Neil and Carlaw to discuss 'improving political cutlure'
Launching the initiative, Eddie Barnes, Director of the John Smith Institute, said: 'Politics is still the best way to make change in society but we know too many young people are turning their backs on democratic engagement because they don't believe it matters or because of the toxicity of our public debate.
READ MORE:
'Political differences of opinion have always existed and indeed are fundamental to the democratic process. But whereas in the past people were able to express those differences respectfully, we now live in an era in which rancour, toxicity and even abuse are all too commonplace.
'The consequences are worrying: when we asked young people whether they backed democracy over dictatorship, more than a third said they'd support dictatorship.
'It doesn't have to be this way. We can continue to disagree on issues, but what matters is the way in which we do so.
'In short, we need to learn how to disagree more agreeably – with courtesy, civility and in an atmosphere of mutual respect."
Dr Macklin, who is co-hosting the event, said: 'I have always been deeply interested in the political process, and whilst I am not affiliated to any one party, I believe it is vital that we do more to engage younger people in a positive way with politics.
'The toxicity we witness all too often these days is having a profoundly corrosive effect not only on our day-to-day political debate, but on the foundations on which our politics sits."
A recent opinion poll of younger adults commissioned by the John Smith Centre found that while most believe in democracy, they fear for its future, with 63 per cent believing that democracy in the UK is 'in trouble'. There was also a strong call for 'better politics', involving more honest, more open debate.
This week's event is envisaged as the first in a series of similar events in schools across Scotland, to be facilitated by the John Smith Centre, in which other leading political figures will take part in debate and discussion on the way forward for the political process.
Looking ahead to Monday's event, Mr Carlaw said: 'I'm delighted to be taking part in the very first event in this new initiative, and to have the opportunity to engage in political debate in front of an audience of senior pupils in Kilmarnock.
'Alex and myself have crossed swords rhetorically many times over the years, and will no doubt continue to hold opposing views on many issues, but I hope that by taking part in this event we can demonstrate that it is possible to do so in a way that is positive, respectful and constructive.'
Mr Neil said: 'Engaging younger people with politics in a positive way is absolutely essential, not least given the level of polarisation we are currently witnessing.
'I was very happy to accept the invitation from the John Smith Centre and Marie to participate in this event, and I look forward to discussion with Jackson, with whom I have had many lively but respectful debates with over the years.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
42 minutes ago
- The National
Reform UK hiring staff in London to write Holyrood manifesto
The party is hiring more staff in Westminster to look at Scotland-specific policy ahead of next year's election. Reform UK are expected to pick up a number of seats in May, with some polls suggesting the party could even come in second place. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage As reported by the Daily Record, one of the job listings advertised by the party in London is a "Scotland policy advisor". The blurb for the role reads: "Play your part in shaping Scotland's future. Join Britain's fastest-growing political movement. READ MORE: Crown Office cancels court dates for Scottish activists on terror charges 'Reform UK is seeking a proactive, passionate, and detail-oriented Policy Advisor to lead on policy development for Scotland. "You'll help shape bold, evidence-led proposals that will form the backbone of our manifesto for the 2026 Scottish Parliament elections, and support our wider policy direction across the UK. "This is a unique opportunity to work at the heart of a dynamic political movement committed to common-sense reform, national pride, and real change.' According to the job advert, the post will be based in "Westminster, England". There is a second advert for a policy advisor role which involves coming up with policy proposals for the "devolved manifestos", which is also based in "Westminster, England". A press officer job is based in Glasgow which the listing states involves championing the party's 'common-sense policies' on immigration and law and order. Political parties in Scotland have said the listings come as "no surprise", with the SNP arguing that Reform UK know "nothing about what's good for Scotland". SNP MSP Kenneth Gibson said: "Decisions for Scotland are best made in Scotland - with the SNP, that's guaranteed. 'Nigel Farage knows nothing about what's good for Scotland. His politics couldn't be more out of touch with the people of Scotland's priorities and values. 'By thinking that policy for Scotland can be dictated from hundreds of miles away in London, Farage is making all the same mistakes that all the other Westminster-based parties have made for decades." READ MORE: Anger as Edinburgh Fringe venue admits to censoring artist's work Gibson added: 'It is only with the full powers of independence that Scotland can finally be free from being told what to do by politicians in London with little understanding of Scotland's needs, values and priorities.' Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said: "The last thing Scotland needs is more London-based policy makers who think they know better than everyone who actually lives here. Farage doesn't want to create jobs here in Scotland; instead, he wants to throw our country under the bus to benefit his wealthy friends. Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie 'This comes as no surprise, given the disastrous impact his climate denialism would have on the Scottish economy. 