Surrey chip shop owner warns businesses over illegal workers
Mr Sullivan told Radio Surrey: "We later found out he had a totally different name, which was different from all the paperwork he had given us."There were no red flags to suggest he was anything but the person who we were led to believe. He was also employed in the UK before he worked for us."He added the worker was employed at his shop on February 2023 and at the time he was paying back the worker's student loan and an attachment of earnings order from a borough council for his rent arrears.Mr Sullivan said he submitted the documents, supplied to him from the concerned worker, to the Home Office.He added he was not worried at the time because the documents were supported."I then received a letter from Home Office saying we were fined £40,000 for employing an illegal person. We were in total shock," Mr Sullivan said.
'Genuine mistake'
Mr Sullivan said the original fine was £45,000 but he was given a discount as he assisted Home Office with their enquiries straight away.He said he was advised by an immigration lawyer to pay the fine rather than challenge it, otherwise the cost could reach up to £80,000 if he lost the appeal. He added he was given an option to reduce the fine to £28,000 if it was paid within a time frame, which he paid."It's had a big impact on the business. There's a massive cash flow hole," he added."Obviously, retail trade is struggling and this is the last thing we needed."Mr Sullivan said there was "nothing he could have done more" to detect red flags and it was a "genuine mistake".
"When we employed him, we went online to confirm his right to work. One of the first questions asked was does the person have a UK passport," he added."As soon as we clicked 'yes', because as far as we were concerned he did, the website said no further checks were needed."We can't check people's passports whether they're true or not. We also paid him through the pay as you go system (PAYE)."Craig Beaumont, executive director at the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), said a penalty of this amount could be "fatal" to small businesses. "Small employers take their responsibilities seriously in necessary documentation checks, but ultimately they are not immigration officers," they added."They need a system which treats genuine mistakes proportionately rather than punishing them with crushing fines large enough potentially to threaten the existence of their business."A government spokesperson said: "Illegal working undermines honest employers and undercuts local wages – it is against the law to work in the UK when you have no right to be here."Employers are responsible for carrying out right to work checks, there is comprehensive guidance on how to do this and we are clamping down on those who do not.They added that right to work checks can be completed by either a manual check, checking using a digital verification service, or a Home Office online check.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Hospitality horror show: Four in five firms hike prices after Budget tax blow with 84,000 jobs lost as half axe staff
Most hospitality businesses have raised their prices and more than half have cut jobs as they reel from Rachel Reeves' tax onslaught. In a report that lays bare the impact of Labour's policies, the Chancellor was warned almost four-fifths of pubs, restaurants and bars have hiked prices to deal with extra costs. The survey by trade bodies led by UK Hospitality also found 51 per cent of venues have slashed staff with 84,000 hospitality jobs lost since Reeves' first Budget last October. The report warned businesses have been forced into 'impossible decisions' due to 'unsustainable' tax hikes. The industry is calling for radical tax changes in the upcoming autumn Budget in order to reverse a damaging wave of venue closures. The calls came as official figures showed another 307 hospitality firms collapsed in June – the highest level since November 2024 in the wake of the Budget. Saxon Moseley, a partner at consulting firm RSM UK, said: 'Insolvencies continue to creep up which is a worrying, but not unexpected trend. 'The hospitality industry has been acutely hit with higher staff costs and rising inflation, and when you overlay subdued sales, continuing to operate has become unviable for some. 'With many operators still in survival mode, the industry is struggling and as a key job creator, particularly for younger workers, a fragile hospitality industry presents an economic headache for the UK.' Hospitality, which includes hotels and cafes as well as bars and restaurants, saw costs rise by £3.4billion after the Budget as they faced higher National insurance contributions, an inflation-busting rise in the minimum wage and increases to punitive business rates. With the economy stuttering and a black hole opening up in Reeves' Budget plans, further tax hikes look likely this autumn. Experts warn this will only make matters worse, however, with figures this week showing eight pubs have closed every week so far this year. In a desperate plea, UK Hospitality has joined forces with the British Institute of Innkeeping, the British Beer & Pub Association and Hospitality Ulster to call for help in the upcoming Budget. The trade bodies together said: 'Unsustainable tax increases are squeezing businesses, stifling growth and investment, and threatening local employment, especially for young people.' Echoing calls for respite at the Budget, RSM's Moseley said: 'Taking steps to overhaul the business rates system, plus supporting the industry to respond to recent tax increases would allow operators to not only weather the storm, but invest in jobs for the future.' Business rates are a local levy based on the value of a commercial property. The hospitality industry was hit by a £500million increase in business rates in April alongside the barrage of other costs imposed by Labour. Before the Budget, small businesses had called for a Covid-era discount of 75 per cent to be extended to give them some breathing space. But Labour reduced this to a 40 per cent discount, capped at £110,000 per pub.
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Queen Elizabeth ‘snubbed airport terminal opening after relative stopped from taking guns on plane', royal cousin claims
Queen Elizabeth II allegedly refused to open an airport terminal after her cousin was stopped from bringing his guns onto a plane. Appearing on the Gyles Brandreth's Rosebud podcast on Tuesday (19 August), Lord Ivar Mountbatten said the late monarch became "irritated" when he told her that staff at Bristol Airport stopped him from bringing his shotguns for security reasons. Lord Ivar had been travelling to the Scottish Highlands for a weekend shooting with the monarch. When he arrived with no guns, the late Queen turned to equerry Simon Brailsford and told him to 'see to it' that the weapons were delivered. She then allegedly told her cousin: 'They want me to open their new terminal. I don't think I will now.' In 2015, Princess Anne opened the new terminal extension at Bristol Airport.
