
Mumbai: Reopening with a reminder; when stones tell history of a bridge
On a November night, three years ago, when 500 people were busy dismantling the 154-year old Carnac bridge, one of the first bridges to be built in the island city, a group of civic and railway officials discovered six basalt stones from the rubble of debris that were gathered at the demolition site.
What caught the attention of officials was that the six stones had inscriptions engraved upon them that were primarily in Marathi, Gujarati, Hindi and English languages.
The inscriptions included the year 1858 when the construction of the bridge began and the year 1868, when the construction works were completed.
The four other stones had the name of the bridge inscribed in four different languages along with an 'anchor' which officials state was a symbol for 'good luck and prosperity' brought through maritime trade.
'Larger portions of the original bridge were made of Basalt stone. During the 19th and 20th century, basalt stones were primarily used for civil construction. Since, Mumbai had a colonial past, almost every major building or structure that was built during that era was made of Basalt. As a result, these kinds of stones were not something new to us, but it was the inscriptions that were present on them that distinguished them from others,' said a senior civic official who was present on the night of demolition when the stones were discovered.
Civic officials said that the stones were originally located underneath a pillar on the eastern and western portion of the bridge. However, the officials became aware of it only during the demolition drive.
After the stones blocks were found, they were transported to the Central Railways Heritage Gully (lane) located at P'D Mello road – behind Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus (CSMT) for preservation, where they were kept for the past three years.
As a newly constructed Carnac bridge is set to be reopened on June 10, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has started to make arrangements to bring back these stones and keep them preserved at the newly constructed bridge to signify the bridge's importance to the city of Mumbai.
'The Carnac bridge has a rich past and the bridge belongs to the BMC, therefore, the stones ideally should be there. We have written to the railways demanding the stones from them, as soon as we get them under our possession we will refurbish it if required and place them at the site of the new bridge,' Abhijit Bangar, Additional Municipal Commissioner (Projects), told The Indian Express.
On April 17, the BMC's deputy chief engineer of the bridges department had also written to the Central Railways demanding refixation of the stones on the newly constructed bridge.
Built in 1868, the Carnac bridge was one of the oldest east-west bridges to come up in the island city of Mumbai (then Bombay). A testament to the times when the city experienced a financial boom and rapidly emerged to become one of the financial epicenters of south Asia.
Bharat Gothoskar, founder of KHAKI heritage foundation and a chronicler of Mumbai's history, told The Indian Express that during the 1840s, new docks such as Carnac Bunder, Clare Bunder and Clerk Bunder were built north of the Fort of Mumbai as a result of which both Indian and foreign ships started docking at these bunders to discharge their goods.
'The building of the railway line to Thane in the 1850s created an obstacle to the smooth movement of goods between the docks and the city, and in 1868, the Carnac Bridge was built over the railway line, connecting Carnac Bunder (Indira Docks' Yellow Gate today) to Carnac Road (Lokmanya Tilak Marg today). All three, the bridge, the bunder and the road, were named after Sir James Rivett-Carnac, who served as Governor of Bombay 1839 to 1841,' Gothoskar said.
The stones are primarily black coloured each weighing up to 1.5-2 tonnes.
Urban planner and architect, Pankaj Joshi said that between 1860 and 1930, the island city of Mumbai witnessed rapid infrastructure growth. Joshi said that considering the technological limitations stones were preferred for construction of infrastructure projects as steel was very expensive.
'There were quarries in Titwala and in areas of the suburbs of Mumbai, which are known today as the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR). Basalt stones were preferred for construction works because of their tensile strength and durability. These stones were locally available and had variable colours like black, yellow and cream. Besides the Carnac bridge, heritage buildings like the Rajabai Tower and CSMT building were also built with yellow and cream basalt stones,' Joshi said.
The bridge was pulled down in 2022 jointly by the civic and railway authorities after a structural audit declared that the bridge was unfit for daily usage and needed to be reconstructed.
