Ministry for Culture and Heritage confirms 80 percent cut in senior historian roles
Photo:
Ministry for Culture and Heritage / supplied
The Ministry for Culture and Heritage / Manatū Taonga is going ahead with cutting the jobs of most of its historians.
The disestablishment of four out of five senior historian jobs has been confirmed, among a total of 30 or so job cuts
proposed last month
to save money after the ministry's funding was reduced in Budget 2025.
The proposal has been amended, to cut about 26 roles in all.
One senior historian role is being retained. Also, two others will stay on till the end of the school year, "recognising that the ministry has made commitments to schools" and that this would "allow for the completion of the already scheduled programming and exploration of alternatives for the future of the education programme".
Websites on New Zealand history the ministry runs also won a partial reprieve.
Secretary Leauanae Laulu Mac Leauanae said he changed the proposals to ensure
Te Ara online encyclopedia
was still accessible and to complete the work on a
Dawn Raids
history, as well as "finding a way forward" for Te Tai Whakaea Treaty Settlement Stories.
"I have... heard your strong feedback on the importance of our heritage content and production team and the taonga they have created and added to over the past three decades," he told staff in a confidential 'decision' document released to them on Thursday.
"I agreed that Te Ara Taonga, Taonga Tūturu, Treaty settlements and Matariki are critical ministry outputs that must continue to operate with as little disruption as possible."
It looked "like a slower version of shutting down websites", said a staffer who RNZ agreed not to name.
The PSA union called it "cultural vandalism".
"What we should be doing is employing even more historians because there's a lot of work to be done in preserving our culture," said national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons, calling them "senseless cuts".
Fleur Fitzsimons.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
"We're concerned that the Te Ara encyclopedia won't be able to be maintained."
Te Ara was established in 2001.
The pressure remained on at the ministry, the document made clear. Leauanae calculated it needed to find $3m in savings this year.
"To enable Manatū Taonga to adjust to our new financial position, I have made decisions to disestablish a number of positions. Decisions in this document confirm our functional shift away from content creation and programme delivery.
"My preferred option will be the transfer of products or programmes, but alternatives may include the decommissioning or stopping of these programmes as a last resort."
The reduced budget left the ministry unable to keep specialised positions in digital production and editing.
As for cutting historians, "feedback received was not in support of removing any historian roles noting the uniqueness of the positions and their importance in maintaining and developing the taonga". But it was not feasible to keep them all on.
However, a U-turn was made on proposal to cut the role of solicitor, which would now be retained.
"Feedback was clear that demands on the legal team will only increase with the impacts of the
Regulatory Standards Bill
on our legislative modernisation work programme" among other things.
The aim was to have the new structure in place by the middle of September.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
4 days ago
- NZ Herald
Government's secret pay equity overhaul bypassed public scrutiny
It halted existing claims and raised the threshold for proving work had been historically undervalued to support a claim. Claims then had to start again under the new threshold. The bill halted existing claims and raised the threshold for proving undervalued work. Photo / Jason Dorday It was revealed in the Budget that the savings from tightening the regime amounted to about $12.8 billion over the next four years. The documents, released to RNZ under the Official Information Act, revealed ministerial meetings, including one involving the Prime Minister, were carefully managed, with instructions to withhold their proactive diary release under confidentiality provisions. One email from Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden's office instructed officials to manually remove digital access to cabinet papers, warning that leaving the default settings in place 'will give access to ministers but also SPSs [senior private secretaries] and some ministerial advisers. So you might want to remove that and we can add individual named ministers instead'. Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden's office kept details of pay equity changes under tight wraps. Photo / Mark Mitchell Another memo described how hard copies were hand-delivered to ministers' offices to avoid creating digital trails. 'If you really need a soft copy, I can email it through,' wrote an official from the office of van Velden. 'For context, I swear I'm not being weirdly difficult – this was the method of distribution that has been advised.' The strategy was internally referred to as 'Project Ten'. A comprehensive communications pack was prepared in advance, to be released only after the bill had been introduced and passed. 'We recommend that any announcements or statements about the proposed amendments must be made after the introduction of the bill,' one paper said. 'This is because there is a risk of a large increase in the number of claims being raised if information about the proposed changes is made public beforehand.' That advice was followed. The legislation stopped 33 active claims overnight, some of which had been under way for years, and implemented a stricter legal test for future ones. The documents make clear that fiscal concerns were central to the push – a key driver was to significantly reduce costs to the Crown. Officials stressed the need for the law to be passed in time for Budget 2025, reinforcing the cost-cutting motive. But, they acknowledged the truncated timeline meant there was no opportunity for public submissions on the bill, a process later criticised as 'particularly unusual and draconian'. Officials also conceded limited testing and analysis of the policy proposals because of the short timeframe, and raised concerns about unintended consequences arising once the bill has been passed. Despite the rushed process, the internal discussions reveal the Government was aware of the contentious nature of the changes. Officials noted the proposed transitional arrangements, which 'retrospectively remove and alter people's rights', were 'most likely to be contentious' and 'may engage the Human Rights Act and Bill of Rights Act'. It proceeded anyway. – RNZ
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
New Low From Govt In Public Service Act Changes Aimed At Ending Long Term Planning, Diversity & Inclusion & Pay Equity
