logo
Missouri football coach Eli Drinkwitz backs CFP play-in games, expanding to 30 — yes, 30 — teams

Missouri football coach Eli Drinkwitz backs CFP play-in games, expanding to 30 — yes, 30 — teams

Yahoo6 days ago
Is there a more intriguing string of words to hear emanate from the SEC Media Days stage?
'This is not,' Missouri football coach Eli Drinkwitz said, 'gonna do me any favors with our commissioner.'
Please, continue!
And Drinkwitz sure did.
During the Mizzou coach's SEC Media Days appearance Thursday, July 17, in Atlanta, Pat Forde of Sports Illustrated asked Drinkwitz about his thoughts on a couple of burning issues in SEC and college football over the past few months: The eight- vs. nine-game SEC schedule; and the expansion/qualifying format of the College Football Playoff.
Let's get to his answer on the CFP, first, because Drinkwitz's suggestions differ from most of what you'll hear or read on the options for an altered format.
The sixth-year Mizzou head proposed expanding the playoff, in essence, to 30 teams, including play-in games for the top-eight teams in each of the SEC and Big Ten and the top-six teams in the ACC and Big 12.
'When you think about whether it's 12, 14, or 16 (teams), you know, to me, if we've decided to go into this expansion of playoffs, and we're trying to follow an NFL model — well, the NFL takes 44% of their teams, in order, into the playoffs to increase the passion or keep the fan base engaged,' Drinkwitz said. 'If we're talking about 12, that's 9% (of FBS teams). If we're talking about 14, that's 11%. If we're talking about 16, that's 12%.
'That's really not changing the math for the fanbase. So, I really don't understand what the big fight is about.'
In 2025, the playoff will remain with 12 teams, with a slight change: The top-five conference champions will automatically qualify, but the top four no longer automatically get byes straight to the quarterfinals. Those now go to the top-four teams in the CFP rankings, which could very well still overlap but are not guaranteed to be the case.
Multiple ideas have been floated for that to change beginning in 2026, but none have achieved widespread support yet.
The SEC has seemingly most-supported what is termed the '5+11 format,' which would grant five conference champions automatic-qualifying spots and includes 11 at-large selections decided by a committee.
There is also the '4-4-2-2-1- format,' which would give the SEC and Big Ten each four AQs, the ACC and Big 12 two AQs and the Group of Six conferences one automatic qualifier, plus three at-large berths.
Under that format, it has been reported that the SEC and Big Ten would consider play-in games for their final two AQ spots, meaning teams in the league ranked Nos. 3-6 would play for their place. That would, effectively, expand the playoff to 20 teams, even before considering other potential play-in games in other conferences.
For now, the SEC and the Big Ten can't seem to come to an agreement on which model to back and the CFP appears likely to remain at 12 teams in 2026.
It was reported earlier this week by Brett McMurphy of On3 that the Big Ten will not support a 5+11 format, the reported preference of the SEC, if the Southeastern Conference doesn't move from an eight- to a nine-game conference schedule, like the Big Ten currently plays.
Want Drinkwitz's quick thoughts on eight vs. nine games?
'Honestly, I think I've been for the nine-game (schedule),' Drinkwiz said. 'I think if it was about players and about fans, I think it's a nine-game schedule for the SEC. If it's about coach preservation, which, hey, man, I get it, you know. But if we're going to go to 11 humans deciding on a committee which are the 11 best teams, and we stay at eight (games), we ain't getting in.'
That brings us to the next part of Drinkwitz's CFP qualms: human error.
He cited implicit bias and a lack of a 'standard set of structures' for playoff selection, and said he doesn't think going from seven at-large berths to 11 at-large berths is going to help solve the problem.
Now we're really getting to the point.
Drinkwitz's solution — one he presents as fan- and player-experience oriented — is to make it bigger.
A lot bigger.
'How do we get more people involved?' Drinkwitz asked.
Drinkwitz supports play-in games, which does seem to go against the grain of what the SEC appears to generally support: The 5+11 format. It's not unwise for the SEC to support that structure. In more years than most, the conference is likely to have five or more teams ranked among the top 16 in the sport.
The Mizzou coach actually went a step further, too. He said he supports even more play-in games.
Drinkwitz used an example where the SEC gets four automatic qualifiers, but seemingly suggested taking those four and making them all play-in matchups. Presumably, the format here would be that the SEC champion would play the team that finishes No. 8 in the standings, No. 2 would play No. 7 and so on.
In Drinkwitz's ideal model, he suggested the Big Ten also stage play-in games for its top eight, and that the ACC and Big 12 each stage three play-in games for a total of six teams apiece. He also said 'one and one,' which presumably means a pair of Group of Six conference representatives.
'Now we're talking about an opportunity for 30 teams, 30 fanbases, to be excited and engaged; engaged and giving revenue,' Drinkwitz said. 'Got 30 teams with players who have access to compete for a championship. And so, for me, I think that makes a lot more sense.'
More: Missouri football's Eli Drinkwitz says QB Sam Horn will compete in 2025 despite MLB Draft pick
More: Moving on from Burden, Wease, where do Missouri football's wide receivers stand in 2025?
It's not entirely out of left field. The legendary late coach Mike Leach, on multiple occasions, suggested expanding the CFP to 64 teams, including in his time coaching Mississippi State on the SEC Media Days stage in 2021.
Even at half of that, Drinkwitz's suggestions aren't overwhelmingly likely to get off the ground any time soon. Anything that provides a barrier of entry — as the potential for an upset in a No. 1-8 play-in game could — isn't going to thrill commissioners and TV executives.
It would, however, benefit the likes of Mizzou. In each of the past two years, had Drinkwitz's suggestions been in place, that would have landed the Tigers in a play-in game. Of course, in smaller fields, Mizzou did not make the four- or 12-team field in the 2023 and 2024 seasons.
'When you're talking about the NFL playoff system, not only is it 14 teams (in the playoffs), but you only have to be the best out of your four-team division. You've got to compete against four teams in order to make the playoffs," Drinkwitz said. "When you're at the University of Missouri, if you say, 'Hey, you just have to finish in the top eight to have a chance to play in the playoffs,' that's a win every day. And I'm all for that. I think that's awesome.'
This article originally appeared on Columbia Daily Tribune: 30-team CFP? Missouri football's Eli Drinkwitz talks playoff expansion
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How will Josh Naylor fit in with the Mariners?
How will Josh Naylor fit in with the Mariners?

