How will Pope's funeral differ from those of predecessors?
Francis died on Easter Monday at the age of 88, with his funeral due to take place tomorrow morning at St Peter's Square in Rome.
.
But where his predecessors John Paul II and Benedict XVI lied upon an elevated bier, Francis's body rests inside a simple coffin barely raised from the floor of the basilica.
This change is one of several Francis introduced in November 2024 following a revision of the Ordo Exsequiarum Romani Pontificis - the Funeral Rites of the Roman Pontiff - with the view to simplifying the ceremonies.
Archbishop Diego Ravelli, master of pontifical liturgical ceremonies, had then told Vatican News the simplification of the rites was "to emphasise even more that the funeral of the Roman pontiff is that of a pastor and disciple of Christ and not of a powerful person of this world".
Certification of death
When a pope dies, the official verification of his death by the Camerlengo - the prelate who runs the Vatican between a pope's death and the election of his successor - would traditionally take place at the location where he died.
Francis's revision of the funeral rites scrapped this requirement, asking that the certification of death be carried out inside the late pontiff's private chapel instead.
In Francis's case, this rite was carried out in the chapel of the Vatican's Casa Santa Marta where he lived - having declined to move into the papal apartments at the Apostolic Palace following his election in 2013.
The new rites then ask that the late pontiff be placed directly into a simple, open wooden coffin lined with zinc, where previous traditions saw a pope entombed in three interlocking caskets made of cypress, lead and oak.
Previously, the pope's body would also be placed inside the three coffins only after its lying in state at St Peter's Basilica.
Funeral
The funeral rites are traditionally divided into three stations: the home of the deceased pope, the Vatican basilica, and the burial place.
With Pope Francis having requested the first station be a chapel instead - though it did form part of his "home" at the Casa Santa Marta residence - his body was then transferred directly to St Peter's Basilica on Wednesday morning.
The coffin did not pass through the Apostolic Palace for another exposition, as was done previously for John Paul II, and was not displayed on an elevated bier - the so-called 'Canaletto' or 'death bed' - as happened with both John Paul II and Benedict XVI.
Francis has been lying in public view for the past three days until evening, when his coffin will be sealed in the presence of several cardinals and officials from the Holy See - the central governing body of the Catholic Church and the Vatican.
The funeral mass will be presided over by Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, the dean of the college of cardinals, and concelebrated by patriarchs and cardinals wearing their white damask mitre (tall, pointed hat).
Archbishops and bishops of the Catholic Church have also been invited to join wearing liturgical vestments, which they will put on in St Peter's Square, according to the Holy See.
President Michael D Higgins and his wife Sabina, Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Tánaiste Simon Harris will be among the world leaders and dignitaries attending the funeral.
While a requiem mass is usually a standard length of around an hour, the number of people expected to attend, including those wishing to receive Holy Communion, means the service is likely to run closer to 90 minutes, according to Joe Ronan from the Catholic Voices media charity.
Burial
According to the traditional rites, and unless a pope has chosen otherwise, his remains are to be moved after the funeral mass to the grotto of St Peter's Basilica for burial.
But the 2024 revision also decreed a pope can be buried outside of the Vatican if he so wishes.
Pope Francis left instructions in which he asked to be buried in a simple underground tomb in Rome's papal basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore.
This makes Francis the first pontiff in more than a century not to be buried at St Peter's Basilica as the last pope who asked to be buried outside of the Vatican was Pope Leo XIII, who died in 1903.
In his will, Francis wrote: "I have always entrusted my life and priestly and episcopal ministry to the Mother of Our Lord, Mary Most Holy.
"Therefore, I ask that my mortal remains rest, awaiting the day of resurrection, in the Papal Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore (Saint Mary Major).
"I wish that my final earthly journey conclude precisely in this ancient Marian shrine, where I go to pray at the beginning and end of every Apostolic Journey…
"I ask that my tomb be prepared in the burial niche in the side nave between the Pauline Chapel and the Sforza Chapel of the aforementioned Papal Basilica, as indicated in the enclosed plan.
"The tomb should be in the ground; simple, without particular ornamentation, and bearing only the inscription: Franciscus."
