Government's secret pay equity overhaul bypassed public scrutiny
The bill halted existing claims and raised the threshold for proving undervalued work. Photo / Jason Dorday
It was revealed in the Budget that the savings from tightening the regime amounted to about $12.8 billion over the next four years.
The documents, released to RNZ under the Official Information Act, revealed ministerial meetings, including one involving the Prime Minister, were carefully managed, with instructions to withhold their proactive diary release under confidentiality provisions.
One email from Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden's office instructed officials to manually remove digital access to cabinet papers, warning that leaving the default settings in place 'will give access to ministers but also SPSs [senior private secretaries] and some ministerial advisers. So you might want to remove that and we can add individual named ministers instead'.
Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden's office kept details of pay equity changes under tight wraps. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Another memo described how hard copies were hand-delivered to ministers' offices to avoid creating digital trails.
'If you really need a soft copy, I can email it through,' wrote an official from the office of van Velden.
'For context, I swear I'm not being weirdly difficult – this was the method of distribution that has been advised.'
The strategy was internally referred to as 'Project Ten'. A comprehensive communications pack was prepared in advance, to be released only after the bill had been introduced and passed.
'We recommend that any announcements or statements about the proposed amendments must be made after the introduction of the bill,' one paper said.
'This is because there is a risk of a large increase in the number of claims being raised if information about the proposed changes is made public beforehand.'
That advice was followed.
The legislation stopped 33 active claims overnight, some of which had been under way for years, and implemented a stricter legal test for future ones.
The documents make clear that fiscal concerns were central to the push – a key driver was to significantly reduce costs to the Crown.
Officials stressed the need for the law to be passed in time for Budget 2025, reinforcing the cost-cutting motive.
But, they acknowledged the truncated timeline meant there was no opportunity for public submissions on the bill, a process later criticised as 'particularly unusual and draconian'.
Officials also conceded limited testing and analysis of the policy proposals because of the short timeframe, and raised concerns about unintended consequences arising once the bill has been passed.
Despite the rushed process, the internal discussions reveal the Government was aware of the contentious nature of the changes.
Officials noted the proposed transitional arrangements, which 'retrospectively remove and alter people's rights', were 'most likely to be contentious' and 'may engage the Human Rights Act and Bill of Rights Act'.
It proceeded anyway.
– RNZ
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
2 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Nope, no way, we haven't already zoned for enough housing in Auckland
Critics are saying the government is bullying Auckland Council into allowing unnecessary new housing intensification. They fail to mention that dense housing remains banned in the places where it makes the most sense. Christine Fletcher's voice took on a tinge of exasperation as she explained her thoughts on housing development to Ingrid Hipkiss last week. The Auckland councillor insisted she wasn't a zealot. She just wanted a good, lengthy, potentially infinite process of deliberation. 'I'm not opposed to intensification,' she said. 'I'm very much in favour of it, because it should be along our transport routes, but this is being done with indecent haste and really needs to be thought through.' Her moderate stance might have been a surprise to those who attended Auckland Council's planning committee meeting in November 2021, where Fletcher likened legislation aimed at making the council allow for housing intensification to 'gang rape '. Now here she was on RNZ's Morning Report on Thursday to talk about a column she'd penned for the Herald with Troy Churton, an Ōrākei local board member best known for complaining about the police Eagle helicopter 169 times in eight months and also comparing development to rape. They were opposing the government's updated housing legislation, which will force the council to allow for hundreds of thousands of new homes and businesses, primarily around train stations and rapid busways. The column eschews comparisons between desperately needed housing and violent sexual assault to argue the new legislation is unnecessary and harmful to Auckland's character and community spirit. It's riddled with statistics, which might make it seem factual and dispassionate. The council, it explains, has already zoned for 900,000 new homes through its Unitary Plan. That sounds impressive, but these sorts of numbers can be deceiving. Technically the entire world's population could fit in a square box with 1km-long sides in the middle of Manhattan. Build The Cube, urbanists like to say. Their more serious point is that planners could just zone for The Cube and say they've released enough housing capacity for the next few millennia. Auckland has its own version of The Cube. Fletcher and Churton are right that its Unitary Plan allows for thousands of new houses, but they fail to mention that most of them are in far-flung and slightly dystopian places like Milldale, Millwater, or even Howick. Development is cut off in many of the most accessible, desirable and wealthy parts of the isthmus. The Unitary Plan locks 41% of all land within 5km of the city centre under so-called 'character protections' designed to preserve the city's heavily renovated and eye-wateringly expensive villas in amber. In some suburbs, like Grey Lynn central and Ponsonby west, dense housing is banned on more than 90% of the land. Despite councillors like Fletcher raising the prospect of sprawl into places with inadequate infrastructure if they're forced to allow for intensification, the most meaningful restrictions on development in Auckland right now are in places with good access to jobs, where pipes, roading networks and busy public transport routes are already in place. Auckland's planners and politicians like to keep this sort of stuff under wraps. They talk about the 'compact city', pretending the Unitary Plan upzoned primarily around town centres and