- Is 65 the new 40? Rethinking retirement in Malaysia, strategy for success or disaster
Opinions on topical issues from thought leaders, columnists and editors.
According to the United Nations, a country is considered an ageing nation when 7 per cent of its population is aged 60 and above. Malaysia reached this stage in 2020 as an ageing nation (negara menua). By 2030, we are expected to become an 'aged nation' (negara tua), with 15 per cent of our population aged 60 and above. The causes are clear evidence that healthcare and technology have helped people live longer, while fertility rates have steadily declined. But with these gains come significant policy implications.
But is this the right response to Malaysia's ageing population? Will it strengthen our economy or create new challenges? We must consider this carefully. The demographic shift is clear: globally, the number of older people is growing faster than the number of births. Malaysia is no exception. This trend has a direct impact on our productive population.
Recently, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said raised the proposal to revise Malaysia's retirement age to 65. She believes that many older Malaysians are still active and capable of contributing meaningfully to the labour market.
Globally, the average retirement age was around 65 in 2020, and many countries are already pushing beyond this. For instance, Australia has set its retirement age at 67, Canada and Brazil at 65, and Singapore is gradually increasing its re-employment age from 65 to 70. In contrast, Malaysia last revised its mandatory retirement age to 60 years old. While CUEPACS (Congress of Unions of Employees in the Public and Civil Services) has proposed an increase to 62 for civil servants, the government currently sees no urgency to implement it.
These examples clearly show that turning 60 does not mean the end of one's ability to contribute, as being older doesn't mean being outdated. It means having more to offer with experience, wisdom, and resilience.
In supporting the statement, a powerful example is the incumbent 10th Prime Minister of Malaysia, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who continues to lead the country at the age of 77. While on the other side of the world, Warren Buffett, at the age of 93, remains the chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, after decades of steering one of the world's largest investment firms.
However, this perception may not reflect the actual reality on the ground. The number of healthy, capable older adults is increasing, and many of them remain active and eager to contribute. They are not merely passive recipients of care but valuable contributors to the nation's economy.
Breaking the myth: Older workers don't steal youth jobs
A persistent myth claims that older adults staying in the workforce will reduce job opportunities for younger generations. But evidence suggests otherwise. The employment trends in Malaysia show that when older workers are engaged, youth employment also rises.
The same trend has been observed in many Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries such as the United Kingdom, Finland, Sweden and Japan.
Older and younger workers bring different strengths. While older workers offer experience, maturity and institutional knowledge, younger workers bring innovation and adaptability to new technology. Rather than competing, these two generations can complement each other. Together, they create a well-managed, inclusive workforce that benefits the entire economy.
Extending the retirement age should not be seen as a barrier to youth employment or promotion. Many young people mistakenly believe that older workers will block their career progression.
The reality is that the number of older adults is increasing, and soon they will outnumber youth. Whether we like it or not, we cannot afford to sideline this growing demographic from the workforce. We will need this group to remain economically active, not just as a social measure, but as a national economic necessity.
Our workforce simply isn't large enough to rely on youth alone. In fact, without them, we risk facing a severe shortage of labour in critical sectors. The retirement policies we decide on today will directly affect the same young Malaysians once they reach their 50s and 60s. If we don't act now, they too may face a financially insecure old age.
The retirement puzzle: Are Malaysians ready to stop working?
Let's be real. Can most Malaysians afford to retire at 60? According to Khazanah Research Institute and Employees Provident Fund (EPF) data, only 36 per cent of EPF members meet the basic savings threshold of RM240,000 by age 55. This amount would only allow for moderate monthly expenses for around 15 years.
But what happens after that? Malaysia's life expectancy stands at 78.2 years for men and 80.9 years for women. That means, on average, Malaysians need savings that can last 18 to 20 years after retirement. Without sufficient retirement savings, many older adults face financial insecurity. Stretching the retirement age, with the right support in place, can help ease this pressure and allow older people to remain financially independent.
Government support alone isn't enough
Under Budget 2025, the Madani government allocated RM1 billion for older adults. This includes RM910 million for older person's allowance, RM10.8 million for older-person activity centres/ Pusat Aktiviti Warga Emas (PAWE), and RM23.5 million for Rumah Seri Kenangan (RSK) and day care.
These are important initiatives, but they are still not enough to meet the growing needs of our ageing population. Should the responsibility of supporting older Malaysians rest solely on the government's shoulders? That thinking would be unrealistic and unsustainable. The conversation must go beyond welfare. We must rethink ageing, not just as a social issue, but as an economic and workforce issue as well.
