Bill Murray Slams John Belushi Biography as ‘Criminal' and ‘Cruel'; Calls Out Author Bob Woodward: ‘If He Did This to Belushi, What He Did to Nixon Is Probably Soiled For Me'
During a recent appearance on 'The Joe Rogan Experience,' Murray slammed journalist Bob Woodward for his portrayal of Belushi in his 1984 biography 'Wired,' which chronicled the life and career of 'The Blues Brothers' star. Murray called Woodward's take on Belushi 'completely inaccurate,' and suspects his sources were pulled from 'the outer, outer circle' of people that knew him.
More from Variety
Bill Murray Recalls 'Tough Nut' Gene Hackman Being 'Really Rough' on Wes Anderson on 'The Royal Tenenbaums' Set: 'I Sympathize' Because 'To Him, Wes Was Just a Punk Kid'
'SNL50' Weekend Update: Bill Murray Roasts the Show's White Anchors, Bobby Moynihan's Drunk Uncle Yells 'Not My Captain America' Over Anthony Mackie
Bill Murray Reprises 'Nick the Lounge Singer' With Maya Rudolph, Cecily Strong and Ana Gasteyer for 'SNL50'
'If he did this to Belushi, what he did to Nixon is probably soiled for me too. I can't take it,' Murray said. 'You could have two sources and everything like that, but the two sources that he had, if he had them for the 'Wired' book, were so far outside the inner circle that it was criminal, cruel.'
Murray suspects that Woodward's takedown may have been motivated by jealousy. He pointed out that Woodward is only 'the third most famous person from Wheaton, Ill' behind professional football player Red Grange and Belushi.
'Belushi made people's careers possible. Mine would be one of them,' Murray said. 'There's a lot of people that slept on John Belushi's couch. There's a lot of people that stayed for free at his house until they made it in New York. And I'm one. He died in an unfortunate way, but man, he was still the best stage actor I ever saw.'
Murray went on to explain that he was asked to contribute to the book, but from the very beginning thought the project 'smelled funny' and refused to help.
'I didn't want to have anything to do with it,' Murray said. 'It went exactly where I thought it was going. Even worse than I thought it was going. Just the title alone, it was cold.'
Best of Variety
What's Coming to Disney+ in March 2025
What's Coming to Netflix in March 2025
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
4 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Why Benedict Cumberbatch Ate So Much To Play Doctor Strange
Benedict Cumberbatch's recent comments about having to eat 'five meals a day' when playing Marvel superhero Doctor Strange left some people seriously confused, but don't worry, it's not as random as it might sound. On Tuesday, Variety tweeted: 'Benedict Cumberbatch Ate Five Meals a Day to Play Doctor Strange, Says Hollywood Is 'Grossly Wasteful': 'It's Horrific Eating Beyond Your Appetite… I Could Feed a Family With the Amount' I Ate,' and Marvel fans were quick to respond in the quote-tweets. 'he's playing a wizard, why does he need to eat that much lol,' one viral reply asked, somebody else echoed: 'He plays a surgeon with magical powers that is extremely clothed all the time. Why did he need to be buff lol?' 'Why did he need to eat five meals a day to play a guy that stands around waving his hands?' one more questioned, while another tweeted: 'he did not need to be doing all that to be playing fucking doctor strange 😭😭😭''he wore baggy robes and a cape the entire time 😭😭😭😭' one more wrote, as somebody else basically summed up the discourse by writing: 'We didn't notice.' However, in Benedict's full interview, he actually explains that he didn't eat that much food for aesthetic reasons — it was purely for practicality. During an appearance on the Ruthie's Table 4 podcast, the actor was asked if he ever has a special diet during filming, to which he replied: 'It depends what job. If I am doing a high volume of exercise, I'm pumped for something like the Marvel films as Doctor Strange, which, you know, you have all that garb on — you need that strength to hold your posture, to have core strength, to be strong in the harnesses, all the fight scenes and the flying.' 'It's great fun, I love it. I love body transformations in my job,' Benedict went on. 'If you don't have the budget, you have to do it very carefully, but on Marvel, it's a big sand pit, so they've got resources.' The star then explained how easy bulking up was made for him, sharing: 'You have someone who can prescribe you what you're eating, and they can cook for you. We had a fantastic chef on the last Doctor Strange film.' 