logo
Labour focused on appeasing Reform, not beating them, says Jeremy Corbyn

Labour focused on appeasing Reform, not beating them, says Jeremy Corbyn

The Guardian2 days ago
Jeremy Corbyn has accused the Labour government of 'appeasing' Reform UK by 'scapegoating' migrants and minorities for its own domestic policy failures, saying his new leftwing political party would take on Nigel Farage instead.
The veteran leftwing MP, who confirmed last week he was launching a new, as yet unnamed, movement with former Labour MP Zarah Sultana, said British politics was at a 'critical juncture' with the rise of rightwing populism. He said he saw their role as providing hope, not fear.
And he accused the Labour party, which he led between 2015 and 2020, of 'paving the path' for Reform's electoral success, by failing to take on a 'rigged economic system' and blaming immigrants for the problems in society.
In less than a week, more than 500,000 people have signed up to the new movement which is explicitly aimed at left-leaning voters who have backed Labour, the Greens or the collection of Gaza-focused independents who saw off Labour candidates in four constituencies in last year's election.
Polling before the party launched suggested it could gather as much as 10% of the vote nationally. However, new parties usually struggle to maintain momentum, and turning polls into votes relies on building an effective campaign machine, which is difficult to do from scratch.
Writing for the Guardian, Corbyn said there was a 'huge appetite' for a reset of the 'broken' political system, under which the traditional two-party domination has broken down.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'Up and down the country, there is huge appetite for an economic reset. One that brings water, energy, rail and mail into public ownership. One that invests in welfare, not warfare. One that makes the wealthiest in society pay a bit more in tax to ensure that everyone can live in dignity,' he said.
'This is the political vision that can inspire hope, not fear. The great dividers want you to think that migrants and minorities are responsible for the problems in our society. They're not.
'Those problems are caused by a rigged economic system that protects the interests of billionaires and corporations. By scapegoating migrants and minorities for its own domestic failures, Labour has paved the path for Reform UK.
'This Labour government is here to appease Reform. We are here to defeat Reform. We are at a critical juncture, and we need an alternative, now.'
The former Labour leader added: 'Politics should be about empowerment. Instead, people are shut out of the decisions that affect their daily lives. For too long, top-down political parties have patronised their members and disempowered the communities they claim to represent.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM says he ‘particularly' listens to hostages after Palestine backlash
PM says he ‘particularly' listens to hostages after Palestine backlash

The Independent

time19 minutes ago

  • The Independent

PM says he ‘particularly' listens to hostages after Palestine backlash

Sir Keir Starmer has said that he 'particularly' listens to hostages after a British-Israeli woman who was held captive by Hamas criticised his pledge to recognise a Palestinian state. The Prime Minister said there is a 'need to do everything we can to alleviate the human catastrophe in Gaza' after Emily Damari accused him of 'moral failure' over the move. Ms Damari said that Sir Keir is 'not standing on the right side of history' and that she was 'deeply saddened' by the decision. As well as Ms Damari's criticism, Wednesday also saw a group of peers warn that the pledge could break international law. Speaking to ITV West Country while on a visit to Swindon on Thursday, the Prime Minister said: 'I particularly listen to the hostages, Emily Damari, who I have spoken to, – I've met her mother a number of times, and they've been through the most awful, awful experience for Emily and for her mother. 'And that's why I've been absolutely clear and steadfast that we must have the remaining hostages released. That's been our position throughout and I absolutely understand the unimaginable horror that Emily went through. 'Alongside that, we do need to do everything we can to alleviate the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, where we are seeing the children and babies starving for want of aid which could be delivered. 'That is why I've said unless things materially change on the ground, we'll have to assess this in September, we will recognise Palestine before the United Nations General Assembly in September.' It comes as some 38 members of the House of Lords, including some of the UK's most eminent lawyers, wrote to Attorney General Lord Hermer. As first reported by the Times newspaper, the peers warned Sir Keir Starmer's pledge to recognise Palestine may breach international law as the territory may not meet the criteria for statehood under the Montevideo Convention, a treaty signed in 1933. Business minister Gareth Thomas described the decision as a 'political judgment' and said ministers 'believe it is' compliant with international law. He told Times Radio 'In the end, recognition of another state is a political judgment and over 140 countries have already recognised Palestine, and we're determined to do so in September if Israel does not end the violence in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and agree to a lasting route towards a two-state solution, and to no annexation in the West Bank.' In their letter to Lord Hermer, the peers said Palestine 'does not meet the international law criteria for recognition of a state, namely, defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states'. There is no certainty over the borders of Palestine, they said, and no single government as Hamas and Fatah are enemies. In their letter, seen by the PA news agency, the peers added: 'You have said that a selective, 'pick and mix' approach to international law will lead to its disintegration, and that the criteria set out in international law should not be manipulated for reasons of political expedience. 'Accordingly, we expect you to demonstrate this commitment by explaining to the public and to the Government that recognition of Palestine would be contrary to the principles governing recognition of states in international law.' Lord Hermer has previously insisted a commitment to international law 'goes absolutely to the heart' of the Government's approach to foreign policy. Sir Keir announced earlier this week that the UK could take the step of recognising Palestine in September ahead of a gathering at the UN. The UK will only refrain from doing so if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months, the Prime Minister said.

