logo
US slaps steep tariffs on Southeast Asian solar imports

US slaps steep tariffs on Southeast Asian solar imports

Mint22-04-2025

The U.S. broadened its trade dispute with China by imposing steep tariffs on solar imports from four Southeast Asian countries where mainland manufacturers have set up factories in recent years.
Tariffs of up to 3,521% on imports of solar cells from Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam and Malaysia would effectively make the products unmarketable to U.S. consumers. That follows a yearlong investigation by the U.S. Department of Commerce into claims by American producers that Chinese companies in those countries were dumping solar cells and panels in the U.S. at artificially low prices.
China has become the biggest target in a trade war that the U.S. launched this year over what it sees as unfair trade practices used by most trading partners, including many of Washington's allies. Tit-for-tat tariff responses by the White House and Beijing are threatening to make much of the trade between the world's two biggest economies grind to a halt.
The solar tariffs announced Monday illustrate concern in the U.S. that China could avoid paying punitive tariffs by raising exports from a global network of factories that it has expanded in recent years.
The American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee last year filed a petition for protection from what it said were China's 'harmful trade practices." The industry group alleged that Beijing's industrial policy has led to massive subsidization in the solar sector in China and Southeast Asia, threatening the U.S. solar manufacturing industry.
The new duties reflect the commerce department's findings that some Chinese producers have been shipping solar products through Southeast Asian countries to avoid paying tariffs imposed in the past.
The U.S. has become a lucrative market for makers of renewable-energy products, fanned partly by policies introduced by the Biden administration such as the Inflation Reduction Act. Solar energy accounts for more than 15% of electricity generated in states including California and Massachusetts.
Last year, the Biden administration issued preliminary decisions to set countervailing duties on solar panels and cells produced in the four Southeast Asian countries, ranging from 0%-300%.
The new duties imposed by the Trump administration apply to several companies in Southeast Asia. Some producers in Cambodia face tariffs of more than 3,500%.
That comes at a challenging time for the solar industry broadly.
Since regaining office, President Trump has begun implementing an energy policy that could jolt demand for solar panels, including by lifting certain barriers to mining coal that some analysts think will slow the closure of coal-fired power plants. Recently introduced tariffs on most U.S. trading partners are expected to drive up costs of new clean-energy projects, including solar.
Write to Kimberley Kao at kimberley.kao@wsj.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Order Mass Production Of Coffins': Iranian Lawmaker Warns Trump After Strikes On Nuclear Sites
'Order Mass Production Of Coffins': Iranian Lawmaker Warns Trump After Strikes On Nuclear Sites

News18

time22 minutes ago

  • News18

'Order Mass Production Of Coffins': Iranian Lawmaker Warns Trump After Strikes On Nuclear Sites

Last Updated: It comes after Trump's announcement on Sunday, in which he confirmed that US forces had launched targeted strikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites. An Iranian member of parliament issued a sharp warning to the United States following recent airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, saying that President Donald Trump should 'order mass production" of 'coffins" for American forces. Qasem Ravanbakhsh, a representative from Iran's Qom province, vowed retaliation against what he called the 'terrorist forces of America." 'Trump should order mass production from coffin-making companies as soon as possible to transfer the bodies of American military personnel stationed in the region," said Ravanbakhsh. It comes after Trump's announcement on Sunday, in which he confirmed via Truth Social that US forces had launched targeted strikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites. In a brief national address, Trump claimed the operation had 'obliterated" Iran's nuclear enrichment infrastructure and thwarted its alleged efforts to develop nuclear weapons. Ravanbakhsh, however, rejected Trump's claim, specifically disputing the extent of damage inflicted on the underground Fordow facility, believed to be a key site for uranium enrichment. Speaking to Iran's semi-official Tasnim News Agency, he said, 'The damage to the Fordow facilities is not as great as the American media and the criminal Trump are saying, and the underground facilities have not been damaged." He further stated that the international community 'should be confident" that Iran's 'nuclear knowledge" remains intact and 'cannot be destroyed by these crimes." Araghchi warned that the United States would face 'everlasting consequences" for its actions. Meanwhile, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, in a statement broadcast on state television, warned the United States to 'expect regrettable responses" following its strikes on Tehran's nuclear facilities. First Published: June 22, 2025, 17:29 IST

