
Bill to dissolve Gary schools dead, but Senate bill could destabilize urban districts
A House bill that would dissolve the Gary and Indianapolis public school districts is likely dead, but a Senate bill calling for school districts to share property tax revenue with charter schools has raised new concerns.
Senate Bill 518, authored by Sen. Linda Rogers, R-Granger, passed the Senate's Tax and Fiscal Policy Committee Feb. 11 along party lines by a 10-4 vote.
It moves to the Senate floor for second and third readings. Thursday is the deadline for bills to pass and advance to the opposite chamber.
The bill impacts urban communities with several charters, like Gary, which is home to eight. It stipulates, however, that Gary would be exempt from revenue sharing until 2028 because of its distressed status.
The bill comes as Gary's enrollment is on an upward trajectory after seven tumultuous years of state control.
Superintendent Yvonne Stokes told the Gary School Board Thursday the district's February enrollment count was 4,542 students, up about 400 from a year ago.
'We continue to get students… we're working daily to make sure Gary Community Schools can be the choice for our students,' she said.
Senate Bill 518 expands a previous charter referendum revenue sharing law that impacted four counties, including Lake.
The new bill calls for school districts that have at least 100 students who live within their boundaries and attend a charter school to share property tax money, and if voters approve a referendum, that funding would be shared.
Districts would also have to share revenue from their debt service funds with charters, based on the number of students attending the charter school.
With the exception of Gary, the property tax sharing would begin next year in a three-year phasing in of the tax sharing until 2028 when it reaches 100%.
A Gary official reported the district collected about $7.3 million from its fall tax draw. The fiscal impact to the district couldn't be immediately determined.
Alessia Johnson, superintendent of the Indianapolis Public Schools, the state's largest district, told the committee the bill would likely force the closure of 20 schools.
Traditional districts, like Gary, receive local property tax funding and can hold referendums to seek more money from taxpayers.
Charter schools don't receive property taxes and their leaders have decried the disparity in funding. They do receive federal funding and state tuition funding, similar to traditional schools.
The Indiana State Teachers Association opposed Senate Bill 518, saying: 'We believe that if additional support for charter schools is necessary, it should come from state-level investments — not local property tax revenues — to ensure a stable, predictable funding model for all schools.'
An amendment calling for charter school board members to be elected failed.
'SB 518 targets urban schools by diverting local property tax funding from traditional public schools to charter schools that are managed by unelected school boards,' said Sen. Fady Qaddoura, D-Indianapolis.
'In addition, the bill does not provide any guardrails or regulations to hold charter schools accountable similar to traditional schools.'
Republican officials said the charters are accountable to their charter authorizers. The Indiana Charter School Board is the state's largest authorizer with 39 schools and its board is an appointed one.
Meanwhile, House Bill 1136 that called for a school district to dissolve if more than 50% of students in its legal settlement area attend school elsewhere, did not receive a hearing in the House Education Committee.
'It didn't get out of committee, but that doesn't mean it can't come up again in another bill,' said state Rep. Vernon Smith, D-Gary. 'My sense is it's going to die because of the opposition.'
Stokes said she was encouraged to see the bill didn't advance.
'We will continue to work with our legislators regarding any proposed bills that impact the Gary Community School Corp.,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans struggle to defend Trump's military parade as tanks prepare to roll in D.C.
Around this time eight years ago, Donald Trump attended Bastille Day celebrations in France in 2017, which the president apparently loved — in part because it included a military parade along the Champs-Élysées. 'It was one of the greatest parades I've ever seen,' the Republican said after the event, adding, 'It was military might.' Soon after, Trump began pushing for a related display in Washington, D.C., which was not an especially popular idea, even among many of his allies. According to multiple reports, Gen. Paul J. Selva, the then-vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the president during a Pentagon meeting that military parades were 'what dictators do.' There were similar reactions on Capitol Hill, including among Republicans. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said ostentatious American military parades would likely be 'a sign of weakness,' adding that he wasn't interested in a 'Russian-style hardware display.' Around the same time, GOP Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana explained, 'Confidence is silent. Insecurities are loud. When you're the most powerful nation in all of human history, you don't have to show it off, like Russia does, and North Korea, and China. And we are the most powerful nation in all of human history. Everyone knows that, and there's no need to broadcast it. I think we would show our confidence by remaining silent, and not doing something like that.' The White House's plan ultimately unraveled in 2018 — though in politics, it's often tough to keep bad ideas down. On Saturday, June 14, the president will finally get the military parade he's long sought, ostensibly celebrating the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. The event will also fall on Flag Day, as well as Trump's 79th birthday. Seven years after Graham said such displays would likely be 'a sign of weakness,' the South Carolinian told NBC News this week that he's now 'okay' with the parade. And while that trajectory was probably predictable given Graham's broader political evolution, as HuffPost noted, many of his colleagues were more reluctant to talk about the event. They snapped. They stared off into space. They zipped into Senate elevators and smiled as the doors closed with them safely inside. This is how nearly a dozen Senate Republicans reacted Wednesday when asked the simplest question: Do you plan to attend President Donald Trump's military parade in D.C. on Saturday, and are you comfortable with its estimated $45 million price tag? What's more, GOP senators aren't just loath to answer questions about the military parade, they're also disinclined to show up for the festivities: Politico reported that most congressional Republicans won't be in attendance when tanks start rolling down Constitution Avenue, and 'those begging off include members of the Republican leadership in both chambers.' As for intraparty criticism, Graham has apparently changed his mind, but other Senate Republicans have subtly made clear that they're not fully on board with Trump's vision. 