Shiite Coordination Framework cracks wide open ahead of Iraq 2025 Vote
Shafaq News/ Six months ahead of Iraq's scheduled parliamentary elections on November 11, 2025, the Shiite Coordination Framework (CF), once unified under a common platform, is showing visible cracks. Despite previous electoral successes, internal disagreements, ambitions, and strategic recalculations have led its main factions to prepare to contest the elections separately — a move that reflects both political pragmatism and deep-seated rivalries.
Framework's Position after 2021
In the October 2021 elections, the Shiite Coordination Framework — a coalition of major Shiite forces — managed to recover politically after an initially poor showing. While the Sadrist Movement emerged as the largest Shiite bloc with 73 seats, the Framework — after judicial interventions and post-election alliances — ultimately secured a dominant role in shaping the government, particularly following Muqtada al-Sadr's withdrawal from the political process.
Major Framework components, including the State of Law Coalition led by Nouri al-Maliki, the Fatah Alliance led by Hadi al-Amiri, and other smaller Shiite parties, consolidated enough influence to form a governing alliance. Their combined strength, supported by allied independents, gave them considerable leverage in parliamentary votes, despite not having initially won a majority at the polls.
A Shifting Electoral Strategy in 2025
Now, as the November 2025 elections approach, the dynamics inside the Framework have shifted dramatically. Rather than contesting under a single electoral umbrella, the Framework forces plan to participate through multiple separate lists — a strategy driven by a mixture of financial disputes, political positioning, and efforts to maximize overall seat gains.
A senior source told Shafaq News that the recent withdrawal of the Iraq Hawks Movement (Harakat Suqoor al-Iraq), led by Qasim al-Daraji, from Al-Maliki's State of Law Coalition was primarily due to funding disagreements.
According to the source, the movement had expected financial backing from Al-Maliki himself, which ultimately failed to materialize, prompting the split.
This rift is symptomatic of a broader trend: within the Shiite house (al-beit al-Shi'i), electoral preparations are now focused on establishing distinct lists to allow each faction to measure its true electoral weight and negotiate from a position of strength after the polls.
New Electoral Lineups
The emerging electoral map within the Framework includes:
-The State of Law Coalition: Led by Nouri al-Maliki, this list will encompass the Daawa Party (headed by Al-Maliki), the Bashair Movement (headed by Yasser al-Maliki), and the Al-Nahj Al-watani Party (headed by Ahmad Al-Rabiee)
-Al-Furatain List: Headed by Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, it will include the Sanad Bloc led by Labor and Social Affairs Minister Ahmed al-Asadi and the Ataa Movement led by Popular Mobilization Commission (PMC) chief Faleh al-Fayyad.
-Victory Alliance (Nasr): Led by former Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi, in cooperation with Ammar al-Hakim's Wisdom Movement (Al-Hikma) and several independent political actors.
-Asaib Ahl al-Haq: The powerful armed and political faction led by Qais al-Khazali is preparing to run on a separate list, although discussions are ongoing about potential alignments with other minor forces.
According to Shafaq sources, this strategy reflects an attempt to avoid the intra-list competition and fragmentation that plagued previous elections under unified banners.
Collapse of the "Qarar" Alliance
Further complicating matters is the unraveling of the Qarar Alliance (Decision), an attempted unification project led by Al-Sudani and Hadi al-Amiri of the Fatah Alliance. Initially envisioned as a comprehensive front to contest the elections jointly, the alliance faltered due to differences between the two leaders, reportedly over the leadership of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) and disagreements regarding the stalled PMF law in Parliament.
Negotiations with Ahmed al-Asadi, leader of the Sanad Bloc, also broke down, further scattering the once-projected alliance into separate electoral trajectories.
Motivations Behind the Division
According to observers, several factors underlie the decision by Framework forces to splinter into multiple electoral lists:
-Maximizing Seats: By contesting separately, the Framework factions hope to widen their overall parliamentary footprint. Fragmented lists could appeal to different Shiite constituencies and reduce vote wastage under Iraq's semi-open list electoral system.
-Internal Power-Balancing: Running separately allows each faction to assess its real political strength in terms of votes and seats, thus reshaping the post-election negotiations based on actual popular support rather than presumptive power-sharing formulas.
-Flexibility in Coalition Building: A post-election merger of winning Shiite lists into a broader governing alliance would provide more leverage during cabinet formation talks. As one Framework source put it, 'Forming alliances after results allows each party to know its weight and public base.'
Risks and Uncertainties
However, the division strategy is not without risks. Competing lists could split the Shiite vote in several constituencies, potentially benefiting non-Framework parties or independent candidates, especially in Baghdad and southern provinces. Additionally, coordination failures could leave some Framework parties underperforming, weakening the Shiite bloc's ability to secure a comfortable parliamentary majority.
