Court denies Apple appeal in Epic Games case, keeping App Store changes in place
Apple was dealt a blow in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Wednesday, as a panel of judges denied the company's emergency application to halt changes to its App Store that resulted from the company's legal battle with Epic Games.
Apple "bears the burden of showing that the circumstances justify an exercise of [our] discretion," according to the order. "After reviewing the relevant factors, we are not persuaded that a stay is appropriate."
Last month, the iPhone maker asked the appeals court to pause an order from U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers that said that Apple could no longer charge a commission on payment links inside its apps nor tell developers how the links should look.
Apple said the ruling from the judge could cost the company "substantial sums."
The ruling has already shifted the economics of app development in the U.S. Developers including Amazon and Spotify have been able to update their apps to avoid Apple's 15% to 30% commission and direct customers to their own websites for payment.
Amazon's iPhone Kindle app now shows an orange "Get Book" button that links to Amazon.com.
The rejection of Apple's stay signals that recent changes under the order can stay in place. Apple CEO Tim Cook has said that Apple would appeal Rogers' ruling.
In April, Rogers found that Apple had violated her original court order from the Epic Games trial, which was originally decided in 2021, that forced Apple to make limited changes to its link-out policy. She issued a new, more expansive ruling, that told Apple to immediately stop imposing its commissions.
The judge also alleged that Apple had misled the court.
"We are disappointed with the decision not to stay the district court's order, and we'll continue to argue our case during the appeals process," an Apple spokesperson said in a statement. "As we've said before, we strongly disagree with the district court's opinion. Our goal is to ensure the App Store remains an incredible opportunity for developers and a safe and trusted experience for our users."
CNBC has reached out to Epic Games for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2 Growth Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever
Amazon's constant innovation is a hallmark of a business that will still be around in 50 years. Netflix is a highly profitable entertainment business that is still finding new avenues of growth. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Buying growth stocks that you intend to hold forever is a smart strategy. It forces you to think about companies that will still be around in 50 years. This raises the odds that the stock will keep compounding in value over your lifetime, which is the lazy way to get rich without doing much work. If this sounds like a good plan, here are two stocks to consider buying. Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) has profitable revenue streams coming from e-commerce, cloud computing, retail advertising, and third-party fulfillment services. It generated $21 billion in free cash flow on $650 billion of revenue over the last year. The foundation of Amazon's business is its online store, making up 37% of first-quarter revenue. Its wide selection, delivery infrastructure, and large customer base with more than 200 million Prime members give Amazon a strong competitive advantage. Amazon's investments in robotics to automate inventory management and order processing are strengthening its competitive advantage in a $4 trillion global e-commerce market. Amazon continues to push the limits of delivery speeds. In Q1, it set a new record for items delivered the same or next day. It's probably not by accident that this accomplishment follows the unveiling of its next-generation fulfillment center in Shreveport, Louisiana, in 2024. This facility is powered by artificial intelligence (AI) and uses 10 times more robotics than the company's other facilities. Amazon said its new fulfillment center will set a new standard for the retail industry. This is an incredibly innovative company that has progressed from selling out of a garage 30 years ago to using AI to deliver millions of items at blazing speed. That's the kind of business you want to invest in. Amazon's investments in AI bolster its long-term prospects. Analysts currently expect the company's earnings to grow at an annualized rate of 17% in the coming years, which reflects expectations for improving margins in its retail business, in addition to strong growth from other high-margin services like cloud computing and advertising. Amazon has a lot of levers it can pull to create shareholder returns. Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) stock continues to hit new highs. It has evolved from a DVD-by-mail rental service 20 years ago to a dominant streaming service. Over the last year, the company generated $7 billion in free cash flow on $40 billion of revenue, and it keeps growing. Its growing cash flow paves the way for increasing content spend to keep winning more subscribers. People have varying entertainment preferences, and Netflix can afford to make a wide variety of content that pleases everyone. It spent $17 billion in content production last year and still reported a stellar 22% profit margin. Netflix still has a huge opportunity internationally. Its growing budget will allow it to invest in widening its content offering to appeal to different cultures. Netflix started investing in local infrastructure to support its growth plans a decade ago and is now producing content in more than 50 countries. What's more, Netflix is testing new content formats to widen the viewership. Its livestream of the Taylor-Serrano fight in November was the most-watched professional women's sports event in U.S. history. With more than 700 million people watching content on its platform, Netflix could also see advertising revenue soar in the coming years. Ad-supported subscriber plans come at a lower price point, helping the company expand its audience reach and boost margins at the same time. Analysts expect its earnings to grow at an annualized rate of 22% over the next several years. Netflix's strong brand and high-margin business have the makings of a stock that is going to reward shareholders for many years. Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Ballard has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Netflix. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 Growth Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
Samsung and Apple are the wrong brands to make thin phones — here's why
It's been a week since the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge launched. But even as the tech world moves on, and we witness the launch of the Nintendo Switch 2, and the build-up to WWDC 2025, it's still occupying space in my mind, and the minds of my colleagues, for being a competent but confusing device. We like the Galaxy S25 Edge plenty, but all the same it feels like the iPhone 17 Air, expected later this year, could easily beat the S25 Edge as long as it does more than just be thin, or makes fewer sacrifices like pricing or camera performance in the name of slimming things down. But there's one thing both companies could have done to help, but that Samsung has not done, and that I expect Apple won't do either. And it's the crux of why I think Samsung and Apple should leave the slim phone idea to other companies. Batteries is the obvious area where thin phones run into limitations. Less internal space requires a sacrifice of battery size and capacity, and that's exactly what we saw in our own battery testing of the Galaxy S25 Edge, which found that the S25 Edge has a battery life between around three and four and a half hours shorter than other Galaxy S25 models. This wasn't inevitable though — Samsung just needed some new tech to help. Brands like OnePlus and Honor have been launching phones with silicon-carbon battery tech — a new combination of materials for batteries that packs more power into a smaller area. This is ideal for a slim phone like the Galaxy S25 Edge, which needs a big battery to fuel its big 6.7-inch screen, but can't take the battery from the identically-sized Galaxy S25 Plus due to its reduced depth. However, Samsung elected to stick with good old lithium batteries for the S25 Edge. Which meant it's ended up with a smaller capacity than the much smaller Galaxy S25, and resulted in the underwhelming battery life results I mention above. Optimistically, a smaller battery for the rumored iPhone 17 Air will perhaps be less of an issue than it is on the Galaxy S25 Edge. Apple's good at getting the most out of smaller batteries with its in-house hardware and software, as we can see on our best phone battery life guide with the iPhone 16 Pro Max. Apple's current top iPhone lasts slightly longer on the TG custom battery test than the Galaxy S25 Ultra, but while using a 6% smaller battery. But the iPhone 17 Air would still presumably get more battery life if Apple elected to use silicon-carbon batteries. I don't have high hopes of Apple fulfilling my wish though, given how the company is normally slower than other brands to integrate new tech into its products. Just look at the iPhone Fold, or rather the current lack of one, compared to the seventh-generation foldables Samsung is expected to launch later this year. It really shows how patient Apple can be about fitting new tech to its phones. So Apple's expected reluctance to address the slim phone battery life question, and Samsung's open focus on design over outright performance with the Galaxy S25 Edge, is why these are the wrong two companies to be pushing this phone format. I don't think the slim flagship phone's going to catch on until users can be certain they'll still get a day's use out of their new phone. Silicon-carbon battery tech is the obvious way to fix this, and therefore Honor, OnePlus and other companies already experimenting with the technology should use this knowledge to show us how slim phones should be done.