'The Scottish Greens are building a strong future for Scotland, with secure jobs based in Scottish communities, and a vision for that that could not be more different from the racist and hateful agenda of Reform.' READ MORE: Police Scotland refuse to reveal number of pro-Palestine activists arrested And Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie said: ""It is no great surprise that a party that does not care about Scotland will be dictating their Holyrood manifesto from London. "Despite pretending to be a man of the people, Nigel Farage took a private jet when he visited here ahead of the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, which his party went on to lose. "Farage is nothing more than a chancer who thinks he can take the Scottish public for mugs.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Wheesht team cries hypocrisy as library unveils ‘democracy' grants
SNP ministers have been accused of hypocrisy as a fund to support 'democracy' in public libraries was announced less than a week after it emerged that Scotland's national library had refused to exhibit a feminist book. The Scottish Library and Information Council (Slic) is seeking grant applications from libraries for £450,000 of Scottish government money. It says projects will be prioritised if they tackle misinformation or support democratic choice, among other topics. However, documents show that Amina Shah, Scotland's national librarian and the chief executive of the National Library of Scotland, who sits on the Slic board, was persuaded to block the inclusion of The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht in a special display despite it receiving more than enough public votes. The book charts the rise of the grassroots movement that opposed Nicola Sturgeon's gender self-identification law. Angus Robertson, Scotland's culture secretary, hailed the launch of the fund saying it 'exemplifies the transformative power of libraries, from introducing digital inclusiveness to teaching about economic wellbeing'. Alison Nolan, chief executive of Slic, said the themes of this year's awards would 'ensure libraries continue to lead as trusted, inclusive spaces at the heart of every community'. Susan Smith, a director of the campaign group For Women Scotland which clarified the legal definition of the term 'woman' in a landmark victory at the UK Supreme Court, said: 'It is quite extraordinary that this announcement has come only a week after the national library was exposed for cowardice and censorship after they pulled The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht from an exhibition at the behest of bullies. 'In doing so, they maligned the writers and misrepresented the book — not something that sits well with campaigns against misinformation.' Smith asked if Shah only applied the principles referred to in the scheme 'selectively or when convenient' . She said: 'Will the culture secretary, Angus Robertson, relocate his spine and speak out against the decision of the chief librarian? Her position was already untenable: unless action is taken, both Shah and Robertson look like the most pathetic of hypocrites.' The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht was due to be included in the national library's centenary exhibition but was pulled after a backlash by the library's LGBT staff network, which claimed it contained 'hate speech' and that displaying it would cause 'severe harm' to workers. They threatened to 'notify LGBT+ partners of the library's endorsement of the book' if management did not remove the publication. Shah pointed to the potential impact on 'key stakeholders' and the library's reputation if the essay collection was featured. She has faced opposition since her decision was made public, with Alex Graham, a library donor, saying he was 'shocked and angry' about the exclusion. Robertson has not directly addressed the row. Susan Dalgety, a co-editor of The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht, said: 'Libraries play a central function in nurturing democracy and promoting rational debate. 'Yet our book, one written by more than 30 women from across Scotland, has been excluded from its rightful place in the exhibition. 'This anti-democratic decision goes against everything libraries stand for. It is somewhat ironic that Slic has announced funding to support democracy this very week. The council should remind the national librarian and Sir Drummond Bone, the library chair, of their central role in promoting democracy through freedom of expression.' Murdo Fraser, the Scottish Conservative Party spokesman for culture, said: 'Many will be sceptical at the timing of the SNP's support for this fund given the recent furore over the national library's censorship of Women Won't Wheesht. 'If ministers like Angus Robertson are serious about tackling misinformation then perhaps they will finally apologise for years of denying the reality of there only being two biological sexes. 'He should also apologise for all the local libraries across Scotland that have closed, or been threatened with closure, as a result of SNP cuts.' The national library reissued its statement about the exclusion of the book from the display. It said: 'Anyone can visit our reading rooms and access this book as well as the 200 other titles that were not selected for display. A full list of those publications is available as part of the exhibition. 'Libraries are vital places where people can access all kinds of publications for free and form their own opinions.' Slic said: 'Stock selection in libraries is a complex issue shaped by a wide variety of external factors. Slic has always advocated for open access to diverse voices in Scotland's public libraries and continues to do so.' The Scottish government said: 'Ministers have no role in curation decisions taken by individual institutions. The Scottish government supports the right to freedom of expression and we are clear that there is no place for any form of discrimination in Scotland.'
