NASA warns of potential blackouts amid solar flare
The eruption unleashed a burst of ionizing radiation, magnetic energy and heat capable of interfering with technology on Earth. Dr Tamitha Skov, an independent space weather physicist, said the flare's impact was strongest in the western hemisphere, affecting areas including the US West Coast, Alaska , eastern Russia , the Asia-Pacific region and potentially New Zealand . Almost immediately, the flare triggered a shortwave radio blackout over the Pacific Ocean, with ham radio operators in Hawaii reporting sudden signal loss.
NASA and other space weather agencies are now closely monitoring sunspot region 4114, the source of the flare. Sunspots are cooler than other parts of the surface. Sunsport 4114 is expected to remain active in the coming days, and scientists warn that another major flare could erupt as soon as today. 'Another flare may be in the offing today. Sunspot 4114 is large and unstable, with a 'delta-class' magnetic field that harbors energy for strong explosions,' the team at SpaceWeather.com shared.
A delta-class magnetic field is like a pressure cooker of magnetic energy on the sun, and it is often a warning sign that a big solar flare is to come. Officials said in a Wednesday update that the solar flare likely came with a huge burst of charged solar particles, known as a coronal mass ejection (CME), which will take about 15 to 72 hours to reach Earth.
A G1 geomagnetic storm watch has been issued for Friday, which is the least powerful on the scale of five. However, it has the potential to cause minor fluctuations in power grids, slight impacts on satellite operations and make the aurora borealis visible at high latitudes.
Results showed power grids failed, blackouts were triggered and communication broke down across the US. The exercise ran four simulations of geomagnetic storms of different severities. One scenario included a 'solar superstorm', strong enough to cause an 'internet apocalypse,' resulting in power grid disruptions across the entire US, with the eastern seaboard experiencing blackouts, which lasted for weeks.
Not only were power grids impacted, but railways and pipelines were also knocked offline, causing mass disruptions of travel and dramatic price increases of gas. Scientists are now calling for a whole-of-government planning approach, arguing it will be critical for protecting America from cosmic disaster. That would include deploying more satellites to monitor space weather, enhancing real-time data collection to improve forecasting models and providing earlier warnings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Using ChatGPT? It might make you stupid, study finds
Using AI might make you less intelligent, a new study has revealed, with the ability to learn, think and remember all being impacted. Students who used large language models (LLM) like ChatGPT to write essays showed to have poorer memory, reduced brain activity and weaker engagement than those who used other methods, the study found. Researchers at MIT Media Lab measured electrical activity in the brain to track 54 students over several essay-writing sessions. One group used ChatGPT, another used Google and the last had no external help at all. The group who used AI had a 'measurable impact' and had a 'likely decrease in learning skills', the academics at the research laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found. Even though 'the benefits were initially apparent', this group 'performed worse than their counterparts in the brain-only group at all levels: neural, linguistic, scoring' across a four month period. The researchers, who published their study in the paper 'Your brain on ChatGPT', deduced that those who used ChatGPT would use their brains less. These students would struggle to quote or remember the essays they had just written as well as feeling little ownership over their work. Meanwhile, the Google users demonstrated 'moderate engagement' and the group who had no external involvement showed more brain activity and original ideas in their content. If these students then tried to use ChatGPT, their brain activity, which is measured using electroencephalogram scans (EEGs), would still increase. Researchers presumed this was because the students would be trying to combine the new tool with what they already know. Where as the ChatGPT group were still demonstrating less activity even when they were tasked with writing the essay themselves. The LLM users were able to answer questions with 'reduced friction' compared to the search engine group, the users admitted. However, they said: 'This convenience came at a cognitive cost, diminishing users' inclination to critically evaluate the LLM's output or 'opinions' (probabilistic answers based on the training datasets). 'This highlights a concerning evolution of the 'echo chamber' effect: rather than disappearing, it has adapted to shape user exposure through algorithmically curated content. 'What is ranked as 'top' is ultimately influenced by the priorities of the LLM's shareholders.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: Experts discover trendy diet loved by millions no better than other weight loss plans
