
New cancer vaccine shows promising results for certain patients
There could be new hope on the horizon for kidney cancer patients in the form of an experimental vaccine.
Researchers at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Yale Cancer Center and other universities have announced early findings from a study of an anti-tumor vaccine for patients with advanced kidney cancer.
"Patients with stage 3 or 4 kidney cancer are at high risk of recurrence," said co-senior author and co-principal investigator Toni Choueiri, MD, director of the Lank Center for Genitourinary Cancer at Dana-Farber, in a press release.
"The tools we have to lower that risk are not perfect, and we are relentlessly looking for more."
After undergoing surgery to remove a malignant tumor, the study's nine participants received a cancer vaccine that was intended to "train" their immune systems to identify and attack any lingering cancer cells, according to the press release.
Each vaccine was personalized to match the individual patient's tumor type based on cancer cells that were removed during surgery. These cells contain "neoantigens," which are "tiny fragments of mutant proteins," the release stated. The researchers used "predictive algorithms" to determine which neoantigens should be included in the vaccine to provide the highest level of immunity.
Five of the patients also received ipilimumab, a type of immunotherapy drug.
All nine patients showed a "successful anti-cancer immune response" after getting the vaccine. After an average of 34.7 months, they all remained cancer-free.
Within three weeks of receiving the vaccine, patients showed an "immune response," with T-cells spiking by more than 166 times, the release said. (T-cells, also known as T lymphocytes, are immune cells that help to fight cancer and prevent infection.)
"The tools we have to lower that risk are not perfect and we are relentlessly looking for more."
In the study, the T cells were found to remain in the patient's body for up to three years and attacked the existing tumor cells.
"We observed a rapid, substantial, and durable expansion of new T cell clones related to the vaccine," said Patrick Ott, MD, PhD, director of the Center for Cancer Vaccines at Dana-Farber.
"These results support the feasibility of creating a highly immunogenic personalized neoantigen vaccine in a lower mutation burden tumor and are encouraging, though larger-scale studies will be required to fully understand the clinical efficacy of this approach."
The results of the clinical trial were reported in the journal Nature on Feb. 5.
"We're very excited about these results, which show such a positive response in all nine patients with kidney cancer," Choueiri noted.
For most stage 3 or 4 kidney cancer patients, the standard treatment is surgical removal of the tumor, which is often followed by an immunotherapy drug called Pembrolizumab (Keytruda).
"Pembrolizumab induces an immune response that reduces the risk of the cancer coming back," according to Dana-Farber. "However, about two-thirds of patients can still recur and have limited treatment options."
First author David A. Braun, MD, PhD, a medical oncologist and physician-scientist at Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, noted that the approach used in this study was "truly distinct from vaccine attempts in kidney cancer."
"We pick targets that are unique to the cancer and different from any normal part of the body, so the immune system can be effectively 'steered' toward the cancer in a very specific way," Braun said in the release.
"We learned which specific targets in the cancer are most susceptible to immune attack and demonstrated that this approach can generate long-lasting immune responses, directing the immune system to recognize cancer. We believe this work can form a foundation for the development of neoantigen vaccines in kidney cancer."
Charles Nguyen, MD, a medical oncologist who specializes in kidney cancer at City of Hope in Orange County, California, noted that kidney cancer is among the 10 most common cancers among men and women in the U.S.
"This is a very exciting and promising tool for many of our patients with kidney cancer, where we can one day make a cure possible for all."
"Patients with early stage (localized) kidney cancer are often first treated with surgery to remove the tumor — however, many patients have a risk of the cancer coming back years after surgery, and there is a great interest in finding ways to lower the risk of cancer recurrence," Nguyen, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital.
"This exciting clinical trial evaluated a personalized cancer vaccine that uses genetic information from each patient's cancer to train and enhance the patient's immune system to recognize the cancer and prevent it from recurring."
While Nguyen acknowledged that this was a small study, all nine patients who received the vaccine were cancer-free even three years later.
"This is a very exciting and promising tool for many of our patients with kidney cancer, where we can one day make a cure possible for all."
