logo
Wealth taxes and rent controls: what backbenchers want next

Wealth taxes and rent controls: what backbenchers want next

Telegraph6 days ago
Days after Sir Keir Starmer was reported to be ready to block a wealth tax, pressure has mounted from Labour's union paymasters to bring in a such a levy. Lord Kinnock said the party was 'willing to explore' it.
It is the latest humiliating signal that the Prime Minister has lost control of the Cabinet after his hand was forced on welfare. Sir Keir had to offer 11th hour concessions just 90 minutes before the vote last week, meaning his flagship legislation will no longer save £5bn.
The backbenchers now know the power they wield. Alongside a wealth tax, they are eyeing up policies including scrapping the two-child benefit cap and introducing rent controls.
Mike Warburton, The Telegraph's tax expert, said: 'The Government is unfortunately in a financial hole of its own making. It has become clear that the ministers are in hock to their backbenchers in attempting to make any meaningful cuts in spending. Tax rises are now inevitable.'
Telegraph Money outlines the potential targets:
Wealth tax
A wealth tax has long been coveted by certain members of the Labour party. It is applied to the total value of an individual's assets, such as property, investments and savings.
Rachael Maskell, MP for York Central who led the backbench rebellion on welfare, said the Government should 'scope out' how a wealth tax would work.
'We need to make the case that paying tax is good,' she added.
Experts are anticipating tax increases to hit the highest earners.
William Stevens, head of wealth management at Killik & Co, said: '[The Government] remains plagued by exceptionally limited fiscal headroom – put simply, the Government needs to raise money, and it's running out of avenues.
'Tax is ultimately the way to do that – both on the surface and by stealth.'
Andy McDonald, MP for Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, was one of the 49 MPs who still voted against the welfare Bill last week. He told The Telegraph: 'I've made a case for the last six months for wealth taxes. I'll continue to do so in the next six months because it's right.'
He has proposed a 2pc tax on assets of more than £10m, which is an idea being pushed by the Patriotic Millionaires UK.
'It is the broadest shoulders argument. 'Distributed to each according to his need.' That's not Marx, it's the Bible,' Mr McDonald said.
Labour has pledged not to raise taxes for 'working people', and promised not to increase VAT, income tax or National Insurance in its manifesto.
Freezing tax thresholds for additional rate taxpayers
In May, Angela Rayner sent a memo to Rachel Reeves with 10 proposals for raising revenue. One of the suggestions in the leaked note was freezing the additional rate income tax threshold.
The memo said: 'Continuing to freeze the additional rate threshold in case terms rather than uprating it with inflation from April 2028 could raise revenue and would be consistent with the manifesto.'
The additional rate of income tax, 45pc, applies to income above £125,140.
Ms Reeves has already refused to 'stand by the commitment' to end a freeze on income tax thresholds from 2028.
She failed to rule out imposing a stealth tax on workers in October, instead referencing the '£22bn black hole in the public finances'. It means millions more households could be dragged into higher tax brackets.
Stretching out the freeze on tax thresholds would also result in more retirees paying tax on the state pension.
And while the Chancellor last year said she is 'not coming back with more borrowing or more taxes,' she may be left with little choice.
After all, Ms Rayner was 'instrumental' in getting Sir Keir to gut his welfare Bill, The Telegraph understands, holding hours of crucial talks with Labour MPs.
It means Ms Reeves may also be forced to listen to Ms Rayner when it comes to the looming Budget.
Equalising capital gains tax
Ahead of the last Budget, there were fears that the Chancellor would uprate capital gains tax in line with income tax.
Instead, the rates rose from 10pc to 18pc for basic-rate taxpayers, and from 20pc to 24pc for higher-rate taxpayers.
But the idea has gained traction again, with Mr McDonald suggesting it would be a viable way of balancing the books.
Ms Maskell also told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme last week that a wealth tax or equalising capital gains could raise £24bn.
Scrapping the two-child benefit cap
The next policy that MPs will set their sights on is scrapping the two-child benefit cap. The cap prevents parents from claiming Universal Credit or child tax credit for more than two children. It was introduced by the Conservative Party in 2017.
Speculation has been mounting that Labour will lift the cap after Nigel Farage, Reform UK's leader, called for it to be axed.
Ms Maskell told The Telegraph: 'We need more positive intervention in politics, and should be investing to save money.'
Last year, seven MPs had the whip suspended for six months after voting against the Government on an SNP amendment to reverse the cap.
John McDonnell, the former shadow chancellor, was joined by Richard Burgon, Ian Byrne, Rebecca Long-Bailey, Imran Hussain, Apsana Begum and Zarah Sultana in rebelling.
The End Child Poverty Coalition has found that reversing the cap would lift 250,000 children out of poverty.
Rent control
Landlords could be facing another blow under Labour if backbenchers call for further rent control.
Ms Maskell said a quarter of her constituency lives in private rentals.
She told The Telegraph: 'Rents are absolutely extortionate, and people are trapped in poverty. If we introduce caps on rent, the Government will also save money on the housing allowance.'
Yet the move could backfire on renters and landlords, as has been the case in Scotland.
In 2022, Nicola Sturgeon, former first minister, froze rent increases for six months before capping them at 3pc.
But the cost of a one-bedroom flat surged by more than 20pc after it was introduced, according to Scotland's largest estate agent DJ Alexander. This was because landlords could still raise rents between tenancies.
John Blackwood, of the Scottish Landlord Association, previously told The Telegraph that increased rent restrictions were the biggest concern.
He said: 'Historically, lots of landlords haven't increased rent mid-tenancy, and have used the void period between lets to carry out improvements and reset the rent to market value.
'Landlords are concerned that without this option to reset rents to market value between tenancies, their properties will become increasingly unviable as costs increase at a faster rate than they can raise rents.'
Landlords are already facing an increasingly hostile environment under Labour, after Ms Reeves increased stamp duty on buy-to-lets from 3pc to 5pc overnight in October.
The Renters' Rights Bill is set to end fixed-term tenancies, prevent action being taken against non-paying tenants for up to three months and ban bidding wars.
A third of landlords are now looking to sell off some or all of their rental properties, according to the latest English Private Landlord Survey.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How do I feel about air conditioning? I'm very hot – but it's destroying the planet
How do I feel about air conditioning? I'm very hot – but it's destroying the planet

