Reproductive health providers call for more state funding as federal threats loom
Mainers demonstrate at the State House in Augusta to urge lawmakers to pass more funding for family planning services. (Photo by Emma Davis/ Maine Morning Star)
Providers of reproductive and gender-affirming health care are returning to the Legislature on Monday to call for more funding as state allocations have remained stagnant for about a decade.
This is not the first attempt, but providers and lawmakers are upping their ask particularly amid looming federal threats of funding cuts.
LD 143, sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Teresa Pierce and nine Democratic co-sponsors, including both presiding officers, would provide an annual allocation of $6.18 million for what are considered family planning services, which include routine gynecological and well exams, testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections, birth control, cancer screenings, gender-affirming and behavioral health care, among others. Such funding is not used for abortions.
These funds would be in addition to the baseline $978,000 the state annually provides for family planning, which providers argue has been stagnant for a decade and is no longer adequate to meet needs.
Last session, Pierce sought a nearly $3.4 million increase. While that bill received initial support from both chambers and was approved to receive funding by the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee, it ultimately failed because it wasn't taken up for final enactment votes before session ended.
Pierce said more funding is necessary now because each year the state waits to deliver support is another year the cost of meeting needs goes up. The higher ask also comes as the state faces a budget deficit for the first time in years.
'It is a difficult time for us to financially decide how to spend the state's treasure,' Pierce said. 'But spending it to help people stay healthy in rural communities and urban communities is an absolute priority for us.'
While federal cuts have yet to impact Maine Family Planning, the nonprofit that currently administers funds for family planning services, its leadership and network of providers cautioned about funding levels being further strained if congressional Republicans cut Medicaid as well as if President Donald Trump limits Title X funding, the country's only federally funded program that supports family planning services, like he did during his last term.
Over the summer, local Planned Parenthood offices warned of a multi-million dollar deficit driven by systemic underfunding of reproductive care compounded by impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, insufficient reimbursement rates and increased demand for free and discounted care.
'The reason the numbers are higher is because it reflects the current reality,' said Lisa Margulies, vice president of public affairs for Planned Parenthood Maine Action Fund and Planned Parenthood of Northern New England.
Margulies and other providers say they're serving more patients and facing higher costs to deliver care.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Olivia Pennington, director of advocacy and community engagement at Maine Family Planning, said the nonprofit's 61 clinical sites throughout the state have also seen increased demand for particular services in certain areas.
For example, they've seen increased demand in response to a cluster of human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, in the Bangor area. Testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections is also another vital service Maine Family Planning sites provide, Pennington said, particularly in light of rising syphilis infections.
'After about 30 years of reporting no congenital syphilis cases, we are on the second year of reporting newborns born with congenital syphilis, which not only is a serious diagnosis for a newborn but also suggests undetected infections in adults,' Pennington said.
Given high incidences, the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended that sexually active people in particular areas get tested.
'We have done the best we can to ensure that folks can continue to access the care that they need at our current funding levels,' Pennington said. 'Some of our rural clinics are only open one or two days a week, so that leaves folks in a position where they either have to travel great distances to get the care they need, or simply go without.'
Pennington and Margulies said their clients are some of the most vulnerable to federal cuts because their organizations serve patients regardless of their ability to pay.
Maine Family Planning and its subgrantees, one of which is Planned Parenthood, serves roughly 31,000 patients across the state each year and more than 70% qualified for free or reduced-cost care in 2023.
Last year, 47% of the patients served by Maine Family Planning were on some type of MaineCare, the state's Medicaid program, which is a joint federal-state program that helps cover medical costs for some people with limited incomes.
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England's four health centers in Maine — Biddeford, Portland, Sanford and Topsham — served 7,120 patients from July 2023 through June 2024 and 2,046 were on MaineCare. However, PPNNE also sees patients without insurance and sometimes patients will opt not to use their insurance due to high copays and deductibles.
Given as much, those at PPNNE and Maine Family Planning are keeping a close eye on federal budget negotiations.
House Republicans approved a budget resolution in late February that instructed the energy and commerce committee, which is responsible for federal healthcare, to cut spending by $880 billion to pay for tax cuts, mass deportations and other measures. The non-partisan budget assessor concluded that such cuts are not feasible without slashing Medicaid.
Another looming possibility is restrictions for Title X funding, the country's only national federally funded program that supports family planning services, which providers had already raised concern about immediately after Trump's reelection.
Maine Family Planning is Maine's statewide grantee for Title X funding, and during Trump's previous term, the organization dropped out of the network after the president barred providers from so much as mentioning abortion care to patients if they wanted to continue receiving funding, what they referred to as the 'domestic gag rule.' Former President Joe Biden reversed the rule in 2021.
Providers in the Title X network have never been able to use the funds for abortion services, however providers who offer such services are eligible to receive and use the funds for family planning services.
'We are currently receiving $2 million in federal Title X dollars,' Pennington said, 'and access to those dollars is increasingly unstable and we've heard some explicit threats.'
