Record-breaking Budapest Pride defies Orban's LGBTQ ban in Hungary
The turnout shattered the previous record of 35,000, coming just days after Prime Minister Viktor Orban's nationalist government amended laws to prohibit the annual celebration, citing 'child protection' as justification. However, the opposition-led Budapest city hall stepped in to co-host the march, ensuring it could proceed.
'I am proud to be gay and very scared that the government wants to bring us down,' said Zoltan, a 66-year-old participant who declined to give his full name. 'I am very surprised that there are so many people, I want to cry.'
Orban had warned of 'legal consequences' for attendees, with organisers facing up to a year in prison and participants risking fines of 500 euros (RM2,474). Authorities also deployed facial-recognition cameras along the parade route to identify marchers.
Szabolcs Pek, lead analyst at the Iranytu Institute, called the massive turnout a 'big embarrassment' for Orban's Fidesz party. Government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs later accused the opposition of staging the event 'at Brussels' command,' claiming it mocked Hungary's sovereignty.
Marchers faced delays under scorching heat as police struggled to manage traffic, but spirits remained high. 'Freedom and love can't be banned,' read a prominent banner near city hall.
EU chief Ursula von der Leyen and 33 nations had earlier condemned Hungary's ban. Since 2010, Orban's government has steadily eroded LGBTQ rights, becoming the first EU country to outlaw a Pride march.
Far-right groups staged counter-protests, including one featuring a wooden cross with anti-LGBTQ slogans. Opposition leader Peter Magyar, however, called the ban a 'huge own goal,' while Budapest mayor Gergely Karacsony thanked Orban for unintentionally promoting tolerance.
Not all locals supported the event. Katalin, who declined to give her surname, called the parade 'disgusting' and said it had become a 'fad.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
15 minutes ago
- The Sun
Bridging powers, managing tensions
AMID intensifying great power rivalry and regional flashpoints, such as the recent Thailand-Cambodia border skirmish, Malaysia is asserting itself as a credible and proactive middle power. Its chairmanship of Asean this year has reaffirmed its long-standing foreign policy strategy of selective alignment, a pragmatic approach that allows Malaysia to build bridges between rival powers while championing Asean's relevance in an increasingly polarised global order. Through a principled and agile diplomatic strategy, Malaysia has positioned itself not only as a stabilising regional force but also as a convener of inclusive dialogue and multilateral cooperation. The recent escalation of the Thailand-Cambodia border dispute, long marked by intermittent tensions, underscored the fragility of peace along Southeast Asia's strategic frontiers. On July 24, this simmering conflict erupted into a four-day confrontation in the Emerald Triangle, with both sides exchanging artillery and rocket fire. Thailand's deployment of F-16 and Gripen fighter jets marked a significant escalation. In its role as the Asean Chair, Malaysia swiftly emerged as a key diplomatic actor. Due to the precarious nature of the conflict, Kuala Lumpur hosted emergency talks on July 28 between Thai and Cambodian leaders, with Malaysia mediating the negotiations. The presence of both American and Chinese ambassadors to Malaysia lent additional legitimacy to the process. A ceasefire was agreed and implemented, restoring calm along the border. Malaysia's successful diplomatic intervention earned praise from the US, the EU and regional Asean leaders. It reinforced Malaysia's growing credibility as a constructive and neutral middle power – one capable of managing high-stakes diplomacy while upholding Asean centrality. The inclusion of US and China in the ceasefire negotiations further underscored Malaysia's ability to balance competing interests without aligning too closely with any single power. Malaysia's leadership was further demonstrated during the 58th Asean Foreign Ministers' Meeting (AMM-58), held from July 8 to 11 in Kuala Lumpur. Against a backdrop of geopolitical uncertainty, the meeting advanced key regional discussions on the South China Sea, the internal crisis in Myanmar and global economic disruptions, such as escalating tariffs imposed by the US. A series of Asean-led platforms were convened in parallel, including the Asean Plus Three meeting, Asean Post-Ministerial Conferences and Asean Regional Forum. What set this year's AMM-58 apart was the level of engagement from major global powers. Malaysia succeeded in bringing together foreign ministers from the US, China and Russia, an increasingly rare diplomatic convergence in today's fragmented geopolitical climate. Notably, US Secretary of State and Acting National Security Adviser Marco Rubio chose to prioritise the AMM-58 over scheduled visits to Japan and South Korea, a move that reflects not only Asean's growing relevance but also Malaysia's ability to shape the regional strategic environment. Hosting one of the most consequential Asean meetings in recent years required more than logistical coordination; it reflected the presence of a deeply rooted and adaptable foreign policy strategy. Malaysia's selective alignment strategy enables it to maintain constructive ties with all major powers. As a middle power, this approach enhances Malaysia's credibility, allowing it to engage across geopolitical divides with strategic flexibility. The strength of selective alignment lies in its strategic ambidexterity. Malaysia is not bound by binary choices and can build cooperative ties with diverse partners even amid global uncertainty. This approach proved effective during the Cold War, when Malaysia maintained strong economic and defence relations with Western powers while simultaneously engaging the Soviet Union and becoming the first Asean member to establish diplomatic ties with China in 1974. Today, that same policy posture enables Malaysia to navigate complex dynamics involving Washington, Beijing and Moscow. Its long-standing defence relationships with the UK, Australia and New Zealand – sustained through the Five Power Defence Arrangements and indirectly connected to the US via the Bilateral Training and Consultative Group – coexist alongside active bilateral