logo
Bill to dissolve Gary schools dead, but Senate bill could destabilize urban districts

Bill to dissolve Gary schools dead, but Senate bill could destabilize urban districts

Chicago Tribune14-02-2025

A House bill that would dissolve the Gary and Indianapolis public school districts is likely dead, but a Senate bill calling for school districts to share property tax revenue with charter schools has raised new concerns.
Senate Bill 518, authored by Sen. Linda Rogers, R-Granger, passed the Senate's Tax and Fiscal Policy Committee Feb. 11 along party lines by a 10-4 vote.
It moves to the Senate floor for second and third readings. Thursday is the deadline for bills to pass and advance to the opposite chamber.
The bill impacts urban communities with several charters, like Gary, which is home to eight. It stipulates, however, that Gary would be exempt from revenue sharing until 2028 because of its distressed status.
The bill comes as Gary's enrollment is on an upward trajectory after seven tumultuous years of state control.
Superintendent Yvonne Stokes told the Gary School Board Thursday the district's February enrollment count was 4,542 students, up about 400 from a year ago.
'We continue to get students… we're working daily to make sure Gary Community Schools can be the choice for our students,' she said.
Senate Bill 518 expands a previous charter referendum revenue sharing law that impacted four counties, including Lake.
The new bill calls for school districts that have at least 100 students who live within their boundaries and attend a charter school to share property tax money, and if voters approve a referendum, that funding would be shared.
Districts would also have to share revenue from their debt service funds with charters, based on the number of students attending the charter school.
With the exception of Gary, the property tax sharing would begin next year in a three-year phasing in of the tax sharing until 2028 when it reaches 100%.
A Gary official reported the district collected about $7.3 million from its fall tax draw. The fiscal impact to the district couldn't be immediately determined.
Alessia Johnson, superintendent of the Indianapolis Public Schools, the state's largest district, told the committee the bill would likely force the closure of 20 schools.
Traditional districts, like Gary, receive local property tax funding and can hold referendums to seek more money from taxpayers.
Charter schools don't receive property taxes and their leaders have decried the disparity in funding. They do receive federal funding and state tuition funding, similar to traditional schools.
The Indiana State Teachers Association opposed Senate Bill 518, saying: 'We believe that if additional support for charter schools is necessary, it should come from state-level investments — not local property tax revenues — to ensure a stable, predictable funding model for all schools.'
An amendment calling for charter school board members to be elected failed.
'SB 518 targets urban schools by diverting local property tax funding from traditional public schools to charter schools that are managed by unelected school boards,' said Sen. Fady Qaddoura, D-Indianapolis.
'In addition, the bill does not provide any guardrails or regulations to hold charter schools accountable similar to traditional schools.'
Republican officials said the charters are accountable to their charter authorizers. The Indiana Charter School Board is the state's largest authorizer with 39 schools and its board is an appointed one.
Meanwhile, House Bill 1136 that called for a school district to dissolve if more than 50% of students in its legal settlement area attend school elsewhere, did not receive a hearing in the House Education Committee.
'It didn't get out of committee, but that doesn't mean it can't come up again in another bill,' said state Rep. Vernon Smith, D-Gary. 'My sense is it's going to die because of the opposition.'
Stokes said she was encouraged to see the bill didn't advance.
'We will continue to work with our legislators regarding any proposed bills that impact the Gary Community School Corp.,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rand Paul slams Graham's push for Russian sanctions as ‘self-defeating economic warfare'
Rand Paul slams Graham's push for Russian sanctions as ‘self-defeating economic warfare'

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

Rand Paul slams Graham's push for Russian sanctions as ‘self-defeating economic warfare'