The Guardian

time18 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

How do I feel about air conditioning? I'm very hot – but it's destroying the planet

It's way too hot. I'm cowering inside, curtains drawn, pale limbs clammily exposed, the sound of my overheated laptop fan drowning out the sound of an ancient, feeble desk fan. If it gets any hotter, I'll stagger to my air-conditioned car and drive to the air-conditioned supermarket to stand in its chilly aisles, shamelessly fanning myself over the ravaged ice-cream cabinet in the freezer aisle. I've even become nostalgic for the summer when I shared an office with a man who insisted on having the AC set to 17C, meaning I had to wear a cardigan to work in August. Ah, air conditioning, the dream. Or the nightmare? Welcome to appliance culture wars, 2025 edition. You may recall, in 2023, the US debated whether induction hobs were a communist plot; then last year Republicans tried, in all apparent seriousness, to pass the Liberty in Laundry and Refrigerator Freedom acts. This year has already featured Donald Trump pledging to 'make America's showers great again' (low water pressure means it takes 15 minutes to wet his 'beautiful hair') and now France is grappling with Marine Le Pen declaring herself its AC champion. As the country suffered through an early summer heatwave, with temperatures reaching the 40s, schools closing and, according to modelling, an estimated 235 deaths, Le Pen pledged, if elected, to launch a 'grand plan' to cool France. Her ally, Éric Ciotti, called for AC to be obligatory in schools, hospitals and care homes to 'protect the most vulnerable'. With even higher temperatures predicted, this might prove a popular promise. It would certainly please the many Americans holidaying in Europe, expressing their sweaty astonishment at how we manage here without the chilly kiss of refrigerant-gas-cooled air. But the French AC debate rapidly heated up: Le Pen faced scathing criticism from the Greens and ecological transition minister Agnès Pannier-Runacher, who noted Le Pen's party voted against plans to develop more sustainable 'cooling networks'. The environment agency president called AC 'an alibi for inaction'. Accused of hypocrisy by right-wing commentators after reporting on environmental concerns around AC, Libération even published a follow-up confirming its offices were not air conditioned (though conceding a few 'air coolers' had taken the temperature down to 32C – ugh – in the hottest spots). Because climate control is a climate problem. In the US, where AC is ubiquitous and its necessity not up for debate, the Department of Energy says it accounts for about 12% of energy consumption in homes and 'contributes significantly to carbon dioxide emissions, releasing over 100m metric tons annually'. In 2019, the International Energy Authority predicted that, as the rest of the world catches up, AC will produce 2bn tonnes of CO2 annually. Relying on it to cope with an ever-hotter planet contributes to global heating, making us need it more. That's not a solution; in Pannier-Runacher's words, it's a 'maladaptive' coping mechanism. AC is quantifiably bad, but I think it's also philosophically problematic. Cooling offers comfort, making the unbearable bearable, at least for now. That happens at a community level (no one is really disputing we should keep the very old, the very young and the vulnerable cool), but also individually. When you can buy a personal bubble of coolness and not truly feel the heat, the screaming urgency to tackle the collective issue of a world on fire can recede slightly. And this is where I have to fess up. I actually have AC – a little freestanding unit we use only in the evenings, maybe 10 times a year. We also have solar panels and a battery, which helps me sleep at night, but the cool helps more. If the government came for my AC, I wouldn't demand they 'pry it out of my cold, dead hands', as one Republican said of his gas stove, but at times like these, I'm deeply, guiltily glad of it. Air conditioning isn't the answer. We need more ambitious plans but, without them, many more people – not just rampant individualists, climate deniers, laundry liberators and fridge freedom fighters, but hot furtive hypocrites like me and anyone desperate to get some sleep – will be tempted by the easy, cool, breezy solution. Emma Beddington is a Guardian columnist