A "group of poor and needy people" will be present on the steps leading to Santa Maria Maggiore to pay their last respects to Francis before he is entombed, the Holy See said on Thursday.
The funeral tomorrow will mark the first day of nine memorial masses called "the novendiali" for the nine days during which they will take place.
The final day of the novendiali will be on Sunday 4 May.
The secret meeting of cardinals, known as the conclave, is expected to begin between 15 and 20 days after the pope's death.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Pope Leo targeted Maga money in early days as pontiff, says Mary McAleese
Pope Leo XIV has attempted to court Maga money from the US back into the Catholic Church while simultaneously contesting aspects of the political movement's thinking and actions, former president Mary McAleese has said. In a critical article reflecting on the new pontiff, Ms McAleese took issue with various aspects of his brief period in office , seizing on same-sex marriage and his attitude toward women in particular. Her views are set out in an article for the current UK Catholic Tablet magazine to mark the pope's first 100 days on Friday. Leo, she wrote, had followed the agenda of his predecessor Francis in support of migrants and the poor, although with reduced volume, 'as he tries to court Maga (Make United States Great Again) money back into the Church while simultaneously contesting aspects of Maga governmental thinking and acting'. READ MORE One of the main subjects considered by the cardinals before Leo's election was the parlous state of Vatican finances where, according to accounts for 2024, there was an €83 million shortfall, while its pension fund shortfall was estimated at €631 million. On May 16th last, in one of his first statements as pope, Leo affirmed Catholic teaching on marriage as founded on the 'stable union between a man and a woman,' and church teaching banning abortion. Ms McAleese said such 'uncompromising comments' could have been made by previous conservative popes Benedict, John Paul II, Paul VI or Pius XI. 'That they also appeal to the constituency of US Catholic voters who distrusted Francis and whose financial support Leo is trying to restore, is noteworthy,' she wrote. [ How a quiet American became pope Opens in new window ] She was also less than enthusiastic about the new pope's stance on women in the church, describing him as 'as bog-standard patriarchal, patronising and prone to tokenism'. Meanwhile, his views on Church teaching where LGBTIQ+ issues are concerned were anything but 'forward thinking,' she said. Noting that Leo recently appointed Rev Thomas Hennen as Bishop of Baker, Oregon in the US, she said the new bishop supported Courage International. [ Pope Leo XIV: what does he stand for? Opens in new window ] It 'advocates celibacy and caters for the spiritual needs of LGBTIQ+ Catholics within existing magisterial teaching which regards homosexuality as intrinsically disordered and homosexual acts as evil. This appointment and its accompanying spin is a worrying straw in the wind.' Overall, she felt the last 100 days showed that 'Leo is more Benedict than Francis though in fairness the latter's reputation as a reformer was well over-egged'. 'We appear at least to have pivoted dramatically from a careless pope to a cautious pope, from a sometimes narky showman to a genial shy man, from an impulsive pope to a measured pope, from a Latin American pope to an American pope.' The first American pope, Leo XIV's election on May 8th last took almost everyone by surprise, mainly due to his nationality. It tends to be Catholic Church tradition that conclaves rarely elect a pope from one of the world's major powers. Pope Leo XIV delivers his Angelus blessing from the window of his studio overlooking St. Peter's Square on August 10th. Photograph: Elisabetta Trevisan - Vatican Media via by Vatican Pool/ Getty Images As surprising was that he had been a member of the College of Cardinals, which elected him, for less than two years. He was on the Roman Curia, as prefect at the Dicastery for Bishops, for a little more than that, since January 2023. Following his election, unlike his predecessor, Pope Leo appeared on the balcony at St Peter's wearing the traditional papal stole and mozzetta. Since when he has decided to reside at the Vatican's Apostolic Palace, unlike Francis, and has already been to the papal summer residence at Castel Gandolfo twice, a place Francis never visited. Commenting on this, Ms McAleese said 'almost entirely gone from Pope Leo' papacy already are the early self-effacing elements of Francis' papacy which provoked much favourable comment about his perceived modesty'. She asked whether Leo will 'have the courage and faith to be an agent of change or are we already looking at another filibuster pope like Francis, just different in personality not outcome?'