'It's this amazing facility to go: 'Right, he needs to be on this many calories a day. He needs to have five meals. He needs to have a couple of boiled eggs between those five meals or some kind of high protein snack, cheese and crackers, or almond butter and crackers. Crackers, lots of crackers,'' Benedict explained. 'And for me, the exercise is great, and the end result is that you feel strong, and you feel confident. You hold yourself better. You have a stamina through the exercise and the food that makes you last through the gig.' But while Benedict's reason for beefing up to play Doctor Strange might suddenly make total sense, that doesn't mean he found the experience pleasant. 'It's horrific,' he continued. 'Personally, I think it's horrific eating beyond your appetite. Going back to responsibility, and resourcefulness, and sustainability, it's just like: 'What are we? What am I doing? I could feed a family with the amount I'm eating!'' 'It's a grossly wasteful industry,' Benedict added. 'Think about set builds that aren't recycled, think about transport, think about food, think about housing, but also light and energy. The amount of wattage you need to sort of create daylight and consistent light in a studio environment. It's a lot of energy.'The star went on to acknowledge that some may find it hypocritical for him to speak about protecting the environment considering his job, but went on to reveal that when he is involved on a producer level, he is 'really hot' on finding ways for a production to be more sustainable and green. Meanwhile, it's perhaps unsurprising that Benedict struggled with his Marvel diet, considering he revealed later in the podcast that the 'comfort food' he reaches for the most is… Kale. 'Kale sort of shocked in a pan with a bit of olive oil,' he said. 'And then lemon juice and some chili flakes, and then a tiny bit of water just to steam it so the flavor is locked in by the quick heat. Then cook through a little bit more, thoroughly but not soggily. I crave that vegetable. I really do.' Each to their own, Benedict! What do you make of the star's podcast comments? Let me know down below!
Elle
6 minutes ago
- Elle
Season 4 Of 'Ted Lasso' Is Officially In Production — And We Have A First Look
The hit Emmy-winning series Ted Lasso has been 'exhumed,' as star Hannah Waddingham put it. The Apple TV+ juggernaut, which was once believed to end after season 3, is officially making its return. Here's everything we know about Ted Lasso's next season. Yes! In March 2025, it was announced that Ted Lasso would return for a fourth season. In a statement about the renewal, per Variety, Sudeikis said: 'As we all continue to live in a world where so many factors have conditioned us to 'look before we leap,' in season four, the folks at AFC Richmond learn to LEAP BEFORE THEY LOOK, discovering that wherever they land, it's exactly where they're meant to be.' Here's the official logline from Apple: Ted returns to Richmond, taking on his biggest challenge yet: coaching a second division women's football team. Throughout the course of the season, Ted and the team learn to leap before they look, taking chances they never thought they would. Jason Sudeikis, Hannah Waddingham, Juno Temple, Brett Goldstein, Jeremy Swift, and Brendan Hunt are all confirmed to return. When asked about returning for a fourth season of Ted Lasso, Waddingham said, 'It feels like it was the most beautiful, beloved dog that was buried, and now we've exhumed it, and I am here for it. I was hankering and hankering and hankering and hankering to see where Rebecca had gone, where she was going to. She's my girl. She's in my bloodstream, so I'm thrilled that it's been exhumed.' She continued, 'I can't wait to get involved with that and put my penneth in and go shopping for her looks.' Season 4 will also have a few new additions: Tanya Reynolds (Sex Education), Jude Mack (Such Brave Girls), Faye Marsay (Adolescence), Aisling Sharkey (Jurassic World Dominion), Abbie Hern (My Lady Jane), and newcomer, Rex Hayes. Their roles have not yet been announced. Grant Feely will also join the cast and step in as Ted's son, Henry, a role previously played by Gus Turner. Yes! On July 21, Apple TV+ announced that production was underway. Principal photography began today in Kansas City, and additional filming will take place in London. We also have a first look: This story will be updated. ELLE Collective is a new community of fashion, beauty and culture lovers. For access to exclusive content, events, inspiring advice from our Editors and industry experts, as well the opportunity to meet designers, thought-leaders and stylists, become a member today HERE. Juliana Ukiomogbe is the former Assistant Editor at ELLE. Her work has previously appeared in Interview, i-D, Teen Vogue, Nylon, and more.
