logo
‘Nothing is stopping': Peace talks feel far away for Ukraine's soldiers

‘Nothing is stopping': Peace talks feel far away for Ukraine's soldiers

DRUZHKIVKA: Sipping a coffee under the blazing sun around 20 kilometres from the front line, Ukrainian platoon commander Andriy is ready for peace.
But as Russia and Ukraine hold direct talks in search of an end to the three-year war, he sees no let up to the fighting in east Ukraine, ravaged by Russia's full-scale invasion.
'Nothing is stopping. Everything is as it was,' the 27-year-old told AFP, in the town of Druzhkivka while on a break from the combat.
Hours after negotiations in Istanbul ended on Monday, the sound of Russian glide bombs flying over – and down onto – the town resumed.
The next morning, those civilians who refuse to leave set about their daily business, meandering through streets dotted with destroyed buildings.
Andriy was clinging to hope the war will end this year, and said talks should continue, despite little sign of progress.
But asked about Moscow's hardline demands for Ukraine's army to completely pull out of the four regions Russia says it has annexed – Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk and Zaporizhzhia – he is sceptical.
'That's too much, I would say. But if the border remained as it is now, then maybe.'
'No real impact'
Nearby, another young soldier who goes by Leleka, in his early thirties, was trying to relax.
He is just back from near Toretsk, one of the hottest spots on the eastern front where Russian and Ukrainian soldiers have been killing each other for months in a battle for the city, claimed by Russia earlier this year.
'To be honest, I haven't watched the news for a long time because it doesn't really affect the reality we face here. So it's a bit like a parallel reality,' he told AFP.
After two rounds of talks that yielded only prisoner exchanges, the ginger-bearded soldier sees no point in trying to deal with the Russians.
'It does not work. Negotiations with them? How? How do negotiations work? We talk about peace, and at the same time, they are shooting at us,' he said.
Moscow has repeatedly rejected calls by Ukraine, the United States and European countries for a full and immediate ceasefire.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has accused Russia of dragging out the talks and not seriously wanting to halt its invasion.
The Kremlin said Tuesday negotiations were 'extremely complex' and that it was 'wrong' to expect a speedy breakthrough.
Leleka said there is 'no way' Ukrainian troops would pull back from territory they still control.
'The local commanders will not allow it.'
One killed, several injured in Russian attacks on Ukraine, officials say
For 59-year-old deputy commander Did – a call sign which means 'grandfather' in Ukrainian – an unconditional ceasefire is the only 'logical' way to end the fighting.
But he understands why Russia is refusing.
'They have more weapons, their factories are working, they have more men, and North Korea and China are supplying them. Why would they stop?'
'Give us weapons'
Instead of a full and unconditional 30-day ceasefire, Moscow has proposed a partial pause to the fighting – two-to-three days and only in certain areas of the frontline.
'They really need this. They need to regroup their troops. They need to restore their logistics,' Leleka said of the Russian call for a temporary truce.
Both Did and Leleka instead issued their own request for the West to step up its military support to Ukraine – saying that could help give them a leg-up on the battlefield, and at the negotiating table.
'Give us more weapons. We know how to use them … Give us good weapons and we will stop them. We will stop them, we know how to do it,' Did said.
Standing away from the other two, Andriy, his head bowed, was thinking of home.
'I want to be with my wife, to rest,' he whispered.
He has been fighting for three years and got married amid the war.
'Whatever it takes, I want to go home.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration ramps up attack on Harvard, Columbia
Trump administration ramps up attack on Harvard, Columbia

