Iran will hold nuclear talks with European nations in Turkey, the first since ceasefire with Israel
The talks, to be held in Istanbul on Friday, will be the first since a ceasefire was reached after a 12-day war waged by Israel against Iran in June, which also saw the United States strike nuclear-related facilities in the Islamic Republic. A similar meeting had been held in the Turkish city in May.
The discussions will bring Iranian officials together with officials from Britain, France and Germany — known as the E3 nations — and will include the European Union's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas.
'The topic of the talks is clear, lifting sanctions and issues related to the peaceful nuclear program of Iran,' Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said in his weekly briefing. He said the meeting will be held at the deputy ministerial level.
Under a 2015 deal designed to cap Iran's nuclear activities, Iran agreed to tough restrictions on its international program in exchange for an easing of sanctions. The deal began to unravel in 2018, when the United States pulled out of it and began to reimpose certain sanctions. European countries have recently threatened to trigger the 2015 deal's 'snapback' mechanism, which would allow sanctions to be reimposed in the case of non-compliance by Tehran.
German Foreign Ministry spokesperson Martin Giese, asked who Germany will send to the talks and what its expectations are, said that 'the talks are taking place at expert level.'
'Iran must never come into possession of a nuclear weapon,' so Germany, France and Britain are 'continuing to work … at high pressure on a sustainable and verifiable diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear program,' he said. 'This course of action is also coordinated with the U.S.'
'It's very clear that, should no solution be reached by the end of August … snapback remains an option for the E3,' Giese told reporters in Berlin.
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a letter to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres on Sunday the three European nations lack 'any legal, political, and moral standing' to invoke such mechanisms, and accused Britain, France and Germany of failing to uphold their commitments in the deal.
'Attempting to trigger 'snapback' under these circumstances, in defiance of established facts and prior communications, constitutes an abuse of process that the international community must reject,' Araghchi said.
He also criticized the three European nations for 'providing political and material support to the recent unprovoked and illegal military aggression of the Israeli regime and the US.'
The U.S. bombed three major Iranian nuclear sites in Iran in June as Israel waged an air war with Iran. Nearly 1,100 people were killed in Iran, including many military commanders and nuclear scientists, while 28 were killed in Israel.
Araghchi stressed in the letter that his country is ready for diplomatic solutions.
After U.S. President Donald Trump pulled his country out of the 2015 deal, Iran has gradually increased its nuclear activities, including enriching uranium up to 60%, a step away from weapons-grade nuclear materials, or 90% enrichment of uranium.
Iran denies allegations it is seeking a nuclear weapon and has long said its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only.
___
Associated Press writer Geir Moulson in Berlin contributed to this report
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Neutrality Got the Swiss Nowhere on Tariffs
After the European Union, it's now Switzerland's turn to bemoan humiliation and surrender at the hands of the Trump administration. Politicians and companies are reeling from the shock of a new tariff of 39%, well above the EU's 15%, which could cost the country 1% of GDP. For Swiss drugmakers like Novartis AG, the stay of execution granted to the sector feels temporary, with a possible 25% pharmaceutical tariff to come if no deal is done. Local media have compared it to the Swiss defeat at Marignano at the hands of the French in 1515. This is obviously not an emerging-market-style crisis moment: Switzerland is one of the richest countries in the world, and Rolex watches are somewhat less price-sensitive than Volkswagen AG cars. The Swiss stock market, which quickly recovered early losses, is taking solace in the fact that 39% feels like a blustery prelude to more concessions and a handshake. Already, the Alpine country is scrambling to offer more goodies to an irate US administration. One might imagine more EU-style pledges are coming, such as buying more US energy.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The "Very Difficult" Task Princess Kate and Prince William Have When It Comes to the "Survival of the Monarchy"
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Multiple reports have suggested that Princess Kate and Prince William have been taking on more responsibility in recent months. Following suggestions the Prince of Wales is already preparing for his future reign as king, one royal expert has spoken about the "very difficult" task Kate and William are facing. Speaking to GB News, royal expert Rafe Heydel-Mankoo claimed that the Prince and Princess of Wales "understand fully" how crucial it is to engage the general public. "Nothing is more important than forging a new bond between the monarchy and the youth of this country," the royal expert explained. Heydel-Mankoo continued, "It is fundamentally important for the survival of the institution of the monarchy that it remains relevant." The outlet also noted that, following the death of Queen Elizabeth II in 2022, a "significant change" had occurred within society. The population's shifting views regarding the Royal Family "posed questions to some about the long-term future of the institution." The outlet also referenced the views of royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams, who suggested that engaging with young people was "very difficult" for the royals on account of the "establishment aura" given off by The Firm. Speaking to GB News, Heydel-Mankoo said that Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis would be essential in "reconnecting in a new way with the institution" in the future. "[The Royal Family's] fundamental being seen to support the civic institutions of this country, the voluntary ethic," Heydel-Mankoo noted. "The late Queen used to say it has to be seen to be believed, and the monarchy must be seen to remain popular." The royal expert noted that the general public will "wait to see the children of the Prince of Wales go up and take on more duties themselves." Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Qatar's LNG Warning Highlights Europe's Fragile Energy Strategy