A Balanced and Voluntary Approach Towards Sustainable and Dignified Ageing
Raising the retirement age isn't about forcing everyone to work longer. It's about giving those who can and want to remain active, financially independent, and socially engaged. It should be based on individual capacity and willingness. A flexible and voluntary approach that assesses health, cognitive function, emotional well-being, and ability to adapt to technology can ensure that those who are able and willing can continue contributing. Working longer is not a punishment. For many, it is the key to a secure retirement and continued social engagement. We must begin viewing older adults not as dependents, but as a valuable asset to the nation.
Final thoughts
Stretching the retirement age is not simply a policy choice, but it's a necessary conversation about how we value older people in society. If we fail to plan, we risk leaving behind a significant portion of our population, many of whom still have much to give.
It is time to embrace a more inclusive and forward-thinking approach to ageing and employment that recognises the reality of our demographic transition and empowers Malaysians of all ages.
To the younger generation, don't see this policy as a threat to your place in the workforce. As we speak, we are all ageing. One day, you too will reach that phase and hopefully still be healthy, capable, and wanting to contribute. What kind of opportunities would you want for yourself then?
I believe that each pie can be divided accordingly, and there is always a portion for every generation, if and only if we are willing to plan wisely and serve it fairly.
-- BERNAMA
Dr Siti Munirah Mohd Faizal Lim is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Social Administration and Justice, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Universiti Malaya.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
3 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Madani slammed for EV perks to rich, burden on poor
THE Madani government's push for electric vehicles (EVs) was initially praised, as EVs are seen as better for the environment than fuel-powered cars. However, the high prices of EVs have made them unaffordable for most Malaysians — especially since almost 35% of formal workers earn less than RM2,000 a month. Under current policies, EVs are exempt from import and excise duties until the end of this year. This has triggered criticism on social media. Some users on X pointed out that while EV buyers — often the wealthy — get to enjoy tax-free benefits, regular Malaysians who buy fuel-run cars must still pay high taxes. One user said that someone buying a locally made car like the Proton Saga would still pay around RM15,000 in excise and sales taxes. Many Malaysians need a car just to go to work, especially in a car-dependent country like Malaysia. Meanwhile, luxury EVs like the Porsche Taycan — which costs RM675,000 — are completely tax-free. When a low-income M'sian buys a Proton Saga, he pays RM15,375 in excise & sales tax. But when a rich man buys an EV Porsche Taycan, he pays zero — saving over RM600,000. Tesla Model 3 saves RM225k. BYD Dolphin saves RM120k. Well done, Madani. Reward the rich, tax the poor. — khalid karim STEMKITA (@khalidkarim) June 6, 2025 To put things into perspective, that car costs nearly as much as the median house price in the Klang Valley, which is around RM745,000. Another user pointed out that even if Malaysians pay less income tax than in some countries, they still end up paying a lot of 'indirect' taxes on daily goods and services. Malaysia's income tax may be lower than many countries but we pay a lot more indirect taxes — 1negara (@1negara1) June 7, 2025 Many Malaysians online feel that the current EV policy seems to benefit the rich while leaving the poor behind. There's growing frustration over why Malaysia has set an RM100,000 minimum price for EVs — especially since brands like BYD offer much cheaper EVs in places like Thailand and China. This price gap has raised concerns about fairness and accessibility in Malaysia's EV market. — June 7, 2025 Main photo credit: Shutterstock
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Immigration denies issuing Aidiladha meat distribution guidelines
KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Immigration Department has denied issuing any statement regarding guidelines for the distribution of "Qurban" (sacrificial) meat at mosques in conjunction with the Hari Raya Aidiladha celebration. Immigration deputy director-general (management) Ismail Mokhtar said the department was aware of the false statement, dated June 5, 2025, that had gone viral. "For the record, the statement is false and has never been issued by Immigration," he said in a statement here Saturday (June 7). He also advised the public to always refer to the department's official channels for accurate and authentic information. "Immigration takes the dissemination of false information seriously, especially when it can lead to public confusion. Any unauthorised use of the department's official emblem and name is an offence and may be subject to legal action," he added. The fake statement, dated June 5, 2025, that went viral, used the name of Immigration director-general Datuk Zakaria Shaaban. Among the things claimed in the statement was that only foreign nationals with valid work permits and visas, or those with United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) cards, were allowed to receive Qurban meat at mosques. It also said that illegal immigrants who collected the meat would face immediate action. - Bernama
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Is China's promise of a new world order a self-serving power play?
