logo
HMRC 'looking at' new tax on homes worth £500,000 and over

HMRC 'looking at' new tax on homes worth £500,000 and over

Glasgow Times13 hours ago
Government officials are looking at a potential national property tax, which would replace stamp duty on owner-occupied homes to start with, and Council Tax in the medium term.
No final decision has been made, but it is thought this national tax could help build a model for taxation, and the threshold discussed is believed to be £500,000.
How would it replace Stamp Duty?
Buyers pay stamp duty under the existing framework, if they purchase property worth more than £125,000.
The new levy would be paid by owner-occupiers on houses worth more than £500,000 when they sell their home, with the amount due determined by the value of the property and a rate set by the Government.
A Treasury spokesperson said: 'As set out in the plan for change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus.
'Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8 billion and cut borrowing by £3.4 billion.
'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance, or VAT.'
Chancellor Rachel Reeves will unveil any changes to the Government's tax policy at a fiscal event, such as a budget.
Sir Mel Stride, Conservative shadow chancellor, said: 'The Conservatives have warned that more taxes are coming and now reports are emerging that the family home is next in the firing line.
'This tax grab would punish families for aspiring to own their own home.'
When will Rachel Reeves start talking about saving money not just finding more & more ways of taking money away from people who themselves have bothered to save and work hard? — Kirstie Allsopp (@KirstieMAllsopp) August 19, 2025
Any moves to increase taxation have also been criticised by property presenter Kirstie Allsopp, who tweeted: "When will Rachel Reeves start talking about saving money not just finding more & more ways of taking money away from people who themselves have bothered to save and work hard?"
Michelle Lawson, Director at Fareham-based Lawson Financial, admitted an overhaul to stamp duty is needed - but 'this is not it'.
She added: "Everyone or nobody pays otherwise you create another division and another cliff edge, namely the £500k mark. Short-sighted tax grabs will be a disaster and will end up generating less rather than more.
'To increase the tax coffers, Reeves needs to charge less, charge everyone and scrap or reduce the crippling Section 24 additional property tax. An ignition of the property market will spark the economy, generate jobs and further increase tax receipts.'
Chris Barry, Director at London-based Thomas Legal, agreed, adding: "Stamp duty 100% needs reform, I don't think there is a debate to be had on that front. It was originally introduced as a tax on high value homes and now impacts most people.
"Tax incentives throughout history have moved the market more than Brexit, war, Covid and interest rates so this has to be the answer to give the market some life. Stamp duty breaks in recent years have been shown to bring in far more by way of tax receipts through VAT and wider economic growth as market volumes shoot up.
'It makes sense to remove stamp duty to a level that will provide a much-needed incentive for buyers. The alternative solutions are unclear but the Chancellor needs to be careful when taxing investment properties and second homes as this makes up approximately one third of the overall market and renters are already experiencing strain on rising prices.'
Mumsnet posters have also expressed their concerns, especially those living in the south east, where property prices are higher.
"Surely this will force people either to never move, or move away from the South East and London," said one poster.
"I'm glad that there is finally something that isn't negatively affecting areas outside the South East but does she (Rachel Reeves) actually understand that £500k isn't much down here - a 3 bed terrace, at best."
Recommended reading:
Another added: "I was thinking it would need to be something that takes into account regional differences in house prices, then I realised we already have something like that - Council Tax."Others agreed that Council tax should be replaced: "Council Tax is a joke - in my village two new builds opposite each other 4 bed sold £850k put in band F and other 5 bed worth sold £750k put in band G, bungalow turned into a house recently sold for 1.25 million still in Band E. All should be band G."
Some have embraced the idea, saying: "As someone who would be impacted by this, I don't think it's terrible. They have property taxes in lots of other countries and our Council Tax is based on completely outdated values."
Another London-based poster said: "It's a pretty good idea. Wealth is under taxed, Council Tax is now regressive and the government need ££. I just hope it happens and isn't watered down to be ineffective. I live in London, by the way."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Proposed ‘mansion tax' makes ‘no economic sense', expert says
Proposed ‘mansion tax' makes ‘no economic sense', expert says

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Proposed ‘mansion tax' makes ‘no economic sense', expert says

The Chancellor is reportedly planning to introduce capital gains tax on the sale of primary residences above a certain value. This proposed measure aims to help plug a reported £40 billion hole in the public purse. Under the mooted plans, higher-rate taxpayers could face a 24 per cent levy on gains, while basic rate taxpayers would pay 18 per cent, a significant departure from current tax-free sales. Property experts warn that such a tax, potentially starting at a £1.5 million threshold, would stall high-value housing sales and disproportionately affect older homeowners and those in London. Critics also suggest the change could lead to an exodus of wealthy individuals from the UK and create disincentives for homeowners to sell, disrupting the housing market.

Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court
Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court

Kemi Badenoch has called for more Conservative councils to launch legal challenges over asylum hotels as the Government faces a potential revolt from its own local authorities. In a letter to Tory councils, Mrs Badenoch said she was 'encouraging' them to 'take the same steps' as Epping Council 'if your legal advice supports it'. Labour dismissed her letter as 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense', but several of its own local authorities have already suggested they too could mount legal action against asylum hotels in their areas. Epping secured a temporary injunction from the High Court on Tuesday, blocking the use of the Essex town's Bell Hotel as accommodation for asylum seekers on planning grounds. The decision has prompted councils controlled by Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK to investigate whether they could pursue a similar course of action. These include Labour-run Tamworth and Wirral councils, Tory-run Broxbourne and East Lindsey councils and Reform's Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire councils. But Labour's Newcastle City Council and Brighton and Hove City Council have both ruled out legal action. Tuesday's High Court decision has also caused a potential headache for the Home Office, which has a legal duty to house destitute asylum seekers while their claims are being dealt with. If planning laws prevent the Government from using hotels, ministers will face a scramble to find alternative accommodation, potentially in the private rented sector. In her letter, Mrs Badenoch praised Epping Council's legal challenge and told Tory councils she would 'back you to take similar action to protect your community'. But she added that the situation would 'depend on individual circumstances of the case' and suggested Tory councils could pursue 'other planning enforcement options'. She also accused Labour of 'trying to ram through such asylum hotels without consultation and without proper process', saying the Government had reopened the Bell Hotel as asylum accommodation after the Conservatives had closed it. The hotel had previously been used as asylum accommodation briefly in 2020 and then between 2022 and 2024 under the previous Conservative government. A Labour spokesperson said Mrs Badenoch's letter was a 'pathetic stunt' and 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system', saying there were now '20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories'. The letter comes ahead of the publication on Thursday of figures showing how many asylum seekers were being temporarily housed in hotels at the end of June this year. Home Office figures from the previous quarter show there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Figures on those staying in hotels date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023, when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. Data is not released on the number of hotels in use, but it is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour has said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210.

Chelsea agree LaLiga move for talented youngster the Blues bought just one season ago - as west London side continue end-of-window fire sale
Chelsea agree LaLiga move for talented youngster the Blues bought just one season ago - as west London side continue end-of-window fire sale

Daily Mail​

time7 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Chelsea agree LaLiga move for talented youngster the Blues bought just one season ago - as west London side continue end-of-window fire sale

Chelsea have agreed a deal to sell one of the players that Enzo Maresca has been looking to offload as the Blues continue to carry out their transfer business efficiently before the end of the window. The west London side have brought in a raft of new players this summer, including attackers such as Ipswich Town's Liam Delap, Joao Pedro from Brighton, and former Borussia Dortmund star Jamie Gittens. Maresca has also burnished additional positions, signing Dario Essugo from Sporting Lisbon, and Jorrel Hato from Ajax. Additionally, Chelsea have finally got their hands on prodigal Brazilian starlet Estevao Willian, after signing the 18-year-old from Palmeiras last summer. But to facilitate the move, the Blues are in need of a slew of outgoings, and while the club have already managed to wave farewell to players including Joao Felix, Armando Broja, Lesley Ugochukwu, Djordje Petrovic, Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall, and Noni Madueke, the club are hopeful of more departures before September 1. Daily Mail Sport reported on Monday that there could be up to nine stars who book loan or permanent moves before the end of the window. Now, Renato Veiga will move to Villarreal after an earlier tipped move to Atletico Madrid collapsed earlier this month. The player will exit the club to join the LaLiga side in a deal worth £26million - with a substantial sell-on clause. The move comes just one year after the Blues bought the Portugal international from Basel for £12m, with the 22-year-old signing a bumper seven-year deal upon his move to west London. Veiga started brightly under Enzo Maresca, making 18 appearances in the first-half of the season, and scoring two goals with a further assist during Chelsea's travails in the UEFA Conference League. But the young talent looked to move in January in a bid to find increased playing time ahead of the 2026 World Cup. Veiga took a loan move to Juventus, where he was able to make a further 15 appearances. In January, Maresca revealed that he had spoken to Veiga about his Chelsea future, intimating that he was keen to play in his preferred position of centre back instead of the hybrid left back role that his manager had used him in at various points over the season so far. 'Playing in the position he is playing with us gives him the chance to join international team and gives him the chance to get speculation around him which means clubs look for him,' the manager insisted. 'Clubs look for players that are doing well, not bad. 'For me, if there is a player that wants to play in one position, they are going to struggle. They have to adapt, play in different positions. It's a good thing for the team and the club.' As well as Veiga, other players earmarked for a move include Axel Disasi, Raheem Sterling, Ben Chilwell, Christopher Nkunku, and Nicolas Jackson.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store