The mammoth operation of pulling down the old Carnac Bridge lasted for nearly 18-hours.
The construction of the new bridge began in early 2023. At present, the work is nearing completion.
'The new bridge will be wider and higher. The roads will be smooth and will be able to accommodate larger traffic volume decongesting key south Mumbai locations,' Bangar said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Vidarbha's ‘Zudpi' scrub lands are ‘forest' lands: how SC ruling has struck a balance between development and environment concerns
After several decades of litigation over about 86,000 hectares of Zudpi jungle (shrub forest) lands peculiar to Maharashtra's eastern Vidarbha region, the Supreme Court last month ruled that such lands should be considered as 'forest' lands. On May 22, the top court provided clarity on the usage of Zudpi lands, saying they cannot be converted without prior approval from the central government, and only after complying with the conditions laid down by the court. An official report referred to by the court says Zudpi is a Marathi word that literally translates to bushes or shrubs, and Zudpi land means an inferior type of unoccupied land with bushy growth. The term was used for all wastelands that were not occupied by individual farmers for cultivation and other purposes. According to the report, Zudpi jungle lands are peculiar to six districts of eastern Vidarbha (Nagpur division) – Nagpur, Chandrapur, Gadchiroli, Bhandara, Wardha, and Gondia – and have been used for non-forest purposes for the past several decades. These lands, traditionally used for grazing, were classified as Gairan under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. For decades, legal status uncertain Vidarbha's Zudpi lands remained in a legal limbo for decades due to administrative lapses, inconsistent government actions, and contrasting interpretations of India's forest laws. Initially vested with the Revenue Department, these lands were used for development, public amenities like schools, health centres, water pipelines, burial grounds, and for allotment to landless farmers. They were also used for infrastructure projects, including railways, defence, and irrigation. After the reorganisation of states in 1960, similar lands elsewhere in Maharashtra were recorded as Gairan or Gurcharan. However, in Vidarbha, they continued to be classified as 'Zudpi Jungle' due to bureaucratic inaction. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (FCA) prohibited diversion of forest land without the Centre's approval. However, in November 1987, the Maharashtra government issued an order declaring Zudpi lands as 'scrub forests' that would not attract the provisions of FCA, and handed them to the Revenue Department for afforestation and grazing purposes. This 1987 Government Order was challenged by the Bombay Environmental Action Group (BEAG) before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. While this plea was pending, the Centre in February 1992 changed and relaxed its earlier position. It clarified that Zudpi Jungle would continue to be treated as 'forest lands' under the FCA; however, for the part of Zudpi lands that were used for non-forest purposes, the state government shall make a proposal to the Centre seeking its approval under the FCA. Taking a cue from the Centre's decision, the Maharashtra government in 1994 withdrew its 1987 order. With these changing positions, ambiguity prevailed until the Supreme Court's December 12, 1996 judgment in the 'TN Godavarman Thirumulpad' case, which stated that Zudpi lands would also be treated as 'forest lands' under the FCA. In 1998, a High-Powered Committee appointed by the state government recommended that 92,115 hectares should be declared protected forests and 86,409 hectares that were unfit for forest use should be de-notified. Eight years ago, the state government again pushed to denotify Zudpi jungle lands. In 2019, the Maharashtra government, through the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur, filed an interim application and sought the SC's approval to exclude the latter category of land from the purview of FCA. The SC formed a Central Empowered Committee (CEC), which filed its first report after site visits. Since some issues were yet to be resolved, the SC last year sought another report from the CEC. This report formed the basis of the SC's May 22, 2025 verdict. GOVERNMENT: The Maharashtra government argued that Zudpi lands were never forest lands, and due to the reorganisation of states and the inaction of certain officials, the revenue records were never corrected. As such, these lands continued to be erroneously described as Zudpi lands in revenue records. The state argued that denying it relief would lead to 'grave and irreparable damage' to lakhs of citizens, and would stall several projects. INTERVENER: Environmentalist Prasad Khale, intervener in the case, however, argued that de-notifying these lands would degrade healthy forests and disrupt wildlife corridors. He submitted that the 2025 CEC report had ignored ecological concerns, including those of wildlife corridors and the protection of scrub forests, which should not be used for non-forest activities. SC directives strike a balance The Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R Gavai and Justice Augustine Masih said that it could arrive at a solution to 'balance the rights of the citizens at large on one hand and the interest of the environment on the other hand' due to the efforts made by the CEC. The SC recognised that a large number of Zudpi lands in Nagpur city alone had public utilities such as the High Court building, defence buildings, state secretariat, graveyards, etc. It said citizens residing on these lands for years, or farmers could not be deprived of their residence or livelihood. Therefore, the Supreme Court held that Zudpi jungle lands would be treated as forests, but made exceptions for lands allotted for non-forest use before December 12, 1996. For such lands, where classification (purpose) hadn't changed, the state would be required to obtain the Centre's approval under Section 2 of the FCA for their deletion from the list of forest areas. The court said the Centre shall consider proposals without imposing compensatory afforestation conditions, and should not seek deposition of Net Present Value (NPV) levies. The court directed the Centre and the state to consult and finalise a proposal format within three months with prior approval of the CEC. For post-December 12, 1996 allotments of Zudpi lands, the Centre shall process proposals only after ascertaining reasons and ensuring action against the officers who took allotment decisions in violation of the SC's directions. Special Task Forces in each district will remove encroachments made after October 25, 1980, within two years. All commercial allotments post-October 25, 1989, are to be treated as encroachments. The court clarified no land may be diverted to non-government entities after scrutiny. The Revenue Department must transfer remaining Zudpi lands to the Forest Department within a year, which are to be used for compensatory afforestation. Other Zudpi lands will not be allowed for compensatory afforestation unless certified by the Chief Secretary. Benefitting the state's development plans The verdict has in some ways paved the way for infrastructure and other development works that the state government plans to undertake on certain tracts of lands, after obtaining approval from the central government. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis welcomed the ruling, calling it a boost to Vidarbha's stalled development. The CEC will monitor the transfer of forest land, as directed by the SC. States and Union Territories have been directed to reclaim possession of such lands from occupiers and hand them over to the Forest Department. The SC had said that if reclaiming possession is not in the public interest, the state/UTs shall recover land costs from occupiers and use them to develop forests.


Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
UGC NET June 2025 exam revised schedule OUT; check how to download, website, date, time and more
UGC NET June 2025 exam: The National Testing Agency (NTA) has revised the exam dates for the UGC NET 2025 June session and released the subject-wise schedule for the NTA UGC NET 2025 June session on its official website According to the official release, the exam will begin on 25 June 2025 and will conclude on 29 June 2025. Earlier, it was supposed to start from 21 June. The notice further mentioned that NTA will notify about the City of Exam Centre on its website prior to 10 days of the UGC NET June Exam 2025. The exam will be held in two shifts- first shift from 9 am to 12 noon and second shift from 3 pm to 6 pm. The exam will begin on 25 June 2025 and will conclude on 29 June 2025. As per the details, the Test paper will consist of two sections, both of which will consist of objective-type, multiple-choice questions. During the exam, there will be no break between the papers. Paper 1 will comprise 100-mark questions, and Paper II will comprise 200-mark questions. Except for language papers, the medium of the Question Paper shall be English and Hindi only. All the candidates will have to answer in the medium as per the option exercised in the Application Form. Step 1. Visit the official website of UGC NET at Step 2. Click on UGC NET June 2025 exam schedule link available on the home page. Step 3. A new PDF file will open where candidates can check the exam dates. Step 4. Download the file and keep a hard copy of the same for further need. Step 1: Open the official website: Step 2: Look for the link titled "UGC NET June 2025 Admit Card Download" Step 3: Enter application number, date of birth, and security pin Step 4: Enter the credentials Step 5: Download and print the admit card for exam day use. 1. Award of Junior Research Fellowship and appointment as Assistant Professor 2. Appointment as Assistant Professor and admission to Ph.D. 3. Admission to Ph.D only for 85 subjects in CBT mode. The candidates may reach out to the NTA Helpdesk at 011-40759000 or email ugcnet@ for any assistance related to the UGC NET June 2025 exam in the meantime.