Trump promised to end wars — Now he's starting one
Trump promised to end wars — Now he's starting one

Time of India

time23 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump promised to end wars — Now he's starting one

Donald Trump campaigned as the president who would end 'forever wars'. He withdrew troops from Afghanistan, pulled the United States out of the Iran nuclear deal, and insisted he would resolve global conflicts through strength, not entanglement. But with a single decision, ordering strikes on Iran's core nuclear facilities on June 22, Trump has pushed the US into its most direct confrontation with Tehran in decades. By aligning with Israel's escalating shadow war, he has risked a broader regional conflict and undercut the central tenet of his foreign policy: keeping America out of new wars. 'Remember, there are many targets left… But if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill,' Trump said in a televised address after the attack. The strikes on Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow, all key to Iran's uranium enrichment efforts, marked the most aggressive US action since the 2020 killing of General Qassem Soleimani. They have cast a long shadow over Trump's 'America First' approach. Is this Trump's Iraq moment? With the strike, Trump may have crossed a line he long promised to avoid: drawing America into another Middle Eastern conflict. Live Events Despite repeated pledges to end endless wars and prioritise domestic concerns, his decision to target Iran's nuclear sites has revived memories of 2003, when the US invaded Iraq over suspected weapons of mass destruction. Then it was Saddam Hussein. Now, it is Iran's estimated 7–10 day 'breakout time' to a nuclear bomb. In both cases, the consequences are unpredictable. Trump once styled himself as the anti-war president. He criticised the Iraq invasion, pulled troops from Afghanistan, and insisted on avoiding military entanglements. 'Great nations do not fight endless wars,' he told Congress in 2019, often claiming he was the only modern president who had not started a war. That narrative may no longer hold. At odds with his own Throughout his political career, Trump questioned US military interventions. His 2016 and 2024 campaigns both promised to scale back global commitments and bring troops home. Under the 2020 Doha Agreement, his administration committed to a full withdrawal from Afghanistan, completed in 2021 under President Biden. Trump frequently cited this as proof of his restraint. Yet the recent decision to authorise strikes in Iran has undermined that claim. According to reports in the Financial Times, Trump's rhetoric turned confrontational during a Gulf visit last month. 'We want them to be a wonderful, safe, great country, but they cannot have a nuclear weapon,' he said. 'This is an offer that will not last forever.' Days before the strike, he left the G7 summit in Canada to consider military options. A two-week deadline given to Tehran was unexpectedly cut short, triggering the Saturday night offensive. Inside the strike The operation was led by US Air Force B-2 stealth bombers, which deployed six 30,000-pound GBU-57A/B 'bunker busters' on Fordow. These weapons are designed to target deeply fortified facilities. Natanz, a central hub for enrichment, houses thousands of IR-1 and IR-6 centrifuges. Isfahan contains uranium conversion units vital for fuel fabrication. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), these facilities are crucial to Iran's nuclear ambitions. As of May 2025, the IAEA confirmed that Iran had enriched uranium to 60%, , dangerously close to the 90% threshold needed for weapons-grade material. approaching weapons-grade levels. US intelligence estimated Iran could accumulate enough fissile material for one nuclear device in under ten days. This rapidly narrowing 'breakout time' was cited by Washington and Tel Aviv as justification for the preventive strike. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed Trump's move as 'bold and historic'. Risks and strategic blowback Trump's advisers reportedly believed Iran would avoid full-scale retaliation due to economic struggles and domestic unrest. According to Financial Times, the president's inner circle described the strike as a 'limited but decisive' step to neutralise a threat without prolonged involvement. 'It all depends on how the Iranian regime reacts,' said Brian Katulis of the Middle East Institute. 'Iran's regional network remains lethal and capable of spreading more instability.' Dana Stroul, a former Pentagon official, said the attack undermined Trump's diplomatic claims. 'Trump repeatedly emphasised deal-making and avoiding conflict. Yet here we are, five months into his second term, and the US is in direct conflict with Iran.'In Washington, the response was swift and polarised. While some Republicans defended the action, critics raised alarm over the lack of congressional approval. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called for Trump's impeachment, while Republican Thomas Massie labelled the strike unconstitutional. Senator Chris Van Hollen said, 'The war in Iraq was also started under false pretences. The US should not have joined Netanyahu in launching a war of choice.' Others in the GOP stood by Trump. House Speaker Mike Johnson described it as 'America First policy in action'. The electoral gamble At the time of the strike, Trump's approval rating stood at 46.9%, with 51% disapproval, according to RealClearPolitics. 'He still has political room, especially if Iran retaliates,' said Aaron David Miller of the Carnegie Endowment, reported FT. 'But if Americans are killed or oil prices soar, that could change quickly.' Troops on the line The US maintains around 40,000 troops across 19 bases in the region, according to the New Indian Express , citing the Council on Foreign Relations. These locations are now potential targets. Mehran Kamrava, a professor at Georgetown University in Qatar, highlighted the risks. 'That means there are 40,000 targets we can hit,' an Iranian commander reportedly said. Energy markets on edge Oil markets reacted swiftly. Brent crude rose 28% in just two weeks, from $61 in mid-May to $78 after the attack, according to J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Iran accounts for only 1.6% of global oil exports, but its geographic position gives it leverage. The Strait of Hormuz, through which nearly 20% of the world's oil supply flows, could become a chokepoint in any conflict. The Economics Observatory estimates that a $10 rise in oil prices adds 0.7 percentage points to inflation and cuts GDP by 0.2% in advanced economies. The last time a similar shock occurred, during the 1979 Iranian Revolution and the Iran-Iraq war, it triggered stagflation in the US, UK and parts of Europe. A history of intervention This is not the first time the US has intervened in Iran with lasting consequences: In 1953, the CIA helped orchestrate a coup that ousted Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh. In 1988, Operation Praying Mantis saw US naval forces sink Iranian ships. In 2020, Trump ordered the killing of General Soleimani, bringing both nations to the brink of war. Each move was described as decisive, but each deepened hostilities. When is war worth it? For Trump, the answer may be: When it prevents Iran from becoming a nuclear-armed state. That has been his red line. But the strike has raised a much broader and more urgent question, for lawmakers, voters, and US allies alike: What are the limits of presidential war-making power in the 21st century? Senator Jack Reed, ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, put it plainly: 'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' as reported by FT.

