledged he was not certain about the claim. U.S. President Donald Trump waves as he arrives at Lehigh Valley International Airport in Allentown, Pennsylvania, U.S., August 1, 2025.(Reuters) "I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard, I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens," Trump told ANI. Trump's remarks come days after his tirade against India for buying Russian oil and the White House's decision to levy 25 per cent tariffs on all exports to America and an unspecified additional 'penalty' for purchasing Russian energy. In a post on Truth Social, Trump criticised India for maintaining the world's highest tariffs and 'obnoxious' trade barriers while continuing to buy Russian military equipment and energy during the Ukraine war. On Friday, external affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal defended India's procurement of energy and defence hardware from Russia, saying New Delhi and Moscow have a 'steady and time-tested partnership'. 'India and the US share a comprehensive global strategic partnership anchored in shared interests, democratic values and robust people-to-people ties. This partnership has weathered several transitions and challenges,' Jaiswal said in response to several questions regarding Trump's tariff policy. Also Read | US sanctions 6 Indian companies for engaging in petroleum trade with Iran 'We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward,' he said. He also pointed to the potential for growing the 'strong defence partnership' with the US and highlighted that India's ties with the US had overcome several challenges and New Delhi is committed to taking the relationship forward.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
MEA dials down Trump noise: India, US weathered challenges, focus on future
OVER 30 remarks crediting himself for the India-Pakistan ceasefire, referring to India as a 'dead economy,' dropping the 25% tariff bombshell and a Russia penalty even as talks are on — US President Donald Trump's diatribe was met Friday by diplomatic pragmatism from the Ministry of External Affairs. Underlining that the India-US partnership has 'weathered several transitions and challenges,' the MEA said that New Delhi will remain 'focused on the substantive agenda' even as it flagged that its friendship with Russia was 'time-tested.' This response came the day Trump unveiled sweeping new tariffs on dozens of countries including 25 per cent for goods from India. Responding to a question, MEA's official spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said Friday: 'India and the United States share a comprehensive global strategic partnership anchored in shared interests, democratic values, and robust people-to-people ties. This partnership has weathered several transitions and challenges. We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward.' Asked about India-US defence ties in the wake of reports of India refusing to consider F-35 fighter jets, the MEA spokesperson said, 'We have a strong defence partnership with the U.S. which has been strengthening over the last several years. There is potential for this partnership to grow further under the India-US COMPACT for the 21st century.' Responding to Trump's talk of a penalty on India for buying energy from Russia, Jaiswal said: 'In securing our energy needs, we are guided by what is on offer in the markets, and by the prevailing global circumstances.' Incidentally, this has been Delhi's position for the last three years, since the war in Ukraine broke out after the Russian invasion in February 2022. On Trump's tirade against India-Russia ties and that they are both 'dead economies', the MEA spokesperson said: 'Our bilateral relationships with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. India and Russia have a steady and time-tested partnership.' On Trump's anger at India buying Russian defence equipment, he said, 'The sourcing of our defence requirements is determined solely by our national security imperatives and strategic assessments.' While India does depend on Russia for the defence supplies, much of it is because of the legacy from the Soviet Union era. Although the dependency is about 60 to 70 per cent, India has, in the past few years, steadily diversified its defence purchases from countries including the US. Yet, the framing by Trump — 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care' — has been seen as offensive by many. While his criticism of India putting high tariffs has been a pet grievance from his first term — when he called India a 'tariff king' — the US President's latest statement described India's trade policies as 'most strenuous and obnoxious'. Trump's remarks deepen Delhi's diplomatic challenge when India and the US are negotiating a bilateral trade deal. There are two possible impulses that guide Trump's responses, according to Delhi's analysis. First, his negotiating style to browbeat and bully the adversary by imposing high tariffs and try and get the deal on his own terms. This has been seen with China, where he imposed 145 per cent tariffs and then dialled down to 35 – after talks in Geneva. Second, some in the Indian establishment feel that the US President has not taken very kindly to Delhi fact-checking Trump's claims on brokering a ceasefire. Not only has PM Narendra Modi conveyed this in the phone call with Trump on June 17, but Indian ministers and officials have repeatedly denied the claim. Despite not stating that President Trump is a 'liar' — as demanded by Congress leader and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi — the Indian government has forcefully contradicted the US President. But New Delhi feels that Trump's remarks threaten to undo the hard work made by the two countries as 'strategic partners' in a relationship that was framed as the 'defining partnership of the 21st century' by US President Barack Obama. South Block is, however, trying to not get drawn into an emotional and angry response, and is projecting restraint amid the US President's verbal tirade and social media blitzkrieg of epithets directed at India. While the Commerce ministry said it has 'taken note' of Trump's statement on bilateral trade and the Government is studying its implications, sources said that any response had to be shorn of emotion. 'India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective,' the Commerce ministry statement had said. Sources said that negotiators from both sides are in touch and they have to be immune from the noise. The diplomatic challenge is three-fold, sources said: how long can Delhi stand its ground against the US; whether India can engage with Trump's inner circle; and whether they can overcome the distrust fuelled by the Trump's comments in the long term. 