The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Why questioning should be encouraged in classrooms
In Theaetetus, Socrates talks about his maieutic method. He tells Theaetetus, his interlocutor: '... my skill of midwifery is, in general, similar in character to theirs [midwives]... the greatest thing about my skill is that it is able to test, in every respect, whether the mind of the young man is bringing forth an image and a lie, or something genuine and true. Now, I do have this in common with the female midwives: I bring to birth no wisdom. And many people reproach me for this, since I ask questions of others while I myself proclaim nothing about anything...' The Socratic method is based on the metaphor of a 'midwife' who does not deliver anything, but ably assists in the delivery of the child. Socrates compares himself to a midwife who, by asking probing questions, enables the youth of Athens 'deliver' the right answers. All he did was to ask his interlocutors a series of inter-connected questions that elicited the right response from them. Bedrock of education Questioning is an art and a skill. To motivate the students to ask the right questions and, more importantly, to help them cultivate a questioning mind coupled with a sceptical temperament are the bedrock of any educational system. In classrooms where there are no questions, there is only passivity and information is consumed mechanically. In such a docile environment, hardly any learning takes place. Both the temperament and the culture to question are sorely missing in our institutions. As a result, the teacher goes unchallenged and what he/she puts across is rarely critiqued. What is prescribed in the curricula and presented in textbooks is consumed implicitly by naive minds. In the final analysis, our students acquire degrees and diplomas but can hardly think and sift facts from opinions, and look at the world critically. The key mandate of higher educational institutions is to train students to think critically. They should be able to analyse and interpret data and arrive at evidence-based conclusions. Put differently, colleges and universities should encourage their students to question just about everything so that they do not take anything for granted. Problems and solutions What factors impede questioning in our classrooms? First, teachers do not encourage their students to raise questions, as they are in a hurry to 'complete' the syllabus. Questions are considered a digression and waste of time. Second, students are afraid of raising questions for fear of failure. The spectre of raising a silly, inane or wrong question leads to shame and this fear and diffidence holds them back from raising questions inside classrooms. Third, our culture and traditions demand an implicit obedience to gurus and this, indirectly, forbids all of us, from challenging teachers and their authority. Fourth, in many institutions students are not competent to raise questions in English, which is the medium of instruction. Last, some teachers are intimidated by students who raise questions and see them as an affront to their authority. What can be done to encourage students to ask question? First, teachers should be friends and mentors rather than authoritarian figures to encourage students open up. Second, teachers should offer prompts and cues. For instance, while teaching a short story, the teacher can ask, 'How do you think the story will end?' In a Maths class, students can be encouraged to guess the sequence of a formula. Third, a climate of debate should be created so that students are not reduced to docile consumers of information dished out to them, and are are trained to become 'interrogators' who will be endowed with critical thinking skills. A questioning mind should not be interpreted as challenging the teachers' authority. Nor should it be seen as being excessively argumentative indulging in empty rhetoric. In other words, a questioning individual should not be looked upon as a negative person who gets on the nerves of people. The rote system of learning, which reduces students to passive consumers, should be thrown out. In its place, a robust system founded on the Socratic maieutic system that revolves around questions should be welcomed. Ultimately, there should be a transition from raising questions inside classrooms to transforming students into sceptics and dissenters who will not only raise questions but will have a questioning mind as well. Similar to the Cartesian pronouncement, students should be able to declare interrogo, ergo sum ('I question, therefore, I am'). The writer is an Emeritus Professor, Gandhigram Rural Institute Deemed-to-be University. Email josephdorairaj@