Why are middle-income families feeling more confident? Insights from the FNB-BER survey
In the second quarter, the index rebounded somewhat, although confidence remains below the more positive readings recorded during the second half of 2024
Image: Karen Sandison/Independent Media
First National Bank and the Bureau for Economic Research's latest Consumer Confidence Index shows that families with an income of between R5,000 and R20,000 are more confident than those on either side of them.
In the second quarter, the index rebounded somewhat, although confidence remains below the more positive readings recorded during the second half of 2024, FNB said in a statement on Thursday.
This, said FNB chief economist, Mamello Matikinca-Ngwenya, is the result of several of adverse shocks that knocked consumer sentiment during the first quarter of 2025, including the initial proposed VAT increase in the first budget, the fallout between the ANC and the DA about the National Budget, brief return to Stage 6 load-shedding as well as 'US President Donald Trump's alarming import tariff proposals'.
Consumer Confidence Per Income Group_BER_FNB
Image: Supplied/Nicola Mawson
Improved sentiment is not uniform across all income groups, ranked from middle-, high, and then low-income consumers in terms of how much more confident they were than a year ago.
For homes with an income of more than R20,000 a month (high-income), confidence may be up, but remains below the feelings of happiness in the second half of last year. For homes with an income of between R5,000 and R20,000 (middle) – confidence was the same as how they felt at the end of last year, while low-income earners still bear the brunt of a bad socio-economic environment.
'Middle-income confidence is currently significantly higher compared to high- and low-income confidence, said Matikinca-Ngwenya. Additional two-pot pension fund withdrawals at the start of the new financial year in March and another 25-basis point cut in the prime interest rate at the end of May are supporting highly indebted middle-income households in particular,' she said.
Matikinca-Ngwenya noted that 'low-income earners are less likely to have pension funds, while the R30,000 annual cap on two-pot withdrawals implies that these withdrawals will deliver a relatively smaller boost to the disposable income of high-income households compared to that of middle-income households.'
Lower fuel prices and the increased availability of more affordable new vehicles are also benefitting middle-income households, said Matikinca-Ngwenya.
Those living in households earning less than R5 000 a month were hard hit by a lack of access to the formal credit sector, higher food inflation, as well as higher unemployment. Statistics South Africa's latest unemployment figures showed that 90 000 people lost their jobs in March.
Food inflation increased from 1.5% year-on-year in January to 4.4% in May and is projected to tick up further, which will disproportionately affect low-income households, said Matikinca-Ngwenya.
'The devastating floods that swept through the Eastern Cape, as well as the alarming increase in the unemployment rate during the first quarter, may also be weighing down the confidence levels of less affluent consumers,' she said.
IOL
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
12 hours ago
- The Citizen
Lesaka Thecnologies to buy Michael Jordaan's bank for R1.1 billion
Bank Zero was founded in 2018 by Michael Jordaan, a former CEO of FNB. Fintech group Lesaka Technologies announced that it will acquire Bank Zero for R1.1 billion pending regulatory approval. Bank Zero was founded in 2018 by Michael Jordaan, a former CEO of FNB. In the announcement made on Friday morning by Lesaka, the acquisition will be settled through a combination of newly issued shares, such that the shareholders of Bank Zero will own approximately 12% of Lesaka's fully diluted shares at the time of completion of the proposed transaction and up to R91 million ($5.1 million) in cash. 'The proposed transaction is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions as well as regulatory approvals ordinarily required of a transaction of this nature, including approval from the Prudential Authority, a division of the South African Reserve Bank, Competition Commission approval and Exchange Control approval,' it said. Why Bank Zero The fintech group said this acquisition will mark another key milestone in its journey to build a vertically integrated fintech platform. Lesaka Technologies is listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) and on Nasdaq. 'The combination of Bank Zero's digital banking infrastructure and its operational banking licence, together with Lesaka's fintech and distribution platform, is intended to transform the way Lesaka is able to conduct business in the future, offering key financial, strategic and regulatory benefits,' Lesaka said. Lesaka expects the transaction to support a more optimised balance sheet in the future, allowing the group to finance existing and continued growth in lending books through customer deposits, driving stronger lending unit economics. ALSO READ: FSCA finds banks do not handle consumer complaints properly Bank Zero's performance 'As at the end of April 2025, Bank Zero had a deposit base in excess of R400 million and more than 40 000 funded accounts across South Africa,' read the announcement. Lesaka expects the transaction to be accretive to its shareholders, with Bank Zero expected to be profitable in the fiscal year following completion of the transaction. 