During the first week of his second term, Trump reinstated what critics call the 'global gag rule,' which prevents nongovernmental organizations that receive federal global health funding from providing access to abortion-related information and care. Maine's congressional delegation reintroduced a bill to permanently repeal it.
Broadly, Trump has threatened to withhold federal funding to Maine over allegations that the state is in violation of Title IX due to its policy of allowing transgender athletes to compete on sports teams consistent with their gender identity.
While Maine Family Planning has yet to see federal funding for Title X or Medicaid change during Trump's second term, the organization and its affiliates are waiting to see what could come from the president's executive order restricting gender-affirming care for people under 19 years old.
Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey joined a coalition of AGs around the country in denouncing the order, which seeks to ban federally-run insurance programs, including Medicaid, from covering care for transgender, nonbinary or gender nonconforming youth seeking medical interventions that affirm their gender identity.
Under Maine law, MaineCare is required to cover abortion and several medically necessary gender-affirming treatments for people with the clinical diagnosis of gender dysphoria, but federal changes would likely supersede that.
'The urgency was there last year,' Margulies said of needing more funding, 'but is even more pressing because of the federal landscape and the potential challenges there.'
While family planning services have become swept up in political debates, Maine's network started as a bipartisan effort, Pennington pointed out, referring to the late Sherry Huber, a moderate Republican state representative from Falmouth who helped found Maine Family Planning.
'We're really hoping that folks see the urgency of this issue and understand that this is not about party,' Pennington said. 'This is about people accessing basic health care.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk predicts Trump's tariffs will cause recession amid growing spat with president
Former presidential adviser and confidante Elon Musk escalated his growing feud with President Trump by saying the president's tariffs would result in a recession later this year. 'The Trump Tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year,' he wrote on his social media website, X. The remark is the latest dig at Trump's policies since the tech billionaire left his role in the administration last week as head of the government cost-cutting panel known as the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Musk blasted Republicans' tax-and-spending-cut bill this week, which Trump helped to shepherd through the House last month, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on X on Tuesday. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Beyond the president's policies, Musk also attacked Trump personally, claiming Thursday that Trump is mentioned in files pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted child abuser who died in jail in 2019. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: [Donald Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' he wrote on X. Musk's efforts with DOGE during his time in the Trump administration stirred a flurry of controversy and led to resignations of top officials in multiple agencies, including the IRS and the Treasury Department. Concerns about his team's access to private data have resulted in lawsuits. 'DOGE's mission to advise OMB and the White House on how to slash regulations and cut expenditures puts at risk important consumer safeguards and public protections,' Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen, an advocacy group that brought a lawsuit against the administration, said in a January statement. Controversies have also been swirling about Musk's personal life. A recent New York Times investigation found that Musk was 'juggling … a drug habit far more serious than previously known.' Musk's criticism is channeling concerns among economists and business leaders about the prospect of a recession resulting from tariffs. Trump's tariffs — notably his 'reciprocal,' country-specific tariffs and triple-digit tariffs on China — have been walked back, but a highly elevated overall U.S. tariff rate relative to recent decades has remained in place. The overall tariff rate is somewhere between 10 and 15 percent now, according to various estimates, and Trump's tariffs are expected to pull in about $2.5 trillion in federal revenues. The Federal Reserve has repeatedly painted a stagflationary picture of the economic outlook in recent months. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) factored a boosted inflationary prediction of 0.4 percentage points as a result of the tariffs into its budgetary calculations this week. However, a recession is far from guaranteed, and many predictions about the economy have grown more positive as trade negotiations have continued. The U.S. trade deficit narrowed by a record amount in April following intense front-running of tariffs by importers in the first quarter, causing a collective sigh of relief from many investors. 'The drop in imports should have a positive impact on GDP, quelling any fears of a recession in the near term,' Damian McIntyre, vice president at investment firm Federated Hermes, commented Thursday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Anti-ICE protesters in Los Angeles spit on and burn American flag
Protesters in Los Angeles were filmed burning and spitting on American flags as they chanted anti-Trump slogans over the weekend. Footage from the incident shows a circle of dozens of people, many wearing masks, surrounding an American flag burning on the ground. Several of the individuals then spit on the flag or sprayed flammable liquid to continue the blaze before a second flag was added to the fire. A number of the protesters held high the flags of South American countries like Mexico as the U.S. flag burned on the ground. They also chanted "F-Trump." The footage from this weekend's riots also shows officers with the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department moving in to disperse the crowds, shooting flash bangs as they went. California Republicans Slam Newsom, Bass For Letting La Burn With Riots Amid Trump Immigration Blitz The Los Angeles Police Department declared an "unlawful assembly" Sunday night as protesters failed to disperse in the downtown area. Read On The Fox News App "Agitators have splintered into and through out the Downtown Area," the LAPD's Central Division wrote on X. "Residents, businesses and visitors to the Downtown Area should be alert and report any criminal activity. Officers are responding to several different locations to disperse crowds." "An UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY has been declared for the Downtown Los