The Government's proposed changes to the Public Service Act, to be debated in Parliament today, aim to strip away key provisions that ensure fairness, equality and long-term planning in the public sector. Under the proposed amendments, detailed in the Public Service Amendment Bill, diversity and inclusion, pay equity and long-term planning would be downgraded. "This is a new low from the Government. It now wants to tell chief executives of Government departments that they are not to focus on the long-term public interest, this is reckless given that the complex problems New Zealand's facing need long term policy solutions," said Fleur Fitzsimons, National Secretary for the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi. "This approach will limit New Zealand's ability to solve complicated problems like climate change adaptation, family violence and our infrastructure deficit." The Public Service Amendment Bill also scraps requirements on pay equity. It would remove responsibilities for chief executives and the Public Service Commissioner to work towards pay equity between women and men, and to work towards eliminating bias and discrimination in decisions about pay. "Pay equity is about fairness and justice for workers and includes ensuring flexible and part time work is available. The Government has already ripped up pay equity claims, denying pay increases for more than150,000 women in the public and community sectors. Taking away its priority in this legislation again shows how little the Government values supporting the career of women and closing the gender pay gap." The Bill would also remove requirements on chief executives and the Public Service Commissioner to foster a public service that's inclusive and representative of the communities it serves. "Diversity and inclusion in our workforce are not nice to haves - they are essential to delivering fair and effective public services that are sensitive to the needs of all New Zealanders. The public service does its job well and is legitimate because it represents our diverse country. Reducing the importance of these principles risks turning back decades of progress." The PSA is also alarmed by amendments to the purpose of the Public Service Act which would reduce emphasis on pursuing the long-term public interest, and remove the requirement of the public service to enable both the current Government and successive governments to develop and implement their policies. "This is a worrying attack on the political neutrality of the public service and makes it less accountable to the people of New Zealand. Public services must look beyond the next political cycle. Downgrading the public service's role in pursuing the long-term public interest means less focus on how our public service can meet future challenges - whether that's dealing with an ageing population, infrastructure challenges, adapting to new technology, or responding to climate change. "The Government has stripped the public service of thousands of jobs despite our population growing, and our challenges becoming more complex and urgent. "The Bill was tabled on the same day the Government extended a tax break for big tobacco, showing how misplaced its priorities are. "This is a time to invest in a fairer, more future-focused public service - not tear down the progress we've made. It's 2025, not 1955." Note
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
Axe falls on history: Ministry for Culture and Heritage restructure sparks outrage
The Te Ara team, February 2007 Photo: Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand A world class website documenting New Zealand's history could be allowed to wither and die with cuts confirmed at the Ministry for Culture and Heritage. The government is slashing jobs at the heart of our national identity, the Ministry for Culture and Heritage. The move will save $8 million over four years but critics argue it feels more like cultural vandalism than financial prudence. Four senior historian jobs have been axed after the ministry's funding was reduced in Budget 2025. In total, 26 roles will go. Popular history websites, including Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand, have had a partial reprieve, but a historian and former general editor of the encyclopedia tells The Detail he has serious fears it will eventually disappear. "What they have said is they [the websites] will sort of go into cold storage, and what that means is that eventually they wither and die because a website that's not kept up is eventually a website that does die," said Jock Phillips, who was the chief historian at Internal Affairs before he became general editor of Te Ara. He said the changes gut vital expertise and risk eroding years of cultural knowledge. And he worries future events won't be recorded appropriately. The history websites, he said, are a crucial resource, both nationally and internationally. "You only have to look at the user figures. Te Ara gets over four million separate users each year, a total of 13 million page views, which is a huge number and far more than, for example, the Te Papa website gets. "New Zealand History gets over 3 million users each year. And the total number of page views on those two sites is about 20 million, which is an incredible amount of use. "And an awful lot of people are enriched by that knowledge. About 70 percent of them are from within New Zealand, but one shouldn't forget the importance of the 30 percent outside New Zealand, who relish Te Ara. "When I go overseas, people are amazed at the quality of it, there's no equivalent anywhere else, in any other country." This week, seven history and heritage organisations put out a joint statement on the restructure decision, deeply concerned that the cuts will "damage New Zealand's international reputation in the historical and cultural heritage sectors". "While not mentioned in the decision document explicitly, we are also deeply concerned about any potential for these resources to be transferred to for-profit organisations," reads the statement from the Professional Historians' Association of New Zealand Aotearoa, New Zealand Historical Association, New Zealand History Teachers' Association, National Oral History Association of New Zealand, New Zealand Archaeological Association, Historic Places Aotearoa, and New Zealand Society of Genealogists. "New Zealand's historical record is not a commodity to be monetised. "These platforms must remain free and publicly accessible, as they have been for decades. Any privatisation would inevitably lead to paywalls, reduced accessibility, and the commercialisation of our collective memory." RNZ reporter Phil Pennington, who has been covering the story, said the restructure is all about saving money - but it comes at a cost. "Historians are really alarmed at these developments ... and at the downgrading and the de-muscling of history in the ministry and at a government level. "And they are saying it is misguided, [and] this ministry becoming a policy shop is the wrong way to go, and it will be like vandalism to our historical knowledge and our understanding." Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook
