logo
Black and minority ethnic workers are losing out on £3,200,000,000

Black and minority ethnic workers are losing out on £3,200,000,000

Metro17 hours ago
No one should be paid less because of their ethnic background, but unfortunately, the disparity is stark.
Nationally, there is a 6% pay gap for employees from Black, African Caribbean or Black British ethnic groups, compared to their white counterparts. And according to a Resolution Foundation 2018 report, this amounts to £3.2billion in lost wages.
The bad news doesn't stop there, though. London specifically has the largest gap in the UK at a shocking 23.8%, which is appalling because it is one of the most diverse capital cities in the world.
But it gets worse – in specific sectors, the gap is even more pronounced. A GMB London survey showed that London's Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) public sector workers take home on average 37% less than their white colleagues, which is reportedly due to reported favouritism, management bias, and malpractice.
On top of that, we already know that Black and minority ethnic people are much more likely to be in 'deep poverty' than white people.
I want to close the ethnicity pay gap. And as the Chair of the London Parliamentary Labour Party, I want to see serious action to close that huge London pay gap, specifically.
I believe the first step to tackle this is to introduce mandatory ethnicity pay reporting. And I have found that it's easier to convince people to acknowledge the ethnicity pay gap once you tell them about the gender pay gap first.
For several years, companies of 250 employees or more have been required to report data on their gender pay gaps. I believe it is no coincidence that the gender pay gap has reduced over time.
I remember one friend telling me that her company, upon realising their gender pay gap, gave her an instant £4,000 raise.
Companies should also have to report their ethnicity pay gaps.
If we measure something, we can fix it. But at the current rate, it will take another 40 years to fix the ethnicity pay gap.
Shining a light on inequality and injustice is vital. So having the data out there pushes companies to act, and it shows you who is working to improve – and who isn't.
It was in the Labour Party's manifesto that the Government intends to deliver mandatory ethnicity pay gap reporting for large employers – as well as disability pay gap reporting.
I welcomed this, as I have campaigned for it for so long.
Back in 2018, as Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Governance and Inclusive Leadership along with Investing in Ethnicity, we launched the Maturity Matrix to spark this type of dialogue. And I regularly called for mandatory reporting when I was a Shadow Minister.
Fast forward to earlier this year, I led a debate in Parliament about pay gaps in the workplace, to urge long overdue action. I was delighted to see that there was cross-party support for tackling the various pay gaps that exist in the workplace – and I had a clear indication that the Government is committed to acting on these issues.
I believe that now, under Labour, we have the chance to tackle pay inequality. It's another chance to show the difference a Labour Government makes.
But I want to make sure that it happens.
The Government recently held a public consultation on mandatory ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting, which they said would help shape the Government's policies. I urge the Government to follow through with delivering it.
Voluntary reporting, often cited as an alternative, is insufficient to tackle the problem. The truth is, the minority of bad companies will not act unless they are forced to.
What I have long proposed is that mandatory reporting should be accompanied by action plans for those companies who do report pay gaps. These action plans should set out what exactly the companies will do to address their pay gaps, to set them on the path to equality.
Because we don't just want to identify pay gaps, we want to close them. And I want to see the option of fines to be included in the regulations, for those companies who refuse to engage or close their pay gaps.
I have also long argued that Government procurement contracts (when government departments hand out contracts to deliver services) should be prioritised for companies who are paying their employees on an equal basis. Then, you incentivise progress, with those who have good practices benefitting.
The case for action is not only about fairness and equality – it has been shown that the most ethnically diverse companies are more likely to be profitable too.
Many organisations have worked on this issue and the progress made is thanks to our collective voice. GMB, my trade union, are campaigning on this with their 'Mind the ethnicity pay gap', which aims to shine a light on the disparities in pay between ethnic groups.
And there are so many others – from the #EthnicityPayGap Campaign, to UNISON, Action for Race Equality, the Runnymede Trust, ShareAction and many more. More Trending
The demand is clear, and I am convinced the consultation will have backed that up. I want to see disability pay gap reporting along the very same lines too – but that must be led by, and centred around, disabled people's voices.
There is a wealth of diverse talent across our country that is ready to flourish. All we want is better and fairer workplaces where people are paid fairly on merit.
Equality benefits everyone. So, if we get this right on gender, ethnicity, and disability, we will create a better and fairer working environment for everyone.
It's time to deliver equal pay for all.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing jess.austin@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: I always felt 'mum guilt' – then I went on a girls' trip
MORE: I dehydrate myself so I don't have to use public disabled toilets
MORE: I won't risk my safety by seeing Charli XCX at Glastonbury 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why govt's promise of 'biggest boost to affordable housing in a generation' may be overblown
Why govt's promise of 'biggest boost to affordable housing in a generation' may be overblown

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Why govt's promise of 'biggest boost to affordable housing in a generation' may be overblown

