logo
Gregor Robertson still doesn't get it

Gregor Robertson still doesn't get it

Like many Canadians, I was prepared to give Gregor Robertson a second chance. As a born and raised Vancouverite and someone who has been writing (and warning) about the housing market for almost two decades now, the appointment of Robertson as Canada's new housing minister didn't exactly fill me with optimism. His track record as mayor of Vancouver includes a 179 per cent increase in home prices that effectively priced an entire generation out of that city's housing market — and, in effect, out of that city.
In fairness, nobody's track record during that period was very good, and much of the increase in home prices was due to inaction or indifference by the federal and provincial governments. Even so, given his obvious association with the period where Canada's housing market started to run away from millions of people, he was a risky choice as housing minister. His first few days on the job have shown why.
For all of his well-documented telegenic charm, Roberston has never been a particularly effective communicator. That was on full display during his interview with the CBC's David Cochrane, where he seemed conspicuously short on answers and long on excuses. 'It's going to take years,' he told Cochrane. 'This is decades of building up a problem, so it's not going to be fixed overnight.' He refused to give a specific date when asked when his government would deliver on its promise to double home building. 'We're years away,' he reiterated.
Cochrane captured the stakes of his new job at the end of the interview. 'I think every Canadian under 40 is counting on you,' Cochrane said, to which Robertson replied, 'Including my kids.' But, of course, Robertson's kids will be just fine. In Gregor Robertson's Vancouver, the children of wealthy and privileged homeowners were more than fine, actually; they were lottery winners. It was everyone else struggling — and, often, failing — to keep their heads above the economic waterline.
When asked if Robertson's appointment was a signal that housing prices should not go down, Carney said that 'you would be very hard-pressed to make that conclusion.' Robertson then went out and made that conclusion for everyone the very next day, telling reporters that he doesn't think house prices need to go down — and that Canada needs to deliver more supply instead. That, of course, would make prices go down, all other things being equal.
This is the truth that most federal politicians are still afraid to say out loud. If we're actually going to address housing affordability in this country, and especially overheated markets like Vancouver and Toronto, prices have to come down. Yes, that might mean that homeowners will miss out on some of the equity that's accumulated in their homes. But as former Housing Minister Nate Erskine-Smith said back in January during an interview with the Toronto Star, 'It's not the government's job to protect a certain amount of equity that has built up in a person's home.'
Unless and until Carney and his new housing minister are willing to say the quiet part out loud, as Erskine-Smith did, it's going to be hard to take their housing pledges and policies seriously. No, they're not going to be able to single-handedly transform Canada's housing market overnight. It may well take years, as Robertson said, to see real progress on affordability. But they could change the way they talk about the issue right now, and in so doing let Canadians know they actually understand what needs to be done.
Of all Mark Carney's cabinet picks, his decision to name former Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson as his housing minister was the most controversial. So far, at least, it's also proving to be his most disastrous.
That's why, if Robertson is going to win the trust and confidence of Canadians, he needs to acknowledge some of the mistakes he made as mayor of Vancouver, from his decision to initially downplay the risks associated with foreign investment to his habit of cozying up with the city's real estate developers.
(So far, at least, he seems more interested in defending that record than learning from it.)
Robertson needs to be honest about the tradeoffs involved, and stop pretending that we can somehow massively ramp up the construction of affordable housing without impacting the broader housing market and its often ludicrous prices. And if he won't do these things, Carney needs to find someone who will — and fast.
The next election, whenever it comes, will be a referendum on the progress Carney's team has made on housing and other key cost of living issues. And this time, good intentions and big plans won't be nearly enough to placate young voters. The Liberals were given one stay of political execution on this issue, both because of Justin Trudeau's resignation and Donald Trump's menacing threats. They will not get a second one.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

B.C. group loses bid to overturn Canada's federal voting system
B.C. group loses bid to overturn Canada's federal voting system

Vancouver Sun

time15 minutes ago

  • Vancouver Sun

B.C. group loses bid to overturn Canada's federal voting system

OTTAWA — A panel of three Ontario Court of Appeal judges unanimously affirmed the constitutionality of Canada's first-past-the-post electoral system in a ruling released on Monday. The system, laid out in the Canada Elections Act, sees the candidate who receives the most votes in a given riding or electoral district become the member of Parliament. Fair Voting B.C. and the Springtide Collective for Democratic Society argued in court that the first-past-the-post system violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of effective representation. The groups also said the system leads to the under-representation of women and other groups in Parliament, breaching the Charter's equality rights provision. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. In a proportional representation system, the number of representatives a political party elects reflects the percentage of the total vote the party receives. In November 2023, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed the challenge from Fair Voting B.C. and Springtide. It said that while a proportional representation system would be a fair alternative to the current system, it's not required by the Constitution. In its decision, the province's Court of Appeal also rejected the groups' key arguments. 'The electoral system is not in conflict with either the right to vote or the right to equality. It does not violate the Charter,' Justice Grant Huscroft said in written reasons delivered on behalf of another judge on the panel. 'The appellants' arguments that the electoral system violates the Charter are, in essence, a repackaging of failed political arguments as constitutional rights violations.' The expert evidence 'put forward in support' of those arguments, Huscroft wrote, is 'replete with highly contestable policy arguments about which reasonable disagreement abounds, not only in the academic community but among the public at large.' 'This evidence demonstrates the shortcomings of constitutional litigation in addressing public policy disagreements,' he added. The short answer to the argument that the electoral system violates the Charter is that Canadian citizens are free to vote for anyone they choose, and for any reason they choose, Huscroft added. 'There is no constitutional requirement that their individual choices aggregate in a way that achieves some ideal of representational diversity,' he wrote. 'Neither the political party affiliation nor the personal characteristics of the candidates who win election are relevant to the constitutionality of the electoral system.' During the 2015 election campaign, then-Liberal leader Justin Trudeau promised it would be the last federal election held under the first-past-the-post system. Once in office, however, Trudeau's government abandoned his pledge to replace the system. Fair Voting B.C. and Springtide argued that under the current system, small political parties do not enjoy the success they deserve, creating a disadvantage for people who vote for them. 'I do not doubt that small political parties fare poorly in Canada,' Huscroft wrote. 'They receive relatively few votes and invariably win few or no seats.' The failure of a political party cannot open the door to a claim for constitutional redress, he said. 'In short, the right to vote is a right to vote pursuant to the electoral system in operation — whatever that system is, and regardless of the electoral outcomes that may obtain,' he wrote. The appellants also argued the first-past-the-post system contributes to the under-representation of women and minorities in Parliament. Huscroft said no matter what sort of electoral system is in place, over- or underrepresentation of particular demographic groups might occur to a greater or lesser extent from time to time. He added that arguments based on degree of representation lose sight of the fundamental fact of the matter: that people are entitled to vote the way they want. 'This is the very essence of the freedom that lies at the heart of the right to vote,' he wrote.

New federal entity to prioritize Canadian-made, affordable housing projects
New federal entity to prioritize Canadian-made, affordable housing projects

Winnipeg Free Press

time15 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

New federal entity to prioritize Canadian-made, affordable housing projects

OTTAWA – Prime Minister Mark Carney's promised new entity to spur massive amounts of housing construction will prioritize the building of affordable housing and the use of Canadian materials, says a consultation document published by the government on Monday. The document shared by Canada's housing department says Build Canada Homes is also intended to accelerate the speed at which federal lands are converted to housing, and to stress the use of materials, manufacturing and construction methods that reduce the cost and environmental impact of building. It says financial and non-financial tools being explored include loans, equity investments, real property and housing investments, loan guarantees and contributions. The department is still working on the program's design and says it's accepting feedback from the public until the end of the month. The document, released as part of a consultation process with builders and other industry stakeholders, says Build Canada Homes is positioned to support projects that deliver a 'significant number' of affordable housing units. It also says the government will look at projects that expand the supply of housing run by organizations like co-ops, non-profits and Indigenous housing providers. The document says the government will look for opportunities to use Canadian-made materials and regional production hubs, and to boost the efficiency of public dollars through tools like below-market-rate loans or private or philanthropic capital. It will also prioritize projects that use new methods of construction, like prefabricated or 3D-printed construction. Housing affordability was a major issue in the recent federal election, as there haven't been enough homes built in Canada to keep up with population growth. The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation said in a June report that Canada needs to build between 430,000 and 480,000 new housing units over the next decade, to bring housing costs back to where they were before the pandemic. Carney promised in his election platform that his government would invest $6 billion in the Build Canada Homes initiative. The platform said Build Canada Homes would act as a developer to build affordable housing at scale, including on public lands. It also promised to provide over $25 billion in financing to prefabricated homebuilders in Canada, support affordable homebuilders and incentivize companies to hire apprentices and recent graduates by establishing new requirements on federal contribution agreements to major projects. Caroline Desrochers, parliamentary secretary to the minister of housing and infrastructure, said in a recent interview with The Canadian Press that the government is exploring options for Build Canada Homes, which could potentially become a separate agency or a unit within Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada. She said the government is aiming to launch the program in the fall and is 'going to start doing work right now with what we have already' while exploring the best governance for the entity. Desrochers said the goal is to not create 'more layers of bureaucracy and approvals.' Desrochers said representatives from the government and the CMHC are on a task force created to develop the options for the new program. She said the government is also in discussion with several promoters and modular and prefabricated home companies to see what projects are ready for funding and to be built. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 11, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store