'Our belief in the combined platform's future is clear and we see strong symmetry in our vision. There is a strong international precedent for fintechs that have acquired banking capabilities to deliver more integrated, compliant and capital-efficient financial services,' Jordaan said. Board changes The announcement also includes changes to the Lesaka board. Jordaan will join the Lesaka board of directors, while Yatin Narsai will continue as CEO of Bank Zero. Narsai, CEO and co-founder of Bank Zero, spent more than 15 years at FNB, where he served as the CEO of FNB's retail bank. 'The broader Bank Zero leadership team will remain in their current roles, ensuring continuity and integration,' he said. NOW READ: Investing in JSE shares: What you need to know

IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
Businessman fined R82,000 for tax evasion
Errant taxpayer, Roelof Serdyn, was convicted of one count of failure to submit an Income Tax return, eight counts of failure to submit Pay as You Earn (EMP201) returns, and 32 counts of failure to submit VAT returns. Image: Ziphozonke Lushaba / Independent Newspapers Businessman and errant taxpayer, Roelof Serdyn, was fined R82,000 for failing to submit Income Tax returns, Pay as You Earn returns, and Value Added Tax returns to the South African Revenue Service (SARS) between 2018 and 2024. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson, Eric Ntabazalila, said Serdyn - sentenced in the Bellville Magistrate's Court this week - was convicted of one count of failure to submit an Income Tax return, eight counts of failure to submit Pay as You Earn (EMP201) returns, and 32 counts of failure to submit VAT returns - all in contravention of the Tax Administration Act. Immediately after his sentence, Serdyn paid R42,000, and the balance of R40,000 was paid in monthly instalments of R5,000. Ntabazalila confirmed that a further cumulative amount of R164,000 or, in the alternative, 246 months imprisonment was suspended for five years on certain conditions. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'Serdyn was charged alongside his company, Akvaba (Pty) Ltd, but the charges against the company were withdrawn after its liquidation. The court heard that Akvaba (Pty) Ltd was registered as a taxpayer and was therefore obligated to comply with all tax obligations towards the SARS. 'Serdyn was the representative taxpayer, employer, and representative vendor of Akvaba (Pty) Ltd. He was responsible for the company's tax affairs, which included the submission of all tax returns (IT, PAYE, and VAT) of Akvaba (Pty) Ltd. 'The accused ignored the reminders and final demand notices issued by SARS. When he was summoned to appear in court, the returns were submitted,' said Ntabazalila. In the lead up to the annual tax season opening, Ntabazalila said the case serves as a warning to persons acting as representative vendors, representative employers, and public officers who serve in these positions. 'These duties and responsibilities should not be taken lightly as non-compliance with such duties will have serious consequences for such incumbents in their capacity,' said Ntabazalila. The sentence in this case follows closely on the cases of J W Lubbe (and Jacor Transport Holding), who was sentenced to a fine of R148,000 on June 11, 2025, and H L van der Westhuizen (and Tempo Konstruksie CC), who was sentenced to a fine of R126,000 on May 30, 2025. In a statement, SARS said this tax season marks an important period where income tax returns of the majority of taxpayers are automatically assessed. The category of taxpayers who are automatically assessed will receive notification from SARS from July 7 to 20, 2025. Taxpayers who do not receive notifications from SARS that they are automatically assessed are encouraged to submit their tax returns in a timely and accurate manner from July 21, 2025. The Filing Season will close on October 20, 2025, for non-provisional individuals. SARS urged all taxpayers to prepare their documentation early to check their assessments and to avoid last-minute delays for those who must submit an income return. 'In line with our strategic objective to make it easy for taxpayers to comply, we have identified a large segment of non-provisional and provisional taxpayers who receives income from one or more sources from formal and other forms of employment and whose tax affairs are not complicated have been selected to be automatically assessed,' SARS said. Taxpayers can access their auto-assessed income tax returns through any of SARS's channels, such as the SARS MobiApp or SARS eFiling, to review and verify the completeness and accuracy of the information that resulted in the auto assessment. For more information, visit the SARS website.