The war in Gaza will end when Hamas is defeated – not when Britain tells us it's over
The war in Gaza will end when Hamas is defeated – not when Britain tells us it's over

Telegraph

time20 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The war in Gaza will end when Hamas is defeated – not when Britain tells us it's over

Let me repeat something which is often forgotten – Israel wants peace. We want to live in peace, free from the threat of state-sponsored terrorism encircling us. Free from invasions by terrorist groups hell-bent on murdering as many of our citizens as possible. But, appallingly, Hamas and the other proxies of Iran, want the exact opposite. In fact, they don't want Israel to even exist as a country. So Sir Keir Starmer's decision to use the unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state as a negotiating tactic with Israel is not some bold diplomatic breakthrough. Nor is it some new, special lever, propelling us towards peace. It is the political equivalent of shouting in the wind — no doubt designed to reassure Labour's backbenchers that Number 10 is taking the electoral threat of Muslim independents and Mr. Corbyn's new party, seriously. The most diplomatically tone-deaf part of this curious situation is that the British Government genuinely thinks that by recognising a Palestinian state it will act as some sort of leverage over Israel's policy towards the murderous terrorist organisation of Hamas which sits on our border. Secondly, the UK's apparent policy seems to put many conditions on Israel, but yet none on Hamas. In September, if Hamas is still in control of Gaza, and if the hostages are still not released, Britain will recognise a Palestinian state with a terror organisation, proscribed in the UK, controlling Gaza and millions of Palestinians. Starmer's announcement almost incentivises Hamas not to release the hostages. As Emily Damari, the extraordinarily brave dual British-Israeli citizen who survived 471 days in Hamas captivity said yesterday: 'This is not diplomacy – it is a moral failure. Shame on you, Prime Minister… this move does not confirm the UK will advance peace – it risks rewarding terror. It sends a dangerous message: that violence earns legitimacy.' Emily is right. This policy is as reckless as it is fanciful. Let's examine precisely what the UK is proposing to recognise here: a Palestinian entity, half of which is governed by a jihadist terror group, Hamas, and the other half of which is governed by a corrupt Palestinian Authority that literally pays salaries to the families of convicted Palestinian terrorists. I do not believe the British taxpayer would want their resources spent on strengthening or propping up any such entity. This recognition comes as 50 hostages remain as captives of Hamas, after the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. On October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorists invaded our country, butchered 1,200 civilians in their homes, raped women and burned entire families alive. And yet somehow, Britain under this Labour government during a war to remove the threat of Hamas has decided: 'Yes, now would be a good time to reward the Palestinian movement with statehood.' Let me be very clear: Britain's recognition changes nothing. It won't change Hamas's genocidal charter. It won't change the fact that rockets are still being fired at our cities. It won't bring a single Israeli or Palestinian closer to peace. If there is to be any consequence from the British Government's absurd posturing it is this: Hamas will be emboldened. It will reward their terrorism. It shows the Palestinians that October 7 was worth it. What Britain calls recognition, the Palestinian leadership calls vindication. Why should they now negotiate? Why compromise? Why reform, when Britain and France recognise a Palestinian state with no disarmament required, no renunciation of violence or terrorism, no need to sit at the negotiating table? Meanwhile, in the real Middle East, grown-up diplomacy is taking place. The Abraham Accords have already proven that Arab-Israeli