US to send Patriot air defense system to Ukraine as furious Trump blasts two-faced Putin: 'He talks nice, then bombs everybody'
US to send Patriot air defense system to Ukraine as furious Trump blasts two-faced Putin: 'He talks nice, then bombs everybody'

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

US to send Patriot air defense system to Ukraine as furious Trump blasts two-faced Putin: 'He talks nice, then bombs everybody'

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday he will send Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine, saying they are necessary to defend the country because Russian President Vladimir Putin 'talks nice but then he bombs everybody in the evening.' Trump did not give a number of Patriots he plans to send to Ukraine, but he said the United States would be reimbursed for their cost by the European Union. The U.S. president has grown increasingly disenchanted with Putin because the Russian leader has resisted Trump's attempts to negotiate a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has asked for more defensive capabilities to fend off a daily barrage of missile and drone attacks from Russia. 'We will send them Patriots, which they desperately need, because Putin really surprised a lot of people. He talks nice and then bombs everybody in the evening. But there's a little bit of a problem there. I don't like it,' Trump told reporters at Joint Base Andrews outside of Washington. 'We basically are going to send them various pieces of very sophisticated military equipment. They are going to pay us 100% for that, and that's the way we want it,' Trump said. He plans to meet NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte to discuss Ukraine and other issues this week.

Bank of England could make cuts to interest rates if jobs market slows down, Bailey says
Bank of England could make cuts to interest rates if jobs market slows down, Bailey says

The Independent

time26 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Bank of England could make cuts to interest rates if jobs market slows down, Bailey says

The Bank of England could make cuts to interest rates if the jobs market slows down, Andrew Bailey has said. Businesses are 'adjusting employment' as a result of Chancellor Rachel Reeves ' decision to raise national insurance contributions (NICs) for employers, the governor of the Bank also told The Times. Companies are 'also having pay rises that are possibly less than they would have been if the NICs change hadn't happened', Mr Bailey said. In an interview with the newspaper, the governor said the British economy was growing behind its potential. This could open up 'slack' to bring down inflation, he said, meaning prices on goods would rise less swiftly compared with earnings in future. Mr Bailey said he believes the base rate set by the Bank of England would be lowered in future, after it was held in June. The current Bank rate of 4.25 per cent which has a bearing on all lending in the UK – including mortgages – will be reviewed again on 7 August by the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee. 'I really do believe the path is downward,' Mr Bailey told The Times. He added: 'But we continue to use the words 'gradual and careful' because… some people say to me 'why are you cutting when inflation's above target?'' The governor's indication that lower lending rates and reduced inflation could be around the corner comes as the government is facing pressure to improve living standards. Ms Reeves's tax and spend plans are also being constrained by the current borrowing costs, as well as downgraded growth forecasts. The chancellor's fiscal headroom has been in part eroded by U-turns on the winter fuel payment and welfare reforms, as well as global shocks to the British economy. Some in the Labour Party, including former leader Lord Neil Kinnock and Wales's first minister Baroness Eluned Morgan, are calling for a wealth tax to help bolster the public finances. On Sunday, transport secretary Heidi Alexander said such a tax had not been 'directly' discussed when ministers held an away day at the end of last week. But speaking to Sky News' Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme, she would not rule out tax rises at the autumn budget, only saying tax decisions would be made based on 'fairness'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store