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How will Josh Naylor fit in with the Mariners?

Yahoo Sports senior MLB analysts Jordan Shusterman and Jake Mintz react to Seattle's acquisition of the All-Star first baseman from the Arizona Diamondbacks. Hear the full conversation on the 'Baseball Bar-B-Cast' podcast - and subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen. View more Video Transcript Now Josh Naylor isn't going to win any MVP awards. He was an All-Star last year. This year, the numbers are a little bit down. He's traded some power for some contact. He only has 11 home runs this year, he hit 31 last year, but he immediately becomes one of the best five hitters in this Mariners lineup, and it comes at a relatively affordable price with two pitching prospects, one of whom is in High A, and one of whom is a reliever. Josh Naylor's floor is really high, and I think that is really where the appeal comes in. Obviously, it's a rental situation, so it's not, you know, a long-term commitment. But when you look at him over the past four years, it's been rock solid. You know, the shape of the production has changed a little bit, but if you look at all the first basemen over the last four seasons, again, we're talking about a big sample size because he generally posts and hasn't had a lot of injuries since his very dramatic leg injury earlier in his career. He is not elite, but he is right at the top of that second tier. The Mariners are basically going to be trying to decide what kind of versatility they want to keep. Do they want to keep as much offensive upside on the roster, which would be keeping Ray, keeping Canzone, who's had a really nice run in right field, and then maybe it's the time is over for Solano, but like I said, then you're really lacking any sort of right-handed element on the bench. So maybe they send down Miles Masterboni and just trust Williamson and Dylan Moore to be the full utility guys. There's a few options here, but my instinct is that it's kind of the end for Solano, but I'm not totally sure. But I do think that Josh Naylor is an everyday first baseman, and I have to imagine that's how they're viewing him. So everything is going to have to fit around that reality. The dude shows up and the dude hits. He basically was exactly what Arizona asked him to do, and you have to give him credit for that, right? He's going to be a free agent. He understands that this is he's been in these postseason races too, you know, with Cleveland. And so he, you know, he'll fit in in that sense, and I trust him to kind of show up. He's a flawed hitter, you know, there are ways where he can kind of go cold, but for the most part, I think he just fits the Mariners for a lot of reasons, again, because of that floor and because of the fact that the lineup is in a better place overall, it looks a lot better to add a guy like him. Close