'I wouldn't have done it,' Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky told NBC News this week. 'I'm not sure what the actual expense of it is, but I'm not really, you know, we were always different than, you know, the images you saw in the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that,' Paul said. (He clarified that he was 'not proposing' that that's the image Trump intends to project, but he's worried what message the parade will send.) As for Louisiana's Kennedy, the senator echoed the point he raised during the president's first term. 'The United States of America is the most powerful country in all of human history. We're a lion, and a lion doesn't have to tell you it's a lion. Everybody else in the jungle knows and we're a lion,' the senator said. It's a point Trump will probably never fully understand. This article was originally published on


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump's Medicaid and SNAP red tape will devastate millions of Americans
Extending President Trump's 2017 tax cuts is a centerpiece of what the president calls his 'big, beautiful' spending bill that was passed late last month by House Republicans by a single vote. Now it is the Senate's turn to weigh in, but that chamber's narrow Republican majority needs to take a hard look at the facts before pressing the yay button. Trump's legislation may truly be enormous, but it is far from pretty — it stigmatizes the wrong people, slashes the wrong programs and will hurt far more Americans than it helps. For starters, those tax cuts will disproportionately go to the wealthy while adding trillions to the deficit. Meanwhile, the punitive work requirements and layers of paperwork for Medicaid and SNAP (formerly food stamps) recipients are still visible beneath the flimsy camouflage of reducing welfare fraud. Academic research, including my own, shows that the vast majority of Americans who are working, are disabled or are providing caregiving already meet these requirements for state and federal aid. Even the independent Congressional Budget Office reports that work requirements for Medicaid and SNAP do not accomplish their stated goal of increasing employment. Millions of Americans rely on Medicaid and SNAP, essential programs that have lasting benefits beyond health care and healthy eating. In 2023, nearly 83 million children and adults — 24 percent of Americans — relied on Medicaid. Medicaid supports care from the cradle to the grave: Medicaid pays for more than 4 in 10 births in the U.S., and is the largest funder of long-term care, supporting the long-term services and supports needed by almost 6 million Americans in 2021. In 2023, SNAP provided food assistance to an average of 42 million Americans each month. SNAP is important across the age spectrum, too: Nearly half of all children in the U.S. participate in SNAP before their 20th birthday, and more than 4 million seniors 60 or older receive SNAP. The CBO estimates that if the Senate passes the bill in its current form, nearly 15 million Americans will lose their health coverage by 2034 because of Medicaid work requirements and other cuts. The reconciliation bill includes the largest SNAP cut in history. It will eliminate food benefits for more than 3 million adults (about 1 million adults over 55) and roughly 1 million children each month. Still, that doesn't keep Republicans from continually trying to portray recipients as lazy cheaters who need to lace up their boots and get back to the factory. They've been making the same mistake for years. Arkansas in 2018 and Georgia in 2023 implemented Medicaid work requirements. Those moves merely caused thousands to lose insurance coverage, had no effect on employment and did not protect these states from fraud. In Arkansas, they were halted after one year. The punitive requirements in the House Republicans' bill will not only fail to force millions of people into low-paying jobs, but they will also increase Americans' medical debt, creating a further, unnecessary strain on our economy and health care system. If Republicans really think that work requirements and paperwork reduce fraud, they are wrong. Medicaid fraud, for example, is relatively rare and more often committed by health care providers, not beneficiaries. Further, these work requirements will bury Americans in mounds of paperwork and cost millions to administer. Instead, they should try to limit the sophisticated tax evasion strategies used by the top 1 percent, which are rarely detected but very expensive for the country. If Trump's complaisant members of Congress really wanted to increase employment, expansions in public preschool and child care would be much more effective and economical. It's somewhat ironic that an administration that supposedly is taking a chainsaw to the federal bureaucracy is moving to wrap ordinary Americans in red tape. But the reality is the Trump administration seeks to break down barriers for millionaires, while building them up around the rest of us. Taryn Morrissey is a professor and chair of American University's Department of Public Administration and Policy, and associate dean of research at the School of Public Affairs.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Quantum stocks higher as Nvidia CEO sees ‘inflection point'
Quantum computing technology is at an inflection point, Nvidia (NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang told the VivaTech conference in Paris on Wednesday, adding that quantum computing will solve 'some interesting problems' in the coming years, Reuters' Supantha Mukherjee reported. The comments sound like a change in tone given that months ago Huang had offered his opinion that 'very useful' quantum computers are likely decades away. Shares of quantum computing stocks moving higher in early Wednesday trading following Huang's comments include D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), IonQ (IONQ), Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and Quantum Computing (QMCO). Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See Insiders' Hot Stocks on TipRanks >> Read More on QBTS: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue D-Wave enters agreement to sell up to $400M shares from time to time D-Wave Quantum Enters $400M Sales Agreement IBM Announces Plan to Build World's First Large-Scale Quantum Computer Trump Trade: U.S., China representatives to meet about trade D-Wave Quantum's Stock Surges Amid Strategic Moves Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data