Some patients did experience side effects from the vaccine, including local reactions at the vaccine injection site and flu-like symptoms, although "no higher-grade side effects were reported."
The researchers also acknowledged that there were some limitations associated with the study.
"There were limitations in the antigen-prediction tools available at the time and in the ability to target only a single antigen," they wrote.
"Moreover, it was conducted in the setting of active metastatic disease in a number of study participants."
Future research with larger clinical trials are planned to confirm the vaccine's effectiveness and full potential, the release stated.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
Funding for this study was provided by the Gateway for Cancer Research, the U.S. Department of Defense, Yale Cancer Center, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Trust Family Foundation, Michael Brigham, Pan-Mass Challenge, Hinda L. and Arthur Marcus Foundation, The Loker Pinard Fund for Kidney Cancer Research at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Conquer Cancer Foundation/Sontag Foundation, the release stated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
These Were the 2 Worst-Performing Stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average in May 2025
Two healthcare Dow stocks stunned investors with their sharp falls in May. The worst-performing Dow stock last month plunged over 26% as things took an unexpected turn. 10 stocks we like better than UnitedHealth Group › The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI) index edged 3.9% higher in May, with 70% of its 30 constituent stocks ending the month in positive territory. However, the two worst-performing Dow stocks in May -- both from the healthcare sector -- kept the index's rally in check, with one of them plunging over 25%. Shares of UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH) crashed 26.6% in May after multiple negative developments sent shockwaves through the investing community. In mid-May, UnitedHealth suddenly replaced its CEO, Andrew Witty, with former CEO Stephen J. Hemsley with immediate effect and suspended its earnings outlook for the full year because of a surge in medical costs. In between, The Wall Street Journal reported a criminal investigation against UnitedHealth by the Department of Justice for a "possible medicare fraud." Days later, The Guardian released a scathing report alleging UnitedHealth put patients' health at risk by paying secret bonuses to nursing homes to cut hospital transfers. For now, UnitedHealth expects to "return to growth" in 2026 and has sued The Guardian for defamation. Regaining investor confidence, however, may not be easy. The stock is down 38% so far this year, as of this writing. Merck (NYSE: MRK) stock lost 9.8% in May and plunged to its 52-week low of $73.31 a share after President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing drugmakers in the U.S. to cut the prices of prescription drugs. This comes at a time when Merck already expects tariffs to add $200 million to its costs this year. Investors are also worried about Merck's future once its blockbuster oncology drug Keytruda loses patent exclusivity. In mid-May, analysts at Citi slashed Merck stock's price target to $84 per share from $115 per share citing the pharmaceutical company's growth challenges and a "lack of urgency" to develop a business that could soften the impact of a potential loss of up to 20% of sales for Keytruda once its patent expires. Merck, however, has a strong pipeline, remains committed to dividend growth, and yields 3.9%. Before you buy stock in UnitedHealth Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and UnitedHealth Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Citigroup is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Neha Chamaria has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Merck. The Motley Fool recommends UnitedHealth Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. These Were the 2 Worst-Performing Stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average in May 2025 was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
Anti-vaxxer or ‘highly capable'? Ex-Harvard Medical School expert tapped by RFK Jr. for vaccine panel defies easy categories
Yet the Swedish-born scientist's views on vaccines are complex, and the rush to categorize him underscores the intense polarization of public science that accelerated during the pandemic and has continued unabated, some in the scientific community argue. His appointment came two days after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Advertisement Critics of Kennedy's move pointed out the former members had undergone a lengthy vetting process that ensured they had the right expertise and no conflicts of interest. Advertisement '[Kulldorff] is a serious and highly capable vaccine scientist who was unjustly put forth as part of a bad tribe of people who wanted to hurt the health of the nation, when all he was doing was trying to put forth a better plan for managing the country's response to the pandemic,' said Dr. Jeffrey Flier, an endocrinologist and former dean of Harvard Medical School. 