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rural taxpayers set to contribute ‘unfair' levels of funding for urban-area services
The government have been warned that people in rural areas who pay council tax will contribute 'unfair' levels of funding for services. Councils councils say that money will be used for urban communities under proposed government reforms. Large rural authorities have also highlighted that maximum council tax increases will be needed to deliver necessary core budget increases for essential services over the next three years. Although, in its submission to the government's consultation on planned reforms, known as the 'fair funding review 2.0', the County Councils Network (CCN) said the proposals were 'better than feared'. The network welcomed some elements that determine funding levels, such as an indicator for remoteness and a new formula for social care and school transport allocations, which it said 'better recognise the needs' of the 38 county areas. But CCN called on the government to reconsider its broader approach, insisting the proposals 'place a disproportionate burden on council taxpayers in county areas to fund local services and redistribute funding to urban areas'. Modelling showed that under the proposals £1.6 billion in council tax income generated in county areas will be redistributed across the country. This is due to a decision by ministers to include 100 per cent of local council tax receipts when allocating funds in a bid to 'equalise' revenue across the sector, in a departure from the previous approach which took in 85 per cent. CCN said this means 32 of the 38 county and rural authorities will lose an additional £400 million in a process that would represent an 'overwhelming' benefit for urban metropolitan boroughs. The analysis showed 22 authorities will receive increases in direct government funding totalling £845 million under the plans. But on average these councils will receive 70 per cent of their overall increase in core spending power, the official measure of funding available for services, from council tax rises specifically. In addition, 16 other councils, including some located in the North and the Midlands, will experience funding cuts totalling £470 million. With no increase in direct government funding, the entire increase in core spending power for these authorities will come from council tax rises, CCN said. 'One third of council tax income raised in these areas over the three-year period is needed to offset cuts to funding and prevent them falling below a proposed 0 per cent funding floor,' the network added. Across all 38 county and rural unitary councils, direct grant funding will increase by £374 million, with 90 per cent of the total uplift in core spending power coming via maximum 5 per cent annual council tax rises. The modelling suggests this scenario is in stark contrast to the impact on councils in urban areas, with nearly 50 per cent of metropolitan authorities' extra resources coming from additional grant funding of £1.2 billion over three years. Overall, in the absence of maximum annual council tax rises over the period, the analysis showed 33 of the 38 county and rural unitary authorities would experience a real-terms reduction in funding, CCN said. The new government grant would fund just 9 per cent of the estimated £4.4 billion increase in the cost of providing services in county and rural areas over three years, while the boost in Government funding for metropolitan authorities would fund half of the total £2.4 billion increase in estimated costs of services in those areas. CCN said it is 'simply unrealistic' to expect some of England's largest social care councils to 'provide life critical services while receiving deep cuts in government grant' and called for 'significantly' more funding to prevent 'unsustainable cuts'. Chairman of the CCN Tim Oliver said: 'Some 16 county and rural councils across the length and breadth of the country will see reductions in grant funding, while the government's proposals place a disproportionate burden on council taxpayers in county areas to fund local services and redistribute funding to urban areas. 'Those facing cuts in government funding will inevitably have to reduce vital frontline services, while the reliance on council tax rises leaves even those with modest funding increases facing an extremely challenging funding outlook. 'While we recognise the need to take account of how much councils raise in local taxation, the government's proposals to fully equalise unfairly redistribute hundreds of millions of local council tax to other areas, while weakening the incentive to build homes.' Sir Stephen Houghton, chairman of the Special Interest Group of Municipal Authorities, backed the government's approach. He said: 'It is absolutely right that any new funding system must fully reflect the wide disparities in councils' ability to raise income through council tax. 'The failure to do so over the past decade has led to disproportionately deep cuts in the most deprived areas, worsening inequality across the country.' The government's consultation on the reforms closed on Friday. A Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: 'We do not recognise the (CCN) analysis. The current, outdated way in which local authorities are funded has left communities behind and damaged local services. 'This must change and is why we are taking decisive action as part of our Plan for Change to reform the funding system so we can improve public services, while maintaining the previous government's referendum threshold on council tax rises so taxpayers have the final say and are protected from excessive increases.' Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said: 'Yet again the Labour government are showing utter contempt for people living in rural Britain. 'The family farms tax has been devastating for British farming and scrapping the rural services grant has put rural councils under enormous pressure. Now this latest spiteful change will steal more money out of the hands of county councils and send it straight into Labour-run urban areas. 'Only the Conservatives are serious about standing up for our rural communities' Liberal Democrat local government spokeswoman Vikki Slade said the reforms could be severely detrimental to some areas. Ms Slade said: 'Councils across the country are already teetering on the edge after years of Conservatives' neglect of local funding and services – from bus services cuts in rural areas to the rising costs of social care. These ill-thought-out reforms only risk leaving parts of the country significantly worse off. 'To truly help local authorities, the government should urgently look at supporting councils who receive the least grant funding and those that face additional pressure on services in rural and coastal areas, to help them with spiralling costs.'