RTÉ News
3 days ago
- RTÉ News
How hunger and starvation are used as political weapons in Gaza
Analysis: Hunger has been used as a weapon of war for millennia, but is now recognised both morally and legally as a crime against humanity "We must never accept hunger as a weapon of war". So says UN Secretary-General António Guterres reflecting on the catastrophic reality in Gaza today, where the population of two million are being deliberately and systematically destroyed by famine and malnutrition. He is right of course, except that hunger has been a weapon of war for millennia. In 52 BC, Julius Caesar secured his most important victory against the Gauls, and hunger was his chosen weapon. The Roman army starved its enemy into submission. The fortified town of Alesia, in modern day eastern France, was subjected to Caesar's most audacious siege. In his Commentarii de Bello Gallico (Gallic Wars), Caesar boasts of killing 250,000 people, one of the earliest recorded genocides in history. Modern historians will tell you that that's a gross exaggeration, but they also agree that many thousands, mostly women and children, died of hunger and malnutrition in that siege. I wouldn't be surprised if Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has a copy of Caesar's Gallic Wars on his desk. From RTÉ Radio 1's Sunday Miscellany, Mary Byrne's Looking for Gauls in Gallia Narbonensis on the trail of the Gauls from Caesar's Gallic Wars to Asterix The siege of Alesia was not the first time hunger was used as a weapon of war, and certainly not the last. There have been many sieges since then, and the 20th century was not an exception. Some of the most recent devastating sieges of the last 100 years include Stalingrad (1942-3), Beirut (1982) and Srebrenica (1992-5). Hunger is, and always has been, a weapon of war. In fact, hunger has always been a political weapon, even outside of wars. In his book The Politics of Hunger, which focuses on politics in England between 1750 and 1840, Carl Griffin examines how hunger was deliberately used by the British Empire as a disciplining device. The Irish people were often at the receiving end of this crushing policy. The future is unpredictable, however history has a tendency to repeat itself. Where wars erupt, hunger, malnutrition and starvation tend to follow. What is happening in Gaza today should not surprise anyone, least of all António Guterres. Nor should it surprise US president Donald Trump, who seemed flabbergasted when asked whether Israel was fuelling hunger in Gaza during his recent visit to Scotland: "I don't know... those children look very hungry... that's real starvation stuff". From RTÉ News, aid agencies say humanitarian suffering in Gaza at 'unimaginable' levels It's important to remind ourselves that at least one thing has changed since Julius Caesar's roamed with impunity across France, Germany and Britain, and more recently since the violent supremacy of the British Empire. The advent of the culture of human rights, and the international law framework for punishing or rebuking those who violate human rights, has been a game changer since the end of World War II. Hunger as a weapon of war is now recognised both morally and legally as a crime against humanity. The concept of crime against humanity has legal recognition in international law, thanks to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The crimes that can be charged as crimes against humanity include enslavement, deportation or forcible transfer of population, torture and sexual violence (rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization). It also includes the crime of extermination. While open to different interpretations, according to William Schabas, Professor Emeritus at the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the University of Galway, the deprivation of access to food and medicine can constitute an act of extermination. From RTÉ News, Taoiseach says Israel's Gaza blockade 'clearly a war crime' The International Criminal Court has jurisdiction in accordance with the Rome Statute with respect to four legally recognized crimes: the crime of genocide; crimes against humanity; war crimes and the crime of aggression. These are not just abstract concepts, or mere words. The recognition of these crimes is an acknowledgement of our common humanity. Impunity or indifference in the face of these unimaginable atrocities that shock the conscience of humanity risk breaking not just the common bonds that unite all peoples, but also shattering the very meaning of what is to be human. Depriving access to food and medicine is considered by many human rights scholars a violation of a basic right, to be precise the right to subsistence. This right can be traced back to the work of 17th century German jurist and political philosopher Samuel von Pufendorf, but more recently it has been vindicated by some of the most influential scholars in human rights and political philosophy, including Henry Shue, who advocates the right to those material provisions needed for