Business Recorder

timean hour ago

  • Business Recorder

Trump administration ramps up attack on Harvard, Columbia

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump ramped up his campaign against top US universities Wednesday, banning visas for all foreign students coming to attend Harvard and threatening to strip Columbia of its academic accreditation. Trump is seeking to bring the universities to heel with claims their international students pose a national security threat, and that they ignored anti-Semitism on campus and perpetuate liberal bias. A proclamation issued by the White House late Wednesday declared that the entrance of international students to begin a course at Harvard would be 'suspended and limited' for six months and that existing overseas enrollees could have their visas terminated. 'Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers,' the order said. Karl Molden, a Harvard government and classics student from Austria, said: 'I'm trembling. This is outrageous.' 'He is abusing his executive power to harm Harvard as much as he can,' Molden told AFP. 'My god!' said another international student at Harvard, who declined to be identified for fear of retribution. 'This is such a disgrace.' China's foreign ministry vowed on Thursday to 'resolutely safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of its overseas students.' 'China has always opposed the politicization of educational cooperation,' ministry spokesman Lin Jian said, adding that the measure would 'harm America's image and international credibility.' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio promised last week to 'aggressively revoke visas' for Chinese students, a move condemned by Beijing. Wednesday's announcement followed the Trump administration's earlier efforts to terminate Harvard's right to enroll and host foreign students were stalled by a judge. The government already cut around $3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the Cambridge, Massachusetts, institution from any future federal funding. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity.' Trump has also singled out international students at Harvard, who accounted for 27 percent of total enrollment in the 2024-2025 academic year and are a major source of income. 'This is yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights,' a university spokesman said. 'Harvard will continue to protect its international students.'

Putin offers to mediate on Iran nuclear talks in call with Trump, says Kremlin
Putin offers to mediate on Iran nuclear talks in call with Trump, says Kremlin

Express Tribune

time5 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Putin offers to mediate on Iran nuclear talks in call with Trump, says Kremlin

Putin says he is ready to help US in nuclear issue with Iran . PHOTO: FILE Listen to article Russian President Vladimir Putin has expressed willingness to use Moscow's close ties with Tehran to help facilitate negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme, the Kremlin confirmed on Thursday following a phone conversation with US President Donald Trump. According to the Kremlin's readout, Putin told Trump that Russia is prepared to leverage its partnership with Iran to support ongoing efforts aimed at resolving the long-standing nuclear dispute. 'We have close partner relations with Tehran,' said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, 'and naturally, President Putin said that we are ready to use this level of partnership with Tehran in order to facilitate and contribute to the negotiations.' Trump, speaking after the call, said time was running out for Iran to make a decision and that Putin shared the view that Tehran should not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons. He added that Putin had suggested he might personally join efforts to bring the talks to a swift conclusion, though he acknowledged that Iran was 'slowwalking' the process. Peskov did not specify when Putin might participate directly but confirmed that discussions between Moscow, Washington, and Tehran were ongoing through various channels. 'The president will be able to get involved when necessary,' he said. Meanwhile, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Wednesday rejected the idea of halting uranium enrichment—a key US demand in the talks—calling it '100 percent' against Iran's national interests. Speaking amid continued negotiations, Khamenei stressed the country's commitment to self-reliance and reiterated the principle of 'We Can.' Efforts to revive a nuclear agreement have continued through indirect talks, with Oman serving as a key mediator. The latest US proposal was presented to Iran last Saturday via Omani officials during a meeting between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff. Despite five rounds of negotiations, major hurdles remain. Iran has refused to cease uranium enrichment on its soil or export its stockpile of highly enriched uranium—materials that could be used to build nuclear weapons. Khamenei has not indicated a willingness to end the talks but remains firm in opposing concessions that he believes compromise Iran's sovereignty.

Indo-US posturing on China via Bangladesh?
Indo-US posturing on China via Bangladesh?

Express Tribune

time5 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Indo-US posturing on China via Bangladesh?