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) slammed Sen. Lindsey Graham's (R-S.C.) push for Russian sanctions, calling his bill 'self-defeating economic warfare.' Graham's sanctions bill on Russia would impose a 500 percent tariff on imports from any country that buys Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products. The legislation has more than 80 co-sponsors in the Senate, potentially making it veto-proof. But GOP senators are waiting on President Trump to move ahead with the legislation, and Trump said this week he hasn't even looked at it. Trump has also said he doesn't want to undermine the chances of a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. Paul, in a series of posts on X on Saturday, said the bill would be ineffective and backfire against efforts to achieve peace, as the war between Russia and Ukraine continues in its fourth year. 'The Graham bill would derail President Trump's efforts to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. Self-defeating economic warfare is no way to achieve peace,' Paul said on X. 'This bill won't force China or India to change behavior, but it will impose an effective embargo on ourselves that will hurt American families,' he said. Paul also argued that the bill could hurt U.S. allies and raise gas prices. 'The Graham bill could raise tariffs on allies like Israel and Taiwan to 500 percent and potentially even higher. Why are we punishing our friends while pretending it'll hold Russia accountable? This isn't strategy—it's economic self-sabotage,' he wrote. 'Cutting off Russian oil takes a major source of supply off the market, resulting in higher gas prices. Analysts warned that a U.S. ban on Russian oil could cause prices to hit $160–$200 a barrel. That's $5+ gas at the pump,' he said. Graham, this past week, sought to address some of those concerns by proposing a carveout for his bill to exempt countries that aid in Ukraine's defense. The carveout could help insulate countries in Europe that still import Russian gas and have provided military support for Ukraine, as well as other U.S. partners that have straddled the line between maintaining ties with Moscow and providing assistance to Kyiv. 'A lot of countries still buy Russian oil and gas but less. Some European countries still have relationships with Russia, but they've been very helpful to Ukraine. So I want to carve them out,' Graham told reporters Wednesday. 'I tell China, if you don't want to have a 500 percent tariff, help Ukraine.'

Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicaid & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicaid & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicaid & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now

President Donald Trump's 'one big beautiful bill' has passed in the House and is now awaiting Senate approval. If passed, Trump's signature bill would extend the tax cuts granted by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and add additional tax cuts. While this might be welcome news to many, the bill also includes changes to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that could threaten seniors' access to these programs. Find Out: Read Next: 'The 'one big beautiful bill' passed by the House of Representatives, if it were passed into law today, would cut Medicaid and SNAP by a combined $1 trillion,' said Chris Orestis, president of Retirement Genius. 'In addition, because of the increase to federal debt of as much as $5 trillion, the bill would trigger an automatic reduction in Medicare funding of $500 billion,' he continued. 'This would represent the largest cut to social services and health insurance for the poor, disabled, children and the elderly in U.S. history.' Here's a look at the changes retirees can make now to secure care and avoid benefit disruptions if the bill were to pass. Before changes go into effect, check with your healthcare providers to ensure there won't be any interruption to your care if there are cuts to Medicaid. 'Check with your healthcare provider to see if they might cut back on services or cease accepting Medicaid-funded patients, and contact any nursing home where you or a loved one may reside to find out if they will be reducing the number of patients they can support — or even [if they are] possibly planning to close,' Orestis said. Knowing this ahead of time will allow you to find alternative care providers before it's too late. Learn More: If you are reliant on SNAP, start searching for alternatives that may be able to provide food assistance in the event your benefits are reduced or cut. 'Make sure you know where there are local support services through community or faith-based organizations to replace lost access through SNAP,' Orestis said. Many retirees plan to 'spend down' their savings so that they qualify for Medicaid to pay for their long-term care. However, this may no longer be a viable option. 'If you are considering going onto Medicaid for long-term care and are preparing to engage the 'spend down' process to impoverish yourself and get below the poverty level to qualify, you may want to reconsider that strategy, and instead look to leverage private pay resources to pay for your care,' Orestis said. 'If you are on Medicaid, you will primarily be reliant on nursing homes for your care, and their ability to withstand these cuts will be very challenging and up in the air,' he continued. 'If you are private pay, you are in control and can decide where and when you will receive care, such as at home or an assisted living community not funded by Medicaid.' Strategies to stay private pay for long-term care would include long-term care insurance, annuities, a life insurance settlement, a reverse mortgage or VA benefits. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicaid & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now

GOP Senators' Competing Demands Risk Pulling Trump Megabill Apart
GOP Senators' Competing Demands Risk Pulling Trump Megabill Apart

Wall Street Journal

time6 hours ago

  • Wall Street Journal

GOP Senators' Competing Demands Risk Pulling Trump Megabill Apart

WASHINGTON—Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R., S.D.) is trying to release this week a revised version of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' But as he races to pass the legislation ahead of Republicans' self-imposed July 4 deadline, he has got about as many problems as there are GOP senators, with lawmakers battling over the additional borrowing and spending cuts that will be used to finance tax relief, plus spending on the border and military.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store