one's self-preservation. As Shue writes in his 1996 book Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy, "no one can fully, if at all, enjoy any right that is supposedly protected by society if he or she lacks the essentials for a reasonably healthy and active life". These essentials, which make up the right to subsistence, include the right to water, food, shelter, and access to basic medical provisions. From RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland, "I'm a genocide scholar. I know it when I see it". Holocaust historian and former Israeli soldier, Prof Omer Bartow, says the IDF campaign in Gaza amounts to genocide Israel signed the Rome Statue on December 31st 2000, but withdrew on August 28th 2002, and they have since formally indicated that they no longer plan to ratify the treaty. Sudan, the United States and Russia also withdrew their signature from the Rome Statute. Nevertheless, if international law is to retain any legitimacy and standing, it is imperative that the international community keeps using these terms, and that politicians and concerned global citizens keep referring to these crimes in relation to current affairs, whether the accused state is a signatory or not to the Rome Statute. The malnourished and starving children of Gaza are not the only victims of this conflict. The biggest casualty of the war in Gaza risks being politics itself. International politics and international human rights law are facing an existential crisis. It takes a gargantuan effort of optimism to keep believing in the power of politics during times of war, but the alternative is too dire to even consider. António Guterres says that we must never accept hunger as a weapon of war because he knows that the UN is being starved of its legitimacy, and international law is being starved of its efficiency. As Israel defends its latest plan to take control of Gaza City, the future of human rights - not only for Palestinians but for all of us - is in the balance.
Irish Independent
4 days ago
- Irish Independent
101-year-old Dubliner recalls her sage advice to a young Charlie Haughey
Moira Mahon's fascinating life is captured as part of the eighth edition of Dublin City Council's (DCC) annual History on your Doorstep collection of stories. Ms Mahon was in attendance yesterday for the launch of this year's volume, collated and written by DCC's Historians in Residence. Elizabeth Kehoe, Dublin Central's Historian in Residence for 2025, interviewed Ms Mahon and wrote the segment on her life. An activist in Fianna Fáil her whole adult life, Ms Mahon recalls teaching a young Charles Haughey how to canvass residents at doors. 'I was 18 at that time, and we'd go off up Marino,' she said. 'I always said to him, when you go up to the door and have an interview and ask them to vote for such-and-such, when you're leaving, don't forget to close the gate.' Ms Mahon, the eldest of six children, also has very fond memories of heading into the city with her family as a child. 'Dublin was a lovely place,' she said. 'Sometimes it'd be coming up to Easter time, and my mother would say: 'When we finish the tea, we'll walk into Dublin, into O'Connell Street'. 'We'd go up Grafton Street, and we'd look at the windows and see what the latest fashion was.' Many other tidbits from Ms Mahon's life feature in the chapter, from her founding of a social ladies club in Coolock in the 1970s, to her father's detainment in the Ballykinlar Internment Camp because of his involvement in the War of Independence. The centenarian, born in Rathgar, said that while it is an honour to be included in the document, she doesn't really feel like she deserves it. 'I do have a great memory. I wasn't very academic in school, but I absorb things,' she said. Along with Ms Mahon's tale, the latest edition of History on your Doorstep also features stories on Yitzhak Herzog, the Irish Free State's first Chief Rabbi; the famous Dublin dish coddle, written as Gaeilge; and 1920s Dublin tramcar etiquette portrayed through letters written to the Evening Herald newspaper. The full list of stories available in the volume are: Letters to the Evening Herald debating chivalry, modern girls and tramcar etiquette in 1920s Dublin – written by Katie Blackwood Moira Mahon's life – written by Elizabeth Kehoe The story of Yitzhak Herzog, the first Chief Rabbi of the Irish Free State – written by Dr Cormac Moore Liam O'Flaherty: Man of Action and Letters – written by Dr Mary Muldowney The story of the famous Dublin dish coddle, as Gaeilge – written by Dr Máirtín Mac Con Iomaire The old and new at Grangegorman: Local children's perspectives – written by Dervilia Roche Why Flanagan's Fields? – written by Catherine Scuffl DCC's Historian in Residence programme is created by Dublin City Libraries and is delivered in partnership with Dublin City Council Culture Company. The eighth volume of History on your Doorstep, along with earlier publications in the series, can be read in any Dublin City Council library. Funded by the Local Democracy Reporting Scheme
