&w=3840&q=100)
Only Aadhaar, PAN, Voter ID not sufficient proof of citizenship: Bombay HC
The judgement by single-judge bench of Justice Amit Borkar said on Tuesday, "Merely relying on the existence of certain identity documents such as Aadhaar, PAN, or Voter ID, without verification of the process through which these were obtained, cannot be treated as sufficient proof of lawful citizenship at this stage, particularly when the very authenticity of such documents is under investigation."
Justice Borkar mentioned that the claim of citizenship can only be examined under the rules of the Citizenship Act, 1955.
"The claim of citizenship must be examined strictly under the rules of the Citizenship Act, 1955, including whether the person meets the conditions under Sections 3 to 6, or any special provisions applicable to their case," the judgement read.
The prosecution alleged that the applicant is a Bangladeshi national and has forged the identity cards. During the investigation, the police found his birth certificate belonging to Bangladesh.
However, the court at this stage has not decided whether the documents presented by the accused are forged or not.
"During the investigation, the applicant's mobile phone was taken by the police as per law and sent for forensic examination. From the data recovered from the phone, copies of two birth certificates were found, one said to be of the applicant himself and the other of a woman claimed to be his mother. Both these documents show the place of birth as being in Bangladesh... The Court is not deciding at this stage whether the documents are true or false, that will be decided at the trial. But the fact that such documents have been found on the applicant's own phone is important and cannot be ignored," Justice Borkar said in his judgment.
Rejecting the bail plea, Justice Borkar said that the accused can apply for bail if the trial is not concluded within a year.
"However, it shall be open for the applicant to revive his request for bail if the trial is not concluded within a period of one year from today," the judgment read.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The streets are no place for dogs. If Delhi gets it right, it can set a precedent for the nation
Written by Harish Tiwari The Supreme Court's recent directive to remove free-roaming dogs from Delhi-NCR streets and place them in shelters within eight weeks is a landmark moment in India's decades-long struggle with stray dog management. It finally recognises what has long been evident — the streets are not the right place for man's best friend. But the real test will lie not in the order itself but in its execution. If Delhi gets it right, it can set a precedent for the nation. If it fails through haste or poor planning, other states will hesitate for years, and the issue could slide back into neglect. The CJI has, however, constituted a three-judge bench to hear the matter further and has reserved the order. For years, debate on this issue has been reduced to 'dog lovers versus dog bite victims,' a false binary that tries to portray the issue as compassion against cruelty. This framing ignores the critical expertise of other stakeholders — ecologists, veterinarians, epidemiologists, urban planners, and public health experts — who understand dog population dynamics, rabies epidemiology, and human–animal interactions. Their insights must guide implementation. The Court's directive gives municipalities political cover to act, but how they do so will decide whether this becomes a turning point or a cautionary tale. Large-scale removal of street dogs is not as simple as netting and relocating them. Without proper planning, shelters risk becoming overcrowded warehouses breeding disease, neglect, and public outrage. Quick-fix, unscientific solutions will fail and harm India's credibility internationally. What is needed is a phased, humane approach supported by robust, long-term capacity. Shelters should not be holding pens but well-designed facilities with sustainable capacity, veterinary care, isolation wards, sterilisation units, vaccination clinics, and enrichment spaces. Microchipping, photo identification, or tagging every dog can ensure real enumeration, traceability and prevent them from returning to the streets. Adoption must be central to the plan. Puppies and sociable adults can find homes through public adoption drives, coupled with proper screening and follow-up to prevent repeat abandonment. Beyond rehoming, Indian local dogs should be valued for their resilience and adaptability. They can be trained as guard dogs, search-and-rescue animals, or security partners for police and disaster response teams, changing public perception about them from nuisance to asset. A lasting solution also requires stopping the pipeline of new street dogs. Pet owners must be required to register, sterilise, and vaccinate their dogs, with strict penalties for abandonment. Public campaigns should promote responsible ownership as part of civic duty. Feeding dogs in public without taking responsibility for their health and behaviour is misplaced compassion that sustains the cycle of conflict. Public fear of dogs is real and must be respected, but it should be addressed by tackling the root causes of aggression. Instead of public feeding, contributions can be channelised to the shelter homes to develop a sustainable business model with perennial social benefits and A-class animal welfare. The writer is DBT Wellcome Trust India Alliance Intermediate Fellow, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IITG), and research affiliate, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
