Romanian fraudsters sought by authorities after they cut GPS monitors: VCDA
The Ventura County District Attorney's Office said Paul Kimpian (aka Roman Janecek) and Marius Vlaic, affiliates of the Dorneanu organized crime group, cut their ankle monitors and fled after they posted $50,000 bail in 2023.
Kimpian and Vlaic had been charged with 'more than a dozen felony counts, including conspiracy and grand theft, related to several instances of CalWORKs theft using cloned EBT cards,' the DA's Office said in a news release.
Anyone with information about them is asked to call Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-TIPS.
Irvine police warn of alleged jewelry-stealing scheme involving Romanian nationals
Allegedly helmed by Mihai Dorneanu, the Dorneanu group has been under investigation by the Ventura County DA's Office and FBI for two years after 'widespread EBT skimming fraud' resulted in 'the theft of hundreds of millions of dollars in California welfare funds, including funds stolen from Ventura County residents,' the release said.
Romanian mob tied to Southern California card skimming scheme
Since 2021 in Ventura County alone, nearly $2.2 million has been lost to EBT skimming fraud, which impacts 'some of the county's most financially vulnerable residents,' officials said.
'Our office remains committed to protecting Ventura County residents from fraud and financial exploitation,' District Attorney Erik Nasarenko said in the release. 'This investigation demonstrates the importance of collaboration between local, federal, and international law enforcement agencies to dismantle organized crime groups that target public assistance programs.'
In Romania earlier this month, the service of 24 search warrants related to this scheme resulted in the arrest of 11 people, as well as seizures of 'devices used to clone EBT cards, electronic components, documents, mobile phones, laptops, large sums of cash, and six vehicles,' officials said.
Romanian nationals have been implicated in other criminal activity in Southern California recently, including a jewelry-switching scheme.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
29 minutes ago
- New York Post
‘Debanking' is an obscene abuse of government power
'Debanking' seems like something out of paranoid dystopian fiction, but this horrific abuse of government power is already all too real. We're almost glad the Biden crew deployed it against then-former-President Donald Trump in 2021: That not only ensures he's aware of this outrage; it points to how even the powerful are vulnerable. It's as simple as it is scary: Government regulators give a quiet nod to financial institutions that certain people or industries are to be 'unpersoned,' and pretty soon they get the same treatment as North Korean tyrants, terrorists or drug kingpins: locked out of the financial system, which means social death. The victim gets turned away at other banks, all with no way to appeal what's blandly painted as a 'business decision.' Just try life without any ready way to cash checks or pay bills, not even a debit card — nor, if you run a business, a line of credit to pay suppliers and meet payroll. The abuse apparently began under President Barack Obama, deployed against disfavored businesses such as gun manufacturers on the laughable ground that they posed a 'reputational risk'; it expanded under President Joe Biden to hit crypto and tech startups, as well as individuals whose opinions or political activity got labeled 'dangerous.' Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen calls it a 'privatized sanctions regime'; American victims apparently number in the thousands. In the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, Trump was first personally dropped by Chase, then refused service by Bank of America. And First Lady Melania Trump reports that she and her son Barron were dropped by their bank. The good news is that Donald Trump is signing executive orders to crack down on the abuse and will surely sign legislation to prevent it. Banks have a duty to watch out for criminal abuse of their services, but forcing them to secretly enforce political insiders' ideological agenda is frighteningly totalitarian.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Two men indicted in shooting of off-duty Border Patrol agent
The Department of Justice (DOJ) indicted two men on Wednesday following their alleged role in the shooting of an off-duty Border Patrol agent last month. Miguel Mora, 21, and Christian Aybar, 22 are accused of shooting the agent on July 19 in Fort Washington Park in New York, according to court documents. The DOJ accuses Mora of shooting the agent and striking him twice, once in the face and once on the hand and wrist. It says the two men previously were involved in the robbery of a 39-year-old woman in the area. 'Even while off-duty on a summer night, this officer quickly leapt into action in an act of bravery,' District Attorney Alvin Bragg said in the Wednesday release. 'We are committed to the safety of law enforcement officers in Manhattan, as demonstrated by this in-depth investigation and today's serious charges,' he added. Mora is charged with attempted murder in the first and second degree in the New York State Supreme Court while he and Aybar both face charges for robbery and criminal possession of a weapon. The two allegedly planned the robbery spree in advance of the incident, according to authorities. 'Miguel Mora and Cristhian Aybar juggled with fate, and lost, when they set out on their alleged robbery spree last month. Throughout much of their time in the U.S., and as culminated with the events of July 19, they disrespected the sanctity of life and the American rule of law,' HSI New York Special Agent in Charge Ricky J. Patel said. 'In the process, they changed the course of their own lives, and tragically, that of an innocent, unsuspecting off-duty CBP officer,' he added. Authorities said Mora illegally immigrated from the Dominican Republic and could face up to 15 years in prison while Aybar, who is also an illegal immigrant, could face 7.5 years behind bars.