Moreover, the Framework's historical rival, the Sadrist Movement (currently the Patriotic Shiite Movement), while currently boycotting political life, remains a wildcard. A sudden return by Al-Sadr or an alliance of independents and smaller parties could disrupt the Framework's plans.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
33 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq's butchers bear the brunt of CCHF Crisis
Shafaq News/ In 2025, Iraq has recorded at least 96 cases of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF), including 13 deaths, according to the latest data from the Public Health Directorate at the Ministry of Health and Shafaq News tracker. Official statements emphasize that the outbreak remains under control. However, health officials familiar with the situation told Shafaq News—on condition of anonymity—that the true number of infections is likely much higher than reported, citing underreporting in rural areas and limited diagnostic capabilities. Nearly all confirmed infections are concentrated among high-risk occupational groups: livestock breeders, animal transporters, and especially butchers. Within this vulnerable segment, butchers face a compounded risk—not only from direct contact with potentially infected animals but from the deteriorating infrastructure that forces them to operate outside official and sanitary channels. 'We Are Forced Outside the System' Muhammad Ali, a butcher in Babil Province with more than three decades of experience, described the daily hazards of his profession. 'We try to follow the laws and health instructions,' he explained, 'but the reality is we're often forced to slaughter outside official abattoirs—not because we want to break the rules, but because there simply aren't enough slaughterhouses.' Ali points to a chronic lack of facilities, especially during high-demand seasons such as Eid Al-Adha, when families sacrifice an animal—typically a sheep, goat, or cow—and distribute the meat to family, relatives, and people in poverty. 'The few slaughterhouses that do exist are overwhelmed. We wait for hours. Work becomes unbearable, customers get angry, and the delay sometimes ruins the meat. Then we are blamed, even though the fault lies in the system's inability to serve us.' He warns that the legal risks butchers face for so-called 'unauthorized slaughter' ignore the economic and logistical pressures that push them into these situations. 'We're not criminals. We're surviving.' Ali calls for urgent interventions: more licensed slaughterhouses, mobile abattoirs for underserved areas, and even temporary legal alternatives supervised by health authorities. 'Without keep working in the shadows—and we'll keep getting sick.' A Nationwide Gap in Slaughter Infrastructure Dr. Thaer Sabri Hussein, Director of the Epidemiology Department at Iraq's Veterinary Authority, confirmed the infrastructure crisis. 'There are only 52 official slaughterhouses in Iraq, and most are in poor condition,' he told Shafaq News. 'We need at least 300 to meet current demand. The few modern facilities we do have are negligible.' The Ministry of Agriculture has submitted a formal request to the General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers to approve the construction of modern abattoirs. As a temporary measure, the Ministry of Environment has been tasked with rehabilitating defunct facilities. However, officials acknowledge that these efforts fall short of addressing the scale of the problem. Cities most affected by unregulated slaughter include Baghdad, which houses more than 10 million people, and now records the highest number of infections (29,) followed by religious hubs like Karbala and Najaf, where massive pilgrimages frequently overwhelm municipal services. 'These areas are hotspots not only for illegal slaughter but also for potential disease transmission,' Hussein warned. Although Iraqi law restricts animal slaughter to official facilities under Article 105 of the 1983 Veterinary Code, enforcement is lax. Hussein admits, 'In reality, controlling unregulated slaughter is extremely difficult. That's why we're focusing on awareness campaigns to educate livestock handlers and the public about the importance of safe practices.' Fighting Disease with Incomplete Tools To curb the spread of CCHF, the Ministry of Agriculture conducts two national anti-tick spraying campaigns annually, targeting the blood-sucking parasite responsible for transmitting the virus. When an infection is confirmed in a specific area, it is classified as a 'disease hotspot,' triggering emergency spraying and a halt to animal movement until livestock are examined and treated. Yet these reactive measures are constrained by limited reach and chronic underfunding. Without systemic reforms—especially in slaughterhouse availability and enforcement mechanisms—such interventions remain insufficient.
Shafaq News
33 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq's CF pushes post-Eid legislative overhaul
Shafaq News/ Iraq's Coordination Framework (CF) is preparing a legislative package to amend key laws immediately after the Eid al-Adha recess, a political source confirmed on Wednesday. One proposal involves revising the electoral law to allocate 80% of party list votes to lead candidates and 20% to others—an adjustment the CF, a governed alliance of predominantly Shiite political parties in Iraq, claims would enhance political cohesion and limit vote dispersion, particularly in Baghdad. The source stressed, however, that the change is procedural and will not disrupt the electoral commission's preparations for the November vote. To advance the agenda, CF leaders have instructed their lawmakers to coordinate with other blocs to secure quorum and fast-track debate on the amendments. The initiative follows months of debate among Iraqi factions and pressure from senior figures critical of the current electoral framework. MP Raad al-Maliki submitted earlier a parallel draft that proposes treating each province as a single electoral district—except Baghdad, Basra, and Mosul, which would be split in two—and limiting party lists to the number of seats available in each district to curb over-nomination. The bill also suggests lowering Iraq's modified Sainte-Laguë divisor from 1.7 to 1.5 to improve representation for smaller parties and enhance electoral competitiveness. To mitigate conflicts of interest, the proposed changes include an automatic resignation clause for sitting lawmakers seeking local office and for governors or provincial council members running for Parliament. Separately, the bloc plans to revisit Iraq's oil and gas law to reinforce federal authority and ensure more equitable revenue distribution across provinces, in addition to pursuing revisions to the Administrative Structure Law, although specifics remain unclear.
Shafaq News
33 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
PM Al-Sudani, Iran's Pezeshkian hold call on regional stability
Shafaq News/ On Wednesday, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani held a phone call with Iran's president Masoud Pezeshkian discussing bilateral relations. According to a statement by the PM's media office, the conversation addressed ways to deepen cooperation, reviewed regional developments, and highlighted joint efforts to tackle shared challenges and enhance stability. In January 2025, Al- Sudani visited Tehran, where he met with Pezeshkian and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Last year, Pezeshkian made his first official foreign visit to Baghdad, resulting in the signing of multiple memorandums of understanding on trade, infrastructure, and border security.