25 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India tightens OCI card cancellation rules: Criminals not welcome back home
Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cards will now be cancelled if the holder is sentenced to at least two years in prison or named in a charge sheet for an offence carrying a punishment of seven years or more, according to a new government notification. The home ministry announced the change through a gazette notification issued under clause (da) of section 7D of the Citizenship Act, 1955. 'An Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) registration shall be liable to get cancelled when a person has been sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not less than two years or has been charge-sheeted for an offence entailing punishment of imprisonment for seven years or more,' the notification read. Applies to offences in India or abroad Home ministry officials told news agency ANI that the provision will apply whether the conviction happens in India or overseas, as long as the offence is recognised under Indian law. 'This move strengthens the legal framework around OCI status, which grants specific rights and privileges to foreign citizens of Indian origin,' said the official. What is an OCI card? The OCI scheme was introduced in August 2005 for people of Indian origin who were citizens of India on January 26, 1950, or became eligible for citizenship on that date. It excludes current or former citizens of Pakistan, Bangladesh, or any other country notified by the government. The card, which resembles a passport, allows multiple entries and indefinite stay in India. It removes the requirement for police registration, regardless of the length of stay, and offers parity with Non-Resident Indians in areas such as financial, economic, and educational access—excluding ownership of agricultural land. However, it does not confer Indian citizenship. OCI holders cannot vote, hold public office, or apply for certain government jobs. According to the Ministry of External Affairs, there are about five million OCI cardholders worldwide.
NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
Supreme Court's Aadhaar Option For Those Struck Off Bihar's Voter List
New Delhi: In a significant development in the Bihar Special Intensive Revision (SIR) case, the Supreme Court today said that those whose names have been struck off the state's voter lists can submit their Aadhaar cards to challenge this deletion. Earlier, the Election Commission had resisted accepting Aadhaar, arguing that while it may be a proof of identity, it is not a valid proof of citizenship. It is unclear if Aadhaar will be an eligible document for Special Intensive Revision exercises of voter lists in other states. For now, it is an option for those whose names were struck off the list in poll-bound Bihar. In its interim order, the bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi asked the poll body to make public the list of 65 lakh names struck off the voter list after SIR, along with the reason for deletion. These lists, the court said, must be publicised through ads so that people can approach the poll body for corrections. "Aggrieved persons may submit their claims along with a copy of their Aadhaar cards," Justice Kant said while reading out the order. Aadhaar was not on the list of 11 documents the election body had okayed for the voter list review exercise. The petitioners had argued this would put lakhs of people, especially from the underprivileged sections, at a disadvantage. Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the Association for Democratic Reforms, told the media, "The court has directed the Election Commission to advertise that they are going to accept the Aadhaar card in addition to the 11 documents they have specified." Earlier, Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi had flagged the exclusion of Aadhaar from eligible documents. The court had then pointed to Section 9 of the Aadhaar Act that clarifies that it is not proof of citizenship. During today's hearing, Justice Bagchi said Aadhaar is a statutorily recognised document for identity and residence. When Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan said the poll body is accepting Aadhaar, Justice Bagchi said, "No, no they have to." Justice Kant added, "It is a statutory obligation. It has to be there." In its interim order, the bench said, "We have briefly heard the Election Commission of India. During the course of hearing , the following steps are agreed: ECI will, as interim measure, take following steps: list of 65 lakhs voters whose names appeared in 2025 list but are not included in the draft list shall be displayed on the district level websites." This list, the order said, must mention the reason for deletion from the draft roll. "Wide publicity shall be given in vernacular language newspapers which has maximum circulation and it must be broadcast and telecast on Doordarshan and other channels. The district election officer, if they have a social media handle, shall display the notice there as well," it said. Senior Advocate Shadan Farasat told NDTV that many of those aggrieved will get some relief after today's ruling. "At least they will come to know why their names have been deleted from the voter list and can file an appeal. This is a major relief. They can also submit Aadhaar. We will continue our legal battle," he said.