Angela Rayner is set to announce plans to build 180,000 new social homes in the next decade, as the government seeks to "turn the tide on the housing crisis". It would be six times greater than the number of social homes built in the 10 years up to 2024 - and forms part of a drive to build 300,000 new social and affordable properties by 2035. The plan is backed by a £39bn investment announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in last month's spending review. 2:29 The deputy prime minister called on the social housing sector to "work together to turn the tide of the housing crisis", and said the investment was "the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation". "We are seizing this golden opportunity with both hands to transform this country by building the social and affordable homes we need, so we create a brighter future where families aren't trapped in temporary accommodation and young people are no longer locked out of a secure home," she said. Ms Rayner's target for social and affordable housing is part of a wider long-term plan - also due to be published on Wednesday - setting out how the government will build both more houses and improve housing standards. Here, Sky News looks at what the plan will mean for the country, how it compares to previous programmes, and how it could be affected by the increased cost of construction. 3:17 Crunching the numbers The £39bn 10-year Affordable Homes Programme is an ambitious investment in affordable housing, representing a real terms increase from the previous programme of over £1bn annually. However, claims of the "biggest boost in a generation" may be slightly overblown. When factoring in inflation, the annual investment of £3.9bn falls short of the equivalent £4.5bn annually from 2008 to 2011 under the previous Labour government. This was however a notably short-term uplift, and the sector will welcome the stability of the new settlement which secures funding for 10 years - compared with five years or fewer under previous programmes. The programme sets out to deliver 30,000 affordable homes per year on average, with at least 18,000 of those being for social rent, rather than other tenures such as shared ownership. This would be more than twice the number under the previous programme, which is estimated to have delivered about 8,000 homes annually for social rent by its completion. Similarly, however, it is fewer than were delivered by the previous Labour Affordable Homes Programme, which was over 30,000 a year from 2008 to 2011. A further challenge to the government's goal of a "generational" uplift is the increasing cost of building, meaning they may face diminishing returns on their investment. The previous Affordable Homes Programme initially aimed to deliver 180,000 homes, which was revised down significantly to between 110,000 and 130,000 due to increasing costs and delays. This government can expect to face a similar economic landscape, particularly with an ambition to deliver a greater share of socially rented homes - the most expensive type of affordable housing to build.

A humiliating day for Keir Starmer in parliament
A humiliating day for Keir Starmer in parliament

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

A humiliating day for Keir Starmer in parliament

It has been a month of U-turns for Keir Starmer's Labour government … but none have been quite as dramatic as this. Helen Pidd heads to parliament on the day the Commons is due to vote on the government's flagship welfare bill, amid a furious rebellion among Labour MPs on its proposed disability cuts. She hears from a series of Labour MPs – from those in support of the bill to those against, and those still undecided – after a week in which the government has offered concession after concession to rebels to try to get its legislation over the line. Yet, as political correspondent Kiran Stacey reports, even as the debate started, senior figures in government were worried they might still lose, prompting the biggest concession of all. So where does this leave Keir Starmer's authority only a year into office, and where can his beleaguered government go from here?

Overseas students using higher education as ‘backdoor' to stay in UK
Overseas students using higher education as ‘backdoor' to stay in UK

Leader Live

timean hour ago

  • Leader Live

Overseas students using higher education as ‘backdoor' to stay in UK

A paper from centre-right think tank Policy Exchange has called for the graduate visa route to be scrapped for all students other than those on postgraduate research degrees. The current model is 'not working' as individuals are using the student visa as a route to longer-term migration, the report has suggested. In May, the Labour Government announced plans to reduce the graduate visa route, which allows overseas students to live and work in the UK for up to two years after their studies, to 18 months. Under changes introduced by the former Conservative government in January 2024, international students in the UK have been banned from bringing dependants with them since – apart from some postgraduate research courses or courses with government-funded scholarships. But the report said the changes do not go 'far enough' and it called for bolder action to ensure study at UK universities is not 'a migration backdoor'. The paper said: 'Most fundamentally, the purpose of student migration should be to study, not to provide a backdoor route to longer term migration or settlement. 'Yet increasingly studying in the UK has become a pathway for widespread and sustained immigration.' The number of international students in the UK increased by 66% between 2014/15 and 2023/24, the report suggested. Two in five (40%) of those who arrived on student visas transferred to a different visa type within one year in 2023 – up from just 3% in 2019, according to the paper. Zachary Marsh, research fellow in education at Policy Exchange and author of the report, said: 'UK universities must return to the business of selling education, not immigration. 'Whilst international students can provide valuable economic benefits, the current system drives migration by those who have no interest in study but instead see the student and graduate visa as an open door to working in the UK. 'The Government and universities must go further to clamp down on those gaming the system. 'A more muscular approach is needed to restore public confidence that international students are good for our universities and wider economy and society.' The report has also suggested that overseas students 'may be crowding out UK students' at some universities. Shadow education minister Neil O'Brien is due to address a Policy Exchange event in London on Wednesday on higher education and migration to coincide with the launch of the think tank's report. Mr O'Brien is expected to say: 'It's not just taxpayers who are losing out. 'The current system isn't working for too many students, who are promised great things but find themselves having to pay back huge sums on very low wages. 'Too many students are being ripped off and we have to ask whether there are better uses of taxpayers' money that will leave young people better off.' Tim Bradshaw, chief executive of the Russell Group, a group of 24 research-intensive universities, said: 'In an increasingly competitive global market, the UK needs to maintain an attractive offer for international students. 'This includes the graduate visa route, which allows international graduates to remain in the UK to work and contribute to the economy for a period after their studies. 'We know that international student recruitment, like any immigration policy, needs to be robust and fair to maintain people's trust in the system. 'Our universities are committed to working with Government to eliminate any abuse of the system and ensure places go to those who are here to study and meet the standards needed to succeed on their course.' A Government spokesperson said: 'A series of measures have already been laid out in the Immigration White Paper to restore control over the system, including reducing the graduate visa from two years to 18 months. 'We will also ensure international graduates move into graduate level roles. This is what the Graduate route was created to facilitate access to, and will also help meet the UK's workforce needs, as part of our Plan for Change. 'We will also crack down further on abuse of our immigration system by strengthening requirements for universities, requiring tighter enforcement on visa approvals, course enrolments and student completions whilst continuing to welcome international students that support our world-leading universities.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store