'The opposition to contrarian views was pathological and ultimately detrimental to public health.' Kulldorff, who works as an infectious-disease and vaccine consultant in Connecticut, is best known as the co-author of the But, because it was published at the height of the pandemic in October 2020, many public health officials excoriated the declaration, saying lifting lockdowns that early would have caused many more deaths and hospitalizations and overwhelmed the health care system. Kulldorff is among other skeptics of lockdown and vaccine measures who were once vilified but have now gained new influence in the Trump administration. Advertisement 'It is unfortunate if each administration is trying to promote its preferred views, while vaccine science does have a lot of strong evidence and it should not be politicized,' said Kulldorff on Thursday declined to comment on his appointment to the CDC panel or discuss his views on vaccines. But in a January interview with the Globe, Kulldorff said the Great Barrington Declaration was borne out of frustration. In the fall of 2020, Kulldorff said he began communicating with several other scientists who were dismayed by the 'one-sided nature' of the public policy discussion over the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Among them was The trio ultimately agreed to meet for three days in Great Barrington, a town nestled in the Berkshire Mountains of Western Massachusetts. Between walks in the woods, they crafted a succinct statement opposing the lockdowns, noting that there was no scientific consensus for school closures and other stringent measures. They argued for a more targeted approach focused on protecting those most vulnerable, particularly the elderly, while life should resume as normal for everyone else. 'It's a basic principle of public health to protect those most vulnerable,' Kulldorff said in the January interview. 'Instead, [lockdown measures] protected the laptop class while exposing the working class.' Advertisement Almost immediately after its publication online, the declaration prompted a visceral backlash in the scientific community and among members of the Biden administration. Kulldorff said he received anonymous death threats via email and accusations that he supported 'mass murder,' he recalled. Others alleged that he was part of a right-wing conspiracy financed by the the oil billionaires Charles G. and David H. Koch, he said. Facebook deleted a page set up by the scientists, and Kulldorff's account on Twitter, now X, was suspended. It later emerged that two of the nation's top federal health officials — National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins, the former head of the National Institutes of Health — worked behind the scenes However, Kulldorff has repeatedly stressed that he is a supporter of vaccines and has called them 'one of the most significant health inventions in history.' At the same time, Kulldorff said he opposed the vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic in part because, in his view, people who had already been infected with the virus did not need them; and vaccination efforts should have been focused on the elderly, who were dying at far greater rates. 'Vaccines are a vital medical invention, allowing people to obtain immunity without the risk that comes from getting sick,' Kulldorff Advertisement Kulldorff was dismissed from his hospital, Mass General Brigham, and from Harvard Medical School, over the hospital's requirement for staff to be vaccinated against Covid-19. Kulldorff has said he declined to get the COVID shot because he had already been infected with the virus, which gave him immunity; and he didn't consider it ethical to get the vaccine while others needed it more. Kulldorff also said he has an immune deficiency that made him especially vulnerable to complications from vaccines. 'I am very much in favor of vaccines, but I was against the vaccine mandates for a few reasons,' Kulldorff said in the January interview . 'If you already had COVID, there is no need for the vaccine. It gives you natural immunity. It's better for others to take it.' Chris Serres can be reached at
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Merck Gets FDA Approval to Expand Use of Its Top-Selling Drug, Keytruda
Merck has received approval from the Food and Drug Administration to expand use of its blockbuster drug, Keytruda, to treat head and neck cancers. Studies found patients taking Keytruda can reduce the risk of head and neck cancer recurrence, progression, or death by 30% compared to current treatments. Keytruda is Merck's best-selling drug, generating more than $7 billion in revenue in the first (MRK) has received the go-ahead to expand use of its blockbuster cancer drug, Keytruda. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Keytruda's use for adults with resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma whose tumors express the protein PD-L1. The study's overall principal investigator, Dr. Ravindra Uppaluri, said the approval "represents a potentially significant shift in how we manage this disease." Dr. Uppaluri added Keytruda "has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrence, progression, or death by 30%, compared with standard of care adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone." Merck noted that it's estimated that in 2025, there will be approximately 72,680 new cases of head and neck cancer diagnosed, and more than 16,680 deaths from the disease. Keytruda is the company's best-selling drug, with first-quarter revenue of $7.2 billion, making up nearly half of its total sales. Entering Friday trading, shares of Merck were down about 18% year-to-date. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data