'We will not get drawn into the tit-for-tat response with the US President, and our negotiators have been asked to not pay attention to Trump's unique style of public negotiations. Those are best left to be done away from the public gaze,' a source said. Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor at The Indian Express, has been a journalist for more than 25 years now. Roy joined The Indian Express in October 2003 and has been reporting on foreign affairs for more than 17 years now. Based in Delhi, he has also led the National government and political bureau at The Indian Express in Delhi — a team of reporters who cover the national government and politics for the newspaper. He has got the Ramnath Goenka Journalism award for Excellence in Journalism '2016. He got this award for his coverage of the Holey Bakery attack in Dhaka and its aftermath. He also got the IIMCAA Award for the Journalist of the Year, 2022, (Jury's special mention) for his coverage of the fall of Kabul in August 2021 — he was one of the few Indian journalists in Kabul and the only mainstream newspaper to have covered the Taliban's capture of power in mid-August, 2021. ... Read More
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
As Trump deploys nuclear submarines after Putin aide Medvedev's warning of war, here's a look at US and Russian navy submarine capabilities
Synopsis President Trump responded to Dmitry Medvedev's provocative statements by ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines. Medvedev's remarks, which included threats of war between the U.S. and Russia, prompted Trump's action as a precautionary measure. The U.S. Navy boasts a fleet of 71 submarines, while the Russian Navy operates 64 vessels, both undergoing modernization efforts. President Donald Trump has taken a bold step by ordering the deployment of two U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia, following aggressive nuclear threats from Russian official Dmitry Medvedev. This unexpected move, announced on August 1, 2025, has sent shockwaves through global capitals and triggered urgent responses from NATO allies. As the war in Ukraine drags on and nuclear rhetoric escalates, Trump's action signals a high-stakes moment in international diplomacy. In a sharp response to former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, days after he made 'provocative statements' and threatened war between the US and Russia, President Donald Trump said Friday he's ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of the country's former president, Dmitry Medvedev. Currently, Medvedev is serving as deputy chairman of Russia's National Security US president, in a social media post, stated that based on the 'highly provocative statements' from Medvedev, he had "ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances,' the president further stated.'Based on the highly provocative statements of the former president of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!,' Trump said on Truth in his post on X on Monday (July 28, 2025), said, 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10… He should remember 2 things.' '1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war,' Medvedev wrote. 'Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country. Don't go down the Sleepy Joe road!' Medvedev stated, referring to former President Joe President Trump hits back at Russia over Medvedev's war threats, here's a look at US and Russian naval submarines: The United States submarine force consists of four operational classes: Ohio, Los Angeles, Seawolf, and Virginia, all of which are nuclear-powered, according to (Nuclear Threat Initiative website, The Ohio class includes 14 SSBNs that make up the sea-based part of the U.S. nuclear triad. Four more Ohio-class submarines have been converted to SSGNs, equipped for both strike missions and Special Forces other three active classes—Virginia, Seawolf, and Los Angeles—consist of SSN attack submarines designed for targeting enemy ships, supporting operations ashore and carrier groups, and conducting surveillance. Total Submarines in Fleet: 71 Ballistic Missile Submarines (SSBNs): 14Nuclear-Powered attack submarines (SSNs): 53Guided Missile Submarines (SSGN): 4Diesel-electric attack submarines (SSKs): 0Air-independent propulsion submarines (AIPs): 0The Russian Navy operates one of the world's largest submarine fleets, with an estimated 64 vessels. Its 16 nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) are a core part of Russia's strategic deterrent. Despite financial challenges after the Soviet Union's collapse, Russia has made major upgrades to its submarine force in recent years. Total Submarines in Fleet: 64 Ballistic Missile Submarines (SSBNs): 16Nuclear-Powered attack submarines (SSNs): 14Nuclear-powered cruise missile submarines (SSGNs): 11Diesel-electric attack submarines (SSKs): 23After the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia took up several projects to boost its submarine fleet. In 1993, Russia started the construction of a Yasen-class submarine, the Severodvinsk (K-885). The country, however, did not commission it until Russian Navy is planning to replace both its SSNs and SSGNs with the multirole Project 885-M Yasen-class submarines. Russia launched its second Yasen-class submarine, the Kazan, in 2017. This vessel entered into service in the Northern Fleet in signed a contract with the shipbuilding company Sevmash to build two Project 885-M Yasen-class nuclear-powered attack submarines in June Borei-class (NATO: Dolgorukiy) SSBNs play a key role in Russia's post-Cold War strategic arsenal. Launched in 1996, the Borei-class is set to replace the aging Typhoon-class, Kalmar-class (NATO: Delta III), and Delfin-class (NATO: Delta IV) submarines, according to Russia launched its first Borei-A class submarine, Knyaz Vladimir, in 2017. It includes several upgrades over the original design. The Russian military declared Knyaz Vladimir fully operational in 2021, and it has since taken part in groundbreaking under-ice April 2019, the Russian Ministry of Defense revealed its plans to build two new Borei-K-class nuclear submarines. The first of these boats, the Knyaz Oleg, was laid down in July 2014-15, completed sea trials, and was commissioned to the Pacific Fleet in late second submarine, Generalissimo Suvorov, was commissioned in late 2022. As of early 2023, reports indicate it is serving with Russia's Northern Fleet. These vessels are nearly identical to earlier Borei-class models but can launch long-range cruise missiles.