The Citizen
16 hours ago
- The Citizen
Sars deducts billions from RAF for ‘Eskom payments' despite court interdict
Claims it had no choice otherwise National Treasury's records 'would not be accurate'. There is no official comment about Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana reportedly having been due to provide 'a certain affidavit' to the court since April. Picture: Moneyweb The South African Revenue Service (Sars) has, despite being interdicted from doing so, deducted R5.07 billion of the R5.1 billion it planned to deduct from the fuel levy payments it makes to the Road Accident Fund (RAF) – the R5.1 billion being the 'diesel refunds' amount Sars has agreed to pay Eskom. This was confirmed on Wednesday by RAF head of communications McIntosh Polela in response to questions emailed to the fund on 13 June. Moneyweb reported on 17 June that the RAF had applied for a contempt of court order against Sars because of its alleged failure to adhere to an interim interdict obtained by the fund in the High Court in Pretoria on 26 March 2025. The interim interdict prohibits Sars from deducting R5.1 billion – or any part of this amount – from the RAF fuel levies it collects and pays to the fund. Moneyweb requested comment from Sars, also on 17 June, about the alleged continuation of these deductions following the issuing of the interim interdict but has not yet received a response. ALSO READ: RAF castigated in high court case, but gets further Sars 'relief' in another Deductions continued Polela said Sars made its most recent deduction on Monday this week, and up to that date (23 June) has deducted a total of R5 072 360 844.85. He said deductions made by Sars to the monthly fuel levy payments it makes to the RAF were made this year on: 20 February (before the interim interdict prohibiting the deductions was issued) 28 March 22 April 27 May 23 June. Sars's alleged non-adherence to the interim interdict emerged in a parliamentary portfolio committee on transport meeting with the RAF on 11 June. Suspended RAF CEO Collins Letsoalo appealed to the portfolio committee to help the RAF with the issue of non-payment by Sars. 'Sars has acted recalcitrant,' said Letsoalo at the time. 'In fact, we have opened a case of contempt of court against them.' He added that, since April, Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana is supposed to have submitted 'a certain affidavit' to court on an urgent basis, but he has not done this and 'so they [Sars] keep on deducting the money'. 'Sars is unlawfully deducting our money. I hope this portfolio committee will write to them and ask them because clearly the ministry has not helped us,' he said. Questioned by portfolio committee chair Selelo Selamolela about the issue, Letsoalo said the RAF won its case against Sars, but the tax authority ignored the court order and still deducted the money. He indicated that by then – 11 June 2025 – he was sure Sars had probably deducted R5 billion of the money. ALSO READ: Scopa launches inquiry into RAF misconduct claims What does Treasury say? Moneyweb requested comment from National Treasury on 13 June about Godongwana's alleged failure to submit an affidavit to court related to the RAF's contempt of court application against Sars. Moneyweb also asked National Treasury if it could confirm that Sars continued to deduct amounts from the monthly fuel levy payments it makes to the RAF after the high court interdict was issued – and, if so, for comment about these deductions while an interdict prohibiting these deductions is in place. It responded last week, stating: 'The matter is before the court therefore, the National Treasury cannot comment until a ruling has been made.' ALSO READ: RAF CEO placed on special leave with full pay, as MPs grill fund Original dispute was with Eskom The dispute between the RAF and Sars relates to 'diesel refunds' claimed by Eskom in terms of the Customs and Excise Act. A dispute between Sars and Eskom arose when Sars decided that Eskom was not entitled to the diesel refunds for a period of about 30 months between 2019 to 2021. However, Sars and Eskom then entered into a settlement agreement on 17 October 2024 in terms of which Sars claimed it was obliged to pay Eskom an amount of about R5.1 billion. But Sars only informed the RAF of this agreement on 12 November 2024 – and that it would recoup the R5.1 billion from the RAF levies over a two-month period, which was subsequently extended to five months. Despite the RAF declaring a dispute with Sars in December 2024 in terms of the Inter-Governmental Relations Framework (IRF) Act and the ongoing dispute resolution process in terms of this act, Sars deducted the first tranche of about R1.2 billion from the RAF monthly levy payments. The fund only became aware of this deduction on 26 February 2025. Sars claimed it had no choice but to proceed in deducting/recouping the money because, if it did not, National Treasury's records would not be accurate. This resulted in the RAF lodging its urgent high court application. In a judgment handed down on 26 March 2025, Judge Ronel Tolmay said she was informed by counsel representing Sars that the certificate to National Treasury regarding the second tranche payment would be issued the same day she was hearing the matter. Tolmay interdicted and prohibited Sars from making the deductions, declaring the order operative for a maximum of 45 days from the date of the judgment, or until the dispute in terms of the IRF Act has been resolved. It is unclear when the RAF's contempt of court application against Sars will be heard. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.