As China has found itself in the midst of a rapidly escalating trade war with the United States after President Donald Trump launched global tariff measures, Beijing launched a sweeping outreach strategy intended to strengthen ties with Russian and Southeast Asian trade partners while also welcoming Latin American and European stakeholders. The multifront diplomatic charm offensive has had at its core one clear message: a shift to a multipolar world is accelerating, and Beijing is ready to work with partners to defend the 'rules-based, UN-centred' international system that has underpinned economic globalisation since World War II. Beijing's message holds that the post-war order, once symbolised by multilateral cooperation, is now being challenged by Washington's retreat under the banner of 'America first'. Observers have watched as China has amplified this theme to court Europe and the Global South, framing itself as a defender of multilateralism and a responsible stakeholder in the post-war system in contrast to what Washington now offers. But the analysts have also cautioned that divergent world views and competing national interests – as well as the strategic calculations of countries seeking to balance or benefit from US-China tensions – could undercut Beijing's vision of a multipolar world. China has used its membership in diplomatic platforms, such as the United Nations and the World Trade Organization, to highlight its World War II sacrifices and contributions to the post-war international order. During a visit to Moscow last month, Chinese President Xi Jinping told his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin that both sides should work together to defend their second world war legacies, as well as the rights of developing nations to pursue an 'equal and orderly' multipolar world. Victor Gao, vice-president of the Centre for China and Globalisation, said Beijing has been reminding the world of the origins of the post-war international system. 'The international order established in 1945 was not unilateral from the outset – it was built on multilateralism, centred around the United Nations,' he said. 'The US launch of a global tariff war ... deprives other countries' rights to development, which China opposes.' Since Xi came to power, China has advanced its vision of a multipolar world order through initiatives such as the Global Development Initiative (GDI), the Global Security Initiative, and the Global Civilisation Initiative – all aimed at providing an alternative to the Western development model. The Belt and Road Initiative has been central to these initiatives to empower developing economies, alongside the expansion of Global South-focused blocs such as Brics. At the China-Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (Celac) Forumlast month, Xi highlighted a 'shared identity' with the region, calling for 'independent development paths' and joint efforts to promote multipolarity and reform global governance. In a separate meeting with African diplomats, Foreign Minister Wang Yi invoked a 'common destiny' shaped by historical injustice. Similar themes were echoed during Xi's April visit to Southeast Asia, seen as a 'back door' for China's exports to circumvent trade restrictions from Washington, where he has prioritised neighbourhood diplomacy and supply chain resilience in response to US tariffs. Gedaliah Afterman, a Chinese foreign policy specialist at Israel's Reichman University, described Chinese advocacy for a multipolar world order as both 'ideological and strategic.' 'This narrative resonates across the Global South, where China positions itself as a champion of 'pluralism' and 'win-win cooperation',' he said. 'However, China's embrace of multipolarity is selective and self-serving. While it publicly promotes a world of diverse centres of power, in practice it seeks to structure this order in ways that amplify its own influence.' Through its trillion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative, China is expanding its footprint across developing regions, including Latin America, Africa, Southeast Asia and the Middle East. The areas have become key destinations for Beijing to diversify its exports and supply chains, while also offering access to critical minerals amid US export controls. Gustavo de Carvalho, a senior researcher on African governance and diplomacy at the South African Institute of International Affairs, said Latin American and African countries embrace China's multipolar vision where it provides 'tangible benefits', such as technology transfers, industrial upgrades and 'institutional alternatives'. Latin American and African countries including Brazil and South Africa – both Brics members – have often backed China's push to reform global governance in favour of Global South interests. But 'rather than endorsing any particular power's vision of world order', these countries have hedged their ties with the US and Europe alongside China amid the US-China rivalry, de Carvalho said. He cited African nations ramping up lithium and battery production to serve both Chinese and Western markets, and Latin American countries pursuing trade deals with the European Union while deepening their economic ties with Beijing. 'This represents calculated hedging rather than ideological conversion,' de Carvalho said. Similar hedging strategies have also been adopted by Middle Eastern countries, as they position themselves to benefit from a future multipolar structure, Afterman said. 'China has found receptive ground for its multipolar vision in the Middle East, especially among states seeking greater strategic autonomy from Washington,' he said. 