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Sturgeon is no feminist: she tried hard to destroy women's rights
Women had been trying to warn Ms Sturgeon and her Government years before, within and outside her party. MSP Joan McAlpine wrote a long open letter to her explaining clearly and unambiguously the issues with self-ID concerning the very real threats to women's rights to safety, dignity and privacy. She also alerted parliamentarians as early as 2018 to the way data collection was suggested in the Census Amendment Bill, introducing voluntary questions on transgender status and sexual orientation in the 2021 Census, redefining the meaning of sex to include gender. She was pilloried for her pains. To this day Nicola Sturgeon still cannot bring herself to say that Adam Bryson is a man. She will not acknowledge, let alone apologise to, the women who have been steadfast in their refusal to be cowed and silenced, and who, in defending the belief (and fact) that sex matters have been vilified, while some lost their livelihood. I think it is perfectly justified to claim that women's rights went under Nicola Sturgeon's SNP bus, and that yes, she tried very hard to destroy women's rights. Women didn't threaten to kill, "decapitate", rape anyone. Trans activists did. So, enough of the "both sides were toxic" argument. Dr Mireille Pouget, Dollar. Read more letters Who governs Scotland? It is shocking that the SNP administration refuses to implement the necessary measures contingent on April's Supreme Court judgment on biological sex being the criterion for the operation of the Equality Act, 2010. John Swinney drags his heels about enforcing the provisions of the Act, claiming that he first requires guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). Yet on April 25 the EHRC published "An interim update on the practical implications" of the judgment. This spells out unambiguously that biological sex determines conditions in public services and sporting bodies, emphasising that "trans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use women's facilities". It could not be clearer. The SNP leadership has gone curiously quiet on gender, with only a very anaemic statement from Shona Robison on the furore over Kate Forbes's appearance at Summerhall, saying: "I don't think it sends out the right signal over freedom of speech". What an understatement! That could be said of much of SNP government, with Freedom of Information requests ignored or the relevant materials supplied with almost total redaction. The Salmond Inquiry was the classic case of evidence being redacted. It is therefore not surprising that For Women Scotland has felt the need to take legal action once again, demanding that the Supreme Court's judgment be implemented in Scotland's schools and prisons. Why is Mr Swinney resisting this? Is he actually in charge? Given the National Library's ridiculous removal of The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht from its centenary exhibition because of demands made by its "LGBT+ network" ("NLS could face 'thousands of legal claims' over gender critical book removal", The Herald, August 16), it is worth asking whether there is a similar network agitating for pro-trans policies within the Scottish Government, perhaps among its civil servants. Who governs? Is it politicians, or is it Stonewall? Jill Stephenson, Edinburgh. A charmless mediocrity I am sure that many of your readers will share my appreciation for Alison Rowat's excellent review of Nicola Sturgeon's memoir ("Review, Frankly: Sturgeon psychodrama suddenly makes sense", heraldscotland, August 18). The key observations made by Ms Rowat are "almost comically dull"; "a pattern of thinking emerges. Nothing is ever Nicola's fault"; "writing which reads at times like a bad Mills and Boon parody"; "For a political memoir, Frankly is remarkably light on policy"; and most damningly in conclusion: "Deep as a puddle to the end". So how could someone who was described as such a political genius and presented herself as having such acute literary taste have produced a book of so little political value and of no literary distinction? It is now clear from her own account that Nicola Sturgeon was a charlatan all along, and her political and literary prowess were always delusions. The next question for the likes of Ms Rowat – and for all of the other commentators who have suddenly had the scales fall from their eyes – is why they played along with the pretence all this time, instead of unmasking it from Day One. Some of us saw through it all along: Nicola Sturgeon is a charmless mediocrity who has failed in everything she has attempted. She would be well advised to enjoy the attention that is currently being lavished on her, as she does not deserve to be remembered for long, except as an exemplar of how not to do things. Peter A Russell, Glasgow. Misleading claims 'The SNP spent £2700 per head in Scotland more than the rest of the UK.' These were the words of Dennis Forbes Grattan (Letters, August 16) which are misleading on a number of different levels. First, the SNP does not spend public money, it is the Scottish Government that spends funds significantly calculated according to spending commitments of the UK Government. Second, in order for the Scottish Government's budget to pass it must be balanced and requires, as the SNP does not have a majority in Holyrood, the backing of at least one other party. Third, not only is much of the so-called spending of the Scottish Government determined by decisions taken at Westminster (90 per cent according to Finance Secretary Shona Robison), much of it is 'notional' because Westminster allocates Scotland a share of UK Government spending, such as for defence where expenditure of £5.1 billion was listed but only £2.1bn was actually spent in Scotland. Finally, as recently pointed out in Alex Orr's letter (August 14), to claim that this Westminster-imposed financial predicament 'underlines the complete folly of independence' is also misleading, especially as SNP politicians (assuming the party does not disband after independence is achieved) would likely be in the minority in future independent Scottish parliaments. Stan Grodynski, Longniddry. JK Rowling, one of Nicola Sturgeon's fiercest critics (Image: PA) A damning indictment I have recently undergone a hearing test appointment, after waiting two years. I have had hearing aids for a number of years but was amazed at the difference once these were recalibrated to account for the drop in certain sound tones over the past years. I can honestly say the improvement is night and day. My appointment took place on a Sunday afternoon, which I thought was unusual. It was not until I discovered that the SNP Government has admitted that it will now not deliver on a promise to raise community audiology services on a par with eye care that I understood the reason for the long wait that I had, and that audiology staff are working hard to try to reduce the waiting times. Experts have stated that the ballooning waiting list could be cleared by the spend of £9 million in three years, but the SNP 's Public Health Minister has admitted that the money, originally ring-fenced, has been spent elsewhere. This is a damming indictment on the SNP Government and is further proof that it puts sound bites before policy and is gaslighting the Scottish people, and has in fact given up trying to improve the elements of healthcare that so many people are dependent on. The sooner the people of Scotland understand that things will only get worse the longer this Government remains in power and take action at next year's election, the better. Douglas Eadie, Alexandria.