Intermittent fasting—a trendy eating pattern beloved by celebrities and A-listers—is no better than regular dieting, a major review has suggested. Hollywood stars like Jennifer Aniston, Nicole Kidman, Cameron Diaz and Mark Wahlberg have jumped on the trend since it shot to prominence in the early 2010s. It sees dieters cram all their meals into a strict daily time window, or in extreme examples, skip some entirely. But now, in a major review of data on the diet, a team of international researchers found the benefits from fasting were essentially 'trivial' compared to normal dieting. Neither eating meals in a specific time window—like in an eight hour period—or doing fasting for five days of the week and then eating normally for two were found to be any better for losing weight. In fact, alternate day fasting—where people fast for 24 hours on alternate days—was only found to help people lose more weight, with dieters slimming down 2.84lbs (1.29kg) more, on average. However, this difference didn't meet what the researchers said was the minimum clinical threshold of 4.4lbs (2kg). But they did say this type of intermittent fasting was found to lower cholesterol levels. Time restricted fasting, which involves a 16 hour fast followed by an eight-hour eating window, was found to slightly increase cholesterol levels. No benefit was found for blood sugar levels or 'good' cholesterol levels in any of the fasting diet strategies. In the study, researchers analysed the results of 99 randomised clinical trials involving 6,582 adults, aged 45 on average, to compare intermittent fasting with calorie reducing diets. Writing in the BMJ, the scientists said while their data suggested intermittent fasting was better for losing weight than not dieting at all, it didn't stand out compared to a basic calorie-counting diet. 'Minor differences were noted between some intermittent fasting diets and continuous energy restriction, with some benefit for an alternate day fasting strategy with weight loss in shorter duration trials,' they added. 'All intermittent fasting strategies and continuous energy restriction diets showed a reduction in body weight when compared with an ad-libitum diet (allowing yourself to eat at any time). 'Of three intermittent fasting diets alternate day fasting showed benefit in body weight reduction compared with continuous energy restriction.' Independent experts, not involved in the research, said the findings were unsurprising. Professor Naveed Sattar, an expert in cardiometabolic medicine at the University of Glasgow, said: 'Overall, the results do not surprise as there is nothing magical about intermittent fasting for weight loss—beyond being another way for people to lower their calorie intake. 'Whether it is sustainable over the longer term is worth examining. 'For those who need to lose much more weight, other options are now clearly available.' Meanwhile, Dr Amanda Avery, an expert in nutrition and dietetics at the University of Nottingham, added: 'The pros and cons of intermittent fasting have been debated for some time now. 'This review can hopefully end the debate with the conclusion that if someone chooses intermittent fasting and overall a nutritionally balanced diet is still achieved, then it could be used as one of the options to support weight loss.' Experts have long been divided over the effectiveness of intermittent fasting as well as its potential long term health impacts. Some have even warned that it may raise the risk of strokes, heart attacks or early death. One study earlier this year also suggested intermittent fasting could trigger type two diabetes. Around two in three adults in the UK are obese or overweight, giving the country one of the highest obesity rates in Europe. Obesity itself increases the chances of person suffering serious health conditions that can damage the heart, such as high blood pressure. Last year, a sobering report also suggested Britain's spiralling obesity levels have fuelled a staggering 39 per cent rise in type 2 diabetes among people under 40, with 168,000 Brits now living with the illness. Piling on the pounds has also been linked to at least 13 types of cancer and is the second biggest cause of the disease in the UK, according to Cancer Research UK.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Feast and famine approach to dieting effective for weight loss
Fasting on alternate days may help shave off the pounds better than other intermittent fasting and calorie restriction diets, according to a new study. While scientists have called for more work to confirm the findings, a new review suggests the so-called feast and famine approach to dieting may have greater benefits when it comes to weight loss. Alternate day fasting involves a 24-hour fast on every second day, and has become more popular in recent years. Other intermittent fasting approaches to dieting have also grown in popularity, including time-restricted eating, where people only eat for a certain number of hours in the day, such at the 16:8 diet involving a 16-hour fasting period followed by an eight-hour eating; and whole-day fasting, which includes the 5:2 diet involving five days of eating and two days of fasting periods. Researchers from Scotland, the US, Canada and Germany wanted to compare fasting methods to continuous energy restriction diets by looking at all of the available evidence. They examined data from 99 studies involving more than 6,500 people. People involved in the studies had an average body mass index (BMI) of 31 and almost nine in 10 (89%) had pre-existing health conditions. The research team found that both intermittent fasting diets and calorie restricted diets led to weight loss. But compared with continuous energy restriction, alternate day fasting was the only strategy to show benefit in body weight reduction, with people on this diet losing 1.29kg more, according to the study, which has been published in The BMJ. The authors said that alternate day fasting showed a 'trivial' reduction in body weight compared with both time restricted eating and whole day fasting 'Minor differences were noted between some intermittent fasting diets and continuous energy restriction, with some benefit for an alternate day fasting strategy with weight loss in shorter duration trials,' the authors wrote. 'All intermittent fasting strategies and continuous energy restriction diets showed a reduction in body weight when compared with an ad-libitum diet 'Of three intermittent fasting diets (ie, alternate day fasting, time restricted eating, and whole day fasting), alternate day fasting showed benefit in body weight reduction compared with continuous energy restriction.' Around 29% of adults in the UK are obese. Last week the NHS' top doctor said that weight loss jabs could be as transformative as statins. Later this month GPs in England will be allowed to prescribe mounjaro, also known as tirzepatide, for the first time. Patients previously needed to access the drugs through a special weight loss service.