'For Gulf monarchies and other regional actors, multipolarity is not about endorsing a new global order but about expanding strategic space. These countries seek to balance between the US, China, Russia and others to advance their national interests.' '[But] divergences become clear when China's vision intersects with contested regional dynamics or entrenched security architectures ... China's growing economic role is evident, but whether it has the will or capacity to assume a meaningful political or security role in the region remains an open question.' Many Middle Eastern nations have long been reliant on US security guarantees, and the region has returned to the forefront of Trump's 'America first' strategy. His recent visit to the region secured billions of dollars in AI-related investments – an arena of intense competition between Washington and Beijing. At last week's China-Asean Gulf Cooperation Council forum in Malaysia, Chinese Premier Li Qiang pledged to deepen regional economic integration, aiming to build a market where investment, technology and talent move freely. While many Southeast Asian nations have been open to China's call for a multipolar world, they have also been assessing whether Beijing was 'fully living up to' the ideals it has been pitching, especially when it comes to its approach on the South China Sea, according to Dylan Loh, a Chinese foreign policy specialist at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. 'While [China] speaks of an equitable, multipolar and just world, [Southeast Asian] states are also assessing if this is the case. Its actions in the South China Sea, for instance, are seen by some as not fully aligning with some of the principles it espouses,' he said. Long-standing sovereignty disputes over the resource-rich region have strained China's relations with several Asean members. The contested waterway has also increasingly become a flashpoint for military tensions between China and US allies. Shi Yinhong, an international relations professor at Renmin University, said multipolarisation may offer smaller nations greater room to manoeuvre but also more pressure to choose sides. It remained doubtful that Trump's 'isolationism' would provide more room for China to increase its influence in the developing world, he added, noting that issues such as the South China Sea, Iran and Russia's war in Ukraine would continue to strain China's relations with Europe and the Global South. 'Apart from some limited and somewhat empty diplomatic gains, China's financial resources will be further squeezed, especially with that consumptive overseas involvement, if the Belt and Road Initiative has not been implemented effectively.' China has begun pivoting its belt and road spending toward more financially sustainable projects in green energy and hi-tech sectors as it continues to face economic headwinds. Many economists have predicted that sustained US tariffs would further slow its economy. Jo Inge Bekkevold, a Senior China Fellow at the Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies, said China's push for multipolarity has gained a lot of traction in the Global South, but less so in Europe. China has long seen the EU as a key pole in a multipolar world, urging Brussels to maintain 'strategic autonomy' as the bloc has aligned with Washington to counter Beijing's influence. EU-China relations have shown signs of thaw as transatlantic ties have been strained over Trump's tariffs and Ukraine policies. In a recent exchange of notes with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa to mark 50 years of diplomatic ties, Xi called the EU a 'major force' in building a multipolar world alongside China. Bekkevold said Europe had not fully agreed with 'America's threat assessment of China' due to geographic distance, which has also allowed it more room to hedge and sustain economic ties with Beijing. At a May forum hosted by the EU delegation to China, European experts also pointed out that while Brussels and Beijing shared an interest in preserving UN-based multilateralism, their strategies and interpretations of it differed. When asked about possible EU cooperation with Brics, Justyna Szczudlik, deputy head of research and coordinator of the Asia-Pacific Programme at the Polish Institute of International Affairs, said Brics was 'China-led multilateralism', adding that the bloc had its 'own agenda' with the Global South. The EU has also diversified its global partnerships, recently signing a major trade agreement with the South American trade bloc Mercosur and pursuing a deal with India by year's end. According to Amit Ranjan, a China-India relations expert at the National University of Singapore, India saw multipolarisation as a way to gain influence in global governance. 'India also projects itself as an important player in world politics and world diplomacy. Therefore, India always calls for reformed multilateralism, because in the current multilateral structure, especially like the UN, it does not have a suitable space for New Delhi,' he said. Ranjan pointed to the UN Security Council, where India's bid for permanent membership has been blocked by China, which has been reluctant to share its status as the sole Asian permanent member amid concerns it could dilute Beijing's influence. Ranjan added that, like China, India has also considered itself a leader for the Global South and has been engaging with state players. Since 2023, India has hosted the annual Voice of Global South Summit with more than 100 nations taking part. It has long pushed back against China's dominance in Brics and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and has refused to endorse the Belt and Road Initiative. Additional reporting by Dewey Sim - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