ties with China and Russia. This enduring balance reflects Malaysia's foresight in managing volatility without appearing aligned with any one bloc. Malaysia's current diplomatic practice also reflects calculated and astute statecraft. It pairs bilateral engagement with active participation in multilateral platforms, using Asean mechanisms to address contentious issues in a constructive manner. By combining dialogues with regional frameworks, Malaysia helps to minimise the risk of coercion and reinforces Asean's role as a credible convener in regional affairs. As the Chair, Malaysia is effectively leveraging this strategy to connect middle and smaller powers with global powers. It is helping to elevate Asean's profile, not as a passive player or a contested geographical space for great power rivalry, but as a proactive platform for dialogue, cooperation and building shared prosperity. That said, selective alignment is not without its challenges. It requires constant recalibration, diplomatic agility and coherent domestic policy support. Additionally, Asean's consensus-driven model can limit the bloc's ability to respond swiftly to emerging crises. Malaysia must, therefore, continue investing in Asean's institutional capacity and enhance its diplomatic and crisis-response capabilities to sustain its effectiveness as a regional power broker. In sum, Malaysia's selective alignment in foreign policy strategy offers a compelling model for middle power diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific. By mediating conflicts, managing tensions and building inclusive coalitions, Malaysia is strengthening its international standing and reinforcing Asean's strategic relevance while safeguarding its own national interests. As its Asean chairmanship continues, Malaysia's role as a bridging power is set to grow, offering the region a steady hand amid a volatile and divided global landscape.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Russia tightens digital grip, limits WhatsApp and Telegram calls
MOSCOW: Russia announced curbs on calls on the WhatsApp and Telegram messenger apps on Wednesday, saying that this was necessary to fight criminality, state media reported. "In order to combat criminals, measures are being taken to partially restrict calls on these foreign messaging apps (WhatsApp and Telegram)," communications watchdog Roskomnadzor said, as quoted by the RIA and TASS news agencies. The messenger apps have become "the main voice services used for fraud and extortion, and for involving Russian citizens in subversive and terrorist activities," the watchdog added. Russian security services have frequently claimed that Ukraine was using Telegram to recruit people or commit acts of sabotage in Russia. Moscow wants the messengers to provide access to data upon request from law enforcement, not only for fraud probes but also for investigating activities that Russia describes as terrorist ones. "Access to calls in foreign messengers will be restored after they start complying with Russian legislation," Russia's digital ministry said. In a statement sent to AFP, Telegram said it "actively combats misuse of its platform, including calls for sabotage or violence, as well as fraud" and removes "millions of pieces of harmful content every day." Since launching its offensive in Ukraine, Russia has drastically restricted press freedom and freedom of speech online. "WhatsApp is private, end-to-end encrypted, and defies government attempts to violate people's right to secure communication, which is why Russia is trying to block it from over 100 million Russian people," a spokesperson for Meta-owned WhatsApp told AFP. More than 100 million people in Russia use WhatsApp for messages and calls, and the platform is concerned that this is an effort to push them onto platforms more vulnerable to government surveillance, according to the spokesperson.--AFP
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Junta accused of routine torture
In ruins: A building destroyed in a bombardment carried out by the military on April 19 in Thabeikkyin township, Mandalay region. Koumjian says that the IIMM had observed 'a continued rise in the frequency and brutality of atrocities' while making 'progress in identifying the perpetrators.' — AFP UN investigators say they have recorded 'systematic' torture in Myanmar's military-run detention facilities including beatings, electric shocks and gang rape. Myanmar has been in a civil war since the military deposed the civilian government in a 2021 coup, with troops fighting an array of pro-democracy guerrillas and ethnic armed groups. The fighting has been accompanied by a crackdown which has seen nearly 30,000 people arrested, according to the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners monitor group. A report by the UN's Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM) said it had identified 'serious abuses during interrogations and in detention facilities'. A junta spokesman could not be reached for comment on the allegations laid out in an IIMM annual report released on Tuesday, drawing on testimony from nearly 600 eyewitnesses. It said there had been 'systematic commission' of torture including 'sexual slavery', the 'burning of sexual body parts with cigarettes or burned objects' and fingernails being pulled out with pliers. It also found evidence 'indicating that children – ranging from two to 17 years of age – have been detained, often as proxies for their parents'. 'Some of the detained children have been subjected to torture, ill-treatment or sexual and gender-based crimes,' it added. IIMM chief Nicholas Koumjian said the organisation had seen 'a continued increase in the frequency and brutality of atrocities' but had made 'headway in identifying the perpetrators'. 'We are working towards the day when the perpetrators will have to answer for their actions in a court of law,' he added. The International Criminal Court's chief prosecutor has already requested an arrest warrant for junta chief Min Aung Hlaing, who ousted and jailed elected leader Aung San Suu Kyi. That warrant request relates to alleged atrocities committed by the military on Myanmar's Rohingya minority in 2017. All sides in Myanmar's civil war have been accused of committing war crimes, and the IIMM report said it had also identified cases where opposition groups had committed summary executions of captives. — AFP