Angeles area," the department added. Trump Bans Travel To Us From Several Countries To Block 'Dangerous Foreign Actors' Protesters marched into the L.A. Live area, an entertainment complex in the heart of downtown Los Angeles that sits adjacent to Arena and the Los Angeles Convention Center, and were blocking lanes on Figueroa and 11th streets, police said. President Donald Trump sent in the National Guard this weekend after Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were reportedly attacked on the streets of L.A. as they conducted raids to catch and deport illegal immigrants. Seeing that neither California Gov. Gavin Newsom nor L.A. Mayor Karen Bass were moving aggressively enough to stop the attacks, Trump signed a presidential memorandum to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops to "address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester," the White House said in a statement. Newsom objected immediately even as the riots spiraled. "I have formally requested the Trump Administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles county and return them to my command," Newsom wrote on X on Sunday alongside his letter to President Trump. "We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty – inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed." Fox News' Louis Casiano contributed to this article source: Anti-ICE protesters in Los Angeles spit on and burn American flag
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Trump-Musk divorce threatens the president and the entire Republican Party
Few expected the relationship between President Trump and Elon Musk to survive four years, but the spectacular collapse of this partnership has shocked even seasoned observers with its speed and intensity. Now, as two of the world's most powerful men openly clash, there are seismic implications for the country as a whole and the Republican Party specifically. Put another way, not only does this fissure expose cracks in the GOP and MAGA coalition, it's also a considerable threat to Republicans' midterms hopes and Trump's signature legislation. The fight, which began two weeks ago when Musk expressed 'disappointment' with Trump's 'one big, beautiful' bill had initially been confined to disagreements over the legislation, rather than personal attacks. Then, on Thursday afternoon, it escalated in unprecedented, dramatic fashion. Following Trump's recent comment that he would have won Pennsylvania without Musk's help, Musk replied 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' That was just Musk's opening salvo against the man he spent roughly $300 million to get elected. The tech billionaire then went on a blistering war path. He claimed Trump was on 'the Epstein list,' supported impeachment — a touchy subject for the twice-impeached Trump — and claimed that tariffs would cause a recession. Not content with attacking Trump, Musk has also threatened to fund primary challenges to Republicans who support the bill, and has criticized both Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-La.). With unprecedented speed, Musk went from the man who could pour hundreds of millions into Republican coffers to Republicans' enemy number one. Influential commentator Steve Bannon pushed for Musk's deportation, claiming he's an illegal alien, and Trump threatened to cancel all government contracts with Musk's multiple companies, saying Musk 'went CRAZY.' Whether or not the rumors of an impending détente between the two is enough to heal the rupture remains to be seen, but it's unlikely that all of the pieces will ever get put back together. Given Musk's deep pockets and control of social media platform X, where he has a cult-like following, Trump and the Republicans now find themselves in a treacherous spot at a precarious time. Indeed, even before the dramatic escalation, Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' was in limbo in the Senate. As Alexander Bolton noted in this publication prior to Thursday's blowup, Trump's bill is 'losing momentum in the Senate in the face of blistering attacks from Elon Musk.' To that end, Musk's criticisms of the bill and threats to primary its Republican supporters has already led two House Republicans who voted for the bill, Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and John Rose (R-Tenn.), to come out against some of it. It appears that this fight has brought some Republicans back into Trump's fold. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), who had been opposed to the bill prior to its passage in the House, condemned Musk, saying he 'crossed the line.' And Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn), another House conservative, dismissed Musk's influence, saying he is 'just another shiny object.' For their part, Republican senators who may have had doubts about Trump's signature legislation now risk being seen as taking Musk's side and being disloyal to the president. However, it would be a mistake to overlook the implications of the breakup or the dangers for Republicans. If he wants, Musk could very easily fund primaries against vulnerable GOP House members, and his control of X gives him unprecedented influence over the media ecosystem. Further, Musk's influence among the Silicon Valley cohort that moved stridently to the right in 2024 could peel off a new group of Republican voters and donors. In that same vein, there are possible electoral consequences for Republicans, even if tempers between Trump and Musk cool down. Trump was counting on the bill's passage to be a significant political tailwind that would boost his polling numbers and Republicans' midterm hopes, particularly given the ongoing chaos over tariffs and trade policy. Now, whichever version of the bill eventually passes, Republicans look like the party of chaos. It is entirely possible that this ongoing feud dents voters' confidence in Republicans' ability to competently govern, something Democrats are clearly hoping for. As the Wall Street Journal reported, Democrats are 'reveling' about the fight, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) reposting Musk's attacks and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) taking digs at the 'GOP civil war.' To be sure, despite Musk's efforts, it remains likely that a version of Trump's 'one, big, beautiful bill' will still pass, but Republicans now have a bigger headache. Ultimately, divorces are always messy, but the Trump-Musk divorce is unprecedented, and it could not have come at a worse time for Republicans. With razor-thin margins in the House and the absence of Trump's much-touted trade bills, it poses the most significant threat to Republicans' midterm hopes, and by extension, the rest of Trump's term. Douglas E. Schoen and Carly Cooperman are pollsters and partners with the public opinion company Schoen Cooperman Research based in New York. They are co-authors of the book, 'America: Unite or Die.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.