Tigers trade proposal lands them a three-time All-Star
Tigers trade proposal lands them a three-time All-Star

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tigers trade proposal lands them a three-time All-Star

The Detroit Tigers are likely going to be buyers at the trade deadline. The Tigers have been one of the best teams in baseball with their 60-44 record, and could look to become even more dangerous. One name the Tigers have been linked to is Atlanta Braves slugger Marcell Ozuna. The Braves are having a miserable season at 44-57 and are well out of the NL playoff picture. Given these circumstances, the team could look to sell off some of their valuable assets such as Ozuna. Sports Illustrated's Mark Morales-Smith proposed a mock trade for the Tigers to land the three-time All-Star. The full trade is as follows: Tigers receive: Marcell Ozuna Braves receive: INF Franyerber Montilla, RHP Zach Swanson Morales-Smith explained the rationale behind this hypothetical deal for the Tigers, citing the team's recent skid. 'The Tigers are in a major slump and need some significant upgrades if they are going to compete with the top teams in the American League come playoff time,' he said. 'Ozuna is a proven slugger who can be a serious difference-maker in a playoff series. The Tigers are 1-6 since the All-Star break, and have lost 10 of their last 11 games. Their lead in the AL Central has shrunk from 14 games to eight. In order to stop the bleeding, the Tigers may need to make a splash move to improve their lineup. Ozuna fits the bill. Ozuna isn't having the strongest year at the plate, batting just .235 with 13 home runs and .749 OPS. But perhaps a change of scenery on a World Series contender could rejuvenate Ozuna, and get him back to his All-Star form.

Aidan Hutchinson taking Lions rookie under his wing
Aidan Hutchinson taking Lions rookie under his wing

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Aidan Hutchinson taking Lions rookie under his wing

Detroit Lions superstar edge rusher Aidan Hutchinson is taking a rookie under his wing at training camp. After Friday's practice, Lions sixth-round rookie edge rusher Ahmed Hassanein stated that Hutchinson has taught him a lot in camp so far. "He's really been helping me a lot," Hassanein said of Hutchinson. "I'm super grateful for him. Honestly, everybody in the room has been teaching me. I've only been doing this for seven years, so I just want to learn and grow." "At the end of the day, I'm gonna give you 100% and I'm gonna run through somebody's face. This is my mentality," Hassanein added. The Lions selected Hassanein with the No.196 overall pick in April's draft. The 23-year-old tallied 9.5 sacks for Boise State in 2024, and also had a 12.5-sack campaign in 2023. Though Marcus Davenport is back from a triceps injury that cut his 2024 season short and will likely be the other starting edge rusher opposite Hutchinson, Hassanein could also be an impact player on Kelvin Sheppard's defense this year. Detroit lacks high-quality depth in the edge rusher room, so Hassanein has a massive opportunity to establish himself as a top rotational piece in the position group. The two-time first-team All-Mountain West selection could also challenge Davenport for the starting spot, though the Lions will likely opt for the veteran who is also impressing at camp. MORE DETROIT LIONS NEWS Jared Goff, Amon-Ra St. Brown showcase elite work ethic at Lions' training camp Detroit Lions urged to sign $110 million castoff thanks to questions on defense Dan Campbell's comments on Alex Anzalone give hope for positive resolution Dan Campbell addresses Detroit Lions training camp fights

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store