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
Why Apple's VisionPro won't make XR headsets mainstream
Major announcements around the VisionPro headset are expected next week and may even confirm tantalizing rumors that a lighter model of the high-end XR device is coming next year. Whatever Apple reveals at WWDC, we can expect another round of analyst predictions that this time, mass adoption of head-mounted displays is finally happening. As Apple, Meta, and other major players continue to struggle with taking the technology mainstream, it's worth addressing the virtual elephant in the room: There's reason to suspect that XR headsets' barrier to success isn't just about cost, headset weight, lack of content, eye strain, or other frequently cited issues. Neuroscience suggests that the sensory experience of XR can't compensate for the value of sharing a physical environment with our screens—especially when it comes to how we form knowledge and memory. Experiments with XR for Full-Time Computing About 10 years ago, I started spending long sessions in VR (4–8 hours daily over several weeks) to see how it might affect my sense of time and attention. I began with the HTC Vive, which was comfortable and fun. Later, I tested the Apple VisionPro with a full virtual workstation of monitors and displays. I was curious whether XR could improve focus and research. It felt like a very different thing to use VR all day, versus a brief demo in a museum or Apple showroom. Early on, I had to stand and move constantly throughout the day. It was exhausting, though it made for a great workout (SUPERHOT was one of my favorites). But this kind of motion-based interaction didn't translate well to daily work tasks. Tossing data around in 3D like in Minority Report might make for compelling cinema, but it's far less practical over time. When the VisionPro arrived, I was excited to use it while seated. A friend set me up with a massive virtual workspace, and I genuinely appreciated the focus it provided when I was digging into something new—say, reading a dense Wikipedia article. Still, when I set up my home office last year, I chose two large physical monitors at eye level and a sit/stand desk. As enjoyable as VR was, the process of setup and adjusting the space took more time and energy than docking a laptop. And even though I was initially thrilled to be in a virtual workspace, I found myself feeling more distant from the real world. I wanted to go outside more, and didn't feel like looking at any screen at all by day's end. I also noticed the difference in eye strain from screens so close to my face. I prefer to work near a window where I can shift my gaze into the distance. That rhythm of looking away and refocusing helps me process thoughts—especially after encountering something new. The Trouble With Losing Touch I asked my colleague Dr. David Sisson, a neurophysiologist, why XR adoption hasn't matched media hype. He reminded me that audio and visual inputs—the primary senses XR taps into—aren't the full picture. Then there's the matter of touch in XR. 'Without touch, there's no 'intimacy.' You're not really interacting with what's going on,' David told me. 'You can hit a ball—and hear the 'crack' in VR—but you're not feeling anything other than a little jerk in the controller that makes you feel like there's some inertia happening.' In short, headsets deprive us of the tactile and physical context that supports memory formation. Contrast that with playing a console game: you're anchored in a physical space, hands on colorful controllers, with the screen at a distance. If you're like me, you vividly remember not just the game, but the exact couch you sat on and the friends or family who played with you. The Neuroscience of Virtual Experience This sense of 'placeness' goes beyond just touch. As David explained, '[C]hemical senses are not a part of [the VR experience] . . . There's a well-considered idea, a linkage between olfaction, smell between memory—that you're living that out of the [VR] picture entirely.' Attempts at incorporating virtual smells into XR exist, but it's unclear whether they're effective—or even desirable. Recent research supports what French literature has long told us: smell powerfully evokes memory. Studies show scent not only enhances recall but may also support learning across other sensory areas. While XR devices like VisionPro do re-create home and office setups and allow for vast screen real estate, they lack a true sense of location. Evolution shaped our brains to operate differently depending on whether we're traveling or at home. Researchers call this the encoding specificity principle —our memories link closely with the environment where they were first formed. With a headset on, our minds don't fully orient to a place, and so we never quite settle in. Apple offers a vast virtual workspace you can take on the go, but that benefit comes at the cost of the sensory richness and physical grounding of a real-world setup. Neuroscience, not just practicality, suggests that working in a physical space—with monitors, windows, textures, smells, and distance—offers deeper engagement and memory retention. Putting the 'Pro' in VisionPro To be clear, XR headsets excel in specific contexts like rehabilitation or short bursts of fully embodied interaction, where body motion tracking is vital. Some content creators might find immense value in a distraction-free, multiscreen virtual studio. But that's not a mass-market audience. XR evangelists may continue promoting VisionPro as the breakout device, but we—and Apple, for that matter—should remember that 'Pro' isn't just branding. It reflects the narrow set of advanced use cases that justify immersion. For most of us, computing still works best in a physical world that engages all five senses. And that's not something XR can replicate—at least, not yet.