The writer heads the independent Centre for Research and Security Studies, Islamabad. He is currently a visiting Research Fellow at Fudan University, Shanghai Listen to article A Zee News report on May 29 suggests the intentions of Indian and US security establishments in the coming months. It also points to the possible deterioration of Sino-Indian relations and a spike in regional tensions due to the emergence of a so-called "Bangladesh-Pakistan-Afghanistan-Iran -China strategic axis". India deployed Rafale fighter jets and the Russian-made S-400 air defence system at the Siliguri Corridor, a strategically important stretch, due to threats from Dhaka, according to Zee News. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's remarks at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on May 30 emphasised "the real and imminent threat China poses". He said Beijing is "credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific" and that the US is reorienting toward deterring aggression by communist China. Both developments are centred around China. Let's examine the US posturing towards China. The US establishment focuses on the "ascendent China challenge", projecting military build-up and war-games as aggressive Chinese posturing. However, history contradicts this. Has China ever invaded another country or used deadly ammunition on foreign territories? Has it occupied an alien country like the US did in Afghanistan, Iraq or Libya? Has Beijing ever quietly endorsed or condoned a genocide, like Israel's repression against Palestinians? Beijing got back Hong Kong after a century of negotiations with the British and is following the same approach for Taiwan, which it considers part of One China. For President Xi Jinping, reuniting Taiwan with the mainland is a mission his generation is committed to achieving. Raising alarm over war drills, a legitimate right of sovereign nations, contradicts US-NATO war games, including in the South China Sea. The latest example was the largest joint military exercises between the US and the Philippines in April, involving 17,000 troops to simulate war with China over Taiwan and the South China Sea. Why would China's marine patrols and exercises be questioned without supporting evidence? After challenging Pakistan and losing multiple aircraft on May 7, New Delhi is now deflecting criticism by bullying Bangladesh in indirect messaging to China. A Zee News report as well as a backgrounder by The New Indian Express reflect the Indian establishment's current focus on Beijing and Dhaka. It noted that the interim government in Dhaka is reportedly leaning toward China and Pakistan, which could reshape India's strategic balance in the east. The report also detailed the reinforcement of the 22km Siliguri Corridor, India's only land link to its northeastern states, which sits at the crossroads of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and China. The Siliguri Corridor in West Bengal connects India's mainland to its northeastern states, known as the Seven Sisters. Any disruption in this narrow strip between Nepal and Bangladesh would sever India's northeastern states from the rest of India. The deployment of the S-400 air defence system and a Rafale squadron at Hashimara Airbase is more than just tactical positioning; it's a strategic warning. India's military posturing at the Siliguri Corridor is a show of strength and a declaration that any misadventure from the north (China) or east (Bangladesh) will be met with full force," highlights The New Indian Express report. India's overreaction began after Bangladesh's interim leader Dr Muhammad Yunus referred to India's northeast as landlocked during his China visit in March. New Delhi promptly restricted certain Bangladeshi exports through its entry points, exempting Nepal and Bhutan though, signaling that undermining India's strategic autonomy in the region has economic and political consequences. The Indian sensitivity primarily stems from Sheikh Hasina's rise to power in August 2024, which diminished India's clout gained over the past two decades. The growing Dhaka-Beijing proximity causes anxiety in New Delhi, especially after the Yunus administration moved the $1 billion Teesta River project to China and decided to revive the 1931 Lalmonirhat airbase .This airbase is near the Siliguri Corridor, which China has also promised to rehabilitate. The Hegseth speech and Indian defence reinforcement at the Siliguri Corridor are both directed at China. Even though the US and India may disagree over tariffs, China will likely force both into a convenient embrace after the recent strategic shift in the region. Both countries may use the feared China-Bangladesh-Sri Lanka-Pakistan-Afghanistan-Iran axis as a justification for attacking China and undermining its interests. However, this may hurt the combined interests of India and the US more than China's, which has built a vast community across Africa and Asia through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) rather than intimidation and military interventions. What we need in these times of turbulence across the globe, and the disruption that an aggressive Donald Trump has caused, is intensified mutually beneficial cooperation instead of artificially drummed-up threats to unjustifiably demonise target countries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store