The race has been on to secure new liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies for Europe since Russia invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022. LNG at that point became the key global emergency energy source as it is quick to secure and to move, unlike pipelined energy that requires time-consuming infrastructure build-out and contract negotiations before it can be moved anywhere. Europe was especially in need of such supplies to compensate for the energy it has bought for decades from Russia without questioning Moscow's long-term strategic motivation for offering such enormous quantities of cheap gas and oil. This was simply to ensure minimal pushback from Europe when President Vladimir Putin began his long-flagged objective to recapture those parts of Europe that were once part of the U.S.S.R., as analysed in full in my latest book on the new global oil market order. The strategy worked perfectly in 2008 with Russia's foray into the independent European sovereign state of Georgia, and again in the 2014 invasion and annexation of Ukraine's Crimea region – a practice run for what would happen in 2022. It would have worked as well in that year too, with early European dithering about taking any meaningful actions against Russia, but for the strong intervention of the U.S., Great Britain, and France, who could see that if this invasion of Ukraine was not opposed then the rest of Europe would follow. Staggeringly now, a crucial source of these compensatory LNG supplies to Europe – Qatar – is under threat from the continent's own sustainability law in question is the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which according to the official blurb: '[Aims to] foster sustainable and responsible corporate behaviour in companies' operations and across their global value chains. The new rules will ensure that companies in scope identify and address adverse human rights and environmental impacts of their actions inside and outside Europe.' It further requires firms to integrate sustainability into their core business strategies, address impacts on the environment and society, and establish transition plans aligned with the Paris Agreement's climate goals. All this is focused on European Union (E.U.) companies with over 1,000 employees and a worldwide turnover exceeding EUR450 million (USD514 million), and non-E.U. companies with a turnover exceeding EUR450 million within the E.U. Failure to adhere to some of its sharper strictures can results in extremely severe punishments for transgressors. One particularly eye-catching punishment is that companies found in breach of these conditions can be fined up to 5% of their global turnover or be required to compensate affected individuals and communities. Unsurprisingly, for those countries in a more emerging stage of development than those who drafted the law (that is, nearly most of the major oil and gas suppliers around the world), some of these conditions are problematic. For Qatar, they are apparently infuriating, with its Minister of State for Energy Affairs Saad al-Kaabi calling the legislation 'ridiculous' at a forum in Doha in December. He also threatened at that point to end all LNG supplies to the E.U. if any of his country's companies were subject to penalties by dint of the CSDDD. Matters have now escalated, according to a senior E.U. security source spoken to by last week, with a letter from al-Kaabi to the European Commission (the executive branch of the E.U.) reiterating the threat of cut-off from Qatar's LNG supplies if the Directive is not modified to ensure that its companies do not face any penalties. Equally unsurprisingly, according not the E.U. source, Europe is taking this threat very seriously. It should certainly do so, as Qatar has many more willing buyers for its LNG than Europe has sellers of the gas to choose from. In Europe's case, it took many months of very tough negotiations led by the U.S. to turn Qatar from a state whose main supply priority was China before the Russia invasion of 2022 to a 'major non-NATO ally' of the U.S. and its European allies as former President Joe Biden put it at the time, as also analysed in depth in my latest book on the new global oil market order. Information received by just after Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022 from impeccable security sources indicated that China had been broadly told by Russia of its plans for a 'large-scale special operation' in Ukraine months before it happened, not just prior to the 4 February 2022 start of the Beijing Winter Olympics, as many reports have it. Indeed, China concluded several major LNG deals with Qatar a year before, beginning with the signing of a 10-year purchase and sales agreement by the China Petroleum & Chemical Corp (Sinopec) and Qatar Petroleum (QP) for 2 million metric tonnes per annum (mtpa) of LNG, and multiple similar deals followed. However, following hard negotiations with the U.S., May 2022 saw Qatar sign a declaration of intent on energy cooperation with Germany aimed at becoming its key supplier of LNG. These plans would run in parallel with, but were likely to be finished significantly sooner than, the plans for Qatar to also make available to Germany sizeable supplies of LNG from the Golden Pass terminal on the Gulf Coast of Texas. QatarEnergy holds a 70% stake in the project, with the U.S.'s ExxonMobil holding the remainder. Following on from these developments, December 2022 saw two sales and purchase agreements signed between QatarEnergy and the U.S.'s ConocoPhillips to export LNG to Germany for at least 15 years from 2026. As of now, Qatar remains a major LNG supplier to the E.U. – its third largest, in fact – having shipped around 10 million metric tonnes of the gas to the continent last year. As one of these three is Russia (in number two position, after the U.S.) – and the E.U. is considering phasing out all Russian LNG and gas entering it by the end of 2027 – Qatar's share was set to rise dramatically. This dovetails with the country's own plans to more than double its current 77 million mtpa production to 160 million mtpa by 2030. By that time, it will account for at least 40% of all new LNG supplies across the globe, making it even more of crucial energy and geopolitical ally to the West, and to China, Russia, and countries in their sphere of influence. Such a situation would leave the U.S. with a huge supply gap to fill very quickly, although industry projections are that its LNG supply will increase by at least 75 million mtpa (from over 90 million mtpa currently) by 2030. This would also accord with the recent E.U. pledge to buy USD750 million of U.S. energy in the next three years, with much of this increase expected to come from the LNG sector. That said, the E.U. may be at least as concerned by the fact that it would leave Europe's emergency energy supply almost entirely in the hands of Washington. Given President Donald Trump's comments about not even helping to defend fellow European NATO members from attack – as the U.S. is obliged to do by Article 5 of the Treaty -- if they do not increase their defence spending to what he considers a sufficient level, the E.U.'s leadership may ponder whether he would take the same view on the U.S.'s commitment to energy supplies to the continent as well should it be attacked by Russia. In short, the loss of Qatari LNG to Europe – and more supplies going to China -- would be catastrophic for Europe – and indeed for the broader Western Alliance even now. And it would be considerably worse if Beijing launches its own 'Special Military Operation' to 'reunite' Taiwan with its 'rightful motherland' mainland China in 2027 – the date Chinese President Xi Jinping has told his military to prepare for. By Simon Watkins for More Top Reads From this article on