Tulsi Gabbard snubbed by Trump? DNI missing from White House Situation Room photos during Iran strike
Tulsi Gabbard snubbed by Trump? DNI missing from White House Situation Room photos during Iran strike

Time of India

time23 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Tulsi Gabbard snubbed by Trump? DNI missing from White House Situation Room photos during Iran strike

File photo of Tulsi Gabbard and US President Donald Trump The White House released official photographs of President Donald Trump in the Situation Room as US forces carried out precision airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, but one conspicuous absence has fuelled speculation, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was nowhere to be seen. The images show Trump, wearing his signature red 'Make America Great Again' hat, surrounded by top members of his national security team: Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. But Gabbard, a central figure in America's intelligence hierarchy, was not in any of the official photos released. Her absence follows a very public disagreement with Trump over Iran's nuclear intentions. In March, Gabbard had testified to Congress that Iran was not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon. But last week, Trump directly rebuked her assessment. 'She is wrong,' he told reporters. 'I don't care what she said.' The timing of the omission has raised eyebrows. Just days before the strike, Gabbard issued a post on X revising her earlier stance, writing, 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo She also accused the media of misrepresenting her testimony and added, 'President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree. ' Still, the public nature of their disagreement and her absence during a moment of such significance appears to suggest more than a scheduling conflict. Historically, the Director of National Intelligence has been present in high-stakes moments like the 2011 Osama bin Laden raid, the 2020 strike on Qasem Soleimani, and multiple post-9/11 national security sessions. Tulsi herself had appeared in earlier White House briefings on Iran in June. Trump's decision to greenlight the strikes came just two days after the White House had publicly said he would take two weeks to decide. Instead, by Saturday evening, US aircraft had destroyed three key nuclear sites using bunker-busting bombs and Tomahawk missiles. Trump declared the mission a success, saying it 'obliterated' Iran's enrichment facilities and warning Tehran, 'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran. ' The strike has divided lawmakers. Rep. Thomas Massie called it unconstitutional, while Rep. Ro Khanna said it lacked congressional authorisation. The administration, meanwhile, insists the action was necessary to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store