3 hours ago
What's known and not yet known about the Justice Department's scrutiny of Trump-Russia probe origins
WASHINGTON -- News that Attorney General Pam Bondi is advancing a criminal investigation into the Obama-era origins of the Trump-Russia investigation means that one of the most studied, and politically polarizing, chapters of modern American history will be under the microscope yet again. Here's a look at what's known and not yet known about the latest Justice Department revelation: Perhaps no issue continues to aggravate President Donald Trump more than the assessment by intelligence officials that Russia interfered in the 2016 election on his behalf and the investigation by law enforcement into whether his campaign colluded with Moscow to tip the outcome of the contest. Robert Mueller, the former FBI director tapped as special counsel by Trump's first Justice Department to investigate, found that Russia had waged a multi-prong operation in Trump's favor and that the Republican president's campaign welcomed the aid. But Mueller did not find sufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign. As president for a second time, Trump has made no secret of his desire to use the Justice Department as a weapon of retribution against perceived political adversaries he sees as having smeared him, including by calling for Obama-era officials to be jailed. And his administration, now more broadly and across multiple agencies, has been engaged in a effort to reopen the long-accepted conclusion — including among prominent Republicans — of Russian interference and to scrutinize the officials involved in reaching that assessment. Bondi, a Trump loyalist, has directed Justice Department prosecutors to investigate the Russia inquiry and has authorized the use of a grand jury. Grand juries are tools used by prosecutors to issue subpoenas for records and testimony and to produce indictments based on the evidence they receive. The bar is low for an indictment given that the presentation of evidence by prosecutors is one-sided, though grand juries do have the option to decline to indict and have done so in the past. A person familiar with the matter confirmed Bondi's directive to The Associated Press but key questions remain. The Justice Department has not disclosed, for instance, which prosecutors are pursuing the investigation, where the grand jury that might hear evidence is located and whether and when law enforcement officials might seek to bring criminal charges. The Justice Department, in an unusual statement last month, appeared to confirm the existence of an investigation into former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director James Brennan but provided no details. It's not clear who might be targeted in the investigation, but the Trump administration has been aggressively challenging intelligence community conclusions about Russia's actions and intentions that had seemed settled long ago. It's been a welcome diversion for the administration as it confronts a wave of criticism from Trump's base and conservative influencers over the handling of records from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. In the last month, Trump administration officials and allies have released a series of documents aimed at casting doubt on the extent of interference and at portraying the original Russia investigation as an Obama administration frame-job. The documents have been hailed by Trump and other supporters as incontrovertible proof of a conspiracy, but a close inspection of the records shows they fall well short of that. Among the documents released by Tulsi Gabbard, the administration's director of national intelligence, are emails showing that Obama administration officials recognized in 2016 that Russians had not hacked state election systems to manipulate votes in favor of Trump. But the absence of evidence that votes were switched — something the Obama administration never alleged — has no bearing on the ample evidence of other forms of Russia interference, including a hack-and-leak operation involving Democratic emails and a covert social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and spreading disinformation. Last week, Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released a previously classified annex of a 2023 report by John Durham, the special counsel appointed by the first Trump administration to hunt for government misconduct in the Trump-Russia investigation. The annex included a series of emails, including one from July 2016 that was purportedly sent by a senior staffer at a philanthropic organization founded by billionaire investor George Soros, that referred to a plan approved by then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to link Trump to Russia at a time when the public was focusing on her use of a private email server. But Durham's own report took pain to note that investigators had not corroborated the communications as authentic and that the alleged author had no recollection of drafting the email. The report said the Durham team's best assessment was that the message was 'a composites of several emails' the Russians had obtained from hacking — raising the likelihood that it was a product of Russian disinformation. Fresh scrutiny has also centered around the intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference published in January 2017. An annex in a classified version of the assessment contained a summary of the so-called Steele dossier — a compilation of opposition research that included uncorroborated rumors and salacious gossip about Trump and Russia. Just as Russian interference has been heavily scrutinized, so too has the U.S. government's response to it. Multiple government reports, including not only from Mueller but also a Republican-led Senate intelligence committee that included current Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have documented Russia's activities in painstaking detail. To be sure, reports from the Justice Department inspector general and Durham also identified significant flaws in the FBI's Russia investigation, including errors and omissions in applications the Justice Department submitted to a secretive surveillance court to eavesdrop on a national security adviser to the 2016 Trump campaign. But Durham found no criminal wrongdoing among senior government officials, bringing three criminal cases — two against private citizens that resulted in acquittals at trial and a third against a little-known FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to doctoring an email. It is unclear if there is any criminal misconduct that exists that Durham, who launched his investigation in 2019 and concluded it four years later, somehow missed during his sprawling inquiry.