public transit. An elaborate system has been set up to maintain the ruse. When planners send councillors reports on development patterns, they use a flattering 1,500-metre walking catchment, meaning anything within 1,500m of the rapid transit network, to determine which homes have been built in the places that make the most sense. That measure has the upside of taking in huge amounts of the city, meaning lots of development that isn't that well-connected gets tractor-beamed into the council's self-aggrandising statistics. Lately though, the government has been asking the council to please stop taking the piss and actually allowing dense housing near the new train stations and rail lines it's spent billions of dollars upgrading. Housing minister Chris Bishop has demanded that councillors like Fletcher allow at least 15-storey developments around stations like Kingsland and Maungawhau. Faced with the distressing prospect of actually following through on its compact city goals, the council has decided that outside of the city centre, the walking catchment for rapid transit is actually 800m. Even with that reduction in place, Fletcher, Churton and their supporters still aren't happy. They worry about an 'oversupply' of housing and make shows of concern about a collapse of our 'suburban and cultural diversity'. But if the government is able to force Auckland Council to zone for an abundance of new housing, the most noticeable change to the city will be that its wealthiest, most well-connected suburbs are no longer an exclusive enclave for Fletcher, whose property holdings are so valuable she once famously told her colleagues she pays $5,000 per month in rates, or her similarly well-to-do constituents. That's not a collapse of its cultural diversity. It's an expansion. It's not creating an oversupply of housing. It's finally allowing it to be built in the places where people want to live. Underneath all this apparent altruistic concern for the fabric of the city, you can hear the faint but unmistakable sound of a familiar refrain: not in my backyard.
Newsroom
2 hours ago
- Newsroom
Hush and rush of Govt lawmaking undermines trust and quality
Analysis: Less than two months before the Government announced its shock pay equity reforms, Brooke van Velden's officials provided her with a briefing where they advised her to keep all details of the $13 billion decision secret until after the legislation had passed into law. 'We recommend that any announcements or statements about the proposed amendments must be made after the introduction of the Bill,' officials say in the March briefing documents.
Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
Land Reforms Aim To End Stalled Development In Papua New Guinea
Article – RNZ New legislation introduced by PNG's Deputy Prime Minister John Rosso would reform six land-related laws and which he says are essential., RNZ Pacific Senior Journalist Reforms to land laws in Papua New Guinea should ensure that landowners have more control over their land. New legislation introduced by the country's Deputy Prime Minister John Rosso would reform six land-related laws. Rosso says the changes are essential to securing the country's future and safeguarding the rights of landowners. Prime Minister James Marape commended Rosso for spearheading the reforms. 'Land is our people's greatest inheritance-our playground, our home, our heritage. Every Papua New Guinean is connected to a piece of land somewhere in this country. We must protect it,' Marape told parliament. RNZ Pacific spoke with its PNG correspondent Scott Waide about the government's motivations for the changes. (This transcript has been edited for brevity and clarity.) Scott Waide: The Lands Department has been, for want of a better word, terminally ill, for many years. It has had legislation that dates back to the colonial era. Papua New Guinea has moved on [and] moved forward with a lot of things. But the [land] legislations have been a hindering mechanism for any form of large scale development, like farming [and] real estate development. Those laws have been a hindrance to much of that development, and also the mobilisation of customary land. Previously, with the old laws, customary landowners could not adequately mobilise and get loans to develop their land, because the laws [and banks] did not recognise customary land ownership, and the accompanying attempts to allow for that development of customary land. It has posed a lot of complications in terms of mining development, logging [and] farming. The changes that have been introduced allow for both protection of customary landowners and the possibility of them venturing into large scale businesses. Don Wiseman: It has being brought in by the Deputy Prime Minister John Rosso. What specifically is he going to do? You have outlined the issues that have existed over land for a long time, but are they going to be overcome with this new legislation? SW: Yes, many of the problems that have existed for many, many years – from a very, very old system, a manual system, when the rest of the world is operating digitally. We have had instances where they have been dual titles issued, issued titles over land that have gone missing, because people are reproducing those titles manually. There is an electronic system that has been introduced as well within the Lands Department, and that is meant to reduce the instances of corruption that have long existed. A lot of the reforms have happened very quietly within the Lands Department. The other reforms that complement the development of housing, which is a big need in Papua New Guinea, support the development of customary land as well. So customary land owners can partner with government or with private organisations and develop housing, cheap housing for other Papua New Guineans. DW: Prime Minister James Marape says this will save the land that is still held, but it is clearly not going to undo a lot of the mistakes from the past, and they have been so many of those, particularly to do with the forestry and so on. SW: Yes, that is a an issue that I have spoken to a few land experts as well around. And that is going to be a huge challenge to undo all of that. The other side to it is that there are customary landowners who also sell their own land for cash. The legislations that have been put in place, in the some of the policies have actually banned the sale of customary land to individual parties as well. So, it offers some level of protection for customary land owners. There needs to be a lot of awareness as well for customary landowners to understand how the law benefits them, and that is going to also take a while.