USA Today
34 minutes ago
- USA Today
Want to save money on your streaming? It's time to embrace commercials
Every time I watch my favorite TV show, I have to sit through commercial breaks. And I don't mind. As a TV critic amid our current streaming revolution, I've sat comfortably on my couch enjoying my Netflix and Disney+ and HBO Max without ever having to suffer the indignities of a car commercial. Yet my obsession of the moment − the hilarious and somewhat niche British TV panel series "Taskmaster" − is only available in the U.S. on YouTube, and I don't pay to go ad-free. So betwixt and between every silly scene of Jason Mantzoukas doing a dumb-but-funny "task" comes an ad for a sports betting app or Dunkin' drinks, and my focus drifts away to my phone or my husband for five minutes, and then the British buffoonery begins anew. But I still get the laughs, and don't have to pay YouTube a cent. Faced with the choice of happily watching 19 seasons of "Taskmaster" with occasional ad breaks or watching my monthly bill for the major streaming services rise even more, I'm starting to come around to the idea that sitting through commercials isn't that bad. The price of streaming is getting out of control: Peacock is just the latest streamer to raise its monthly fees to the stratosphere: As of July 23, it costs $17 a month to watch the "Love Island" streamer without commercials. And that's just one among many: Watching the latest season of "Squid Game" without interruptions will nearly double the price of Netflix, to $18 a month. The rest of life is too expensive, with inflation hitting groceries, housing and everything else, for your entertainment to take up such a big part of your budget. If you subscribe to more than one service's premium ad-free tier, the costs add up quickly. To go ad-free, you're paying an extra $10 for Netflix, $6 for Disney+, $3 for Prime Video, $6 for Peacock, $7 for HBO Max, $5 for Paramount+ and $9 for Hulu. Tally it all up and suddenly "cutting the cord" is way more expensive than cable ever was: If you subscribed to all seven of these services, you could save $552 a year by watching ads. Many families are looking to cut frivolous expenses. But you don't need to sacrifice great entertainment for the sake of your budget. Just accept the commercial breaks. Your parents did it their whole lives. Though I might have once been a snob about sitting through ads, happily inhaling "Stranger Things," "Andor" or "The Summer I Turned Pretty" with nary an interruption, the increased prices have me coming back around again to this partial solution to our financial woes. I don't need premium everything. Just enough to get by. Streaming services led by Netflix burst onto the media landscape in the 2010s promising, among other innovations, commercial-free TV and movies. While broadcast and cable networks need ad breaks to pay the bills, Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime Video and the like promised your low monthly subscription fees were all they ever needed. So I, like so many of you, streamed with anti-capitalist glee, proud to not be learning any more cat-food jingles than I already knew. And if I wanted to watch a network or cable show I had plenty of commercial-free options, from next-day streaming to DVR. But that was when Apple only made technology, not TV shows, when a month of Netflix cost less than a Chipotle burrito and there were more than 400 new scripted TV shows premiering every year. Streaming was shiny and new and growing, the money for new shows flowed freely and there were only a handful of services to choose from. Now there are more than a baker's dozen of streamers, network TV is shrinking with increasing speed and prices are rising while simultaneously streamers cut back on their offerings. If you're ever going to make the jump back into the land of ad-supported TV, now is the time. Streamers are purposefully keeping those prices down to encourage viewers to switch from premium to ad tiers, because they can make more money that way by selling both commercials and subscriptions. The savings may not always be this big. I won't sugarcoat it: Commercials are annoying. There's a reason commercial-free TV was one of the original selling points of streaming. Ads are loud, manipulative and distracting to lure you into parting with more of your hard-earned cash. But once upon a time that was the only way to watch TV, yet access to outstanding classics, from CBS's "I Love Lucy" to NBC's "Friends" or ABC's "Lost," was worth the tradeoff. The idea of the commercial break is so ingrained in TV storytelling that writers have long used it to their advantage: Building the action to a cut-to-black before ads is a structure many classic TV series employ. Going back to watching that way is just like riding a bike, albeit one with "WELLS FARGO" printed on the side. But the pedals still work, the jokes still hit and everyone saves a dime or two.