peace is best achieved through bilateral discussions. It requires courage, vision, and mutual interest. Israel now has flourishing diplomatic, economic, and security relations with the UAE, Bahrain and Morocco. The tragic reality is that we have been down this road for decades. The Palestinians have been offered a state, time and time again. Whether in 1947, 2000, 2008 – the list goes on. Israel has tried to live in peace and security with our Palestinian neighbours based on a two-state solution model but on each occasion they have refused because they cannot accept the existence of a Jewish state in any borders. They refuse our very right to exist. When offered a viable opportunity for statehood, the Palestinians have chosen terrorism and intifadas. Israel does not have a viable partner for peace. We have repeatedly shown our willingness for peace, with Egypt, Jordan, and via the Abraham Accords. In 2005, every single Israeli Jew left Gaza. What did we get? You guessed it, more terror. And while the British Government indulges in symbolic gestures, Israel will continue doing what we must: defending our people, defeating terrorism, and building real partnerships with those in our region who want a future based on coexistence – not destruction. So to our friends in the UK: recognise what you wish. Make your declarations. Pass your motions. It will not do anything to solve your own domestic issues with radical Islam. It won't change the fact 75 per cent of all counter terrorism work carried out by MI5 is focused on Islamist extremism. You will recall a poll that found only a quarter of British Muslims believe Hamas committed murder and rape in Israel on October 7; recognising a Palestinian state wont change these shocking statistics. It won't bring home our hostages either. It won't remove the very real threat of Hamas from Gaza. And it certainly won't bring us any closer to the peace that we so dearly want. The Labour Party is more concerned about its short term political future, contesting seats with large Muslim populations than it is about its relationship with the only democracy in the Middle East and a key security partner in the eastern Mediterranean. The British Government thinks that by dangling the sword of Palestinian recognition over Israel it will alter our government's policy, but it won't. The war in Gaza will end when Hamas is defeated, when they are disarmed, and most importantly, when all the remaining hostages are home – not when Keir Starmer tells us it's over.

Trump's envoy in Israel as Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry says 91 killed seeking aid in past day
Trump's envoy in Israel as Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry says 91 killed seeking aid in past day

BBC News

time34 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Trump's envoy in Israel as Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry says 91 killed seeking aid in past day

'Reward for Hamas' - Israel criticises Canada's Palestinian planpublished at 08:48 British Summer Time 08:48 BST The Israeli government has criticised Canada's plan to recognise a Palestinian state. Israel's Foreign Ministry said the move was was a "reward for Hamas". Recognition of such a state "harms the efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza", the ministry posted on X, and damages work towards the release of the remaining hostages. Defence Minister Israel Katz said the plans to recognise a Palestinian state "give Hamas encouragement and harden its stance". A Palestinian state would be a "Hamas state", said Israel's Minister for Foreign Affairs, Gideon Saar, in reaction to the UK and France's earlier decision to formally recognise a Palestinian state. The UK's move was also criticised yesterday by British-Israeli citizen Emily Damari, who was taken hostage by Hamas on 7 October 2023 and spent 15 months in captivity. "This move does not advance peace - it risks rewarding terror," she posted online. "It sends a dangerous message: that violence earns legitimacy."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store